Radiohead - In Rainbows

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1708 of them)

drums + piano in "down is the new up" are fantastic

Mark Clemente, Friday, 7 December 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

"shame that the only way this will probably be released is with the big expensive package"

right, so why not just steal it instead?

dblcheeksneek, Friday, 7 December 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

yes that's what i did, which i don't like doing. i just meant that it'd be cool if they released it as an ep-priced thing, and then i would buy it.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 7 December 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)

agreed, it'd be cool if they released the extra tracks as an EP (and who knows, they still might). in the meantime, unfortunately (for radiohead), you don't dislike doing it enough to not do it.

the irony of file "sharing" the second disc after they effectively gave the first disc away for less than the price of an EP should not be lost on anyone.

dblcheeksneek, Friday, 7 December 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

My disc box still hasn't arrived yet (Belgian post, come on!) :-(

StanM, Friday, 7 December 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

could be worse, you could be on the other side of the pond,

"Wherever possible (especially to customers in the USA), we’ve sent these by road and sea."

by sea!(?) how quaint!(?)

needless to say, my discbox hasn't arrived yet either.

dblcheeksneek, Friday, 7 December 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

New York Times today:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/arts/music/09pare.html?_r=1&ref=arts&oref=slogin

three handclaps, Saturday, 8 December 2007 17:24 (eighteen years ago)

"Pay What You Want for This Article

Taking chances with commerce as well as art: From left, Ed O’Brien, Colin Greenwood, Thom Yorke, Phil Selway (reflected in the mirror) and Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead.

By JON PARELES
Published: December 9, 2007"

three handclaps, Saturday, 8 December 2007 17:24 (eighteen years ago)

“Money makes you numb, as M.I.A. wrote."

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 8 December 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)

I am also in Belgium and still no sign of the discbox arriving. Hard to believe it is coming by courier and can take more than 1 week!! hope it is worth the wait!!!

JamesEdward, Monday, 10 December 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

Four Minute Warning OMG!

I don't really 'get' Bangers & Mash, but I keep wanting Thom to follow that last line with "I've got the remedy".

Matt DC, Monday, 10 December 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)

Am I the only one who likes Weird Fishes/Arpeggi? The last 1:40 of the song are glorious

youcangoyourownway, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 13:56 (eighteen years ago)

No, I love it too. It's gone from being my least favourite to my nearly-favourite - Faust Arp is now top.

nate woolls, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 13:59 (eighteen years ago)

yea i think it's great.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 14:19 (eighteen years ago)

"Down Is the New Up"... grooves. Reminds me of "Talk Show Host" a bit.

Roz, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)

Top 3 (subject to change once I hear Disc 2):

1. Weird Fishes/Arpeggi
2. Reckoner
3. Videotape

dblcheeksneek, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

4 minute warning should have taken Videotape's spot on disc 1.

For people who already got the discbox: Does the vinyl include all the songs, or just the songs from disc 1?

Z S, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

Vinyl = disc one.

Mark G, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

4 minute warning should have taken Videotape's spot on disc 1.

To quote one Vincent Vega, "That's a bold statement." Cue the Pepsi challenge once my discbox arrives...stay tuned (and hot with anticipation).

dblcheeksneek, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

Vinyl = disc one.

Damn, 2 LPs for 10 songs? Oh well.

Z S, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

Last Flowers has some interesting guitar parts in the right channel that weave nicely and subtly with the piano, but Thom's voice is mixed so high it's almost hard to hear. Still a nice song, though.

Z S, Tuesday, 11 December 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)

Got my discbox today!

lou, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 00:19 (eighteen years ago)

Where do you live?

(not trying to be creepy, I'm just wondering if any packages have hit the US yet)

Z S, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 01:14 (eighteen years ago)

In DC.

lou, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 01:15 (eighteen years ago)

I got mines today too (Greater Boston). Encoding Disc 1 as I write this...

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 02:34 (eighteen years ago)

As for the vinyl, it's two plates but only the first disc b/c they're 45 RPM.

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 02:36 (eighteen years ago)

There's not enough love for "Up On The Ladder."

Turangalila, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 07:19 (eighteen years ago)

I just got my box too! A winner is me!

StanM, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 09:25 (eighteen years ago)

OMG!!! They've thought of everything! Vinyl run out groove inscriptions! (old Sisters of Mercy fan here, I don't know why I checked, even, but they did it)

disc 1 side A: RIPPLES
disc 1 side B: ON A
disc 2 side A: BLANK
disc 2 side B: SHORE

StanM, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 09:32 (eighteen years ago)

That's the first thing I checked for when I opened my box!

New Order always used to have good run-out inscriptions.

nate woolls, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 09:38 (eighteen years ago)

Does Thom really sing "I'm trapped in the Tardis" at the beginning of one of the songs?

I really don't get the love for Bangers and Mash, it just sounds like an awkward half-finished mess to me.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 09:48 (eighteen years ago)

Does Thom really sing "I'm trapped in the Tardis" at the beginning of one of the songs?

Yes, yes he does.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 11:03 (eighteen years ago)

disc 2 : "this CD contains some photos and some pictures." "here are a few suggestions of what to do with them:"

StanM, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 11:22 (eighteen years ago)

What's that? Other stuff on Disc 2?

nate woolls, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 11:24 (eighteen years ago)

I never thought of exploring it!

this CD contains some photos and some pictures.

the photos are by jonny & colin.
the ones with an SK in the filename are by steve keros.
the pictures are by donwood & tchock.
all of them were taken/made during the making of this record.

here are a few suggestions of what to do with them:

1. use them as a screensaver.

2. make a slideshow of the photos or pictures. play the record at the
same time. ?.

3. print them out massive, frame them and hang them above your bed.

4. admire the dynamic artistes at work, as they plunge flailing into
middle age.

5. attempt to trace the arguably bizarre trajectory of donwood and
tchock as they begin by doing urban landscapes and end up with work
that even they cannot describe.

6. adapt or alter to your liking. it's extraordinary what you can do
with photoshop. or even scissors and glue.

7. turn an old tshirt inside-out. print something out on that iron-on
transfer stuff and stick it on the tshirt.

8. actually thinking about it, just type 'inkjet media' into a search
engine and see what the possibilities are.

9. for instance, you can print onto thin magnetic sheet and then stick
it onto a vehicle or a fridge or something.

10. try to work out which photos we edited out, and why.

bye

nate woolls, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 11:28 (eighteen years ago)

Listening to my 320/LAME encoderings, the bump in fidelity (and mastering!) was much overdue. Adios 160kbps bottoming out and/or distortion! I didn't appreciate the greatness of "Faust Arp" or "All I Need" until now.

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

I'll definitely be picking this up the day it comes out. (1) to support the band (2) added fidelity will be welcome.

three handclaps, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)

Dammit, I didn't realize they were going to play at 45RPM.

Once again my fucked up turntable (plays 33s fine, but plays 45s at about 38-39RPM) lets me down.

Z S, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 16:28 (eighteen years ago)

Presently understanding why "Down Is The New Up" didn't make the Disc 1 cut (didn't like it live, don't like it recorded either - the title & lyrics of spiritually kindred "2+2=5" strike me as a touch clevererer).

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

I really like Down Is The New Up - the best bit is the enormous empty half-moan-half-roar that emerges from god knows where to offset Thom's fake Prince yelp.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)

Love the lyrics to "Down is the New Up", and I'm pleased with the studio version even if I think the Thom solo performance from that Nigel Godrich show is my favorite.

lou, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)

Not to bolster my argument with an artist's own decisions, but: they did relegate it to the second disc for a reason. Musically it's a fine b-side; interesting, "pleasing" - to paraphrase.

It's the obviousness of its title/chorus that irks me (which is unusual for Radiohead's otherwise consistent meeting/exceeding of my lyrical/creative expectations). So it's not all of the lyrics, it's just the title/chorus that makes me cringe (a little).

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)

At least for "Down is the New Up" and "4 Minute Warning", it seems to me that they were left off the album primarily for thematic reasons--they don't suit the more personal nature of proper album.

lou, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

Assuming this transcription of the lyrics is accurate (my discbox and I are suffering a bit of separation anxiety at the mo'), "Down..." would fit thematically (i.e., sufficient amount of the personal "you" and "I", no?):

Get yourself together
Let the light pour in
Pour yourself a hot bath, pour yourself a drink
Nothing's gonna happen without a warning
Down is the new up
What is up, buttercup
Down is the new up, is the new up

Your services are not required
Your future's bleak, you're so last week

Ladies and gentlemen, without a safety net
I shall now perform a 180 flip-flop
I shall now amputate, I shall now contort
Because down is the new up
What if I just flip-flopped?
Down is the new up
Down is the new up
Down is the new up, is the new up

You're on Candid Camera
The chink in your armor
Topsy turvy town, topsy turvy town
Shake your pockets out
Pass it on, pass it down
Topsy turvy town, topsy turvy town

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)

45 12 inches sound really awesome though

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 17:44 (eighteen years ago)

dblcheeksneek: I don't know, the lyrics still seem politically-oriented, or they at least seem to address the outside world rather than his own self or a personal relationship like so many of the songs on In Rainbows. I think it's the "flip-flop" references that make me feel this way--they immediately call to mind the 2004 election.

lou, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

Some of the lyrics of "Down..." immediately call to mind the 2004 election. You're making my point: it's one thing to be direct and lyrically clever ("2+2=5"") vs. direct and patently obvious ("Down..."); the latter I (and, in my opinion, Radiohead) can do without.

To your point, I can see where not all of the first-person lyrics of "Down..." fit with Disc 1's mostly relational theme, but, for now, I'm sticking by relegated-for-quality-rather-than-thematic rationale.

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

In other news, the break at 2:06 of "Bodysnatchers" is brilliant, brilliant, brilliant.

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

Fair enough, though I don't think that being direct and patently obvious is necessarily an issue. And the lyrics to "2+2=5" don't strike me as particularly clever either.

lou, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)

As one of many masters of the obvious here at ILM, I'd like to point out that differing points of view can co-exist and be equally right: I don't think that being direct and patently obvious is necessarily an issue.

No. It's not. For you. But as you may glean from my posts above: it is, for me. I'm not atop a soapbox here. Not proselytizing.

You : "2+2=5" :: Me : "Down Is The New Up"

I get it. And I'm OK with it.

dblcheeksneek, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.