how was vanilla ice portrayed by the media?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (264 of them)
catchy doesn't equal good.(doesn't equal bad, either) in fact it's usual the most annoying, grating songs that get stuck in my head.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

that pic waay up-thread... is that Jim Carrey doing him on In Living Color?
Yeah. That clip is hysterical!

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:47 (nineteen years ago) link

iow, judging a song by its catchiness is just as meaningless as judging a rapper on his technical merits. meaningless in an objective sense, but it can still be very meaningful to someone individually. i mean, there's nothing inherently wrong with judging something on its catchiness or its virtuosity. some people prefer catchiness while some prefer virtuosity. (maybe it's just that virtuosity has been held to be superior to all else by so many critics for so long---even before rock n roll existed---and people are reacting against that)

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:50 (nineteen years ago) link

"He's not stupid...he just dupes it!"

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:51 (nineteen years ago) link

ALSO:

But in Vanilla Ice's case, his shortcomings give the whole record the obnoxious mood of a cipher attempting to be down and failing, not splendidly, but miserably.

OTfreakin'M.

Vanilla's only legacy is that he got a bunch of white kids interested in rap, many of whom did get move on to the more "legit" (quotations intentional) stuff. I was 16 when "Ice, Ice Baby" hit, and was already well into Rakim, KRS-One, Paris, etc. by that time, so Vanilla Ice just didn't do a thing for me.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:58 (nineteen years ago) link

He was actually a big part of what turned me off rap, I think.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Vanilla Ice was a mere herald of the true genius that was Snow.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I didn't set up catchiness as a criterion here; these posts did:

>no real lyrical hook<

>the only real hook in it is taken straight off a much better Queen/Bowie song

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:09 (nineteen years ago) link

And I have no idea why anybody would judge an artist (or even more so, an individual song) on the artist's "legacy" (though that may not actually be what tantrum is doing -- I couldn't really tell.)

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Snow's gonna lick ya boom boom DOWN!

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:13 (nineteen years ago) link

well then i guess i have no idea why you like the song. I assumed by contrasting it to 3rd Bass's "clunkiness", you liked it for its catchiness. I don't see why else one would like Ice, Ice Baby, actually.
Catchiness is a perfectly good criterion, but no better of one than mic skillz.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Were his mic skillz so horrible?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:18 (nineteen years ago) link

obviously chuck likes it because everyone else hates it.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, Tim.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:21 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm getting pretty tired of this "the public and critical consensus of a few years ago was just a conspiracy!" stuff. Vanilla really had skillz! Jimi couldn't play the guitar for shit! Elvis was really black!

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, "Obviously," Shakey.

And "everyone else" obviously includes the millions of people who bought the damn thing, right?

I've written about the song plenty in my second book, and elsewhere. There's a lot to love about it.

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Millions of people eat McDonald's and Taco Bell every day.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:25 (nineteen years ago) link

I like "Brooklyn Queens" better than "Ice Ice Baby". Actually, I wish I still had a copy of the Cactus Album. I would listen to it right now.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:25 (nineteen years ago) link

oh stop plugging yr book chuck. why would I pay for it when I can read yr drivel here for free? But so far, no one on this thread can figure out yr criteria for liking this song, so stopping stringing us along and come with the goods already...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:30 (nineteen years ago) link

And I have no idea why anybody would judge an artist (or even more so, an individual song) on the artist's "legacy" (though that may not actually be what tantrum is doing -- I couldn't really tell.)

No, what I'm saying is that Vanilla Ice's ability to bring rap to the mainstream in a way that hadn't been done at that time is the only thing about him that I personally find interesting. I found him laughable in his day and damn near unlistenable now.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:42 (nineteen years ago) link

"Vanilla Ice's ability to bring rap to the mainstream"

um, Run DMC/Aerosmith, and the Beastie Boys would like a word with you...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I found him laughable in his day and damn near unlistenable now.

Or rather, I found him laughable in his day and I FIND HIM damn near unlistenable now.


SCREAMING! SCREAMING FOR A PREVIEW BUTTON!!!

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I like the song. It's not just manufactured crap. It was some white kid who was genuinely into what he was doing, made a pretty good rap record, and had a big hit. I can't tell you how much more I like "Ice Ice Baby" than I like the Beastie Boys.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:46 (nineteen years ago) link

i mean, there's nothing inherently wrong with judging something on its catchiness or its virtuosity. some people prefer catchiness while some prefer virtuosity.

I think there's a problem in separating and isolating the two things here. I think "Ice Ice Baby" fails to be catchy because it lacks skills - the rap doesn't flow, the beats are too straight, there is little going on sonically to catch you aside from the bassline, which is catchy but which is taken straight off another song that had a lot more going for it. And I think "Triple Stage Darkness" is more catchy or affecting because it flows more rhythmically, both in the voice and beats and because there's more going on with the samples and how they're put together. That looped sax melody near the end is great. Maybe I should say "affecting" rather than "catchy" but I don't like virtuosity just for it's own sake - I like it as a tool that achieves something affective. I'm not an expert on rap technique so lots of people probably disagree with me (well they would even if I were an expert) - enough people liked IIB at the time! - but that's how it sounds to me.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:47 (nineteen years ago) link

um, Run DMC/Aerosmith, and the Beastie Boys would like a word with you...

Oh, without question!

I'm referring specifically to places like the horrible backwater town in which I grew up, which is why I said "in a way that hadn't been done before". I understand that most of Western civilization had heard at least some rap music by Vanilla Ice's inception. In places like my home town, though, rap, even in 1991 was still this somewhat new-fangled invention by them there "colored" folk.

(And I'm not exaggerating - growing up I heard "colored" as much as I heard the n-word. Canucks who love to trumpet our country's supposed lack of racism have no idea of what they're talking about.)

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 18:52 (nineteen years ago) link

See, Sundar, "Ice Ice Baby" came out a time when rap was sounding increasingly slow and mellow, and (in the wake of Rakim etc.) was getting increasingly humorless and self-important and obsessed with sounding "complex" or "relevant", and was denying its beginnings as straightfowardly catchy dance music, and "ice ice" went completely against the grain of all that. It's all forward motion, and the ominous iciness of the queen/bowie hook lets vanilla skate ahead, punching out hook after hook all through. it totally improved on "under pressure," which had a horrible stentorian self-parody of a bowie vocal (after his voice had totally given up on the swishy glammy falsetto that had once made him great and he'd started singing like some sisters of mercy dork) and no forward motion whatsoever. but it used the austereness of that sampled music the way, say, grandmaster flash used liquid liquid's "optimo" (or "cavern," i always forget which) in "white lines" -- there really is something cool and sleek about "ice ice baby." but not cool and sleek in a DETACHED way. vanilla's voice is all energy. he wasn't making some adult-contemporary quiet storm, which is what rap seemed to me to be turning into; he wasn't trying to sound respectable. so he rocked and rolled the mike like neither bowie nor freddie mercury had in years. he did for rap music what white teen-idol phoney frankie ford had done for new orleans r&b with "sea cruise" decades earlier. and i'm not sure if ice was *trying* to be funny or not, but who cares; it was a funny record. and a tough one, too. and he wasn't posturing any more than most gangsta rappers. but he also wasn't making music for your granny. and his nines and shells and guages weren't the main point of the song - they snuck up on you, like what used to happen in real early rap songs by trickeration or spoonie gee, say. they snuck up like violence does in real life. they were LESS of a shtick than most gangsta rap. the bubblegum of the sound made them feel MORE real.

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 19:27 (nineteen years ago) link

So at a time when sonic complexity (like the complexity that drew you to 3rd Bass) was becoming the rap norm if not a total cliche, the straighforwardness of "ice ice baby" was *refreshing*, at least to me -- sort of like, I dunno, AC/DC in the midst of prog-rock, maybe.

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 19:33 (nineteen years ago) link

it's true that "relevant" and "complex" hip hop was getting most of the attention (because it was something somewhat new and different, and like you said, the dance/party stuff had been around since the beginning) and respect back then, but there was plenty of fun, party-oriented stuff made around that time, and most of it was better than ice ice baby.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 19:40 (nineteen years ago) link

You do make it sound really good, so much so that I'll go and download it a second time to try to hear it from a different perspective. I'd probably still take "Bust a Move" myself but I will listen again.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 19:45 (nineteen years ago) link

just for chuck:
Here's Roni.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 19:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I was just gonna mention "Bust A Move".
And Digital Underground!
And Del! Who was/is "complex" AND fun.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:18 (nineteen years ago) link

""Ice Ice Baby" came out a time when rap was sounding increasingly slow and mellow, and (in the wake of Rakim etc.) was getting increasingly humorless and self-important and obsessed with sounding "complex" or "relevant", "

as usual, this is 100% grade-A balonium. Rap during Vanilla Ice's day was not dominated by humorless, "complex" artists, especially not on the charts and radio - see MC Hammer, Digital Underground, Fresh Prince, Salt n Pepa, Tone Loc, Young MC, ad nauseam.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Haven't we had this comparing-Rakim-to-prog argument before? Or maybe I just read about it but wasn't involved in it.

People love Rakim because of his personality, not his "skillz". His skills INFORM his personality - his character was all about talking about how badass a rhymer he was, and he backed it up w/ techincal ability.

Shakey's list of fun rappers aside, I don't see hip-hop of this time as being "humorless and self-important" "quiet storm adult contemporary" at ALL and I think the accusation is baseless and ludicrous.

I also don't understand why you feel the need to tear down the old "hip-hop canon" (a canon that has been underappreciated by the mainstream of critical thought as it is) in order to prop up this joke of a song that - while I certainly understand why some ppl like it - is not somehow INHERENTLY better than 3rd Bass just because it embraces a fun party aesthetic, ESPECIALLY because there were much better fun party songs going on at the time (see Shakey's list).

By the way Chuck I bought yr book ("accidental evolution"...) a few days ago and just got it in the mail and am very interested in reading it.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

ILM - Where fun rules with an iron fist

who posted that a while back?

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Did Maestro Fresh-Wes make it Stateside at all? "Let Your Backbone Slide" was awesome.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Part of what I love so much about current hip-hop is that it has managed to meld the party aesthetic with the "serious" themes (themes chuck might call "humorless and self-important," though I still disagree about that characterization).

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:32 (nineteen years ago) link

And Chuck, you like to rail against the "dinosaurs" or early 90s hip-hop like Tribe but Tribe was all about fun, none of their lyrics were self-important and you could hardly call it humorless! It wasn't concerned w/ "complexity" either - in fact I often wonder how modern "undie" heads take complexity etc. so seriously but still talk about how tribe is "classic" (the power of the canon I suppose, haha).

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link

see, i think i just got so sick of ice ice baby cuz they played that video so many damned times. i would never play it on my own. but i could listen to ton loc or young mc ANY DAY of the week cuz i love those beats so much. or even Everlast's i got the knack which i love. even though it didn't improve upon my sharona.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked Rakim okay; I just hate his legacy.

And I found Young MC, Tone Loc, etc, (and even more so Real Roxanne, Roxanne Shante, L'Trimm, EPMD, etc.) (and later Kris Kross, House of Pain, etc.) refreshing as well. I never said "Ice Ice Baby" was the only rap record I liked at the time. But it still wasn't too hard to notice the full-of-itself/anti-dance direction rap was heading back then (and sorry, but stuff like KRS-One and the first Tribe Called Quest album *did* feel like adult contemporary quiet storm -- the latter's fun seemed as labored to me as an indie rock band. And the whole "look at us we're sampling Lou Reed and jazz and stuff" shtick *was* about proving how complex their music was. But I've said this a zillion times already; probably no need to say it again.) Anyway:

Technique in Rap and Rock

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link

>Part of what I love so much about current hip-hop is that it has managed to meld the party aesthetic with the "serious" themes<

I like this about current hip-hop (and early hip-hop) too! What I didn't like in the '90s is how much the "serious" stuff took over.

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, you should have been at my house. I was sitting around watching "hair or weave?" and 'your mama's on crack rock" on video all day long. although i did play the jungle brothers a lot too. though i always thought they were one of the best groups to merge fun/serious.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

although, i've already said on other threads (i think) that mid-90's rap is my dead zone. post-death certificate, i guess. or maybe post-chronic. somewhere in the mid 90's i lost touch. i picked up the ball again in the late 90's with the rise of the undies and the crunkies.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 20:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck I think Tribe was more about expanding hip-hop's palette as far as production, not in terms of complexity but moving beyond the James Brown oversampling that had started to choke the music at that time. And i never really think of it as being self-consciously "intellectual" cuz it was a grassroots, populist movement from producers during this period all over (Large Pro, Pete Rock, DITC, Premier, Beatnuts, etc. etc. etc. etc.) - it was partly because technology allowed artists to DO more with samples, and partly just the overuse of the same breaks. It was quite a productive period that resulted in great music that I love - I don't see why hip-hop should be limited to such strict party themes. The whole "fun rules with an iron fist" thing.

Since then - the mid 90s period on I suppose - the crate-digging thing became very much about the obscurity of the sample, a navel-gazing excersize that choked creativity and shunned the dancefloor (and subsequently lost its long-term critical cachet). But at the time, crate digging wasn't this cultish, elitist thing, it was very much about finding new sounds, producing in fresh ways, and taking advantage of new technology.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

> I don't see why hip-hop should be limited to such strict party themes<

It shouldn't, and it never was, not even in 1981. In fact, I've been saying just the opposite (incl. in my description of "Ice Ice Baby.)

But Scott has a point -- if I had been listening to more Bobby Jimmy and Critters and Maggotron albums, I wouldn't have been complaining!

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 21:09 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think hip hop was dominated by the serious. Like I said, maybe the attention paid to it by the mainstream was focused on Public Enemy et al. and it was notable because it was a new direction, different from the party vibe that dominated up til that point. So it stuck out, made the headlines, but was far from being the only game in town.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm a little surprised at the idea of Rakim being thought of as "humourless". His rhymes and persona may have radiated a studied cool, but most of his singles were as fun and danceable as anything else out at the time. (Try NOT moving during "Move The Crowd", "Let The Rhythm Hit 'Em", or "I Know You Got Soul".)
Ditto Public Enemy, who, despite their political leanings, still knew that they had to make people move.

And Chuck, when you say you hate Rakim's legacy, what are you referring to? (Not trolling or flaming, just curious...)

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Again, Tantrum, look here:

Technique in Rap and Rock

Basically, I think Rakim (intentionally or uninentionally -- again, i do like his early music) helped instigate in rap a virtuosity fetish that helped ensure people arguing over "which rapper has the best skills" would wind up boring and ulitimately deadening as your average guitar magazine. and this really hurt the music a lot.

chuck, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 22:12 (nineteen years ago) link

and sorry, but stuff like KRS-One ... *did* feel like adult contemporary quiet storm

When? In 86? or in 91? and how?

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 22:28 (nineteen years ago) link

He's probably referring to the Temple of Hip Hop "respect your elders" stuff that KRS spouted, then and now.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 22:30 (nineteen years ago) link

so far all chuck's "excuses" for championing this song have fallen flat. Sounds like NWA? No. Unique party-rap single in a sea of humorless, self-absorbed, seriousness? No. Made cartoonish violence interesting by sticking it in a bubblegum wrapper? Um, hardly (tho this is actually the one point of chuck's I understand the least). But I would like to reiterate that chuck's contention that the nature of this single set it apart from the dominant forms of rap at the time is total revisionist garbage. The only thing that set it apart from other fluff-rap singles of the day was, um, the guy was WHITE. But chuck probably thinks the whole racism aspect of VI's ascension is a red herring...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 14 September 2004 22:33 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.