theo parrish s/d

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1100 of them)
Vibes is at 14500 W 8 Mile Rd. in Oak Park; call 248-967-9904 for hours and more information.

Display Name, Thursday, 26 April 2007 03:15 (nineteen years ago)

Don't want to fall into initial listen hyperbole or anything but I finally got this, and it sounds like a masterpiece. Utterly focused and completely on point.

matt2, Wednesday, 2 May 2007 03:07 (nineteen years ago)

C'mon, surely someone else wants to gush with me. This is the first time in quite a while I've completely abandoned my frantic blog downloading because I'm totally content to just sit and listen to this. The immediate standout to me is "The Rink" aka Moodymann Tribute as Ugly Edit. That's gotta be a Marvin sample. And the last disc is perfect. "Soul Control" is a great almost straight-up house tune with great vocals and "Synthetic Flemm" (with Omar S) bangs bangs bangs with acid-y flourishes and is a great kinda-followup to the also great "Renaissance" by T.O.M. Project.

As I said, though, something about this just feels so focused and tight.

matt2, Thursday, 3 May 2007 19:30 (nineteen years ago)

Sounds like I could gush along, but I'm not gonna hurry and find/blag it.

blunt, Thursday, 3 May 2007 19:36 (nineteen years ago)

no one can afford it!!

resolved, Thursday, 3 May 2007 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

It is annoyingly difficult to find and expensive when found. But like gnippiks linked above, it is at least available at Emporium50.

matt2, Thursday, 3 May 2007 20:45 (nineteen years ago)

I think it'll be out on CD soon, no? I really can't afford the $30+ at the moment

Michael F Gill, Thursday, 3 May 2007 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

One would hope. I would like to have a high quality digital version, but it's always hard to know what to expect.

matt2, Thursday, 3 May 2007 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

how is the pressing?

tricky, Friday, 4 May 2007 03:30 (nineteen years ago)

this is sounding pretty great. of course the sample cuts off just enough to whet the anticipation even more.

tricky, Friday, 4 May 2007 03:34 (nineteen years ago)

WHEN THE MORNING COMES on apricot. CLASSIC.

Jah Q Areas, Friday, 4 May 2007 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I saw that Omar S/Theo release too. Luckily Omar S makes his FXHE easier and cheaper to get off the FXHE website as long as it's in stock.

The pressing on the Theo album sounds pretty great to me. Lots of low end thump and crystal clear on the high end.

matt2, Friday, 4 May 2007 16:06 (nineteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

THE RINK

am0n, Sunday, 27 May 2007 16:16 (nineteen years ago)

so rad

pretzel walrus, Sunday, 27 May 2007 16:45 (nineteen years ago)

at gramaphone they said this was sold out and they're waiting for a repressing :-(

deej, Monday, 28 May 2007 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

Most recent favorite on is "They Say." Still loving this.

matt2, Monday, 28 May 2007 03:58 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...

"a slow lurching shuffley house groove replete with out of time massively swung hi hats and a guy singing "we're going downstairs, we're going downstairs" or something for like 15 minutes."

YO did anyone ever get an id on this?

r1o natsume, Thursday, 16 August 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

You should try to ask here r1o:

http://www.djhistory.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18983

Sorry I can't help

matt2, Friday, 17 August 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

two months pass...

Theo Parrish!

admrl, Tuesday, 6 November 2007 01:38 (eighteen years ago)

s: the two 'Essential Selections' 12"s with Marcellus Pittman !!!

resolved, Tuesday, 6 November 2007 11:35 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, do search them. I've been particularly enjoying "Equality of Patience" off volume two recently.

matt2, Tuesday, 6 November 2007 16:30 (eighteen years ago)

theo is the man, i have nearly everything he's ever done. my favorite underrated thing he did is this:

http://www.discogs.com/release/114976

pipecock, Wednesday, 7 November 2007 00:14 (eighteen years ago)

this is really good. i'd never heard the origial 'falling up' before getting it!

thee local shoppe had a copy of 'sound sculptures vol 1' last time i was in. wonder if it'll still be there next time. that 'synthetic flemm' track is siiiick.

haitch, Wednesday, 7 November 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)

"Synthetic Flemm", "Soul Control", "They Say", and "The Rink" are ALL sick but in different ways. I'd recommend getting it as soon as possible. Thanks for the recommendation on that Skooby Laposky pipecock. I'm checking it out on Emusic now.

matt2, Wednesday, 7 November 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

the original is nicer than the CC remix

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 7 November 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)

"the original is nicer than the CC remix

-- moonship journey to baja"

assuming youre talking about falling up, i agree wholeheartedly. i was one of those people hammering on the original off the beatdown comp years before the rmxes. i liked the C2 rmx when it dropped, but it was not stellar enough to stand up to the repeated plays that it got. now i want to buy that double pack just to get the original on a full sided pressing! the technasia rmxes were embarassingly bad, too. ick.

pipecock, Wednesday, 7 November 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, I wish that release was just the original and the CC remix cause I heard the Chateau Flight Remix and it just seemed kinda pointless.

matt2, Wednesday, 7 November 2007 17:14 (eighteen years ago)

Anybody know anything about this: http://www.discogs.com/release/1114923. I want it right now.

matt2, Thursday, 15 November 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

"Anybody know anything about this: http://www.discogs.com/release/1114923. I want it right now.

-- matt2"

yeah i need to get that one myself, i really liked the Duminie 12" on sound signature, some nice sounds on that joint......

pipecock, Friday, 16 November 2007 00:34 (eighteen years ago)

three months pass...

Holy shit! Look at the expanded version of Sound Sculptures, Vol. 1:

http://www.ustem.org/dopejams/index.php?page=shop.product_details&category_id=37&flypage=shop.flypage&product_id=2479&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=33

Hideous link, I hope it works. I can not wait.

matt2, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 04:49 (eighteen years ago)

And it looks like it's going to contain the "Goin Downstairs" track folks were talking about upthread. Again, very excited about this.

matt2, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

^^^
Why I didn't include the original release in my '07 year-end poll ballots/lists (as with Newwworldaquarium's Dead Bears).

Andy K, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:39 (eighteen years ago)

Ah, so you knew this was coming in expanded form? I heard that a cd version was coming but I didn't expect this. Someone on his myspace already did the tell-me-it-isn't-so about there being tracks on the cd that weren't released on vinyl.

matt2, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:46 (eighteen years ago)

the vinyl that is out is called "volume 1" and the pic on that page is of the vinyl cover (you can see the vinyl catalogue numbers). its possible the CD contains all of what could be "volume 2" on a later vinyl release, that seems to be the way he does things (like with the First Floor LP/CD). the 3 chairs album on CD has tracks on it that did not come out on wax, though none of them was as good as that in the basement jam. i NEED that shit on wax.

pipecock, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, I can't imagine that one not showing up on vinyl at some point. I'll bet you might be onto something with the Vol 2 bit.

matt2, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:37 (eighteen years ago)

More an educated hunch (as noted by pipecock, it tends to be his MO with diff't formats), matt2.

Andy K, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:40 (eighteen years ago)

looking forward to this appearing on my year end list again...

Michael F Gill, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 00:43 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.discogs.com/release/955865

C1 Twisted Friskie Biscuits

did he retitle this track or remove it altogether?

Dr. Phil, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:02 (eighteen years ago)

A question: is the sound on the Ugly Edits bootlegs OK? Presumably they were just mastered from the original white labels, rather than a proper master so I'm thinking not. They're much cheaper, though!

Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 11:01 (eighteen years ago)

the original ugly edits sound kinda poopy as theyre just recordings of records chopped and sampled into low bit rate samplers. boots of them sound even poopier. if you can get the OGs, get them.

pipecock, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

So are any of the Ugly Edits currently available from places like Forced Exposure (these: http://www.forcedexposure.com/labels/sound.signature.html) "legitimate"? How can one really tell? For instance, this one (http://www.discogs.com/release/123113) is obviously one of the bootlegs, but are the ones with the spray painted catalog numbers the real thing?

matt2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

"but are the ones with the spray painted catalog numbers the real thing?

-- matt2"

yes, those ones are real. the first batch of 1-5 did not have spraypainted numbers on them, i have 4 and 5 as straight up white labels and i know 1-3 came that way as well. then from 6 on, they did the spray paint for all of them, as well as the second batches of 1-5 (which is where i got my originals of #1-3). afaik, none of them have been repressed in at least 3 years now.

pipecock, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

Thanks for the info pipecock. I've got downloads of most all of them, and just haven't made myself pay the $17+ per 12" for the vinyl yet. I wanted to make sure get the real ones when I did.

matt2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:50 (eighteen years ago)

what are you guys even talking about? it's not like TP paid for those samples and I wouldn't be surprised if random people reissued it seeing how easy & lucrative it can be. I like some of those OK but the whole thing was kinda sordid from the start.

blunt, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:12 (eighteen years ago)

i only have 7 and 10 i think? maybe its not ten. which one has 'journey to the light'?

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

what are you guys even talking about? it's not like TP paid for those samples

I think the questions were just meant to be about sound quality, not sampling & bootleg ethics

i.e. if you buy a boot of a boot does it sound like shit

dmr, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:01 (eighteen years ago)

"what are you guys even talking about? it's not like TP paid for those samples and I wouldn't be surprised if random people reissued it seeing how easy & lucrative it can be. I like some of those OK but the whole thing was kinda sordid from the start.

-- blunt"

well, no matter what the legal aspects are, the original Ugly Edits were relatively bad sounding. the bootlegs of them (recorded from vinyl) sound even worse. and people try to pimp them off as originals, which means you are paying more for a worse product.

anyway, why does your irritation extend only to the Ugly Edits? nearly all of the early KDJ and Sound Signature records are basically illegal disco edits, they just have a color label on them. who cares? bootleg edits are part of the culture, deal with it.

pipecock, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

illegal edits are the unsung heroes (well, maybe not anymore) of dance music. i'm no theo parrish scholar, but some of my favorite things by him are the underground cd-r dj mixes he did. the edits are like condensed versions of those.

tricky, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

blunt, I understand what you're saying, but that's why I said "legitimate". Cause I had heard before that the bootlegs (of these already rough sounding bootleg-ish edits) had even worse sound quality.

matt2, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:18 (eighteen years ago)

those mixes are the bawm. yeah I think the ugly edits are vastly overpriced. the early kdj/ss releases are generally too rearranged to be considered edits, in a typical or reverent sense IMO, they're often stripped to bare loops of a disco break.

xpost I'm not really worried about the sound of those records, as you guys can tell by now. crank that mutha up & eq the hell out of it!

blunt, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:25 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.