Ryan Leslie, c/d, s/d

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (343 of them)

i think the problem is that he's singing the songs and cassie isn't

ben folds' cover of "such great heights" (Tape Store), Tuesday, 27 October 2009 03:16 (sixteen years ago)

('cassie' could also be replaced with, like, 'krys ivory' or whoever, though cassie is still probably the best voice for leslie)

ben folds' cover of "such great heights" (Tape Store), Tuesday, 27 October 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)

whomeverrr

ben folds' cover of "such great heights" (Tape Store), Tuesday, 27 October 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)

THIS LEAKED? Jeez. Bad night to be out on the town. Finding it now.

7borad dudes get sb'd, frequently. (Alex in Montreal), Tuesday, 27 October 2009 04:41 (sixteen years ago)

Liking way more than the first album, initially. I'm only about a third of the way in tho.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 27 October 2009 04:47 (sixteen years ago)

she'ssss got that something
she's got that sooomething
that i liiiike

k3vin k., Sunday, 1 November 2009 22:34 (sixteen years ago)

come on guys, this album is hot

k3vin k., Monday, 2 November 2009 00:04 (sixteen years ago)

yeah but not in a way you get all excited about up front. ur sposed to realise that all the songs are in ur head six months later and be like "hey remember this turns out it was awesome" IMO

plaks (I know, right?), Monday, 2 November 2009 00:08 (sixteen years ago)

still waiting for that to happen with the first album tbh

some dude, Monday, 2 November 2009 00:14 (sixteen years ago)

honestly this album's even less immediate - it's darker, bassier, more contemplative. it's a total winter record

k3vin k., Monday, 2 November 2009 01:36 (sixteen years ago)

dude needs to STOP rapping though, real talk

k3vin k., Monday, 2 November 2009 01:37 (sixteen years ago)

this album's better than the 1st

i guess i like his 'bloopy bubble backround noise' effect more than 'neptunes bass jangle' effect

heart goin ham (deej), Monday, 2 November 2009 10:30 (sixteen years ago)

i still find dude a way more difficult presence as an artist than he should be, though

like when folks hate on the-dream's persona, i find leslie way more ... i dunno ... unlikeable. hes so much more reserved & insincere feeling or something

heart goin ham (deej), Monday, 2 November 2009 10:31 (sixteen years ago)

i like him because i think he is more relatable in a different way

plaks (I know, right?), Monday, 2 November 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

love that pusha t almost sounds like he's rapping about liking project runway. from cooking crack to sundays on the couch watching bravo...

Moreno, Monday, 2 November 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

i find leslie way more ... i dunno ... unlikeable. hes so much more reserved & insincere feeling or something

kind of sad that i can't engage w/ this album despite the fact that i really want to. there's just no excitement or something.

Moreno, Monday, 2 November 2009 21:38 (sixteen years ago)

andy k, <3 the brady bunch ref in your review

k3vin k., Tuesday, 3 November 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

Lanvin broke niggas call em ray-bans

bare grills (tpp), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

i don't think leslie is more unlikable he's just a more boring writer

a goon boy (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 22:47 (sixteen years ago)

i think he's definitely "unlikable" - there's plenty of other issues that make his assholishness interesting & worthwhile to me though

k3vin k., Tuesday, 3 November 2009 22:48 (sixteen years ago)

like what

a goon boy (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 22:50 (sixteen years ago)

i could see not "liking" him because he's sort of a boring presence but i think you really need to be stretching with your extrapolation to think he's actively an asshole or something

a goon boy (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 22:51 (sixteen years ago)

I find him obnoxious but I've no idea why so it's completely unjustified. I like both his albums this year

bare grills (tpp), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 22:54 (sixteen years ago)

don't get much of an asshole vibe from him, but find him less likable than The Dream b/c he a boring writer/performer.

Moreno, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 23:09 (sixteen years ago)

interesting though that everyone sites "gibberish," the one song he didn't write vocals for, as his high point. you do get the feeling in his singing that he's also a little bored by his lyrics. he does seem looser or something on "gibberish." i could see the process of writing the words instead of just singing random shit taking the fun out of it.

Moreno, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 23:18 (sixteen years ago)

like what

― a goon boy (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, November 3, 2009 5:50 PM (53 minutes ago)

fwiw, here's what i just wrote, last paragraph of my review

The usual complaints arise, of course – first and foremost, Leslie needs to drop this deluded dream he has of being a rapper. Songs like “Sunday Night” threaten to be sabotaged by Leslie’s laughably gauche punchlines, and even on “Something That I Like” (where his swagless “rapping” is actually much more tolerable), he’s completely upstaged by a very average Pusha T verse. At best, though, Leslie’s lyrics are agreeably bland, so what makes him so damn compelling? Is it my own sadistic nerd projection? Maybe; there’s certainly something gratifying in seeing a Harvard-educated wannabe playboy continually trip over his own lyrical feet. But Leslie’s gift for melody and mood is undeniable, and ultimately his strengths outweigh his weaknesses, especially on this record. For as long as he’s going to be referring to the girl he’s trying to get to spend the night with him as his “sidekick,” he’s gonna need to keep whipping up these great gloomy atmospheres to bum out to.

k3vin k., Tuesday, 3 November 2009 23:45 (sixteen years ago)

swagless!

51 sent (The Reverend), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 00:01 (sixteen years ago)

thank you

swagless price (The Reverend), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 00:02 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i don't really get an asshole vibe from him either, occasional "I could be with any other fine girl instead of you" lyrics aside, more like he's just a studio nerd famous for desperate web 2.0 stunts like faking YouTube stats, which would make me like him less if i didn't think he was a really talented guy and kind of an underdog

the tuppence takes manhattan (some dude), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 00:48 (sixteen years ago)

wasn't he cleared of the youtube controversy?

booth, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 03:20 (sixteen years ago)

i dunno, never heard anything proving he didn't, link?

the tuppence takes manhattan (some dude), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 04:16 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoHr2QmB2Mo

booth, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 05:02 (sixteen years ago)

the point isn't whether r-les was guilty of juking the stats (oh noes) or not but that that minor fiasco was another unsurprising daily event in his implacable diddy-without-the-heart endless vlogger multimedia cross-promotion start-up company hype campaign which had been rolling on since like 2005. none of which would make him an asshole as such (he isn't really), but then when he finally follows through with that self-satisfied pharrellian chocolate-box banality of an album earlier this year i was more than a little fucked off with dude, yeah - after all the stringing-along it felt like he was quite happy just to blithely drop off his business card for the (to quote brainwasher way upthread) "...but I can't wait to hear what he comes with next!" happy helmet set, scented with just enough weak lavendery perfume to mask the main "It sucks that a lot of these songs have been around forever so the album doesn't feel particularly fresh..." bit.

funny thing is i really really like this new one though; way stronger balance between the light playfulness of what's always going to be something of a vanity side-project - he seems to be knowingly aware of his capriciousness now in a way others (like say terius) aren't (not a de facto good or bad thing-in itself before you jump on me) and not taking the piss and seeming fundamentally insincere, with better songwriting and mildly compelling better attention to detail this time round. i don't believe he should suffer critically for that lightness when dudes like dam-funk or wonky dubsteppers jacking boogie moves on hyperdub are on the exact same yuppie shit he is but gameface it out with quintuple gatefold lp sets and sophisticatedly finessed pr prescences (respectively).

r|t|c, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 14:59 (sixteen years ago)

another thing is that as time's gone by (since the earlier album i guess) it's felt like there's been an appreciably solidified difference between his solo stuff and his outside production, which are often more sculpted and have the darker bassier contemplative gloomy atmospherics that k3v talks about but i have trouble quite locating on this album.

r|t|c, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:09 (sixteen years ago)

the back half of his s/t kind of hints at that feel, but the new one really fleshes it out and explores it more fully. it's a winter album for that reason, like i said

k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

i do still think i prefer the first to this though, as much as i like it. the highs are probably more pronounced and the production is probably fundamentally more impressive to me, though Transition is (to beat a dead horse here) more of a mood piece that begs to be explored - kind of the definition of a grower

k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:16 (sixteen years ago)

er, i just kind of realized i'm disagreeing with you w/ that first post? i dunno, right out the gate you can tell there's a different look he's going for - compare "never gonna break up" & "something that i like" w/ "diamond girl" & "addiction"

k3vin k., Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:26 (sixteen years ago)

but 'addiction' is the darkest out of that lot, surely? i agree that transition is more of a grower but that's by virtue of its level consistency rather than by any definable shift in mood or scope. i need to listen to the first again before i say any more tbh; like i say the context will have changed entirely though.

r|t|c, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

suppose it might matter that i refuse to acknowledge the version of 'addiction' with fabolous on it - the presence of a third party totally spoiled that shit.

r|t|c, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

but yeah no fine, 'addiction' is just the one track like that anyway; i see what you're generally saying but - slighty more demure production aside - he is still exactly the same guy on transition as he is the s/t. the trick of this album is in not making that guy look so glibly irritating now so you can have a wry smile and a pinch of salt to go with his continuing r-les-ness.

r|t|c, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

"Addiction" definitely felt more like itself in its original incarnation, but that's one of my favorite recentish Fab verses and I always think of it when I think of the song (whereas I never thought his encroachment on "Shawty Is A Ten" was an improvement in any way and kind of ruined the intro)

some dude, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 16:03 (sixteen years ago)

i dont get the comparison to dam funk / wonky dubstep at all (& i only feel defensive about the former, usually totally into h8ing on dubstep but whats the comparison exactly??)

heart goin ham (deej), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)

i <3 his rapping fwiw

a goon boy (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 23:09 (sixteen years ago)

like, i would take this more seriously if he released it on quadruple gatefold? i doubt it

heart goin ham (deej), Thursday, 5 November 2009 01:37 (sixteen years ago)

deej I don't think you're the kinda strawman r|t|c's referring to.

Tim F, Thursday, 5 November 2009 02:24 (sixteen years ago)

no leave it, he likes puzzling me out. http://www.soulstrut.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/popcorn.gif

r|t|c, Thursday, 5 November 2009 02:58 (sixteen years ago)

i didnt mean that tho, i just mean this 'lightness' 'yuppy' thing ... i dont get the concept behind it -- that these guys are all indulgent? that there's not ... what ... meat to it? what does that mean? it feels like a vague concept imo

heart goin ham (deej), Thursday, 5 November 2009 03:15 (sixteen years ago)

oh no doubt it's a vague concept. i mean, i like dam-funk okay i guess but i just feel i'm unlikely to ever see anyone finding him a problematic artist the same way they might leslie, and the only real reason i can see for that - besides the fact that leslie sings songs and dam-funk doesn't, which is a superficial distinction imo - is that dam-funk has all the apparently legitimizing trimmings of a serious musical dude of gravitas. and what they share is not a sense of indulgence as such but i dunno, a dorky retro boogie keyb capriciousness, a cute 80s flavoured peculiarity. (maybe leslie is more of modern times for some people but that's how i hear him anyway to a certain extent.)

the yuppie thing is partly a straight descriptive of that (particularly in leslie's case) but also - besides being my handy way of stating where i stand on wonky artists and kode9's pert claims on a lineage from pirate radio/nuum/etc, heh heh - kinda nicely sums up the ~vybe i get from these three put together, what's at play in the sphere of fandom (that i find myself in too, to an extent, tbf) for this sort of stuff: i dunno, it's all a bit, um...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGsht0Lto9o

~ internet connection, babyyy - serious~

r|t|c, Thursday, 5 November 2009 04:12 (sixteen years ago)

... yknow?

anyways, carry on.

r|t|c, Thursday, 5 November 2009 04:13 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXWJB-XZFUY

owl city's cover of "such great heights" (Tape Store), Thursday, 5 November 2009 05:06 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.