OK, is this the worst piece of music writing ever?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (11123 of them)

Article on Creed in Slate today. Reads utterly incoherent to me and I'm not sure that it's not a joke, but it seems sincere enough I guess.

wmlynch, Thursday, 22 October 2009 00:02 (sixteen years ago)

I'd hardly say its incoherent save for

"Higher" might turn out to be the nu-grunge "Don't Stop Believing": dismissed by cognoscenti on arrival as bludgeoning and gauche but destined for rehabilitation down the road as a triumphant slab of ersatz inspirationalism.

ersatz?

inigo_montoya.jpg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 22 October 2009 00:14 (sixteen years ago)

Oh just go for the clip:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 22 October 2009 00:15 (sixteen years ago)

That article was fine. It was of a piece with Slate's baffling obsession with contrarianism and revisionism. It was a decent read.

Bill Magill, Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:18 (sixteen years ago)

It was a great read, except it would have read EXACTLY the same if it was on The Onion.

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:32 (sixteen years ago)

derivative blowhards with a self-righteous Christian agenda

i like how he describes in 8 words why no one likes creed and then spends 5 paragraphs defending creed.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

I'm a sucker for a thoughtfully contrarian essay, so this worked.

lihaperäpukamat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

Then you remembered the sex tape with Kid Rock and came to your senses.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)

I can share Brett Michaels' own tape with you.

lihaperäpukamat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)

Why is Creed "good" and "underrated"?

1. They write "first-rate schlock-rock."
2. "In his lyrics, Stapp is a well-meaning, Bible-fluent doofus, easy to chuckle at"
3. Stapp's stage presence is "obnoxiously anachronistic"
4. "Higher" is "a triumphant slab of ersatz inspirationalism"
5. "Tremonti was a brutally effective guitarist"

It's like he couldn't even take his own argument seriously. His defense is pretty backhanded.

wmlynch, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)

the bar is pretty low for good music writing tbh

access flap (omar little), Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

Why is Creed good? Cuz they write shit songs with bad lyrics and their frontman is irritating. THAT'S WHY!

wmlynch, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

Wait, it's that they're ersatz good.

wmlynch, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

the slate thing is just a space-filler, but its hardly terrible. or terribly written anyway. dunno if it was worth the effort...

scott seward, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)

what IS worth the effort these days? where's the good writing thread? i haven't read anything good in a dog's age. somebody must have written something good this year about music.

scott seward, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

you don't need space-filler on the internet. it's not like a newspaper or magazine where you have to fill space; you choose how much of the theoretically infinite space of the internet you want to use.

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:58 (sixteen years ago)

but even internet newsmags have, um, theoretical space limits and such, no? they have sections. they need to fill a section. they need product, basically. same as a regular magazine.

scott seward, Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)

that's probably because old people run it

nice email (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)

it's the internet just throw up whatever

nice email (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)

in case anyone was wondering why they ran that article, its because it gets forwarded around the internet and posted on message boards like this, and then people go to the site and some of them click on the ads, and then slate gets money, and pays its writers

Bobby Wo (max), Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

Thanks for explaining the internet Max, you are a hero.

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)

it's the internet just throw up, whatever (xxp)

Fetchboy, Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)

np jon seemed like there was some confusion on this thread vis-a-vis the article, and why slate would publish something that wasnt particularly insightful but was contrarian enough that people seem to want to tell everyone about it

Bobby Wo (max), Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)

it's about as contrarian as a cannned ham.

scott seward, Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

cannnnnned ham

scott seward, Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

"utterly incoherent to me and I'm not sure that it's not a joke, but it seems sincere enough I guess."

Ha! sums up my feelings re: Creed and maybe Rammstein and Rush. Maybe ICP and Burial, too.
What groups are like that for you guys?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)

To compare Creed and ICP to Rush is sacrilege.

Bill Magill, Thursday, 22 October 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

Bill Magill OTM. Faygo & Seminars>>>>>>>>Ayn Rand.

Fetchboy, Thursday, 22 October 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)

which awful alt-weekly cover story essay on jay-z is worse??

http://www.citypaper.com/music/story.asp?id=19159
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/old-bull/Content?oid=2473786

i got nothin (deej), Friday, 23 October 2009 03:23 (sixteen years ago)

jk the stranger one is ugh but the cp one is http://www.soulstrut.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/lvl.gif

i got nothin (deej), Friday, 23 October 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)

He is Gen-Why's Crack Cobain, in their search for a new musical Nirvana.

man i fuckin hate wordplay

call all destroyer, Friday, 23 October 2009 03:26 (sixteen years ago)

it's about as contrarian as a cannned ham.

What about scrapple?

_Rudipherous_, Friday, 23 October 2009 03:27 (sixteen years ago)

city paper joint is the worst piece of rap writing i've read this year

everybody loves am0n (J0rdan S.), Friday, 23 October 2009 03:34 (sixteen years ago)

RIP al shipley circa 2008 getting space to rightfully shit on 'american gangster'

everybody loves am0n (J0rdan S.), Friday, 23 October 2009 03:35 (sixteen years ago)

He may be getting old, but this album is a warning flare to the world that he could do this shit forever.

like, i don't even know where to start

everybody loves am0n (J0rdan S.), Friday, 23 October 2009 03:40 (sixteen years ago)

haha i still get space i just wouldn't use it to shit on nu-jay more than once

some dude, Friday, 23 October 2009 03:47 (sixteen years ago)

"Jay may be the Magna Carter (though they aren't related, both men share similar surnames) but Weezy smells succession"

similar?

suggest friend (hmmmm), Friday, 23 October 2009 08:15 (sixteen years ago)

He is "literally" carrying hip hop on his back.

Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Friday, 23 October 2009 08:33 (sixteen years ago)

"And we are in the age of Obamica now; if a black man can become president of the United States, then a wicked jump shot or slinging crack rocks—as the greatest rapper of all time, the late Christopher Wallace once suggested—is not the only way out of the hood. The looming shadow of the big baller/shot caller has not disappeared completely, but it's getting smaller."

This paragraph is literally burning my eyeballs. My head is literally going to explode. Figuratively speaking, this is a terribly written piece.

dabug, Friday, 23 October 2009 16:56 (sixteen years ago)

btw that goof jonah weiner who wrote that article on Creed has a 'conceptual' rap group:
http://www.myspace.com/spiderfangz

i got nothin (deej), Saturday, 24 October 2009 03:35 (sixteen years ago)

haha the way nick sylvester constantly posted about 'spiderfang' on his blog i thought it was just some bullshit he made up himself

wein blockas (some dude), Saturday, 24 October 2009 03:53 (sixteen years ago)

Ghostface Killer (Tony Starks)

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 24 October 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)

ohhh, he means Tony Starks

i got nothin (deej), Saturday, 24 October 2009 04:14 (sixteen years ago)

honestly the predictable contrarianism of that creed article is so obnoxious to me for some reason ... like yes, we get it, all music isnt that bad when its not on the radio all the time

i just hate the idea that dude was like, "oooh creed catalogue torrent ... maybe ill make a hundred bucks in slate cash off a half assed review of this that SHOCKS MUSIC FAN SENSIBILITIES"

i got nothin (deej), Saturday, 24 October 2009 04:21 (sixteen years ago)

So hold on, is Weiner now Slate's official pop critic?

http://www.slate.com/?id=3944&qp=43219

Jeez, that's f'n depressing...

uninspired girls rejoice!!! (Hoot Smalley), Thursday, 5 November 2009 19:20 (sixteen years ago)

they were going to hire me and give me free reign to write about Wilco every week, but the deal fell through at the last minute.

kshighway1, Thursday, 5 November 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

they went for second best.

kshighway1, Thursday, 5 November 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

If I ever got a chance to interview Jay, I

so sad that this sentence occurs in a cover story on the guy

banned, on the run (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 November 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)

isn't a covery story

the goondock saints (some dude), Thursday, 5 November 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)

er cover story

the goondock saints (some dude), Thursday, 5 November 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.