just do what i do kid
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:35 (fourteen years ago) link
- I realize the ratings are pretty much trivial, and I'm not bashing either record (enjoy both), but how does this *really* make any sense?? I think there have been other cases of maybe Baroness, Converge or someone too un-Pfork-y scoring in the 8.5 realm and not making Best New Music... what gives?- I'm not mad, just pointing out the disconnect between ratings and BNM tags.
- I'm not mad, just pointing out the disconnect between ratings and BNM tags.
Well of course they're disconnected: they're two different things. If everything above an 8.x was automatically BNM, what would the point of BNM be? It wouldn't tell you anything at all.
I mean, I would type out a whole lengthy explanation, but a lot of this has been said by n/a. My understanding as a (minor) contributor is that you should think of it this way: ratings represent close attention to individual records by individual critics. BNM represents the site's staff looking over everything and picking out a set of records that they can solidly recommend to the audience as a whole as being notable and great. It's like a "featured" rack. A "maybe start by directing your attention here" pointer. A "we don't expect you to read every single review, so here's the stuff we're pretty confident you might find rewarding" shortlist.
I mean, if a stranger who'd never heard any of your records asked you to pick out 10 albums you'd recommend listening to, would they really be the same as the records you'd rate highest when talking about each one individually? It certainly wouldn't be for me.
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:36 (fourteen years ago) link
I would type out a whole lengthy explanation, but
― go haim on em (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:41 (fourteen years ago) link
I'm on the Internet today.
― bamcquern, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:42 (fourteen years ago) link
Expressing curiosity about how Pitchfork works isn't always equal to getting worked up about it. Getting worked up about someone supposedly getting worked up about Pitchfork seems way more pointless though many do that to ironically prove they are somehow cooler/above it?
― Evan, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:43 (fourteen years ago) link
wait aren't you getting worked up about someone getting worked up about someone supposedly getting worked up about pitchfork
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:45 (fourteen years ago) link
this is all going to end like "Event Horizon" where Satan makes us all eat our own eyes, isn't it
― we call him black Nev coz he's black & his names Neville (HI DERE), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:47 (fourteen years ago) link
this would be the thread for it
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:48 (fourteen years ago) link
fwiw dude got multiple sincere answers; but ask a q abt p4k and you better expect a bunch of b- zings imo
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link
http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/8770/crisisoninfiniteearths.jpg
― bamcquern, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link
I mean, if a stranger who'd never heard any of your records asked you to pick out 10 albums you'd recommend listening to, would they really be the same as the records you'd rate highest when talking about each one individually?
Really good way to characterize things, imo.
Thx nabisco!
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link
Ah but I am not worked up, otherwise good point! Just my observation.
― Evan, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link
ok so youre saying you caught shit for your post but it's cool because you stumbled into trolling?
Yeah, pretty much.
tbh I don't see how that position makes him any different from over half of the regular posters here
And, yeah, pretty much.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link
if anyone cares, this blog had a pretty interesting and comprehensive study on why there is sometimes a .1 difference between Best New Music and otherwise
― go haim on em (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link
hi dere's zing was an A-, not a B-
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link
the thing about that question nabisco asks is that between the ages of 13 and 27, I am pretty sure my answer would have been "yes, absolutely"
― we call him black Nev coz he's black & his names Neville (HI DERE), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link
whoa man no need to get worked up
― iatee, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:52 (fourteen years ago) link
I realize the ratings are pretty much trivial, and I'm not bashing either record (enjoy both), but how does this *really* make any sense?? I think there have been other cases of maybe Baroness, Converge or someone too un-Pfork-y scoring in the 8.5 realm and not making Best New Music... what gives?
u shld b set on fire
― Lamp, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:54 (fourteen years ago) link
1. The Cure "Goth Beach Party"2. Depeche Mode "We're Dead in the Graveyard"3. Bach "Bach is Fucking Awesome in B Minor"4. The Cure "Sadness is Contageous"5. Blink 182 "Take Off Your Pants and Jack It"6. Prince "holyshitiamsoloingwiththisguitariloveU2much"7. U2 "Zooropa"8. Insane Clown Posse "ISP 4: The Faygo Years"9. Dreamboat Gorilla "Songs from Nantucket"10. Jewel "Songs in the Key of Teddybears"
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link
Hi Lamp. Howya doin.
― bamcquern, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link
iatee, just calm down! Alright?!!?!?!!? GAHHHH!!!
― Evan, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link
wtf Que
you know I would never in a million years rep for Dreamboat Gorilla
― we call him black Nev coz he's black & his names Neville (HI DERE), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link
Speaking of fire... the new High on Fire album got an 8.0 but no Best New Music?!?!!!?! OMG WTF DIE P4RK DIEEEEEEEE
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/13966-snakes-for-the-divine/
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:57 (fourteen years ago) link
who is better ilxor or kshighway
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:01 (fourteen years ago) link
i give 1 an 8.2 the other an 8.4 but only one is a best new poster
― Lamp, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:02 (fourteen years ago) link
just kidding theyre both terrible
http://www.seattleweekly.com/2005-03-16/news/double-zing-ceremony/
― go haim on em (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link
just kidding theyre both terrible― Lamp
― Lamp
i lol'd
― ksh, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:09 (fourteen years ago) link
1.2
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:30 (fourteen years ago) link
guys
― its sad he was a blogger (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:31 (fourteen years ago) link
am I gonna have to draw ILX's fire with lurid revelations again
― its sad he was a blogger (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:32 (fourteen years ago) link
do it
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:32 (fourteen years ago) link
ok well i had a steamy threesome with pitchfork and cokemachineglow - you'll never guess who enjoyed THAT one the most
― its sad he was a blogger (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:33 (fourteen years ago) link
let's just say that it's called pitchfork for a reason
you what now
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:33 (fourteen years ago) link
you had sex with a website
two websites
― its sad he was a blogger (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:35 (fourteen years ago) link
I've done that. Not with two, though.
― bamcquern, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:36 (fourteen years ago) link
4.3
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:36 (fourteen years ago) link
http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/NewAnswersControllerServlet?boardid=44
― bamcquern, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:37 (fourteen years ago) link
7.2
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:37 (fourteen years ago) link
http://m.assetbar.com/achewood/one_strip?b=M%5ea11f09b8576e606bcb5038dfdb92fb821&u=http%3A%2F%2Fachewood.com%2Fcomic.php%3Fdate%3D08232005
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:37 (fourteen years ago) link
no chance of catching logorrhea tho - we all made sure to wear wizard's caps
― its sad he was a blogger (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:38 (fourteen years ago) link
puff puff: 9.7LJ: 7.9
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:38 (fourteen years ago) link
http://m.assetbar.com/uua6RGHSf.gif
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:40 (fourteen years ago) link
no cookies for you LJ
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:41 (fourteen years ago) link
well hello, achewood.com
― its sad he was a blogger (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:41 (fourteen years ago) link
just say the word and there'll be a dvd and a bottle of shiraz waiting for you
― its sad he was a blogger (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:42 (fourteen years ago) link
look i even brought some truffles
― its sad he was a blogger (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:43 (fourteen years ago) link
louis do not fuck achewood
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:43 (fourteen years ago) link