― Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)
You really don't get it, do you? Last time for real:
While still very popular (for it's "niche" etc), TPP was initially harmed by stylistic comparisons to Endtroducing due to its willingness to deliver something more unexpected, COMPARISONS THAT WERE THEN REFLECTED FAVOURABLY, MOSTLY BY FANS, TO THE DEBUT ALBUM THAT WAS RELEASED IN THE SAME TIME-SPAN BY A HITHERTO-MOSTLY UNKNOWN, LIKE-MINDED ARTIST WHO REFLECTED A LOT OF THE STYLISTIC QUALITIES OF THE OTHER ARTIST'S PREVIOUS ALBUM AND THEREBY EXCEEDING THE SALES AND PROFILE EXPECTATIONS FOR DEADRINGER THAN WAS EVEN EXPECTED.
Now, either you get it now or you never will.
Probably not as big as Messrs Yorke and Ashcroft though.
Or the huge marketing campaign, the usual Mo' Wax collectability shenanigans, the touring, the increasing profile of the label and their star find...
I don't disagree with you here, but this IS the weakest singles market ever so all things are relative.
Right, so this - the mainstream pop landscape has changed a lot in the four intervening years - is in fact so relative an occurence it's not a major issue then? Or it is? Which is it? I didn't see 'One More Time' at no.1. And for all the change you're citing, these singles are doing a lot better than 'Plug It In' or 'Stupidisco' (irregardless of quality, overreacters).
I think what I'm essentially getting at is that even if Daft Punk had released Discovery II this week there is no guarantee at all that the record would sell any better than Human After All, let alone Discovery.
Well, Discovery II would by definition contain some enjoyable populist dance tunes. Think that'd help any?
x-p: Ro, the only people making that big a deal out of it are you and Matt, and that comes with your (continuing) cluelessness anyway.
― BARMS, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Guile, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― BARMS, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)
(xpost - I still wuv Barima though)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
Superpitcher, on a very special edition of Cribs
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't believe the relative fortunes or receptions of these records are linked
Yes, but neither did I, you know?
I don't think most hardcore DP fans really need to be bailed out by some forthcoming album.
Well, surely not - that's not necessarily absolute either, all the hardcore fans buying/loving it, I mean, but the supposition wasn't about them anyway. I'm wondering about the less hardcore, who may also be partly comprised of the Discovery fans, and by that I mean the Discovery fans who don't care for or about Homework (potential Cut Copy buyers). Or! the Homework fans who didn't care for Discovery and may still not be so taken with HAA (potential Vitalic/Black Strobe buyers). I don't claim any of these fan subsets to be vocal majorities and neither do I deny an overlap of fans for all dance outfits included.
― BARMS, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― BARMS, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― BARMS, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)
OK, I admit it, I gave it a 4/10. Because at least it's better than Palookaville.
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 18:19 (twenty-one years ago)
(Antipathy not worth noting, really, there's enough going round for DP anyway and there's plenty of BLNL love on the Cut Copy thread)
― Deerninja B4rim4, Plus-Tech Whizz Kid (Barima), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)
race you to the bottom!
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)
the reviews and parts of this thread are far more depressing/disappointing than the album itself. they're all falling over themselves to see who can be the first to give it a 1/10 or find the cleverest way to say how gutted they are and we should be at it's tossed-off-ness. i'll be in my room with it cranked and moving my body cuz i can't help it and every few minutes i'll say out loud to thomas and guy-m., "you dudes are fuckin sick! this is some sick shit!" -- andrew m.
― sleep (sleep), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm still not feeling this album. And as much as I'd like to have faith in DP, I can't bring myself to buy into the stylus review's angle.
― sleep (sleep), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)
This is the same thing someone was pulling on the MIA thread, though. The whole "You guys don't allow anyone to express an opinion different to yours", as if anyone here is in a position to inhibit anyone else's views being expressed. It's just argument - get over it!
People seem to love the victim vs. mob status so much they seem to fall over themselves claiming it, sometimes people from the opposite camps at the same time, as here.
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)
I still think it's neat, doesn't get boring at all after repeated listenings and I love to spin mad theories about it.
Now as for that falling over to give it bad reviews bit. Someone like Mark has been gutted for months and that's some honest disappointment he writes about. But really some of the newspaper reviews totally read like "oh man I've been waiting for this chance for a long while." Hey, you don't like it, great, but what depresses me is how little effort some make to analyze this album beyond "repetition. boring. they made it in two days. they lost it. insert crap one-liner."
― Omar (Omar), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)
Now THAT'S an interesting new precedent - brand new Daft Punk fans. Cool.
Dude, we're talking about newspaper reviews.
Mind you, I reckon Nate, for example, has made an effort to go beyond that and he still finds HAA wanting. That's a dodgy generalisation to make.
― Deerninja B4rim4, Plus-Tech Whizz Kid (Barima), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)
It's true though. Dude.
That's a dodgy generalisation to make.
Talking to me? :) err...just in case, I didn't make any generalisation did I? (I'm going "some this", "some that." )
― Omar (Omar), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)
Some of the reviews I've read do possess a rather boring "so the emperor really DOES have no clothes" air of anti-DP triumphalism - basically by people who think both Discovery and HAA are superficial conceptual jokes, only this time the masses won't be taken in.
I don't need to hear the new album to know that this is wrong obv.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 22:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― green uno skip card (ex machina), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 23:02 (twenty-one years ago)
It would be one thing if this came out after Homework, but it just so happened to come out after one of the best pop albums of the decade. Which for tons of people makes HAA's lack of tunes and proper songcraft unacceptable — for me, it makes this intentional. And pretty brave.
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
(PS: I hope Wolf Eyes' next album sounds like Franz Ferdinand.)
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)
I like how the Pfork review of HAA is as tossed off as the album is.
(that said, I find HAA a bit average with some good bits)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dr. Eldon Tyrell (ex machina), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost
― Dr. Eldon Tyrell (ex machina), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)
Christ, I could forgive you if you were, I don't know, funny or something.
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:27 (twenty-one years ago)
(xpost: good idea)
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:29 (twenty-one years ago)