Daft Punk - Human After All

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1446 of them)
(I was, to be fair, using the broad Ewingesque definition of indie which also encompasses the Scissor Sisters and Annie). I didn't say this was a bad thing though!

I don't like the CC album as much as HAA but its still enjoyable but the comparison seems overstated. The albums certainly aren't as close to each other in either sound or method as Deadringer is to The Private Press. And yeah, of course there's a big DP influence in there but the same is true of hundreds of records released over the past few years.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 14 March 2005 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

This album has been brought to you by the letters "P" and "U."

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Monday, 14 March 2005 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, Matthew. Let me shed light like cats shed fur:

Shadow releases album wih recognisable shtick. Despite subsequently dumping 50% of said shtick inbetween albums to further embrace hardcore hip hop, surf rock, electro and techno, the follow-up resembles less his previous album and more the subsequent work, somehow confusing fans who have settled into a comfort xone of sorts.

Enter RJD2, whose debut album has shades of DJ Shadow's slow burn cross-genre instrumental hip hop, varied moody vs old school rappers-samples and inventive drum programming at times. With this and its general relative safe-playing vs the personal framework exploding/sidestepping and explorations of the rather more energetic second Shadow album, it acquires a large number of old-school Shadow fans who do not immediately spark up a blunt take to their former idol's sophomore effort.

I suggest that the negativity surrounding the current new Daft Punk release could potentially bestow such a similar fortune to the forthcoming wider release of the Cut Copy album, which qualifies for the comparison by being significantly influenced by an older act in the same business (first DP release 1994, first CC release: 1999/2000 - that's for Ronan) and for taking BLATANTLY OBVIOUS influence from a widely known previous album and sound from said act and infusing the end result with its own wider influences and, crucially, an easier to swallow accesibility/pop sensibility.

And any 'indie definition' of Annie that goes beyond her being on an idependent label sounds spurious and wrongheaded to me.

Bye!

BARMS, Monday, 14 March 2005 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't wait to buy this at midnight tonight!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 March 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

(Sorry, I've been particularly dense today all over the place. Blame it on a lack of sleep. I think I must have somehow missed your middle post on this subject).

Whether the Cut Copy record will benefit from post-HAA disillusionment (Human After All being the Kid A to Cut Copy's Parachutes) it still doesn't change my basic point that the Cut Copy record is coming from a completely different place. They're both great pop records but, with the exception of one or two tracks, BLNL just doesn't feel like a house record to me whereas Discovery clearly does. The indie bit was a windup but it still feels like an indie-dance-pop record influenced by French house. Its all in the drums.

Whereas you could've release Deadringer as a DJ Shadow album and no one would have batted an eyelid.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

True, but Cut Copy do house also, "Glittering Clouds" for instance is like Avalanches+Daft Punk. I think they share certain sensibilities. I think Phoenix and The Avalanches (even Air) are part of the same continuum (which I'd love to discuss!).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Listening for the first time.

To me this is like an album of b-sides. The only track that really stands out to me is the title track and the artwork is fucking half-arsed as fuck.
Daft Punk have followed in the steps of their countrymen Air and gone for a simpler sound for their second albums rather than the all-out flamboyance of the second.
I just find it hard to believe that DP are happy with this release and wouldn't be surprised if the rumours about contractual obligation were true. How can the same band who did something as gorgeous and timely as Digital Love be content with something like Brainwasher?
It's not a truly terrible album but I can pretty much tell on first listen that like Talkie Walkie it won't have the staying power of Discovery or 10,000Hz the Legend.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha, re: Air, I thought you were talking about Moon Safari.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

The Stylus review is OTM. I've been saying all along that the whole thing is incredibly tongue in cheek.

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)

(Actually I don't really agree with the notion that Deadringer was significantly closer to Endtroducing than The Private Press was. What lets the Private Press down in a battle between the three is that The Private Press just isn't as good, although I maintain its a decent record nonetheless).

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

re: Air

I just wrote this massive thing but then deleted. In short, they've followed similar trajectories from good commercial debut to accomplished and wonderfully proggy follow-up to slightly half-arsed third album.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Jacques Lu Cont should've got his arse in gear and put out a new LRD record and that really would've cleaned up the post-Discovery overspill.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

nah he doesnt need to, felix da housecat beat him to it last sumer.

piscesboy, Monday, 14 March 2005 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

the artwork is fucking half-arsed as fuck.

It's not. It's their ode to Radio-Activity (most of the album is really...I got on this trip when I realized 'Emotion' is basically their take on 'Ohm Sweet Ohm'. Hey 'On/Off', goes for that 'Intermission' spot.)

(You have to wonder with DP if they just toss stuff off or really get all the details right, that tv-set is what at least 30 years old? Like that radio on Radio-Activity was at least 30 years old at the time, etc. etc.)

Omar (Omar), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

The cover may be a tribute but there's something so knocked-up about it. Yes I know Radioactivity looks tacky too but the minimal liner notes, the "don't put this on the web or we'll cry" message on the inside... It just feels slipshod. When I bought Discovery I felt like I'd bought a proper album but this is just ugly even down to the massive sticker on the front telling me that it has the single "Robot Rock" on it.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 14 March 2005 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Whereas you could've release Deadringer as a DJ Shadow album and no one would have batted an eyelid.

Uh, dude, the comparisons between Deadringer and Moby's Play are not as facile as they appear (ie, I disagree). And Deadringer is also a lot less fleshy than both Endtroducing and TPP - less ideas too, which certainly makes it the weaker of the 3 for me.

Spencer, a more timely example (ie album cuts) of Cut Copy house is 'That Was Just A Dream', in addition to 'Future', 'Zap Zap' and 'A Dream', which has Crydamoure written all over it.

Deerninja B4rim4, Plus-Tech Whizz Kid (Barima), Monday, 14 March 2005 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

But I still feel like those are written more like indie-disco songs, whereas "Glittering Clouds" is a house track from the ground, uh floor-up.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 March 2005 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey I got the Cut Copy promo, I mean fine, you can say that that sound is better at aping old Daft Punk than the latest Daft Punk album, but there are better old Daft Punk copyists too.

Hystereo for one, plus they have the harder edge too.

My point really is that, what all of us want surely, from Daft Punk, or any artist, is for them to do something new, something really new and interesting and original.

And the people doing that now are not going to be album orientated acts anyway. It just won't happen. debut albums are what's needed in dance at the moment.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 14 March 2005 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry I am being very cynical, but I have to listen to reams and reams of bad 3rd album dance music every day at work and it's just got nothing on the vinyl at the moment, NOTHING. the amount of good releases so far this year surpasses is mindblowing.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 14 March 2005 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

bah, surpasses lots of.......years

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 14 March 2005 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Heard it for the first time today and, well, sounds terribly disappointing. What's with all this "rock" sounding stuff? I thought Big Beat ended in the late 90s?

Their first two albums were great, but upon first listen, it seems they have lost it completely third time around. Pity...

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 14 March 2005 21:58 (twenty-one years ago)

............

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

It just feels slipshod

I know. But is it? That "All Guitars By Daft Punk" line...I mean: are they stupid/careless (i really don't think so) or do they want to suggest that they didn't sample but replayed that Breakwater riff (noticed how they put it in the liner notes not as 'contains samples of...'?) Suddenly we're deep into Warhol territory (what with all the repitition, the robots, the cries of "I could have made 'Robot Rock'") This album can be read at very different levels, seems almost deliberatly built to generate diverse readings (I'll be surprised if they give any interviews to explain themselves) and we will never know if we're suckers. (aargh bastards, must.stop.now)

Omar (Omar), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I'm going to back track a bit on the Cut Copy thing. I said upthread that I like some Cut Copy songs more than things on HAA. I meant this in a general sense, and not in a directly comparative sense. I do feel they make some house songs, but most of their songs sound like they're doing a synthpop band thing. They're more danceable because they're not afraid of house/dahnce, but obviously there are going to be proper vinyl house singles that are "better" dance records. Hope that makes more sense.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

"I like HAA and it's a nice record but it's no better than lots of other nice records, like Le Dust Sucker's album."

yeah, anyone who enjoys HAA needs to check the Le Dust Sucker s/t full-length on Plong. I guarantee you'll like Le Dust Sucker better.

Who's putting out Cut Copy? Anyone?

david day (winslow), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)

On further listens this seems like a random jumble of songs, not a proper album. I'm itching, for example, to put "Prime Time Of Your Life" over another track. Each track has it's own context whereas Discovery was a lot more focussed.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:49 (twenty-one years ago)

re: Cut Copy

my friend directed the video for Future - might be a chance that Ill be putting CC out if talks go right

LeCoq (LeCoq), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

the RJD2/DJ shadow thing is interesting, but that stylus review raises a much weirder point: "i love these guys so much, and this album is so bland and emotionless, that i have to assume it's deliberately terrible as some sort of performance art statement on how bland and emotionless most modern music is. thus, this awful record is actually brilliant."

is there any precedent for this? now that the "this can't possibly be daft punk" crutch is gone, how far will DP devotees go to avoid calling a spade a spade?

cobra commander (cobra commander), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Not all devotees thought it was fake.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.musicbomb.com/reviews/k/kraftwerk_radioactivity.jpg http://media.bestprices.com/content/music/30/519535.jpg http://www.albumvote.co.uk/d/daft_punk/human.jpg

Looks like a tribute to a tribute, strangely.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)

modular is putting out cut copy i thought.....

glenny g2003 (glenny g2003), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:29 (twenty-one years ago)

If Daft Punk played this at your house, you'd chuck them out.


*giggles*. The Guardian's review is hilarious.

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 01:30 (twenty-one years ago)

the RJD2/DJ shadow thing is interesting, but that stylus review raises a much weirder point: "i love these guys so much, and this album is so bland and emotionless, that i have to assume it's deliberately terrible as some sort of performance art statement on how bland and emotionless most modern music is. thus, this awful record is actually brilliant."
is there any precedent for this?

Well, there's always Metal Machine Music...

Telephonething, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)

You stole my thesis!

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Whoa, eerie. Just saw your thread after posting here...

Telephonething, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Looks like a tribute to a tribute, strangely.

Jesus. Stop it already! :) I'm really starting to believe in this performance art reading.

Omar (Omar), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

But I still feel like those are written more like indie-disco songs, whereas "Glittering Clouds" is a house track from the ground, uh floor-up.

Indie-disco songs with house production and structure. And 'Live' and 'Rendezvous' are sorelly underrated - I listen to 'Live' just as much as 'GC'. Better'n Hystereo too.

Hey I got the Cut Copy promo, I mean fine, you can say that that sound is better at aping old Daft Punk than the latest Daft Punk album, but there are better old Daft Punk copyists too.

That's fascinating, but how many are putting out debut albums this year, this close to HAA no less?

Also, so you're clear, I reiterate that being inspired by Daft Punk is not the entirety of CC's shtick by a long way, but it IS a recognisable part of it. Nowhere did I ever say that Cut Copy made "a good/better Daft Punk album" (though that 50% of DP's pop sensibility that's missing here had ta go somewhere ;-)) and this applies to RJ and Shadow, who are also as divided by difference as they're brought together by similarities (the exact reason RJ supported Shadow on tour, something he told me in an interview was a mild issue for him during 2002, albeit one that ultimately worked in his favour).

And if we break it down purely to my *personal* preferences and comparisons, regardless of which sides of the dance rubik cube these two records spin on, I'll dance to 'Saturdays' 6/10 times over 'Robot Rock' or 'Going Nowhere' over 'HAA', as voted by my feet. Listening's a foregone conclusion, obv.

Haha at Geir up above. That "What's with all this "rock" sounding stuff?" comment is great.

BARMS, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 09:25 (twenty-one years ago)

(Also, I like a *good* debate, but not one where I'm just repeating myself over and over and over like I'm a new Daft Punk release. This wouldn't have gone this far if there was a better understanding of both the RJ-Shadow situation, and the albums themselves, as well as the Cut Copy record. And the fact that I was stating a supposition not a fact born out of clairvoyance)

I'd definitely like to think this is in the contractual obligation zone, but it still doesn't make up for some of the lack of engagement. Even Prince did better when we knew he was trying to escape Warners.

BARMS, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 09:31 (twenty-one years ago)

when Cut Copy first appeared they were understandably tagged with The Avalanches, so i'd always think of them first when listening to Glittering Clouds et al. as a result i was quite surprised when i first heard 'Future' and even more surprised at hearing the filter-house stuff - it's all pretty good and it's nice to have an album out with that sort of range, i prefer it over the Mylo for example tho i do also like that one. perhaps there's too much focus on what became DP's trademark of big release filter house, as opposed to the hard techno sound they were initially championing as much as anything else (New Wave, Assault, Rock n' Roll) which is where comparisons to Vitalic and Hystereo (Corporate Crimewave) may be better founded.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm sceptical about the contractual obligation thing but to be honest i could understand Virgin (well known and respected for their tolerance and support of 'difficult'/non-prolific but iconic/iconoclastic artists generally aren't they?) getting the arse with Daft Punk wrt their trajectory if it's true. i mean, this album's rushed for sure, so Virgin have to worry a little about selling it hence the TV ads which really surprised me as it seemed obvious from first listen that this album was not going to go down well with the mainstream press or even many devoted fans at all - then factor in DP's 'downloadibility' (Daft Club in the end effectively an 'endorsement' of file-sharing as much as a measure to tackle it somehow), i would not be at all surprised if HAA flopped terribly, tho i suppose right now it could just as easily make the top 20, hard to tell...

Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Making the top 20 would hardly make it a resounding hit album.

Didn't the Cut Copy album come out months ago? Why are we talking about Cut Copy again? I think I agree with Matt that outside of a handful of tracks that bear a certain similarity to something DP a bit of, it's got nothing to do with much at all. I think I have lost touch with this thread.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:19 (twenty-one years ago)

"DP did a bit of", that should read.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)

And god, listening to 'High Life' or 'Face to Face' next to Cut Copy's album is like listening to the Beatles next to Gerry and the bloody Pacemakers or something.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)

they've got as much to do with DP as Vitalic or anyone else, even if the new album is closer to the latter in terms of sound (abrasive 'guitars' and general metallic noize replacing glossy disco sheen)

the Cut Copy album is being re-released in May

Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't remember the bit rate of my advance HAA files but I can't remember hearing such a difference between mp3s and the CD version. Putting the CD on last night for the 1st time, it sounded so HUGE.

Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)

but yeah, i probably wouldn't have bothered mentioning them myself, other than to point out the few Braxisms/Bangalterisms that do occur on BLNL. now let us all chase Barima to the ends of the earth with big sticks.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I still like 'Glittering Clouds' though.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)

perhaps there's too much focus on what became DP's trademark of big release filter house, as opposed to the hard techno sound they were initially championing as much as anything else

Good to see your brain's still on somewhat, Steve, "trademark" being the key word. Did Discovery outsell Homework in both albums and singles categories or just get bigger MTV etc rotation (plus using Disco...very to score an animated film would certainly up the trademark some)?

But you lose points for not reading my last but one post where I point out the entire fucking reason for the analogy. And you question why I prefer ILE.

BARMS, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)

It is not selling in our shop, at all. Like I have yet to sell a copy, and I worked 3 out of the 4 days it's been out. I don't think we have sold even one copy. Mystifying cos "Push The Button" sold loads of CDs.

As for Cut Copy, well this is a Human After All thread, so I assumed you'd placed the album in opposition to HAA!

N otm though, there are so so so many Daft Punk copyists, and my point was that this is a thread about "what is wrong with HAA, why is it not a step forward or something Daft Punk should have done", not, at least in my opinion, "why didn't Daft Punk make Discovery again".

I think someone as removed from the scene as Cut Copy can only hope to make a record collection record, whereas the real new Daft Punk sound (and I accept perhaps Barima was not saying this is what Cut Copy are doing), album dance music, is going to come from where Daft Punk originally did, singles dance music.

There's always the strong likelihood of new artists bursting onto the scene in the interim, but I don't think it's crazy to think Black Strobe and Tiefschwarz will eventually do a Vitalic and make a great album, and become the new generation of dance dinosaurs along with him.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post BARMS as I said it's on a Daft Punk thread, of course people are going to think you're comparing the record to Human After All.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.