I prefer that the kids not talk about "the kids" because they are, in fact, "the kids." People over 40 can do whatever the hell they want.
Cheers.
― namdam, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jess, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― ethan, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jeff, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Clarke B., Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sean Carruthers, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nate Patrin, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― holy shit, i am not making this up., Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jel --, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
guilt: Remorseful awareness of having done something wrong. Self-reproach for supposed inadequacy or wrongdoing.
Why the guilt, ex-indie rockers? new answers please.
― http://gygax.pitas.com, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
b-but why did you buy them in the first place? can't you COUNT!?
If sequencing or song placement is the measure by which you determine the quality of a record, then I am very pleased indeed that we have little in common with regard to taste in music.
I know it must be endlessly rewarding to develop such a carefully calculated theory about "Symmetric Tracks Per Side" (or STPS as "the kids" are calling it), but the records sound so much better when you actually take them out of the sleeves and play them once in a while. I know, then it won't be MINT anymore, but you could always eBay it.
Oh, and I love your answer to the original question. Very direct.
(oh God, I sound stupid when I try to make a sensible point )
case in point: In the 1996 thread, someone mentioned defending any year (with rare exception) with "indie" records was *gasp* "precarious" (interesting how these words are used usually by people who quote dictionary definitions O_o), yet this person is clearly an indie product (as tackily (but necessarily as to make this particular point) referenced above). there is a definite anti-indie backlash in this forum, usually by those who possibly embraced it harder than others. i singled one person out unfairly, but this person is far from being the lone voice of indie guilt on ILM.
i'm looking to answer the question, not attack any online persona... Esp, not any wigga! Some of my best friends are wiggaz. w3rd y0! I think Josh's answer is most OTM so far.
― Josh, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dare, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bnw, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
HAHA, it's not ALL indie records, I won't defend indie, somebody else's music. I'm more concerned about Indie Guilt phenomena that runs rampant on ILM. It's confused me.
HAHA, if someone would have put all jazz records (or all country/electronic/dub/house), i guarantee all y'all indie apologists would've stroked their chins in unison.
C'mon, what was happening in the charts, with the stuff that most people were listening to?
there's some groundbreaking shit that has influenced all the way into the POP stratosphere there right here and now today. obviously someone was listening to those records...
Sterling, do you think that rejecting indie self-consciously after finding someone else who shared the same (i'll use this word cautiously) "precious" LoComDenom/indie interests as you has made you into someone who wants to have GCD shared musical interests (eg, the hip-hop/pop listening pile?)
― gareth, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
& I didn't self consciously reject indie after that, but now lo-this-many-years-later I can look back and perhaps see that as something pivotal, something which shattered my perception of the nature of the music and a person's necessary relationship to it, which broke through some idealist strand of essentialism and forced me out of that particular rut.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
That's going to be the nature of lists by one person any time, not just with indie. It could be a list consistenting of indie, pop, and smooth jazz and still it wouldn't encompess music as a whole. I just don't think it's possible for one person to listen to everything and make an informed decision being totally fair to all genre's, all while comparing apples to oranges. I'd rather see personal lists, i want to know what YOU liked in 1996 regardless if it was indie or not.
More important than TIGERMILK? [totally joking here]
& I didn't self consciously reject indie after that, but now lo- this-many-years-later I can look back and perhaps see that as something pivotal, something which shattered my perception of the nature of the music and a person's necessary relationship to it, which broke through some idealist strand of essentialism and forced me out of that particular rut. i understand, agree (!?!?), and more importantly, that was nice and concisely put. i think there is a lot of personal reasons not worth getting into with this subject and i admit I didn't have the right angle at first, but amid the varying pleas for sympathetic chortles, there were quite a few nice replies. i have to leave ILM now for the lab (please, hold back the groans and tears), but I have definitely learned something today about ILM and the extremely essential love/hate indie relationship within. thank you all.