I can't get up much righteous ire at the idea of her wearing it when the emo/punk kids at my high school are wearing it too. You can either say "It's fashion and you're only into punk because all of your friends are," or "how neat that you and your friends found out about this interesting music you'd never heard before." I can't see any of them going "oh maybe Shania's not so bad, I should try listening to her," though, they'd just all yell "POSER, I HATE HER!" so it can't be a very good promotional strategy.
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 01:48 (twenty-three years ago)
well, I meant recognizably from a distance! :p Anyway, this Atomic Kitten thing disturbs me way more for some reason (dammit, why should I even give a shit about what people's shirts say??) There's some sort of unwritten (oh it's prob. been written by now on the band t-shirt etiquette thread) thing about wearing your band shirt sincerely vs. ironically, which is somehow being violated here and driving me insane ARGH
― Poppy (poppy), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 02:08 (twenty-three years ago)
Worrying that Shania's Ramones shirt "demeans" punk concedes that Shania is stronger than the Ramones.
Which I actually think she is, but then I don't particularly mind. Remember Joey (?) supported Reagan but Shania won the "world's sexiest vegetarian award" one year (i shit you not).
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 05:12 (twenty-three years ago)
She's giving a metaphorical finger to those who despise her work, and the righteous ire shown by those who find her appropriation of these images is just more fire in her belly. As they used to say, if you wan't to defeat your enemy sing their song.
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 09:47 (twenty-three years ago)
..and don't talk about fire in Shania's belly so early in the morning... I have to scroll up to take a look at it.
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 12:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 12:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 02:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 02:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 15:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 16:07 (twenty-three years ago)
well if its just a couple of pics this theory won't work will it.
is anyone going to find out in how many pics is shania wearing a ramones t-shirt?
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)
whereas if she wears it on several pics then maybe ppl will find out I'm sure.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:37 (twenty-three years ago)
In fact I predict that within the next twenty-four months major American retail chains such as the Gap and Old Navy will be selling distressed t-shirts featuring faux-vintage rock art (but either no band specified or one made up); probably sooner, as you can already buy the standard Ramones or CBGBs t-shirts at Urban Outfitters.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 17:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 18:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 18:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 18:59 (twenty-three years ago)
.. I can't wait for this, if the band names are indeed made up. "Happy Rock Fire Bang"
― dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 19:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 19:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 19:02 (twenty-three years ago)
there's nothing intrinsically ridiculous about shania growing to like the music of the ramones, even a lot, for exactly the reason you give custos
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 19:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 19:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 19:50 (twenty-three years ago)
Yes -- the passion of people unaware of options of SUPERIOR quality.
"trying to apply your tiresome cock-rock standards as a universal norm is just dumb."
Hey Tom -- UP YOURS! By this point, you should know my tastes run well beyond 'tiresome cock-rock'. That was wholly unecessary.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)
Right?
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)
... except for vocals.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:15 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)
Plus that "Getcha Good" song is pretty spiffy.
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:19 (twenty-three years ago)
No, there is no secret catch. The Ramones and AC/DC shirts (whether they were Shania's doing, or -- in all likelihood -- some stylist's) are just crass tools to juxtapose the country-pop diva with genres she has really has nothing to do with (any argument there?) for the sake of fresh take beyond: "here's Shania in a tank top" or "here's Shania in a leopard skin jumpsuit" or "here's Shania with a cowboy hat on." It's just that the appropriation is offensive to we that take the iconography she's adopted a bit more serioulsy (then we arguably should). No apologies here either!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:22 (twenty-three years ago)
Your fiancee's tastes are your own problem, Tom.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:27 (twenty-three years ago)
Oh come on Alex, THAT is fucked. I didn't see Tom saying anything about what your significant other thinks of your taste.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:30 (twenty-three years ago)
Her husband's tastes are her own problem, Ned. (And ours).
I'm not offended at all by that - but the fact is Alex claimed that if Shania fans were exposed to superior options they wouldn't be as passionate about Shania. Now I happen to know a Shania fan very well and offered to test this claim: why Alex would turn down such a challenge I have no idea!
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 20:38 (twenty-three years ago)