Betty Davis

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (287 of them)

did that ever get released? i've always wanted to hear it...

stevie, Thursday, 31 May 2007 16:07 (nineteen years ago)

not officially. but its on her site for $30. its worth getting. although i think theres two versions out there with diff tracklistings. not sure which one is on her site.

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 31 May 2007 16:30 (nineteen years ago)

ooh, do you have a link?

stevie, Thursday, 31 May 2007 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

$30? who does she think she is, Marissa Merchant?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 May 2007 18:49 (nineteen years ago)

I only have a 128 kbpr version that I dled from someplace, but it's TOTALLY worth $30. And it does actually have a Betty Davis cover on it (If I'm in Luck, I Just Might Get Picked Up.)

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 May 2007 18:57 (nineteen years ago)

no link... i have it on cd somewhere but i dont know where. its brilliant though. theres one track from it on jois myspace, the very first song. and it fucking KILLS.

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 31 May 2007 20:20 (nineteen years ago)

joining this funky thing late, but I gotta say I hear the Shuggie Otis Effect at work here, like I bought that Otis reissue w/ the shoutouts from the usual archivist musician hipster guides we all need. I sorta liked the instrumentals in a sub-SlyRiotway and it was nice to have his own version of Strawberry. but actually the Bros Johnson did it way better, their big psychedelic break in the middle is a funk landmark. Betty Davis was a cool figure, I guess, with connections, and I do like a lot of the music, because I have fairly low standards for funky shit such as this--I even like the Miracles record that came after the great City of Angels. but it's not great or anything and she wasn't all that great--if she looked like Phoebe Snow and was married to, like, Harry Chapin and not Miles, then I might perk my head up. but hell, I'll probably buy the reissues even though I have most of the great tracks you could get for years, burned from the vinyl.

whisperineddhurt, Thursday, 31 May 2007 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

haha I don't think I ever bothered to listen to that whole Shuggie album... I'm more of a Johnny fan.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 May 2007 20:34 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.mp3rockabilly.com/ac501p10.jpg

o yeah

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 May 2007 20:35 (nineteen years ago)

WTF is that instrument?

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 31 May 2007 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

I gotta say I hear the Shuggie Otis Effect at work here

Big time OTM. Heard Shuggie again a few days ago in the background at a small get together which is where his shit belongs. Inoffensive, serviceable. I didn't even mind when it played twice in a row. But soooo not great, sooo not anything to get exercised about.

Same with Ms. Davis. I can imagine a DJ dropping one of her tracks in a mix and wowing me for those several minutes. But no one on the dancefloor would remember it the next day.

And I still say the original Bette Davis kicks Betty to all kinds of curb.

Kevin John Bozelka, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:14 (nineteen years ago)

hmmm, gotta say I disagree about Shuggie -- I still find Inspiration Information to be pretty awesome overall. A beautiful, enveloping, warm record that might be comparable to Sly or Stevie Wonder, but really exists in its own universe. But I can see how it (and Betty Davis' records) might be somewhat overrated these days, simply because they went unnoticed for so long. There's definitely a desire amongst critics to be all like "This is the greatest record you've NEVER heard!" But that doesn't mean those records aren't great anyway.

tylerw, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:23 (nineteen years ago)

who gives a shit about press hyperbole

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

shuggie was brilliant (for one album at least), betty was brilliant over the course of a few albums. she might not be labelle or whoever but she occupies her only entirely unique little space in 70s funk/soul that i dont think any other female artist really did so deserves a bit of fame/respect. its not like shes that well known even after these reissues is she? and its not like shes being championed for obscuritys sake IMO, her records really ARE just plain great. a friend of mine who gave me jois 2nd album about ten years ago put betty davis on the b side of the tape and ive always wondered why she was never bigger, considering the miles davis connection.

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

Labelle's pretty flat and boring next to Betty, imho

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:47 (nineteen years ago)

the nightbirds album is good though... im trying to think of a female artist to compare betty to from that period.

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:54 (nineteen years ago)

yeah I have Nightbirds and its not bad - I'm not knockin Labelle, I like them fine, but Betty was way harder than they were.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:55 (nineteen years ago)

and Nona Hendryx from Labelle is cited upthread, but her stuff is AFTER Betty. I don't think Betty really had any contemporaries - ie, strong tight female funkstress writing her own material and directing her own career.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

i need to investigate 70s tina turner but betty reminds me of her stuff with ike a fair bit.

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

also have you guys heard the first mothers finest album?

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 31 May 2007 21:58 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

matos be hatin'
http://www.slate.com/id/2167827/

gershy, Friday, 15 June 2007 02:28 (nineteen years ago)

as someone who doesn't have a real firm opinion on ms. davis (altho i certainly think the little i've heard is ok), the article reads a bit like your real target is the obscuro record geek, and poor betty is just a vehicle for that. is that an unfair take, matos?

gershy, Friday, 15 June 2007 02:32 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think it's unfair in the least. Matos be right. He got down to musical specifics and really nailed it re: the voice. Not just awful (big whoop) but unconvincing, as if she were giggling coquetteishly behind that turquoise chain (or whatever the hell it is). Plus the obscuro record geek SHOULD be targeted. Not everyone gets buckets of free CDs and if Matos can save one customer service representative from spending their barely-existent-anyway discretionary income on these over-hyped thangs, then target away baby!

Only misstep is the Journey bashing. Steve Perry can take Ms. They Say She's Different But Yo She So Ain't to church.

Kevin John Bozelka, Friday, 15 June 2007 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

i meant is my sensing a not-so-hidden agenda in his review fair or not, not if his review of betty is fair or not (tho i do think it reads a bit unfair, but i'm still forming an opinion of her music so maybe i'll end up agreeing with him one day)

gershy, Friday, 15 June 2007 02:50 (nineteen years ago)

"She consistently over-gesticulated, zoomed around her minute range freely but with little real control, and growled and roared with a wearying constancy, even when she toned down the volume ... Davis often ignored the beat entirely."

wow. i've never read a better elucidation of what made betty davis such a tremendous vocalist. it could easily apply to albert ayler, or bob dylan, or keiji haino. obviously, matos was using that to make the opposite argument, but ultimately that's beside the point.

Lawrence the Looter, Friday, 15 June 2007 03:04 (nineteen years ago)

if Matos can save one customer service representative from spending their barely-existent-anyway discretionary income on these over-hyped thangs, then target away baby!

if only!
http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1329853.jpg

gershy, Friday, 15 June 2007 03:13 (nineteen years ago)

i meant is my sensing a not-so-hidden agenda in his review fair or not, not if his review of betty is fair or no

What's the difference?

it could easily apply to albert ayler, or bob dylan, or keiji haino.

Yeah but you're forgetting convincing which apply to Ayler and Dylan (don't know Haino well enough to comment).

P.S. Everyone CSR I suggested M.I.A.'s debut to adored it.

Kevin John Bozelka, Friday, 15 June 2007 03:15 (nineteen years ago)

Everyone = Every

Kevin John Bozelka, Friday, 15 June 2007 03:15 (nineteen years ago)

Why lost funk queen Betty Davis doesn't live up to the hype.

...because i need 500 words by tomorrow morning.

btw i'll expect complete lists of records KJB and matos like so we can point out massive hypocrisy re: vocals. thanks.

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Friday, 15 June 2007 08:44 (nineteen years ago)

that review is very unfair. heard this album this week for the first time in years and its even better than i remember it. and considering no one really knows betty, condemning it for not living up to the hype when the hype isnt actually that big in the first place seems a bit bizarre.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 15 June 2007 12:39 (nineteen years ago)

fair enough if someone hates the way 'lost classics' are revered just for being old and obscure but betty is one of those occasions where it wasnt obscure because it was shit, but for other reasons.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 15 June 2007 12:40 (nineteen years ago)

Great article, Matos! After fighting with a friend a few days ago about why her voice sucked - and listening to him insisting that "it's the funk that matters" – I feel vindicated.

(Those two albums aren't bad at all, just quite ok)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 15 June 2007 13:05 (nineteen years ago)

'Game Is My Middle Name' kinda owns.

fukasaku tollbooth, Friday, 15 June 2007 14:08 (nineteen years ago)

'In the Meantime' is pretty sweet too axshully.

fukasaku tollbooth, Friday, 15 June 2007 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

Why should the hype not fit into a piece about Davis? As if the hype isn't part of the context that she's being heard in, and as if it doesn't have a lot to do with how her reissue is being marketed. (Just like any other record, for crissakes). And as if talking honestly about the hype prevents somebody from also talking honestly about the music (which Matos did, in that piece, in more detail than anybody else I've read has done.)

Personally, I like her more than Esquivel, less than Os Mutantes (who were overrated too.)

xhuxk, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:13 (nineteen years ago)

I also love all this "she's inept therefore she's avant-garde" logic. Hell, you could use it for pretty much any lousy artist ever, couldn't you?

xhuxk, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:32 (nineteen years ago)

journalists angry about hpe = teh roflz

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

hi, could someone please explain how "hype" exists for these albums? first time i heard of her was probably someone mentioning her in a funk thread here. i've been listening to her since the last round of bootlegs came out and know about two people who like her. HYPESPLOSION! i sure am a fucking rube.

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

xp

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

i just feel like SOME PEOPLE are more pissed about "hype" and "record snobs" than, you know, "the music."

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

gott punch OTM

journalists in war over cred shockah

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:56 (nineteen years ago)

(ie "I heard it first and it sucks! You are a sucker for buying the album based on what other journos told you - listen to meeeeeeee")

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:56 (nineteen years ago)

Horseshit. Matos talks about "the music" more than anybody on this thread has.

xhuxk, Friday, 15 June 2007 15:57 (nineteen years ago)

that article's about the music just as much as the (equally long) ones in Wax Poetics and the Chronicle

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 June 2007 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

actually wait no those other two articles (from THE HYPE MACHINEtm I assume) are longer

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 June 2007 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

I guess I'm always surprised/disappointed when journos feel the need to spend their talents talking about things they don't like. Why discourage other people's enjoyment, is there not enough out there that you DO like to write about?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 June 2007 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

Why shouldn't journos just write about records that are interesting to write about, whether they like them or not?

Actually, come to think of it, though, that Incredible Bongo Band reissue last year didn't really live up to its hype, either. And I'm pretty sure Matos fell for that one lock, stock, and barrel. So we're all susceptible (me included). Plus, duh, we don't all have the same ears (or nervous systems). But that doesn't make Matos's Davis piece any less valid.

xhuxk, Friday, 15 June 2007 16:07 (nineteen years ago)

Because it's our job to explain why something sucks?

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 15 June 2007 16:08 (nineteen years ago)

xp: (And I LOVE a few Incredible Bongo Band tracks, by the way. So let's not get into a war about that one too. Just found the reissue disappointing, as a whole.)

xhuxk, Friday, 15 June 2007 16:09 (nineteen years ago)

I've never heard the Incredible Bongo Band (uh-oh - HYPE FAILURE!) so no worries there

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 June 2007 16:10 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.