Aphex Twin's _Selected Ambient Works Volume II_ is ten years old

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (583 of them)
Windowlicker was released in 1999, only a couple of years before Drukqs. (ie not 6) I agree that if you were expecting (in Drukqs) a tour de force of his genius then you'd come up disappointed. Definitely not his strongest release, but a very good one none-the-less. (I can imagine he was pressured by Warp to do the double-album thing, or maybe his fame got the better of him and he overestimated his own work, or maybe he just felt like cashing in - who knows? There may even be some truth to his claims that he released Drukqs purely because he lost an mp3 player full of his unreleased tunes and wanted to get them released legally before they leaked to the net.)

Anyway, I'm not going to be an apologist for other peoples tastes. I've always felt that RDJ's real talent lies in his melodies/harmonies. While I really adore much of his drill'n'bass work, it's the underlying melodies of those tunes that really pushes me along. (in 'Meltphace 6', for one) When it comes to insane production skills and amazing break cutups I turn to Squarepusher who is purely virtuosic in his talents.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I can imagine he was pressured by Warp to do the double-album thing

Err, why? I heard he did it to get out of contractual obligations.

Baaderoni (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 10:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the reason I like Aphex is because he has good ideas. Before Druqks came out, each song had it's own gimmick. The noise that sounds like someone pushing a chair in "Alberto Balsam"; the Egyptian R'n'B of "Windowlicker"; the bouncing ball in "Bouncing Bucephalus Ball" - that's what I like best. Druqks just seemed to be lacking cute ideas which made it kind of boring. Really could have been cut down to a short album and that would've been worth it. I might even make an abridged version tonight that cuts out all the piano interludes apart from Avril 14th and sticks to the "decent bits".

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I heard he did it to get out of contractual obligations.

That's the kind of pressure I meant. Sorry if I was unclear.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)

It still sounds soooo good.

Russell Dixon (Skinny), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 13:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked Marcello's article; so much so that I drove up to St.Andrews and Anstruther and various other places in Fife to sit and listen to track 3.

Still in debt to this thread for finally getting into this record; it's a belter.

Keith Watson (kmw), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)

the pain in Drukqs is that is not bad, is simple second hand routine. To add more pain, if you select the five or six very beautiful tracks from that mass of thirthy, you would have had another perfect wonderful little masterpiece, like "come to daddy" or "windowlicker"

SAW II is the only album that i have perfectly heard while sleeping, which is scary. I think is one of the greatest recording of the (past) century. Volume 1 come very close.

francesco, Tuesday, 18 May 2004 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

four months pass...
Interesting, how so many are drawn to CD 1-Track 3/Rhubarb. It was the first to grab me...

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Sunday, 17 October 2004 05:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Who else has noticed their CDs are decomposing? Is it something to do with the artwork?

the music mole (colin s barrow), Sunday, 17 October 2004 05:39 (twenty-one years ago)

"SAW II is the only album that i have perfectly heard while sleeping, which is scary. I think is one of the greatest recording of the (past) century. Volume 1 come very close."

OTM, I still feel that the best way to listen to SAW II is while lying down in the dark at night.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 17 October 2004 05:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, it's dream music, the real deal.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Sunday, 17 October 2004 09:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Some of the tracks are 20 years old.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 17 October 2004 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

track 8 cd 2 is my favourite at the moment...
its bordering on being cheesy,but instead its just breathtakingly beautiful...

robin (robin), Sunday, 17 October 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

geir, do you mean tracks of the first selected ambient works album (85-92)?

that's one of my favourites too robin. i like how after a couple of tracks that are more about creating a creepy atmosphere, a really simple, childlike melody appears out of nowhere. it's what makes the album such a gripping listen.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Sunday, 17 October 2004 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

robin & weasel diesel are correct

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 17 October 2004 20:30 (twenty-one years ago)

i like ned's mention of "high church ritual and hush" in his piece linked above. d2 tr8 definitely sounds like something that would sound perfect played on an organ during a church service.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Sunday, 17 October 2004 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmmm. I was of course speaking of the first one.

(The second one I found too ambient - maybe be strange with me - of all people - missing a beat, but I did in the case of that one)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 17 October 2004 21:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I read once that the two discs sound great played simultaneously. I tried it for a few minutes and I rememer it being pretty, but then I realized that James probably conceived of this album as a three-parter, and so it couldn't have been intentional.

Maxwell von Bismarck (maxwell von bismarck), Sunday, 17 October 2004 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

One of the great things about Disc 2 Track 8 is the quiet swells of echoing crackling noises that come through every so often. I'm not sure if they're an actual intended effect or just digital distortion, but they're very nice

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 17 October 2004 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
Maybe someone else mentioned this upthread, but I just popped the album -- not listened to in eons -- into my iTunes here at the office (I'm on a bullshit Sunday shift....I'm virtually the only person in a building with thirty-something floors), and whay-hey!, the tracks have titles! Who knew?

"Cliffs"? "Radiator"? "Hexagon"? "Shiny Metal Rods"?

I stil remember the first time I heard this record. My friend Sean and I were dropping off a gorgeous friend of ours who had just started seeing a sleazy Scandiweigan guy named Sven who lived is a megahuge loft in Brooklyn and did lots of drugs. We'd been imploring with our friend all day not to date this guy, but she was smitten (he later knocked her up and abandoned her -- went back to whatever Nordic rockpile he climbed out from under, but I digress...) In any case, we pulled up to the guy's building -- in a then-desolate area of Brooklyn (not so anymore), and decided to escort our friend inside. On the way up the stairs, there was this HUGE, sound emanating from the floors above....just bizarre and otherwordly. We walked into Sven's huge, cavernous loft, and it was like a scene out of "Excalibur". Just weird shit all over the place, incense burning, really dim lights and candles everywhere, and this intensely beautiful but somewhat disconcertingly foreboding music playing. Sean and I stayed for a few moments. Our friend immediately vanished into a back area somewhere, no goodbyes or anything. I was too busy being creeped out/intrigued by the music. Before I could ask Sven (who hadn't gottten up when we came in, sitting at a long wooden table in a bizarre stupor) what was playing, Sean had grabbed my arm and was pulling me to the door. We left feeling hugely weirded out.

A couple of days later, I got a package from Sire records (I was writing for a few periodicals at the time, and used to be on several labels' mailing lists). At the time, I'd never heard of the Aphex Twin, but the cover art to this strange looking album looked like some ancient artefact prized from some interdimensional time capsule. I slipped the disc into my player and hit play, and intstantly knew what this was.....and it instantly gave me the same sort've creeps. It still does. And I love it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 23 October 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)

Maybe someone else mentioned this upthread, but I just popped the album -- not listened to in eons -- into my iTunes here at the office (I'm on a bullshit Sunday shift....I'm virtually the only person in a building with thirty-something floors), and whay-hey!, the tracks have titles! Who knew?

I've known this since I first got the CD! They got most of the titles wrong, though.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 23 October 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)

I kinda preferred it when they didn't have titles -- I liked the idea of people trying to discuss the album, and only being able to cite specific tracks by trying to mimic them or describe them ("Ummm...y'know, the one where it sounds llke your soul's anus is being fingered by laughing, headless baby dolls wearing butcher smocks")

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 23 October 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

bahahaha

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 23 October 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

Aren't the titles just things that fans made up?

KeefW (kmw), Sunday, 23 October 2005 20:11 (twenty years ago)

Is this out of print or something? I was just browsing Aphex stuff on eBay and it can go for an oddly large amount

DJ Mencap0))), Sunday, 23 October 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

This was actually the thread that first brought me to ILM. Or was it an Arthur Russell thread around the same time?

Bimble The Nimble, Jumped Over A Thimble! (Bimble...), Sunday, 23 October 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)

I think this thread is largely responsible for the album's high placement in the 90's poll last year (at least that's my pet theory about it).

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 October 2005 21:17 (twenty years ago)

Alex etc, yeh those aren't the real titles - just invented by fans so they could discuss the tracks online. The titles are based on the pictures on the inner sleeve. If you look at the diagrams then you'll see why.

I think the reason this cd goes for a lot of money is that Warp originally used a cheap cd manufacturer to print this as a double-cd and a lot of copies (mine included) will have started oxidising about 5 years ago.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 24 October 2005 06:13 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
"cliffs" is so beautiful

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 04:54 (twenty years ago)

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 05:05 (twenty years ago)

it's all about "stone in focus", the missing track (u.s. version)

snakeshit ;] (eman), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 05:58 (twenty years ago)

The new Knife record, although it sounds totally different, inspires similar feelings in me, terror mixed with awe and appreciation.

I was just reading Ned's review of a Black Tape for a Blue Girl album today; I would like to talk some ambient with him.

If he's listening, I would ask: I love my Aphex Twin SAWII, and I am in love with 'Tired Sounds of the Stars of the Lid," what should be next in that haunting, gorgeous vein?

Freud Junior (Freud Junior), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 06:09 (twenty years ago)

More records like Aphex Twin's "Selected Ambient Works 2"

snakeshit ;] (eman), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 06:12 (twenty years ago)

Has anyone met/talked to Richard before?

Freud Junior (Freud Junior), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 06:28 (twenty years ago)

"it's all about "stone in focus", the missing track (u.s. version)"

OTM. I remember losing my SAWII and DLing it and crying when it didn't have Stone in Focus. All is better now.

Suzy Creemcheese (SuzyCreemcheese), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 07:49 (twenty years ago)

I've been meaning to make myself a copy with "stone" restored to its proper place for ages. It's one of the 3 most beautiful tracks on there.

Abu Hamster (noodle vague), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 09:19 (twenty years ago)

I think the reason this cd goes for a lot of money is that Warp originally used a cheap cd manufacturer to print this as a double-cd and a lot of copies (mine included) will have started oxidising about 5 years ago.

Err. Have they fixed this? I'm ordering some junk from Warp soon, and I was going to do SAW II because for some damn reason the US track is missing "Stone in Focus," but if this is true I might just get it from Bleep...

telephone thing, Thursday, 23 February 2006 03:13 (twenty years ago)

This is where I perhaps obviously note that it sure would be nice if someone could YSI "Stone in Focus." Please. Thanks. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 February 2006 03:58 (twenty years ago)

Ned OTM. I never even knew about this song until now.

Lingbertt, Thursday, 23 February 2006 04:05 (twenty years ago)

comin' up

snakeshit ;] (eman), Thursday, 23 February 2006 04:10 (twenty years ago)

Thank 'ee.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 February 2006 04:15 (twenty years ago)

The only thing I ever had against Stone in Focus was that there is that wee little kh kh kh kh kh sound in the background - it took my first headphones listening to catch it. Almost ruined its perfection. Almost.

Suzy Creemcheese (SuzyCreemcheese), Thursday, 23 February 2006 04:17 (twenty years ago)

its found on the otherwise useless "excursions in ambience: the third dimension" comp. (ok seefeel is on it too, but the cover is ugly as shit and ive never been able to trade or sell it because its dinged up)

Aphex Twin - #19 (aka Stone in Focus)

i like that metronome sound!

snakeshit ;] (eman), Thursday, 23 February 2006 04:21 (twenty years ago)

i just recently bought this used for $7.00 after wanting it for such a long time. and i must say that it's pretty damn sweet.

Christopher Costello (CGC), Thursday, 23 February 2006 04:23 (twenty years ago)

"Excurisions in Ambience 3" is awesome! (but EiA4 is better)

and yes, "#19" is the best thing on SAWII

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 23 February 2006 04:24 (twenty years ago)

its found on the otherwise useless "excursions in ambience: the third dimension" comp

Ah, you know, then I did have this, because I used to have this around somewhere and definitely ripped it before I sold it. But this saves me the trouble of scrounging through the CDRs. ;-) Thanks!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 February 2006 04:27 (twenty years ago)

What do ye all think of Labradford?

Freud Junior (Freud Junior), Thursday, 23 February 2006 05:12 (twenty years ago)

Love 'em.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 February 2006 05:27 (twenty years ago)

C/D: Labradford, pre-Mi Media Naranja

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 23 February 2006 05:30 (twenty years ago)

thanks snakeshit

A. Lingbert (A. Lingbert), Thursday, 23 February 2006 06:53 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.