Why not? It's essentially exactly the same argument you make when Tim complains about certain critics getting excited about post-dubstep house and techno and not taking UK funky seriously. (xpost)
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Friday, 8 January 2010 12:51 (sixteen years ago)
a calamity of music journalism
The worst kind of calamity!
― Neil S, Friday, 8 January 2010 12:52 (sixteen years ago)
ignition was massive in the uk and there are a lot of british writers on stylus. pretty sure in ireland that it is the only r kelly single that is known by most ppl, maybe i believe i can fly or the worlds greatest, but only cos of the movies they were in rilly
― plaxico (I know, right?), Friday, 8 January 2010 12:55 (sixteen years ago)
I mean, the difference being that UK funky could probably do with that sort of critical support and the multi-million pound globally successful and utterly ubiquitous R&B industry really doesn't. You're making an underdog out of a triumphant winner.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Friday, 8 January 2010 12:56 (sixteen years ago)
I never got Ignition either (and didn't vote for it at all), but I'm kind of glad it won.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 12:58 (sixteen years ago)
only if you believe the sole purpose of criticism is to help sell records - of course this is important but that is not why you or anyone else reads music writing
xp
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 8 January 2010 12:59 (sixteen years ago)
"ignition was massive in the uk and there are a lot of british writers on stylus. pretty sure in ireland that it is the only r kelly single that is known by most ppl, maybe i believe i can fly or the worlds greatest, but only cos of the movies they were in rilly
― plaxico (I know, right?), 2010. január 8."
Perhaps this shows that globalization is still has a way to go. I've lived in the whole decade in the conviction that 'Ignition' was never a big hit. Wow.
― zeus, Friday, 8 January 2010 13:00 (sixteen years ago)
if r kelly wasn't an evil child fucker then ignition would be the greatest song ever
― Home Taping Is Killing Zack Morris (a hoy hoy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:01 (sixteen years ago)
Nick, why are you glad then? I'm really curious.
― zeus, Friday, 8 January 2010 13:03 (sixteen years ago)
also it's nice to know that there's a world where electrik red, richgirl, vistoso bosses, cassie, meshell ndegéocello, teedra moses, tweet, j*davey, lloyd et al are "globally successful and utterly ubiquitous" but sadly it is not the actual real world
xps to matt
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:04 (sixteen years ago)
Why not? It's essentially exactly the same argument you make when Tim complains about certain critics getting excited about post-dubstep house and techno and not taking UK funky seriously.
my argument here is that people DO take uk funky seriously, it's just that post-dubstep bobbins is good too, so it's not actually as sidelined as tim thinks it is.
whereas in terms of critical respect, r&b and soul are definitely sidelined - either ignored or dismissed or seen as inherently flawed genres.
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:08 (sixteen years ago)
and the reason i'd like this not to be so is that i'd quite like to see a lot more smart writing about great music
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:09 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah but a lot of those acts can't even sell records or get adequate promotion IN AMERICA which means there is a different and bigger and more significant problem which would be a far better target for your critical ire than whether they fit into the indie crit canon. You're railing against the wrong enemy here.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:10 (sixteen years ago)
why does 'smart writing about great music' always seem to equal 'opinions i agree with about music i like'
― Karen Tregaskin, Friday, 8 January 2010 13:11 (sixteen years ago)
That said I've got so used to eyerolling at lazy criticism of dance music that it barely registers by now. It actually doesn't really matter.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:12 (sixteen years ago)
oh i am angry w/the music industry as well - this is a recurring theme with me, surely you know by now! - but that's an entirely separate issue! ideally i'd like my favourite music to sell well and get critical respect, but these two things shouldn't have anything to do with each other. i mean most publications don't seem to have any problem with covering lots of other relatively obscure acts, right?
i wasn't aware that stylus considered itself an indie-specific site - nick, do you consider it indie-specific?
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
This is all very amusing given the rnb single at #1 in the list (undeservedly so IMO).
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:16 (sixteen years ago)
zeus; Just because everyone at Stylus loved it at the time - it was a single that seemed ubiquitous both on TV and radio where I was, and in the internet circles I moved in, especially the ones with Stylus writers. I'm glad it won because it's a very Stylus choice, if that makes sense.
I think, when you organise a list like this, you become very... comfortable, with the idea that the list is the product of consensus, and thus not going to be very close to your own choices. Or, at least, very much less enraged by "where's my fucking favourite, are you saying I don't matter?!" thoughts.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:17 (sixteen years ago)
ideally i'd like my favourite music to sell well and get critical respect
this seems like a rubbish objection
― plaxico (I know, right?), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:17 (sixteen years ago)
Lex; I thought Stylus was some poncey Wire-esque publication when I started writing for it, dealing mainly with uber-obscure and experimental electronic bollocks that no one buys. Obv. that changed quite a lot. I'd say that we were "independent"; take that how you like.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:18 (sixteen years ago)
like, so do the ppl who make these lists, which is why they picked music they liked, this seems kinda obvious
― plaxico (I know, right?), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:18 (sixteen years ago)
Lex; if people who want to write reasoned and intelligent and OTM criticism about r'n'b etc actually wrote it as much as people who want to write pointless verbiage about shitty ego-indie wrote that, then, y'know, it'd exist.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:21 (sixteen years ago)
i do and it does - you'll note that my main criticism has been of a needless, ill-thought-out bullshit swipe at an entire genre that barely makes sense
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:23 (sixteen years ago)
A "needless, ill-thought-out bullshit swipe at an entire genre" that doesn't exist, or, at least, isn't "needless, ill-thought-out bullshit swipe at an entire genre" at all, in the slightest; you taking umbrage at it only reveals your own hangups, not those of the writer. You're reading it as an affront when it's just an observation.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:25 (sixteen years ago)
Lex it's a really job you're not massively emotionally invested in indie bands in the way you are with rnb because the lazy swipes they get (usually two years after they were fashionable) would have you raging virtually day in day out.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:25 (sixteen years ago)
Remove Bookmark from this Thread
― Home Taping Is Killing Zack Morris (a hoy hoy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:26 (sixteen years ago)
Hi everyone what did I miss
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 January 2010 13:26 (sixteen years ago)
Radiohead won!
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:30 (sixteen years ago)
And R.Kelly.
And I, indie-fart that I am, was much happier about the latter winning than the former.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:31 (sixteen years ago)
but are you troubled or at least intrigued that the album top 20 features no RnB artist?
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:38 (sixteen years ago)
It's not stopping me sleeping.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:40 (sixteen years ago)
good, that would be OTT
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:42 (sixteen years ago)
"it's a singles genre"
― Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:54 (sixteen years ago)
btw its more an observation than a criticism and has been made of both Stylus and Pitchfork in the past. maybe the singles lists exclude as much as the albums lists really (its just that what is excluded or demoted differs between the two) but might be interesting to see if this decade they become closer matched.
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 8 January 2010 13:58 (sixteen years ago)
ok "Ante Up" in top 20 all is forgiven
― The Reverend, Friday, January 8, 2010 3:34 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
xp after reading the blurb, I take that back
― The Reverend, Friday, January 8, 2010 3:38 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i'm still scratching my head over the decision to list the remix instead of the original, and never once refer to it as the remix
― some dude, Friday, 8 January 2010 14:07 (sixteen years ago)
no fucking kidding. jesus.
― Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:09 (sixteen years ago)
btw feel free to take this as sour grapes since i wrote something like 70 reviews for Stylus and nobody thought to invite me to this party, but the fact that even in death Stylus has to keep reaffirming its also-ran status by doing a list with such a similar format and results as Pitchfork's is pretty fuckin' depressing and honestly the site's legacy deserves better
― some dude, Friday, 8 January 2010 14:11 (sixteen years ago)
Now that this is all over I'm welcome to discuss the site's "legacy," since, as I pointed out a little while ago upthread, other people clearly have different ideas than I do.
― Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:14 (sixteen years ago)
The similar format is because, well, they're lists; suggestions of innovative list format very much welcomed.
Similar results is because, well, more than a handful of Stylus writers moved onto Pitchfork!
You weren't invited because, well, I don't actually know who you are.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:15 (sixteen years ago)
Also many people were invited and had the email end up straight in their spam, sadly; we caught a few people via here, the ex-staff board, and word-of-mouth, but I'm sure other people slipped through.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:16 (sixteen years ago)
even i know who some dude is nick!
― Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:18 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah but I didn't know who YOU were for about six months. I'm still not sure; Henry?
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:18 (sixteen years ago)
burt_stanton
― Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:20 (sixteen years ago)
Karen T is Dom, if that helps
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:20 (sixteen years ago)
I know who Karen T is, Mr Ewing.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:22 (sixteen years ago)
i'm Marcello, duh-brain
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 8 January 2010 14:22 (sixteen years ago)
my name is A1 $hipley -- my staff board privs got revoked when I got too busy to keep doing album reviews on the reg, which was a matter of months before the site folded
― some dude, Friday, 8 January 2010 14:22 (sixteen years ago)
ok, that's enough. that's the fourth person i've been accused of being in the past week
i'd never heard of stylus until i started posting on this board tbh but from the regard it seems to be held in these parts i guess i was just hoping for a different looking upper eschelon
― Karen Tregaskin, Friday, 8 January 2010 14:24 (sixteen years ago)
ok fifth counting 'mr ewing' now
is anyone who they say they are around here? do you have any idea how weird this looks to a newbie?
― Karen Tregaskin, Friday, 8 January 2010 14:25 (sixteen years ago)