i could get on board with calling the dude's singing amateur, but it'd be difficult for me to say that about the girl's
― kshighway (ksh), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:23 (sixteen years ago)
Male singer still reminds me of Tricky somehow.
― brain thoughts (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:23 (sixteen years ago)
I don't like Emusic or whoever telling me that as an electronic music consumer I have to get this XX record.
I guess if that is what eMusic is saying, it's poor marketing. I think fans of electronic music might be into the xx more than they would be into other indie bands, but it's not like they obviously belong in that world. When I think of people I know who are into the band, it's certainly not all electronic/dance fans. And I don't know anywhere else that's marketing them that way.
It seems better suited to the general pop market.
You're going to have to define "pop" here. I think the band has a fairly broad fanbase, but at least in the U.S., it's still pretty much an indie thing. At least until Todd Terry remixes them.
― Hoisin Murphy (jaymc), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
the best example imo of how the band are completely control of their music is "Night Time." everything is precisely placed and paced. it doesn't sound like they're playing slowly because they're being cautious, it sounds like they're completely in control (as lex said) and deploying every sound at the exact moment the song calls for it.
― kshighway (ksh), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:27 (sixteen years ago)
That's subjective, though.
― brain thoughts (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:28 (sixteen years ago)
You're going to have to define "pop" here.
This should be amusing.
― Shannon Whirry and the Bad Brains, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:30 (sixteen years ago)
sure, totally! i agree.
but i'd be more inclined to agree with you w/r/t to their music being amateur if you were talking about their playing live, esp. as evidenced here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYcxX-SOtY4
they sound significantly more tentative there imo
― kshighway (ksh), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:30 (sixteen years ago)
that sounds pretty sleek and confident to me.
― jed_, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:41 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, not feeling hesitancy there; no more than on record.
― brain thoughts (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:49 (sixteen years ago)
i feel it ~2:38 on the second guitar, and the whole thing just doesn't feel as tight as the record to me but, as you said, it's subjective
― kshighway (ksh), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
I think if u read through this thread you will see that a lot of ppl start off being "ugh this is really like a pretty blatant remake of something i already like" and end up going "xx r taking over my brane from inside", nobody is really praising them for novelty or invention, more for how they are a minimal rock band that sound sleek rather than austere and they have a subtlety that creeps up on you and means that the album sounds really lush despite its relative bareness
― plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 17:48 (sixteen years ago)
Individual instruments are pretty lushly mixed, if a little antiseptic sometimes. Not so much an issue with the guitars, but I'm getting really tired of drum machines / maxed-out compressed drums. Not so much of an issue here, though, given the size and warmth of the kick drum.
Gave this 2 listens today; once off iPhone through headphones while updating our virus FAQs (niiice) and then again through the big B&Ws while making paella. Also nice. Lex, still don't get why you're not into hi-fi when you're so into style and sense; fewer things more sensually indulgent than playing a lot of the stuff you and I crossover tastes on through a big, well-balanced system while sitting on a big sofa with a glass of wine.
― brain thoughts (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 19:15 (sixteen years ago)
nobody is really praising them for novelty or invention, more for how they are a minimal rock band that sound sleek rather than austere and they have a subtlety that creeps up on you and means that the album sounds really lush despite its relative bareness
― plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, January 26, 2010 12:48 PM (1 hour ago)
but dont u see, only music that is novel or inventive is worthwhile
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 26 January 2010 19:20 (sixteen years ago)
only music without crap vocals is worthwhile
― guammls (QE II), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:14 (sixteen years ago)
liked this record for about two listens when it first came out, think it is shit the more I hear it. this is dinner party music...you hear it everywhere you go because it combines being fashionable with being incredibly bland and easy to listen to. doesn't stand up to the amount of play it's getting. not their fault but doesn't stand up to much play at all...it's more tedious and mopey and wet each time.
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:24 (sixteen years ago)
the thought of listening to this record in a social setting feels like a slow death to me, it'd turn a friday night into a sunday
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:25 (sixteen years ago)
feeling almost the exact opposite myself!
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:28 (sixteen years ago)
it's no christina aguilera
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:29 (sixteen years ago)
i am kinda depressed but don't feel like this is depressing music (i know no-one necessarily said it was)
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:29 (sixteen years ago)
you hear it everywhere you go because it combines being fashionable with being incredibly bland
I literally don't know what this means (and where are you hearing this? You mean like as muzak in restaurants or something?)
― Shannon Whirry and the Bad Brains, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:36 (sixteen years ago)
er, you don't have to listen to it in a social setting or on a friday night? pretty perfect sunday night music tbh.
― jabba hands, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
it "combines being fashionable with being incredibly bland" in a way that reminds me of norah jones.. the new norah jones album is pretty good, incidentally (no challops)
― guammls (QE II), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
norah jones is just feist for the hipster crowd iirc
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:44 (sixteen years ago)
planningtorock is feist for the hipster crowd
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:45 (sixteen years ago)
planningrorock can blow me iirc
― plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:46 (sixteen years ago)
ur just lj for the hipster crowd
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:47 (sixteen years ago)
mind blown
― plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:47 (sixteen years ago)
- don't think i've listened to this in a "social setting" other than actual xx gigs- dinner parties are great and dinner party music is great - calling something that is such a compliment, <3 nice food and nice company- nick - i guess the same reason i don't drink or buy vintage wine? i'm not anti-audiophilia, i just don't like it being made the benchmark, i guess
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 00:07 (sixteen years ago)
when i say "i don't drink or buy vintage wine" that's not, like, a principle or anything, it's just a reflection of how it is~~
the ability of a piece of music to effectively sink into the background has nothing to do with it's quality.
― guammls (QE II), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 00:15 (sixteen years ago)
bah "its quality"
http://www.audiosparx.com/sa/zdbpath/composerpix/2748.jpg
― plaxico (I know, right?), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 00:16 (sixteen years ago)
i saw some british tv actor on current tv refer to this band as "The Double Kiss". is that for real??
― guammls (QE II), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 00:17 (sixteen years ago)
xp, i'm not saying it's a bad thing.. i am saying that "kind of blue" and "buddha bar XXVIII" are both effective at sinking into the background but that fact says nothing about their merits otherwise
― guammls (QE II), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 00:19 (sixteen years ago)
unless we're talking about AMBIENT music
― guammls (QE II), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 00:20 (sixteen years ago)
yeah people said this about Endtroducing... and Dummy, someone's on a thread right now saying this about five years of minimal, "dinner party music" as a pejorative has to be taken out and shot
― zvookster, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 01:59 (sixteen years ago)
Playing music during dinner parties is classic, as you'd know if you had any friends or knew how to use a knife and fork.
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, December 5, 2003 2:00 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark
― jabba hands, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 02:02 (sixteen years ago)
so uh, how are you supposed to say their name? The ecks ecks? The double ecks?
― henry s, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 02:10 (sixteen years ago)
"the ex ex"
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 02:36 (sixteen years ago)
now you can talk to your friends about them at dinner parties
prefer "eeks"
― his power told him (about the fish) (gbx), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 02:47 (sixteen years ago)
^^^amazing
― jed_, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 02:50 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah where is that from, I want to feel the full effect of the zing.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 02:56 (sixteen years ago)
I do remember that line but can't recall from where.
― Mark, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 03:16 (sixteen years ago)
Moby
― mintox plus oral (electricsound), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 03:28 (sixteen years ago)
I don't drink 'vintage' wine, and I wouldn't say audiophilia is a benchmark at all; I just like big speakers with a big, detailed sound, and a glass of wine.
― brain thoughts (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 12:17 (sixteen years ago)
depends on your neighbours/co-habitors situation to some extent
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 12:48 (sixteen years ago)
xxpost -- Must have shamed 'Rudolf' so much he went away and never returned.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
The way this provokes strong emotions and yet accusations of blandness reminds me of the Cocteau Twins in their heyday.
― bendy, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 14:29 (sixteen years ago)
i don't get how calling this slick dinner party music is any more of a criticism of the xx than it would be of ryan leslie which iirc you really like LOCAL GARDA xxxx...xxp
― plaxico (I know, right?), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 18:03 (sixteen years ago)