i still use telegraph tbh
― kshighway (ksh), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 03:53 (sixteen years ago)
prinzhorn dance school?
These guys are like The Fall Redux, and the xx are nothing like 'em.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 04:59 (sixteen years ago)
It's not about "authenticity", it's about bad recording that doesn't do any justice to the chops of the singers. They are talented singers but they don't sound HUMAN. Also they sound so high school talent show, no distinctive personality. This has nothing to do with ideology, and I have no "authenticity" fetish, sometimes the recording doesn't fit the style of music.
― US EEL (u s steel), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:03 (sixteen years ago)
how should they have been recorded?
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:05 (sixteen years ago)
Like, someone upthread mentioned the Cowboy Junkies, at least their records have a sense of naturalism to them. People are being sold a bunch of rubbish here, I am afraid, the reviews and marketing are manipulative like I'm supposed to "feel" something when listening to derivative high school talent.
― US EEL (u s steel), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:08 (sixteen years ago)
w/humanity
― mage pit laceration (gbx), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:09 (sixteen years ago)
so bummed to have been lied to, thx for getting these dang scales off my eyes
― mage pit laceration (gbx), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:10 (sixteen years ago)
they're beat happening with all the noise sucked out & rough edges sanded off so that the space is pristine. variations on the same aesthetic choice imo.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:14 (sixteen years ago)
u s steel i really don't think most people are having the same experience you are with this record.
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:18 (sixteen years ago)
I don't disrespect people for liking it, it is an appealing style, it's just that I think the press aren't doing their job if they don't realize how many artists are currently mining the same turf and have been for about ten years.
― US EEL (u s steel), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:22 (sixteen years ago)
pls name names
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Monday, January 25, 2010 8:26 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
cozen beat me to it, genuinely curious.
― you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, January 25, 2010 8:27 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:23 (sixteen years ago)
For example, I have a subscription to emusic where every day I find twenty-two bands with this style. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. Why is it so important to you?
Try Colder or, as someone mentioned above, The Chromatics, both better groups. What rock are you living under if you don't realize the eighties thing is too influential right now?
― US EEL (u s steel), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:29 (sixteen years ago)
what a disaster for humanity, and the press
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:31 (sixteen years ago)
wow dude pretty amazing you find 22 bands/day with this style yet can't remember their names well enough to type them out to me. a little concerned for you tbh.
on a related note, i fucking listen to the chromatics and have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:31 (sixteen years ago)
As a journalist, you are supposed to do research as part of your job, not just repeat what some marketing department tells you.
You would think "I'm just not feeling it" would be inoffensive criticism. As for the Chromatics, I am not the one who mentioned them upthread.
I am sorry, perhaps if you get defensive enough on this thread you can convince me of the emotional power of The XX. You want people to do you favors for free, you could be nicer about it.
― US EEL (u s steel), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:39 (sixteen years ago)
lol honestly i was genuinely curious as to what bands you considered to be similar to this one. i care fuck all whether you like them or not.
but please carry on being a complete dick and not engaging with people who are trying to engage with you, i'm going to bed.
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:42 (sixteen years ago)
i don't think anyone really cares if u s steel is convinced of the emotional power of the xx, gotta say
― waka shame (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:43 (sixteen years ago)
altho i will say that i think call all destroyer is shirking his journalistic duties to ilx
really really liked that Sasha Frere-Jones piece - explored the strengths of the band without relying on the same old shorthands.
― sean gramophone, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:44 (sixteen years ago)
― US EEL (u s steel), Monday, January 25, 2010 11:22 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark
not even sure why i'm bothering BUT -- clearly this isn't the point. "how could anyone like this band that plays the musical instrument electric guitar?! they've been playing guitars for 60 years now!"
― waka shame (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:45 (sixteen years ago)
they sound like radiohead (when they don't sound like chris isaak)
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:46 (sixteen years ago)
what Radiohead songs do you think they sound like?
― kshighway (ksh), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 05:55 (sixteen years ago)
They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names. They are so ubiquitous it is impossible to name names.
kudos
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 06:16 (sixteen years ago)
xpost that one with the bleeps and the bloops? and lots of reverb?
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 06:16 (sixteen years ago)
that's their best song imo
― kshighway (ksh), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 06:18 (sixteen years ago)
I stormed out of the ilx thread unexpectedly cross
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 06:32 (sixteen years ago)
<3 hoos
― waka shame (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 06:37 (sixteen years ago)
this part is better imo: "Why is it so important to you?"
uh, i dunno, because this is a message board about music
― mage pit laceration (gbx), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 07:02 (sixteen years ago)
w this thread & vampire weekend i find myself spending time defending shit that i only kinda like
― not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 07:04 (sixteen years ago)
also Girls
― not a playa but i ilx a lot (deej), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 07:05 (sixteen years ago)
all the ILXOR yaysayers will hate this in a year. Just u wait.
― Emily's Cheese, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 07:38 (sixteen years ago)
does that matter? surely that's all the more reason to be a yaysayer while a person still can.
― lords of hyrule (c sharp major), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 08:01 (sixteen years ago)
'oh no i like a band that one day i might not like i'd better just not listen to music then'
― lords of hyrule (c sharp major), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 08:02 (sixteen years ago)
all the ilxor yeasayers
― waka shame (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 08:33 (sixteen years ago)
was just going to zing based on similar bands being so ubiquitous it's impossible to name names but I am genuinely curious, pls?
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 09:53 (sixteen years ago)
I think the thing with The XX is that they are such a blank canvas that people can, and are, projecting wildly onto them in terms of reading influences, references, meanings, emotions, etc. I quite like the album but I'm certainly not that blown away.
― brain thoughts (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 10:28 (sixteen years ago)
it says something about the current state of rock/pop music that a dullish band like the xx is so much in the limelight. in the 80s they would have been nothing special and nobody would have talked about them. i kind of like them but don't get all the fuss about them. on the other hand i don't know a new band making more exciting music than the xx right now. my main problem with them is their minimalism, stereolab eg were minimal too but somehow there was more to them, maybe because of the groove?
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 10:48 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think the xx are particularly exciting, their appeal isn't excitement or novelty
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 10:49 (sixteen years ago)
lol I don't even like them all that much - think they're ok but a bit like the music ur little brother wd make after he got into ur low records
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 10:52 (sixteen years ago)
Dunno whether anyone has said this yet, but I can hear quite a big Interpol influence in there. I'm guessing Turn On The Bright Lights was a big record for them in their early teens - timing would be about right I think? Hearing the same thing on the Wild Beasts record too.
― We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 10:56 (sixteen years ago)
Now i feel old. Up there with Sum 41 citing Nimrod as the album that got them into music.
― Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:03 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think being young automatically means "no depth". A lot of the younger people I encounter online listen to classic rock, progressive rock, or oldies. These problems are as old as the eighties (hyped band being held up as "representative" of trends), maybe older.
I am not a Radiohead fan at all, but I tolerate Radiohead fans because I think that as a group they can handle all the attention.
I loved the Low reference, another group I don't think is terrible but I wouldn't go out of my way to buy just because it's the one alterna-group everyone has seized upon.
― US EEL (u s steel), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:16 (sixteen years ago)
imo xx have been caught in that magical stage before they've started worrying about what they're doing and that's a nice thing to hear in a record in an age where lots of stuff tends to sound super self aware. i like that comment on thequietus where mpc dude is like "i don't think anyone else is rocking an mpc like me" and cites rjd2 as a major influence. i guess some people will be all like omg haven't you heard of hiphop and btw rjd2 sux didn't you read the resident advisor review u noob. other people will enjoy the fact this dude has such enthusiasm and self believe in what he's doing. i'm def in the latter camp and think that innocence/enthusiasm is one of the things that makes this record pretty special in 2010 especially when presented in an indie/hipster context.
― Crackle Box, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:20 (sixteen years ago)
I know I'm out of touch but Low "the one alterna-group everyone has seized upon"? o_O
― Colonel Poo, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:24 (sixteen years ago)
I am curious as to how can I find this "innocence" and "enthusiasm" in the actual recordings, as opposed to the band's background or press. All the self-belief and RJD2 fandom in the world isn't going to make your CD not suck.
It would be nice if people didn't bring issues here that they got in some flame war on some other forum.
x-post: Low - you had to be there, I guess. Or not ten years old in the nineties.
― US EEL (u s steel), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:30 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gifhttp://www.phone-forensics.com/forum/images/smilies/shrug.gif
― I think ur a probotector (cozen), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:33 (sixteen years ago)
I assumed you were talking about nowadays.
I wasn't ten years old in the nineties, and I don't remember Low being anything more than the odd small article in NME once every couple of years or so.
― Colonel Poo, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:48 (sixteen years ago)
us eel u really think they sound too packaged and expen$ive? that's insane.
u are wrong. this album sounds like a bunch of myspace demos tarted up for cd release. using a *really* basic sound palette- lovingly. hence the innocence and enthusiasm.
this album is really easy to critisise but u are doing a really bad job of it. you want to focus on how the songs don't go anywhere, the vocals have lame 09 singer songwriter affectations, that they take themselves really seriously, the drums are really thin like he's downloaded a sample pack of freedrumsamples.org, there is automated spaceverb on everything etc etc
― Crackle Box, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:50 (sixteen years ago)
i'll never understand why "taking oneself seriously" is so often used as a diss - that's a GOOD THING imo
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:51 (sixteen years ago)
I'm sorry I am doing "such a bad job" at it I'll work harder to impress you next time since you take this little thread so seriously.
By "expensive", you ought to know what I mean, they sound like groomed talent, they do not sound spontaneous. If School of Seven Bells is opening for you, perhaps you think too highly of yourself. Or someone thinks too highly of you. How can you be this naive about the industry?
How can you say they don't sound Xpensive when that last track someone posted sounded more like Alanis Morissette (whom I like) or some other commercial chick singer nonsense than any alterna-shit.
― US EEL (u s steel), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 12:09 (sixteen years ago)