i think they are not dreamy/spaced out,and more direct,clear and rough than the acts youve mentioned.so they fit somewhere inbetween those acts and more earthly stuff like Fleetwood Mac and The Walkmen
― Zeno, Thursday, 28 January 2010 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
i like the fact that, as a final result, everything stays relatively simple and unpretentious on the record.
― Zeno, Thursday, 28 January 2010 18:46 (sixteen years ago)
this album is just as good as devotion. a bit unremarkable but that's how they roll.
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:26 (sixteen years ago)
I'm a big fan of all the usual references for this band (Nico, Cocteaus, Mazzy Star, Galaxie 500, Low, etc.) but can't seem to get into them to any huge degree. Just more of a "ho hum, this is kinda nice" reaction. What am I missing?
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, January 28, 2010 1:23 PM (2 hours ago
you mean BESIDES A SOUL
― max ipad (k3vin k.), Thursday, 28 January 2010 20:36 (sixteen years ago)
Precisely.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 28 January 2010 22:42 (sixteen years ago)
this is a v. v. pretty album
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 31 January 2010 00:59 (sixteen years ago)
zebra is AMAZING. def will be one of my favorite tracks of 2010. matt dc nailed it that stretching and rising feeling they give you on that track is something else. plus the fleetwood mac moves just seals it for me.
― oscar, Sunday, 31 January 2010 01:02 (sixteen years ago)
"certainly not a 9.0 (yet another Pitchfork record store clerk overstatement)."
ok, i admit thats more or less what i thought in the beginning,(good but not great) but this album is a much more "grower" thing than i thought.and fuck it - the 2nd half is as good as the first.it just took a little time to realize it.only "used to be" is skippable imo.
― Zeno, Thursday, 4 February 2010 07:14 (sixteen years ago)
i hate that pitchfork record store
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Thursday, 4 February 2010 07:44 (sixteen years ago)
songs should all be a bit shorter imo
― figuratively, but in a very real way (amateurist), Thursday, 4 February 2010 08:50 (sixteen years ago)
i don't think this album is better than its predecessor but they're both at least 9.0 albums to me. i feel like they're naturally embedded in their style they couldn't really ever make a bad song or album, even the most boring beach house song would still be lovely and warm, would feature her voice etc.
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 4 February 2010 15:32 (sixteen years ago)
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Thursday, February 4, 2010 2:44 AM
― ♖♕♖ (am0n), Thursday, 4 February 2010 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
my wife thought this was a dude singer too btw
Even after finding out the girl was the singer, I looked up the credits, thinking "well maybe the dude only sings lead on some of the songs"
― ecuador_with_a_c, Thursday, 4 February 2010 17:09 (sixteen years ago)
u guys are weird
― brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Thursday, 4 February 2010 17:11 (sixteen years ago)
transvestite!
― Zeno, Thursday, 4 February 2010 17:14 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, this is how I feel. i think they sound pretty good whenever they come on, but I'm never really swept away ... haven't heard the new one ...
― tylerw, Thursday, 4 February 2010 17:16 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think this is quite as good as Devotion, but I fucking loved that record and I'm growing to fucking love this one too. It does need time though, the first three or four listens left me unimpressed. Now, "Silver Soul", "Walk In The Park", "10 Mile Stereo" and "Real Love" are knocking me sideways.
― bakerstreetsaxsolo, Friday, 5 February 2010 00:58 (sixteen years ago)
boring shit
― ian zamboni, Friday, 5 February 2010 01:13 (sixteen years ago)
Awwww... don't talk about yourself like that, Ian.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Friday, 5 February 2010 03:44 (sixteen years ago)
hey, is that ian zamboni of zamboni sdtks? that's a FUCKING GREAT blog, dude.
― figuratively, but in a very real way (amateurist), Friday, 5 February 2010 09:03 (sixteen years ago)
This is definitely a good argument for the beauty of content-free recordings.
― Megadeth Panel (Ówen P.), Monday, 8 February 2010 15:20 (sixteen years ago)
What – ILM?
― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 February 2010 15:23 (sixteen years ago)
Ha! No, this record. It's not meant to be a zing, either. I feel like nothing happens on this record and it's perfect for it.
― Megadeth Panel (Ówen P.), Monday, 8 February 2010 15:24 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, it's pretty basic and introverted for most of the time (with some nice nuances), a little MOR even,and i say that as a positive things.
― Zeno, Monday, 8 February 2010 15:32 (sixteen years ago)
owen otm
― samosa gibreel, Monday, 8 February 2010 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
for me this album is just one big giant heart throb. the best moment is when she sings "i take care of you."
― samosa gibreel, Monday, 8 February 2010 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
but "in a year or two"...
― Zeno, Monday, 8 February 2010 16:56 (sixteen years ago)
they're so good at ending songs with beautiful heartbreaking choruses that go on forever
― samosa gibreel, Monday, 8 February 2010 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
like i said, songs go on too long
― figuratively, but in a very real way (amateurist), Monday, 8 February 2010 22:36 (sixteen years ago)
Beach House = sex
Even they think so...
“This record has a lot of sex in it and it has more balls"...
http://www.clashmusic.com/feature/beach-house
Talk complete balls though...
― Cream Of Some Young Guy, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 16:01 (sixteen years ago)
beach balls
― am0n, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 16:13 (sixteen years ago)
ball house
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
liked the fallon performance but wasn't sure about headbanging to a song without a beat
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 16:33 (sixteen years ago)
i was disappointed by her fashion choices on that TV appearance.
― by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 17:14 (sixteen years ago)
so they got the Hope Sandoval approval - said she liked them, and that they remind her of Opal.we can all relax.
― Zeno, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 17:42 (sixteen years ago)
we can all relax.
by taking quaaludes and listening to hope sandoval?
― by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 17:44 (sixteen years ago)
i don't know if i can ever listen to this record as i'm struggling to believe it can possibly live up to the spluttering hype it's getting everywhere
― trembling blue knees (electricsound), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:30 (sixteen years ago)
The more I spin this album, the less I'm convinced it's any good.
Kind of starts to sound like if Grizzly Bear started making repetitive, monochromatic songs with a female lead vocalist, instead of their usual over-orchestrated kaleidoscopic indie-pop thing. Maybe a good thing for Grizzly Bear fans... but I just think it's really boring. Not even bad, just boring. Which is probably why it reminds me of Grizzly Bear. Not bad... just boring.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 20:15 (sixteen years ago)
if you find beautiful melodies boring then yes there is not much besides those on this album
― united arab amirites (samosa gibreel), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
sometimes i feel like it takes all sorts of retarded INNOVATIVE/EXPERIMENTAL/PSYCHEDELIC superfluous tags for people to be able to fuck with killer pop tunes these days. i'm sure if you ran this dream-pop album through animal collective's synth meat grinder it would'nt get knocked for being boring; but it also wouldn't be any better.
― united arab amirites (samosa gibreel), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:07 (sixteen years ago)
I love a good dream-pop album but this isn't dream-pop, it's more like mope-pop.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:22 (sixteen years ago)
Better yet: snooze-pop.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:23 (sixteen years ago)
so beach house reminds you of grizzly bear if grizzly bear started making music like beach house
― am0n, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:28 (sixteen years ago)
ah, the good old days when beach house songs sounded like beach house songs written by beach house
― united arab amirites (samosa gibreel), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:36 (sixteen years ago)
Well, yes, but you're making it sound stupid. I mean, imagine if Slayer started making music like Beach House, it would be a bit different, right? So it's got something Grizzly-esque to it, their sense of neutered dull boring-ness or something.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:43 (sixteen years ago)
Also, for an album full of "beautiful melodies" and "killer pop tunes" it sounds surprisingly dull to my ears. Even compared to, say, the new Hope Sandoval record (hopefully a fair comparison) this album really falls flat. Where are these tunes you speak of??
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:44 (sixteen years ago)
ah, the good old days before grizzly bear invented boring-ness in music
― united arab amirites (samosa gibreel), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:45 (sixteen years ago)
did you ever like or listen to beach house before this album, ilxor? because i can't imagine anyone being surprised or dissapointed that they would put out a record that sounds like this. if you just never liked beach house i get it that it's not your thing, but you're kind of accusing them of doing exactly what they've always done + tacking on a random grizzly bear diss.
― united arab amirites (samosa gibreel), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:49 (sixteen years ago)
did you ever like or listen to beach house before this album, ilxor?
I'd previously heard the first album and a couple songs from Devotion. Pretty much thought "oh, this is nice, I'll keep an eye on this band in case they turn into something awesome down the line" and moved on to other things.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:51 (sixteen years ago)
You do have a point, though, maybe I've just never been the ideal fan of theirs. Though I've seen the hype around this new one and I try to give things a fair shake, regardless of past judgments, so...
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:52 (sixteen years ago)