American Politics Thread 2013: I'm a cool Rodham grandma in the USA

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4309 of them)

They hate us for our freedom. We hate them for their nuptials.

Aimless, Friday, 20 December 2013 21:24 (ten years ago) link

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/12/a-sharp-progressive-joins-the-doj.html

this is excellent news, especially if it means obama is warming her up for a long-overdue appointment to the federal bench. i saw her speak at my school when i was an undergrad -- really smart and interesting lady

k3vin k., Saturday, 21 December 2013 02:22 (ten years ago) link

https://pic.twitter.com/UQ9cvGAONY

balls, Sunday, 22 December 2013 02:08 (ten years ago) link

the intellectualizer in me wants to say that this stockman race will be interesting in showing just how strong The Crazy is vs an established (and very conservative!) pol in the gop, and how the rest of the party handles it.

but that's bullshit really it's just kind of entertaining.

napgenius (goole), Sunday, 22 December 2013 02:21 (ten years ago) link

This McCain feature in Sunday's NYT magazine is a treat.

Beatrix Kiddo (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 24 December 2013 12:33 (ten years ago) link

I couldn't believe an editor got away with assigning a cover out of it though

the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 December 2013 12:38 (ten years ago) link

I saw the cover and thought do I really want to read more about McCain, and skipped it. So it really has stuff in it worth reading?

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 24 December 2013 16:28 (ten years ago) link

charles pierce is forever awesome.

Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 25 December 2013 01:28 (ten years ago) link

Except when he sneers at popular country music in a haughty manner and comes across as snotty as the Republicans he criticizes.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 25 December 2013 06:02 (ten years ago) link

http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=21409580

Dude quits his Town Councilman position to run for Senate, writes resignation letter in Klingon.

Also, is running on the Constitution Party ticket, which makes this all that much more perfect.

An Android Pug of Some Kind? (kingfish), Friday, 3 January 2014 17:27 (ten years ago) link

Thought it was mandatory to know both Klingon and Vulcan to oint hat party? ~also Esperanto~

hatcat marnell (suzy), Friday, 3 January 2014 18:35 (ten years ago) link

^join that party

Ooh, think my laptop battery is expanding, tres amusant, Apple....

hatcat marnell (suzy), Friday, 3 January 2014 18:35 (ten years ago) link

charles pierce is killing it

got dayum

j., Friday, 3 January 2014 21:39 (ten years ago) link

check out driftglass.blogspot.com
Charlie Pierce steals megastuff from there

I got the glares, the mutterings, the snarls (President Keyes), Saturday, 4 January 2014 04:26 (ten years ago) link

While almost all working Americans will pay into Social Security through their paychecks throughout the year, the 900 wealthiest people in the country won’t. That’s because the highest-earning 0.0001 percent of the U.S. — many of them corporate CEOs — made $117,000 in the first two days of the year, which is the maximum annual income that is subject to Social Security taxes under federal law.

It’s tough to say for certain who will be a part of this group in 2014, since the most recent available data on Americans’ earnings is from 2012. In that year, 894 individuals nationwide made enough to qualify for membership in this club, according to the Los Angeles Times. Economist Teresa Ghilarducci came up with the calculation, and points out that Forbes data on top earners enables analysts and the public to see some of the members of this group. There were nearly 70 corporate CEOs who made enough to qualify in 2012, including the top officers at companies like Philip Morris, NewsCorp, Starbucks, ComCast, and Pfizer.

They get to live the year free from Social Security taxes because the law says that only the first $117,000 earned in a year can be taxed to fund the retirement program that kept more than 15 million people out of poverty in 2011. Democrats have pushed to raise the cap in recent years from $106,800 in 2009 to the current level. Eliminating the cap entirely could make the program solvent for the next 75 years without cutting a dime from anyone’s benefits — and doing so wouldn’t touch the earnings of 94.2 percent of all American workers.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/01/03/3118281/rich-social-security-taxes/

Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Saturday, 4 January 2014 14:59 (ten years ago) link

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_01/jesse_myerson_throws_down_five048479.php

It’s called “Five Economic Reforms Millennials Should Be Fighting For.” Myerson’s reforms are the following:

1. Guaranteed Work for Everybody
2. Social Security for All
3. Take Back The Land
4. Make Everything Owned by Everybody
5. A Public Bank in Every State
All right, settle down, these proposals are hardly as far-out as they may sound on first hearing. Number one is a public works program, number two is a universal basic income, the third is a land value tax, the fourth is collectivizing wealth ownership by having the government buy up private sector assets and paying a dividend to all citizens (Alaska has a program similar to this in place), and the fifth is pretty much what it says: i.e., a public bank that doesn’t rip off its customers or rape the country.

As Digby points out, the wingnuts are having a meltdown over Myerson’s article

curmudgeon, Monday, 6 January 2014 15:24 (ten years ago) link

"disorderly conduct," myerson's podcast with alexis goldstein, is fuckin awesome and highly recommended.

(alexis goldstein, Wall Street IT nerd turned OWS talking head)

Ohhhhh good good good I needed a new podcast! Excellent. I love Alexis Goldstein.

Horreur! What are this disassociated lumps of (in orbit), Monday, 6 January 2014 15:57 (ten years ago) link

she asked my mic advice for the show! i was flattered. they only do a show like once a month tho, i wish they were on more often.

I want to say lots of things about how incongruously small and elfin she is but I won't.

Horreur! What are this disassociated lumps of (in orbit), Monday, 6 January 2014 16:03 (ten years ago) link

Okay I will. She's this unassuming looking small person with economic justice superpowers just blackly gathering, swirling under her hoodie, waiting to be released. She legit might be a superhero.

Horreur! What are this disassociated lumps of (in orbit), Monday, 6 January 2014 16:04 (ten years ago) link

thx for the tip hood

flopson, Monday, 6 January 2014 16:05 (ten years ago) link

hoos

flopson, Monday, 6 January 2014 16:05 (ten years ago) link

also <3 tiny alexis

the comments in the Rolling Stone article are edifying.

Boy there sure are a lot of libertarians on the internet.

Horreur! What are this disassociated lumps of (in orbit), Monday, 6 January 2014 16:23 (ten years ago) link

good god that myerson article

Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Monday, 6 January 2014 17:28 (ten years ago) link

A few weeks after our lunch, Luntz tells me he's made a move. He has changed his principal residence from Northern Virginia to a condo overlooking the Las Vegas Strip

that should make him feel better, i always hear las vegas is really nice

Karl Malone, Monday, 6 January 2014 20:15 (ten years ago) link

Most of all, Luntz says, he wishes we would stop yelling at one another. Luntz dreams of drafting some of the rich CEOs he is friends with to come up with a plan for saving America from its elected officials. "The politicians have failed; now it's up to the business community to stand up and be heard," he tells me. "I want the business community to step up." Having once thought elites needed to listen to regular people, he now wants the people to learn from their moneyed betters.

curmudgeon, Monday, 6 January 2014 20:18 (ten years ago) link

if only business could have an impact on our politics in some way

Speaking of which there's a big Washington Post article today on the Koch brothers and their network

curmudgeon, Monday, 6 January 2014 20:56 (ten years ago) link

Koch Bros influence is overrated imho, they're kind of an easy target but there are so many other groups basically writing terrible legislation

Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 6 January 2014 21:05 (ten years ago) link

OTM. Picking out one group or another misses the point.

Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Monday, 6 January 2014 21:43 (ten years ago) link

Koch Brothers help fund ALEC, one of the largest of such legislation writing groups http://www.thenation.com/article/161973/alec-exposed-koch-connection

From today's W. Post article:

The filings show that the network of politically active nonprofit groups backed by the Kochs and fellow donors in the 2012 elections financially outpaced other independent groups on the right and, on its own, matched the long-established national coalition of labor unions that serves as one of the biggest sources of support for Democrats.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/koch-backed-political-network-built-to-shield-donors-raised-400-million-in-2012-elections/2014/01/05/9e7cfd9a-719b-11e3-9389-09ef9944065e_story.html

curmudgeon, Monday, 6 January 2014 21:45 (ten years ago) link

x-post

I know there's the Chamber of Commerce acting upon behalf of business and a zillion others all influencing Congress for years in ways that Luntz wants to pretend does not happen.

curmudgeon, Monday, 6 January 2014 21:50 (ten years ago) link

there is a hivemind out there

but Scorsese's transgressive, numbing film will wake everyone up

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 6 January 2014 21:54 (ten years ago) link

wake them up until the next bright shiny crusade appears

Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Monday, 6 January 2014 21:55 (ten years ago) link

this country loves to take a nap

Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Monday, 6 January 2014 21:56 (ten years ago) link

sometimes at the movie theatre

curmudgeon, Monday, 6 January 2014 21:57 (ten years ago) link

Yeah it's pretty clear that American politics overwhelmingly represent the business community (and have since the beginning).

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 6 January 2014 22:50 (ten years ago) link

Actually even before the beginning.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 6 January 2014 22:50 (ten years ago) link

and now after the end

i haven't read that yet, but this sentence -- "Luntz dreams of drafting some of the rich CEOs he is friends with to come up with a plan for saving America from its elected officials." -- could be a slightly unfair gloss on him?

i mean, i'm well primed to hear pinochet behind every business-centrist utterance, but that's pretty blatant

napgenius (goole), Monday, 6 January 2014 22:56 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.