― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 00:32 (eighteen years ago) link
"a specific line" like THE FUCKING TITLE OF THE SONG
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 00:35 (eighteen years ago) link
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 00:38 (eighteen years ago) link
Banana is completely OTM.
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 00:40 (eighteen years ago) link
I'm still waiting for you to do the latter.
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 00:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 00:52 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 01:00 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 01:02 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 01:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 01:07 (eighteen years ago) link
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 01:08 (eighteen years ago) link
And if you re-read the sentence (and the thread) its pretty clear I'm not accusing you of anything.
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 01:40 (eighteen years ago) link
By a very slight margin, but bear in mind that it cost TONS more to make andTONS AND TONS more to promote - the return on the investment in it washer poorest yet. So far, this has been true for each album.
> It seems like she's gained new fans to make up for those crying betrayal. It > will hurt though when she realizes that these new fans are just as fickle as > the indie fans.
I think she's always "traded even" - gaining (roughly) one new fan for every oneshe's lost. But I think her ruin will be from the fact that it's been an expensive process, and therefore dangerous in careerist terms. She (and Capitol) really believed that the last record would sell millions, and they spent an inordinateamount of cash to make this happen. Barring greater success on this record,you will either see Liz abandon music (she doesn't care enough about it for tocontinue for its own sake) or totally retread.
― Dee Xtrovert (dee dee), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:48 (eighteen years ago) link
I hate to break up the Prince dialogue but I have to track back to a point:
"Now I'm just trying to figure out if "singles" is a term that's not understood by the general population and thus needs to be defined in a NYT article."
I don't assume the general population realizes that certain songs are specifically crafted and tailored to the MOR (with top-tier artists, often with the involvement of guest writers like Diane Warren or Desmond Child) while other album tracks are by process closer to the artist's original intent.
So yes, the NYT had a good point in operationally defining "singles."
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:59 (eighteen years ago) link
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 04:16 (eighteen years ago) link
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 04:17 (eighteen years ago) link
Joe’s Pub, 425 Lafayette St. (betw. E. 4th St. & Astor Pl.), 212-539-8778; 7, $25/adv., $30/door
― Dr. Glen Y. Abreu (dr g), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 04:19 (eighteen years ago) link
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 04:26 (eighteen years ago) link
--- A.D. Amorosi
― Dr. Glen Y. Abreu (dr g), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 04:32 (eighteen years ago) link
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 04:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― nickn (nickn), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 04:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:02 (eighteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― Douglas (Douglas), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:11 (eighteen years ago) link
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:15 (eighteen years ago) link
that's much nicer than the recent indie trend of giving songs totally opaque song titles. although maybe this is not such a recent trend, and not necessarily indie either.
"One Thing She Did In the Early Days That I Miss" "I Hate To Break Up the Prince Dialogue But I Have To Track Back To A Point""Although Maybe This Is Not Such A Recent Trend""The Whole Thing Had A Pleasing Concision To It" "I Am Just A Big Talker and I Happen To Enjoy Spinning My Wheels" "I Don't Know This Guy From Adam But I'll Call Him Out"It's About To Snap At Any Moment""Christ, She's On A Major"A Diva Without Portfolio Or A Sly Genius, Depending"Dude She's Looking For Someone To Take Care Of Her Kids"
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:24 (eighteen years ago) link
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:27 (eighteen years ago) link
Don't ask me to rationally defend this distinction, because I can't, but there it is.
― M. V. (M.V.), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:36 (eighteen years ago) link
those are great song titles.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:38 (eighteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 06:06 (eighteen years ago) link
haha oh boy
1) I conceded the what-those-songs-were-about a good while ago re Phair2) the discussion moved toward Prince3) I disagreed with some of the interpretive stuff in re: Prince based on things I've spent years thinking about, most of which is understandable enough but I've always heard them in different ways4) this has jackshit to do with the Phair songs from earlier, whose content I conceded I probably misheard/remembered
there. is that basic enough for you?
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 07:40 (eighteen years ago) link
And collaboratating with Dianne Warren and Desmond Child to craft singles wouldn't be closer to an artist's original intent?
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 10:11 (eighteen years ago) link
Well, since Phair's songwriting shares exactly no aesthetic qualitites with Warren's (Desmond Child) - thematically, melodically, what have you - it's curious enough to warrant a "what's this about, then?" Like, if David Hockney suddenly announced a collaboration with Mark Kostabi (not that Phair's a Hockey nor Warren a Kostabi). There isn't much in Phair's catalogue that suggests an aesthetic kinship with Dianne Warren, so questioning whether the collaboration intends to explore some artistic connections or simply to "reach more listeners" (i.e. "make her songwriting more palatable to the broader audience that Warren has repeatedly demonstrated an ability to reach") seems fair.
Of course, the "debate" on "rockism" (which in its current incarnation is neither a debate, nor about rockism; it's public preening about social positioning) might argue that to decry artistic collaborations that are specifically about cold, hard cash is "naive," etc. But just because it's perfectly fine for art to be about commerce (it is!) doesn't mean that success is good simply by virtue of being profitable. Capitalism's all right (maybe), in other words; Wal-Mart's still a shitty store, and Phair/Warren's a dumb idea by any measure other than "hey, fuck, we could really sell some records if we got Dianne Warren on board!"
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 10:56 (eighteen years ago) link
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 11:22 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 11:31 (eighteen years ago) link
omg please have her release that!
― latebloomer: i hate myself and want to fly (latebloomer), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 11:39 (eighteen years ago) link
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:20 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:28 (eighteen years ago) link
http://www.patfullerton.com/superman/pix/phantomzone/generalzod.jpg
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:30 (eighteen years ago) link
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:34 (eighteen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:42 (eighteen years ago) link
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:55 (eighteen years ago) link
Liz & friends give oral history of Exile in Guyvillehttp://www.spin.com/articles/liz-phair-exile-in-guyville-oral-history-best-1993/
Phair: I can remember listening to [Guyville] in my apartment and thinking it sounded amazing. I was so proud and felt a rush of power because I had done something I knew was good. Listening back at my parents' house, privately, feeling terrified that my two worlds would collide and it was not going to be pretty. I had kept them separate. It would blow my cover.
― free your spirit pig (La Lechera), Monday, 24 June 2013 14:51 (ten years ago) link
Even more novel and exciting was the fact that Guyville was, in both form and concept, a rookie's rogue retort to classic rock: Phair conceived it as a track-by-track response to one of the pinnacles of swaggering musical masculinity, the Rolling Stones' Exile On Main St
I think I posted this on another thread, but a few days before it was released, she was interviewed on WXRT in Chicago. The interviewer asked if this was a response to the Stones record. Phair said she hadn't heard Main St. until after recording Guyville, and only knew it by name. The interviewer pointed out that Guyville had the same number of tracks as Main St.. Phair: "Really?! That's so weird. What a random coincidence."
― Esperanto, why don't you come to your senses? (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Monday, 24 June 2013 15:04 (ten years ago) link
= she was trolling xrt?
― free your spirit pig (La Lechera), Monday, 24 June 2013 15:05 (ten years ago) link