Warsaw

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I was just curious how good is the Warsaw cd. I recognize a lot of the track titles as Joy Division songs. Is this worth buying?


WARSAW "Warsaw" (Moviepla) CD
The classic Warsaw recordings from the pre-JOY DIVISION art punk combo WARSAW. Seventeen tracks, including "Leaders of Men," "They Walked In Line," "Transmission," "Living In The Ice Age," "Shadowplay," "Gutz," "At A Later Date," and "Interzone."

Frank Booth (Frank Booth), Monday, 28 July 2003 07:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Sound quality is quite poor, but it does contain some radically different, interesting versions of well-known JD songs and a couple of "old" rarities like "at a later date". If you're a big fan, you'll like it I guess. It does not, however, kick as much ass as "Warsaw" (the song) on Substance.

willem (willem), Monday, 28 July 2003 07:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks. I think the tune "Warsaw" on Substance is awesome, that is why I was wondering about Warsaw the album.

Frank Booth (Frank Booth), Monday, 28 July 2003 08:07 (twenty-two years ago)

the sound quality seemed fine on my copy - not much worse than joy division's "still." i think much of this cd wound up on the "heart and soul" box set. it's worth hearing either way.

your null fame (yournullfame), Monday, 28 July 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Only 3 tracks from Warsaw are on 'Heart And Soul'. They are : The Drawback/Interzone/Shadowplay. That still leaves 8 tracks from the RCA demo and all 5 tracks from the 1977 Pennine Sound demo - so 13 tracks in total are not on H & S. Whilst some of the tracks are pretty much the same as later recordings, there are v. different versions of Transmission, No Love Lost which are essential to get, I reckon.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 28 July 2003 11:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I say buy it. Quit being so wishy-washy.

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 28 July 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)

It is only for the die-hard fanatics. If you are really curious what a shitty punk band sounded like before they hooked up with Martin Hannett and became Joy Division we all recognize, pick it up. It is a historical yet musically useless curiosity that that ranks right up there with the Electric Circus bootleg.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, come on. a "shitty punk band?" are you giving martin hannett all the credit?

your null fame (yournullfame), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 02:36 (twenty-two years ago)

mike taylor in crazy assertions with no basis in fact shocker

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 02:38 (twenty-two years ago)

most of ilm guilty of exactly the same thing shocker

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 02:46 (twenty-two years ago)

At a later Date is Excellent!

Andrzej B. (Andrzej B.), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 03:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it stands on its own as a great punkrock LP, quite aside from being a mere pre-Hannett curio.

CNWB, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 04:53 (twenty-two years ago)

They weren't shitty, they were just mediocre. Let's face it, if they didn't turn into Joy Division, nobody would be even faintly interested in them today.

Susan (Susan), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 12:16 (twenty-two years ago)

If Mike Taylor is talking about the 5 tracks from 1977 then he's on the money. If he's including the RCA demos, i.e the bulk of the Warsaw album, he's bonkers. No Love Lost - shitty punk? No.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Susan in recognizing MT's OTM Shockah

The rest of you are desperate fanboys with spots. When it comes to Joy Division fandom, 97% of ILM is my bitch.

If Unknown Pleasures had actually been released the way Barney and Hooky wanted it to sound it would have tanked and they never would have had another shot on Factory. In fact, it was the first factory LP and probably would have tanked the company if it had not sold a respectable 10,000 copies during it's first pressing.

Barney wanted Unknown Pleasures to be a super loud rock album with big guitars; thankfully Martin Hannett saw things differently and mixed the guitars way down with lots of reverb and hollowed out the drum sound behind Hooky's back. Hannett was the man who made Joy Division sound like Joy Division. Say what you like but I have plenty of live bootlegs that attest to JD usually being better heard on record (except when they were really on point and then they were unstoppable. This was the exception, not the rule BTW) You should watch Here Are The Young Men sometime to get a better understanding of what JD really sounded like.

If that is what you want to listen to, that is your prerogative, but I would much rather hear JD's playing tightened up in the studio through Martin Hannett's studio process than as a sloppy live band. And the second album of Still doesn't count as JD live because that was recorded on live on an 8-track and sweetened in the studio with overdubs.

JD without Martin Hannett is like Corn Flakes without the milk.

BTW, when are you planning on sending me the case of Bass ale that you owe me Jess?

Mike Taylor (mjt), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)

There's a great song from the earliest demo session, "You're No Good For Me," that never showed up on anything else but bootlegs... sort of ineptly played, but worth hearing for their full-on punk roots.

Douglas (Douglas), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 02:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Mike I think that generally speaking you're right - Hannett's importance is hard to overstate - but you minimize the appeal of Ian Curtis as a performer. Minus Hannett, Unknown Pleasures gets released, finds a small but dedicated core audience of people who pronounce Curtis a genius/visionary/whatever, but doesn't generate much further interest beyond that. Then Closer gets released on Reptile House only it's called The Young Men because Andrew Eldritch thinks it's a better title and the boys are eager to please their new label because they can feel the lanky tentacles of the dayjob closing around them. The Young Men does rather well, sounds much more like the non-Bizarro-world Unknown Pleasures; the Sisters start sucking even quicker than they actually did; Joy Division signs to Sire and then on the verge of touring the U.S., etc.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

John is correct. Joy Division was Ian Curtis and Martin Hannett. Hook and Morris are competent, but competent musicians are easy to come by. As for Sumner, he couldn't play guitar - or at least not at the New Order gig I went to in the early eighties when he persistently played in the wrong key, out of time etc. Ian Curtis wrote the words and basically orchestrated the song-writing sessions, he had the voice and the stage charisma. Hannet gave them their sound.

When Curtis died, the survivors tried their hand at making another Joy Division record. But "Movement" just comes over as second-rate wannabe Joy Division (I do have a soft spot for this album, but objectively it's pretty poor stuff). Sumner has had 20 years to prove he can write lyrics - and he's signally failed. I can take or leave New Order - they had a few decent singles - but they've dated far worse than Joy Division. "Closer", despite a few clunky synth moments, still sounds remarkably fresh. Hard to say that about any New Order album.

Susan (Susan), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 08:50 (twenty-two years ago)

**You should watch Here Are The Young Men sometime to get a better understanding of what JD really sounded like**

You should have fucking SEEN them, MT!!

Clearly their live sound was more in line with Barney and Hooky's *original* idea of what JD might sound like, especially on material like Shadowplay, Disorder, Warsaw where the punk roots are more exposed. See Shadowplay on the Les Bains Douches set - thunderous!

**And the second album of Still doesn't count as JD live because that was recorded on live on an 8-track and sweetened in the studio with overdubs**

It wasn't overdubbed.

Susan - b-but Steve Morris's drumming style was essential to the way they developed their sound - machine rigour instead of conventional beat n' fill rock drumming.

I think Barney's guitar playing is really good, obv not in a technical muso sense (who cares about that!) but he makes a damn brutal row (e.g. Shadowplay live), and has a good melodic ear too (New Dawn Fades, Ceremony) and did some neat rhythmic experiments (Sound of Music). I suspect we'll never agree on his lyrics, other than pointing out that you're utterly wrong, I don't want to say anything more on that old chestnut. You're also wrong about Movement.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 09:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I was wrong about Sound of Music - I forgot Hooky played guitar on that. Subsititute 'These Days'.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 09:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh and what about the Peel Sessions - sans Hannett obv, but still fantastic.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 09:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, Morris's drumming was part of their sound - but a drummer does not a band make. As for Sumner, I read that Curtis once tried to get him sacked for being crap - if Curtis HAD got another guitarist in, I very much doubt that it would have made much difference to Joy Division.

Dave, as for Sumner's lyrics, well:

"I don't wanna be like other people are
Don't wanna own a key, don't wanna wash my car
Don't wanna have to work like other people do
I want it to be free, I want it to be true"

Is it possible to be more banal than this?

Susan (Susan), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

There's threads and threads on his lyrics. It's 50:50 for and against. We'll never agree.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree that a drummer is not usually that important in defining how a band sounds. But Steve M, whilst not the defining factor in JD's sound, is far more important than most because of the way that JD were structured. Take She's Lost Control - bass as melody, guitar as texture and drums as lead instrument.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Point taken. When I think of Morris's drumming, I think of The Only Mistake - it really makes that song.

Susan (Susan), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)

It does. But if only the snare was a bit....*crispier*.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Fuck all that shit up there.. The Warsaw CD is an interesting alternate way of hearing JD songs. Is it as good as Joy Division? No. Is it better than a Joy Division tribute record? Yes. Maybe you're interested in hearing it, maybe you're not. But once you've memorized every note in the JD catalog, it's refreshing to hear the songs done another way - even if they're worse.

Maybe some of the naysayers would like to sell you their copy cheap?

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 10:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Closer", despite a few clunky synth moments, still sounds remarkably fresh. Hard to say that about any New Order album.

Regarding the last point: HA!

And I'll leave it at that. Dr. C is being a touch more polite on the other points than I feel like being right now. Both bands are fantastic and frankly I feel more of a 'connection,' however described, with Mr. Sumner these days (these daaaaaays...).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 15:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Say what you like but I have plenty of live bootlegs that attest to JD usually being better heard on record (except when they were really on point and then they were unstoppable.

You should rip these into MP3s and share them with us, the lowly masses...

JMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, Wednesday, 30 July 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I just like discussing JD minutiae. Though I love them I do thing JD and NO *should* be scrutinized and criticized, as any artist should. There's some wierd stuff on this thread mind you - 'Still' live sides overdubbed??

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 30 July 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I swear I read that it was polished in the studio after it was recorded. I want to say I read that in Ideal For Living, but it has been so many years...

I have a hard time believing that for once the entire band played perfect except for Stephen Morris dropping a single quarter note on I think* Passover. Maybe it is live, but it is a fucking miracle because they were sloppy live.

*I will not stake my life on this, but one of those songs in the beginning has a single drum snafu and it is the only bum phrase played on the entire live half of Still. I don't have my copy anymore because I lent it away my copy a few months back.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Thursday, 31 July 2003 00:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Mike - you're right about Steve's screw up on Passover, but there's loads of other mistakes! Barney plays a horrendous bum chord in New Dawn Fades before quickly sliding down a fret to the right place. IIRC there are some similar guitar probs on 24 Hours and I think Steve goes wrong too.
Also the synth is way out of tune in Decades (I once asked P.Hook abt this as I wondered why they let it be released - he said that the whole master tape was found to be stretched slightly but was only noticeable on the synth songs Decades and Isolation).
The straight from the desk sound of this gig doesn't really suit the blood and thunder of JD's live sound.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 31 July 2003 07:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I've always wondered about that synth on "Decades" (from Still). It's gotten so I can just listen to it with the expectation of it being out of tune, but it's not an easy listen, and this is the first time I've seen the whole question answered, so thank you Dr. C.

David A. (Davant), Thursday, 31 July 2003 09:34 (twenty-two years ago)

And Movement is a dark gem, gorgeous, neither JD nor NO in a way, something unique.

David A. (Davant), Thursday, 31 July 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

"You should have fucking SEEN them, MT!!"

Oh yes indeed, the good Dr. hits the nail squarely on the head!

The first time I saw them was supporting Buzzcocks in '79 when they left the whole crowd in the Oxford Apollo stunned into silence.

I was extremely tempted to leave after their set because I knew there was quite clearly absolutely no way, whatsoever Buzzcocks could possibly follow them - and I loved Buzzcocks.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 31 July 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Those two official live discs that surfaced in recent years are pretty damn godlike -- Preston and Les Bains Douches to thread! -- and while I think those who were there could best say, they sure as hell sounded like they were making it loud and wonderful at full volume.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 31 July 2003 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)

"And Movement is a dark gem, gorgeous, neither JD nor NO in a way, something unique."

I quite like this album, but nonetheless it's the sound of a band trying to make the next Joy Division LP, and failing. Hannett adds the electronic effects he used on Unknown Pleasures and Closer; Sumner tries to copy Curtis's voice and sings Curtis-esque lyrics.

Susan (Susan), Thursday, 31 July 2003 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Faster but slower.

Lynskey (Lynskey), Thursday, 31 July 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:07 (twenty-two years ago)

a band trying to make the next Joy Division LP, and failing
that's inevitable. trying to make a jd lp without ian curtis is a must-failure. i love that album and i hear it as the requiem of the remaining band members for ian curtis. and as a requiem it is quite a success, if requiems can be successes...

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:26 (twenty-two years ago)

**Hannett adds the electronic effects he used on Unknown Pleasures and Closer;**

I dunno about that - I think Hannett is experimenting wildly and with spectacular success. Some of the sounds he used were new (weird panned drum phasing, various electronic textures) and IMO were never really followed up once they'd got their hands on the sequencers. I think Movement stands as a unique, slightly flawed triumph and more credit to them for trying something different. I don't see it as a requiem - I think Ceremony/IALP was the requiem and with Movement they were bravely taking the first steps forward into the light.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 31 July 2003 14:17 (twenty-two years ago)

with Movement they were bravely taking the first steps forward into the light.
no way, dr. c. i think this record is even gloomier than any of the joy division albums. on movement new order are only looking back and not looking forward at all. the lyrics are so clearly about the disappearance of curtis that it hurts:

The Him

Some days you waste your life away
These times I find no words to say
A crime I once committed filled me
Too much of heaven's eyes I saw through
Only when meanings have no reason
They're taken beyond your sense of right

Small boy kneels, wandering in a great hall
He pays pennance to the air above him
White circles, black lines surround me
Reborn, so plain my eyes see
This is the reason that I came here
To be so near to such a person

I'm so tired, I'm so tired


or


Doubts Even Here

Those steps which seem to take a lifetime
When eyes just turn and stare
The day begins, collapsing without warning
You fade from sight, there's nothing there

All talk allowed, calls are answered daily
The questions are on your side
Deeply moved, beyond all consolation
You felt the pulse, now hear the cry

In my mind, thoughts are becoming clearer
I'm watching every move you make
Counting time spent in observation
A single blow a false mistake

Then you revealed to me
All that I need to know now
(The close went down to times
too, too much behind us)
Then please don't turn away,
Why can't I talk to you now?
(The number of forgotten years
Where my honor isn't deepest
Grows the deepest feeling and it
Grieved for safety and despair)
There's nowhere left to go
Where is this taking her and how?
(The torish threats forevermore
Over our natural favor
And us and he's and I'll fall
Far in it, and it sees enough
In our failures and it's not time.)
There's nothing more I want
To know beyond your trust now
(I missed his promised time again
For my friend)
Don't throw our joy away
Why must you just you leave now?
(Has God forgotten to approach us?
Has He rememberd to not despise us?)
Memories are all that's left
I need you near to me now
(There, now, now, don't come to mind my deeds
And call out in defiance of times gone by)


sorry for all those lyrics. i couldn't resist to post them.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Thursday, 31 July 2003 15:00 (twenty-two years ago)

where the hell did you find the lyrics to doubts even here? I love that song and could never figure out what the words were at the end.

Peter Hook sings this song if I'm not totally mistaken. Maybe he wrote the lyrics too because they're too good for Barney unless he had some amazing inspiration after Ian died or stole one of Ian's notebooks or something.

The first time I heard this song I was convinced it was a left over JD track w/Curtis on vocals, it sounds so similar.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Thursday, 31 July 2003 16:21 (twenty-two years ago)

"And Movement is a dark gem, gorgeous, neither JD nor NO in a way, something unique."

well, when i first heard that when it first came out i thought it was the most half-baked piece of junk, i really wanted my money back -- this band appeared to have no new ideas at this stage and having had a year to make the most of the old ones i think it speaks volumes for the actual ablities of the surviving members as creators, as musicians -- a pale void in the place of this fierce intense music of JD that left everyone dumbfounded back then -- and many people felt as i did about "movement", that here were the hired hands trying to cash in and make the best of this inspiration that had clearly come from someone else

when they were JD they were struggling, against the grain and odds, and the whole feel is so integrated into Curtis' m.o. -- it's so clearly his band -- and it always seemed as though his suicide was the great van gough type tragedy that played right into the marketeers hands -- New Order are just so "industry", so conveniently effetely wet -- isn't bernard the archetypal new age bore ? (in this respect alone he was a bit ahead of the pack)

but worse was to come, the revolutionary "blue monday", a piece of music compararable in complexity to material played to kindergarten children or line dancers

as for synths going out of tune on "Decades", well that slightly sea-sick end-of-movie sound it had on Closer was o.t.m. in the same way as Curtis' controversially pitched voice -- how novel -- we can't have anything going out of tune !!
compare it to the synths on the new order material -- the latter is dead wood synth from the peak of the new digital synths of the '80s, the blandest of all synth periods everyone seems to agree now, matching bernard's dead-wood tone and "life is soooo hard for me" whining -- well o.k. -- new order, a celebration of blandness, uncertainty, ambivalence, maybe even impotance, i always presumed

let's be clear here -- if new order had emerged on their own w/out the JD legacy they would have sunk without trace, and no record company would have given a damn -- surely the most overraterd band of recent decades and a deeply cynical cash-in -- and without the global interest in JD these pale creatures wouldn't have been able to afford the new synth stuff that gave them their new sound, their 'novelty', her edge -- weren't they just first on the block to those new synths ?

JD -- real passion, fear, hairs standing up -- new order (NO) passionless, always trying to regain the former glory, ordinary uncreative ex-punks in the right place at the right time (creative ? hey, let's all dance on e and jump around to tracks like blue monday and play pretend, and let the japanese synth preset programmers write our songs for us)

(and they even admit that they weren't even really listening to what Curtis was singing about, as they claim that if they had been they might have actually twigged that this guy had some serious emotional issues on his mind -- with friends like them, eh ?)

george gosset (gegoss), Thursday, 31 July 2003 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)

George, your revision of history regarding New Order's live performances in particular is amusing but astoundingly inaccurate.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 31 July 2003 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah didn't live performances almost break up the band? What with the rediculous amount of sequencing and equipment tweaks that were necessary in order to play a random setlist every night. I hardly think that if a bunch of nameless, faceless folks were in charge of that sort of thing, I don't think it would have been a serious issue...

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 31 July 2003 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)

**New Order are just so "industry"**
**that here were the hired hands trying to cash in and make the best of this inspiration that had clearly come from someone else**
** deeply cynical cash-in**
**ordinary uncreative ex-punks in the right place at the right time (creative ? hey, let's all dance on e and jump around to tracks like blue monday and play pretend, and let the japanese synth preset programmers write our songs for us)**

I don't know where to start George, I really don't. I'll respond in detail later, probably over the wkend when I have more time.

For now : Decades - what are you talking about? Decades studio version - best thing JD ever did, devastating lyrics, fantastic synth sound (sea-sick is a good description!). I was talking about the 'Still' version - flat, lifeless, out of tune.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 1 August 2003 08:29 (twenty-two years ago)

"I don't see it as a requiem - I think Ceremony/IALP was the requiem and with Movement they were bravely taking the first steps forward into the light."

No, Movement, although it has its charms, was a blind alley rather than any step forward. It really has nothing much to do with anything that came later. They were stuck with the existential rock template of Joy Division, but without Curtis couldn't pull it off. Temptation signals the change of direction when they decide to become an electronic dance band.

There's an interview with Jean-Pierre Turmel, author of the Licht and Blindheit text which ties up Joy Division with German romanticism, where he says he met the band after the Bains Douches concert and outlined his ideas but only Curtis was interested, the others found him a joke. That says a lot, I think, because all the intellectual and aesthetic underpinnings of Joy Division came from Curtis alone.

for those who read French, interview here:
http://www.angelfire.com/ga/zza77/temp/turmel.htm

Susan (Susan), Friday, 1 August 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I would say that Everything's Gone Green rather than Temptation might be the turning point. You could say that getting Gill in the band was important, although it took time to work through.

I agree that Curtis was *different* from the others and that any attempt to make Movement a JD-like recd could never work without Ian. Thing is, I don't think Movement is, or ever set out to be, the third JD album. Clearly whatever it was it stands alone and NO went off in a new direction soon after.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 1 August 2003 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)

when i first heard movement (the first new order i ever heard as a rabid JD fan) i was disappointed; it sounded like a crap attempt at another JD album. i now have absolutely no idea why i thought that.

Decades studio version - best thing JD ever did, devastating lyrics, fantastic synth sound (sea-sick is a good description!).

dr c otm as ever...

toby (tsg20), Friday, 1 August 2003 11:09 (twenty-two years ago)

@ anthony kyle: try this search.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 1 August 2003 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)

@dr. c: that's fine with me. so then we can distinguish four bands:

1. early warsaw around 1977 with very raw basic punk
2. warsaw album and joy division. post-punk, goth-rock, dark wave or whatever
3. new order's movement: a last reverence to ian curtis
4. new order after movement: treading new paths for electronic dance pop.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 1 August 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Susan, how does the fact that Bernard Sumner basically wrote all the music for Joy Division AND New Order fit into your theory that he was the most dispensible member of the group?

sb, Friday, 1 August 2003 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Because it's all about Peter Hook! (And some days I think that, and others I'm all, "No, it's the way Bernard sings," and then other days...)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 1 August 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)

But without the great tunes neither band would have even got of the ground. And without Bernard's criminally underated guitar playing they wouldn't be half of what they were either.

sb, Friday, 1 August 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

**how does the fact that Bernard Sumner basically wrote all the music for Joy Division AND New Order**

No he didn't. In JD it mainly came out of group jams. Less so in New Order, more tinkering with the synths. I would agree that BS probably writes *most* of NO's music. But certainly not all of it.


**so then we can distinguish four bands**

I suppose so. Or you could say :Pre-Hannett>JD+Hannett>NO+Hannett>Sequencers

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 1 August 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

"Susan, how does the fact that Bernard Sumner basically wrote all the music for Joy Division AND New Order fit into your theory that he was the most dispensible member of the group?"

Well, I don't think he wrote basically wrote all the music for Joy Division. From the Jon Savage article "Good Evening, We're Joy Division":

"Ian used to spot the riffs", says Peter Hook. "We’d jam: he'd stop us and say, That was good, play it again. We didn’t have a tape recorder then: imagine! He spotted 'Twenty four hours', ‘Insight’, ‘She’s lost control’ – all of them. If it hadn't been for his ear, we might have played it once and then never again. You didn’t know you’d played it half the time. It’s unconscious, but he was conscious”.


Well, that doesn't sound like Sumner writing all the music to me. It sounds like a bunch of musicians noodling about on their instruments and Curtis picking up on the usable bits.

Susan (Susan), Friday, 1 August 2003 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

It sounds like jamming is the best way to write songs, too. Which in my experience it is. Can's, too. It's so hard to jam on yr own, boohoo

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 1 August 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Average musicians noodling about on their instruments hardly produces and abundance of great riffs. Just because Curtis spotted some that they might have otherwise discarded doesn't mean they wouldn't have come up with equally good ones without him. And New Order proves that point. Also, who apart from Sumner was consistently coming up with these riffs? Look at the solo work of the other members of the group - how many tracks have they produced that could have been great New Order in the way that Get the Message and Getting Away With It and Disappointed could have been?

sb, Friday, 1 August 2003 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)

First 3 tracks on the first Monaco album are better than all of Republic apart from Regret! Selfish off 'the Other Two and You'.

Susan - are you Susan Jones?


Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 1 August 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Dr. C, no, a different Susan.

sb - well Sumner no doubt came up with some riffs that went into making great songs, so yes Joy Division would have been different without Sumner. But his role is more like an actor in a movie written and directed by someone else. Sure, Clockwork Orange wouldn't have been the same without Malcolm McDowell, but the movie would have been made without him, even if it turned out a bit differently. However, the movie wouldn't have been made without Kubrick or Burgess.

[/end tortuous, probably ill-advised analogy]

Susan (Susan), Friday, 1 August 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't mean to disparage the role of the others. Curtis's singing and lyrics were indispensible to Joy Division, and Hook and Steven and Gillian are indispensible to how New Order sounds, and I haven't heard the Monaco album but going by their single at the time, which sounded more like side one of Brotherhood than anything Electronic have released, Hook probably has a lot more input than just coming up with the bass parts. All I'm saying is Sumner is the major tunesmith of both bands and without him Joy Division and New Order would be inconceivable. Without any of the others Joy Division and New Order would simply have sounded very different.

sb, Friday, 1 August 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

No one person "writes" a band, though. That's sort of the point of them.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 1 August 2003 13:16 (twenty-two years ago)

**Dr. C, no, a different Susan**

So you'll be relieved to know you didn't stub out a cigarette on my hand at a Blancmange gig in 1983 then!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 1 August 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

**So you'll be relieved to know you didn't stub out a cigarette on my hand at a Blancmange gig in 1983 then!**

It wasn't you? I wonder whose hand I got then...

Susan (Susan), Friday, 1 August 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

three years pass...

I just got this today and am loving the shit out of it.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 June 2007 08:02 (eighteen years ago)

YOU FUCKIN BETCHA!!! I'M GONNA BUY YOU A DRINK! I mean really, were that band EVER better? EVER? Maybe 20 years ago I would have said so, but not today. See also LCD Soundsystem's cover of "No Love Lost" released this year as a b-side to "All My Friends". Not as good as the original, obviously, but I think it flatters JD in the nicest way. That music should live on, even if someone else less talented is playing it. New Order have officially broken up now as well. I just read it in NME as of a few days ago. I wondered why no one on this board seemed to notice this blurb I read, and it isn't even posted on the neworderonline site. I guess I'll have to dig up a New Order thread and post it, though I'd really rather not. See no evil, hear no evil...

Bimble, Sunday, 24 June 2007 02:43 (eighteen years ago)

There was already a thread on New Order's breakup.

Binjominia, Sunday, 24 June 2007 03:33 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah well we've certainly discussed plenty here that it seemed to be going that way, but I don't remember this story from the NME being quoted here, where Hooky laments that the reason for the breakup is "personal".

Bimble, Sunday, 24 June 2007 06:14 (eighteen years ago)

music should live on, even if someone else less talented is playing it.

...the thought that birthed a thousand cleopatra label tribute compilations.

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Sunday, 24 June 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)

four years pass...

WARSAW IS SO AWESOME

Mad God 40/40 (Z S), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 02:08 (thirteen years ago)

Also, to be a fly on the wall at the "Ideal for Living" session, Dec 1977, during which the following 4 songs were laid to tape:

1. Warsaw
2. No Love Lost
3. Leaders of Men
4. Failures

holy shit.

Mad God 40/40 (Z S), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 02:09 (thirteen years ago)

I picture them exiting the studio after that session, 3 am, a poorly lit street, and then some poor guy rounds the corner and accidentally steps on the same sidewalk as the four of them, and he immediately gets exploded off of the pavement by electricity, propelled hundreds of feet into the air and directly into an open grave a few blocks away, and Warsaw/Joy Division don't even notice because they're too busy being immortal

Mad God 40/40 (Z S), Tuesday, 12 June 2012 02:11 (thirteen years ago)

Warsaw's definitely awesome, like the raw, youthful punk birth of JD. Remember finding that album on some FTP server in the 90s, got me into Joy Division oddly enough.

Spectrum, Tuesday, 12 June 2012 02:13 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.