Joanna Newsom - Have One On Me (RIP blogs)

Also it's so weird to me how a lot of people hold MeM as the standard, as I think it's mostly a big pile of shit.

I don't think it's a "pile of shit," but I definitely think it looks slight next to Ys.

MeM is so good. I dunno. To me Milk-Eyed Mender always felt like when someone gets the right balance between traditional rock and out-weirdo elements. Like Sonic Youth's EVOL or Faith No More's Angel Dust. Ys and HOOM just seem like trying to hard to be a serious artist, yknow?

I think there's like, three good songs in that album and some of the others might be okayish but to me they're either unlistenable (e.g., cannot withstand one listen of studio "Peach, Plum, & Pear") or just... not that interesting.

I genuinely think she re-wrote much of Ys *around* VDP's arrangements and not the other way around and don't think I'd like those songs half as much without the additional harmonies & counterpoint.

xp i dont really hear that at all tbh

Ys and HOOM just seem like trying to hard to be a serious artist, yknow?

Yeah, she shouldn't try to do this.

Joanna Newsome Hamburgers Olympics

MeM is so good. I dunno. To me Milk-Eyed Mender always felt like when someone gets the right balance between traditional rock and out-weirdo elements. Like Sonic Youth's EVOL or Faith No More's Angel Dust. Ys and HOOM just seem like trying to hard to be a serious artist, yknow?

always weird to me when Whiney & me see almost completely eye-to-eye on something

at the same time, I really think it's awesome that she seems eager to challenge herself to grow, that it's a big part of who she is as an artist. but I am a keep-the-song-short kinda dude as is known. epic metal bands get a pass but generally speaking I'm more interested in compressed narratives/pieces, which MeM excelled in imo

i mean the "weird band grows increasingly more accessible" thing is VERY well-worn and familiar in indie music (Sonic Youth, White Zombie, Husker Du, Butthole Surfers, Jesus Lizard, Animal Collective, Deerhoof)

but the "popular artist growing increasingly stranger" is a little more rare and way harder to pull off

like joanna, i think Mastodon is another band who used to be great with simple weirdo-rock and are now just look silly trying to be a serious, art-prog band.

jeez u zvuck one cock and suddenly fools are mad reachin in their new dn

i haven't decided whether to start beefing with you yet

"popular artist growing increasingly stranger"

Am looking for this thread, am sure we've done it. lol Talk Talk amirite (also, Blur, sorta)

Scott Walker!

I actually think the new one is sort of casual stuff, not especially "serious artist"y, and if it were 35 minutes long rather than 125 minutes I doubt anyone would be making that claim. That said, I'm still unconvinced the new one had to be as long as it is, because I'm not sure how its length works to its benefit. It's not like it's some thrilling all over the place "Sign 'o the Times"/"Sandinista!" grab bag, or a particularly compelling song-cycle/narrative (you know, like Tori Amos' "Scarlet's Walk!"). I sort of wish it was, though it's also fine enough as it is. I'd be curious if anyone considers this the strongest of her three records, even though that's how it's been posited by much of the hyperbole. Then again: hyperbole.

Man, I have so much love for Ys, but I could see why some would prefer Mender.

Wilco did "avant-garde" better with YHF, tho. . . . . . . . . .

j/k

have one on me is the most accessible thing shes done, if you ask me.

i think the song length is really a red herring, esp. in the case of have on on me

If you're talking about her voice on it, sure. The production, sure. But it's three fucking discs long, I'm a huge fan, and it's difficult for even me to slog through.

Nah, I fully go with that statement. YHF is unfairly kicked these days, and has some (albeit isolated) moments of genuine avant-garde vision.

xxxp

I would be curious to know whether she thinks it's something to be listened to front-to-back.

three discs doesnt make her 'weird' or 'inaccessible' it just makes it long

If she sees this as a unified record to be listened to front-to-back, I think the fact that it is over two hours long is enough to make the record as a whole "inaccessible," even if its constituent parts aren't.

I see where you're coming from though.

i mean... 'inaccessible' in some sense? but thats not what were talking about is it? were talking about the arc of her career (pop --> weird vs. weird --> pop) or whatever. and even then its like... i dont think shes doing any of the things ppl are ascribing to her

haha whiney if it goes down msg me with an official declaration so's i'll know. is it true you took the hardman award home from TwitterCon???

I know Whiney abandoned the argument, but I think there's a legit discussion to be had about art school rock (or whatever they call it) v. "authentic" avant garde, and where Newsom falls into that spectrum

oh jesus pls don't say authentic even in scare quotes

haha yeah because your use of the word "real" last time around was way better

tbaa i don't think it matters much how schooled-on-a-remote-mountain my arty music is

tbaa = touched by an angel?

max I think "longer" does = "less accessible" to an extent - even, like, recall when Elvis Costello was making 20-song albums: it was asking a lot of a listener - even saying "look, you don't have to listen to it all at once" is kind of asking for more attention & engagement from the listener than a standard album, which is just, here's a known format, you know what to do, put it on and give it +/- three quarters of an hour, do other stuff while it spins, enjoy.

yeah sure

id just hope that there is more to the "joanna newsom is getting MORE weird" theory than "she released a triple LP"

she also puts ketchup on her oatmeal iirc

max is the only person who is making any sense in here--the album is broken up into three 6-song discs for those of us who still buy cds--it is extremely accessible.

all this talk of avant garde/artistic pretensions is insane--she's basically a folk singer.

doesn't really matter how many records its broken up across, it's still one piece

assuming we can still call HOOM qua collection of songs an album

like joanna, i think Mastodon is another band who used to be great with simple weirdo-rock and are now just look silly trying to be a serious, art-prog band.

― zvocksucker (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, February 28, 2010 3:14 PM (48 minutes ago) Bookmark

also this is wrong in a sense--mastodon has gotten compositionally more "serious" and "prog" but actually their music, part-to-part, is much less intricate. this is why they are an occasionally enjoyable, mor metal band now.

ksh i don't really want to get into a "what is an album" discussion but the point is that hoom has two logical break points that open wide the door to the listener digesting it in pieces.

all this talk of avant garde/artistic pretensions is insane--she's basically a folk singer.

― call all destroyer

the point I was trying to make upthread is that of course it's ridiculous for people to call her music avant-garde, but for some reason people do it, again and again

yeah i guess i'm just going to get annoyed if we can only talk about this record through the lens how how some mysterious constructed 25-35 year old thinks of it.

re "digested in pieces"

when it comes to a novel or something, it's just sort of assumed that the reader will take it in in multiple sittings. but with a record that isn't some sort of multi-disk compilation or something, with an album, i think there's sort of an expectation that it will be taken in in one sitting, so spreading something across three discs is going to try the patience of many listeners.

ok here's a hint--by running time, this could have fit on two cds.

this is a degree of whiny tight-assery that should be filed under some word that "first world problems" won't adequately cover

― allyboy (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, February 22, 2010 12:44 PM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it's two hours long. i don't know about you, but i think the ideal length for a record is somewhere between a half hour and fifty minutes nine cases out of ten. not to say this one should be shorter, but even as a JN stan, i really can't see myself listening to this straight through too often, if ever.

and if i start to listen to it in parts instead of straight through, then that's a really different approach to listening to a record than i, and i'd assume many of us here, usually take.

yes--you are making my point for me--it is broken up across three discs so that you don't need to listen to it straight through. if you feel some weirdo obligation to because it's an "album" i don't know what to tell you.

i listen to parts of albums all the time--since i mostly listen to music when i'm driving or walking somewhere i'm beholden to however long my trips are.