defend the indefensible: glenn fucking greenwald

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

ugh, the worst, right? anyway, i just really wanted to share this lustrous takedown of him from some guy's blog i don't know:
http://jacobinism.blogspot.co.il/2013/05/drooling-self-love-dime-store-third.html

One will search Greenwald’s writing for coherence in vain because, although he espouses moral relativism when it suits his agenda, as we’ve just seen, he’ll vehemently disown it with his very next breath. His is not a thoughtful, principled commitment to a philosophy he’s prepared to defend or apply consistently. Rather, his geopolitical outlook might be best described as a half-understood kind of dime-store Third Worldism; a gruesome combination of a thoroughgoing Western masochism with an ostensible compassion for the wretched of the earth that masks the same racist condescension and contempt typified by the worst kind of colonialist paternalism.

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:32 (five years ago) Permalink

hes cooler than you

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:35 (five years ago) Permalink

isms in my opinion aren't good

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:36 (five years ago) Permalink

it was funny when the exile would troll him by only referring to him as "glenn greenwald of the libertarian cato institute"

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:38 (five years ago) Permalink

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OoUEP8atZl4/UY8Z5RFJ5mI/AAAAAAAAALg/ftL1Q9ZSCTc/s1600/greenwald.jpg

he looks like an older mark zuckerberg here

iatee, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:38 (five years ago) Permalink

Principled, consistent, systematic political philosophers do not become pundits. Greenwald's inconsistencies merely validate his membership in that group. Apart from that shocking accusation, all the rest of the takedown quoted above is pure vilification. iow, it is a less witty version of what Greenwald does for a living. pot calling out the kettle.

Aimless, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:39 (five years ago) Permalink

no no I meant it as a compliment

iatee, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:40 (five years ago) Permalink

By calling him the "worst", you are being as simplistic as he sometimes is.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:40 (five years ago) Permalink

I think he is a bad writer but I agree with most of the points he makes.

Michigan seems like a dream to me now (Treeship), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:41 (five years ago) Permalink

good thing i'm only making threads on ilx and not opining for a major newspaper xp

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:42 (five years ago) Permalink

Mordy does simplistic a lot, with relish

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:42 (five years ago) Permalink

mordy doesnt like glenn-chan because he refuses to kiss israel's feet and lips and buttlips. let's just be real about it

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:43 (five years ago) Permalink

well that's why he's the worst!

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:44 (five years ago) Permalink

Mordy, I've only read the Thatcher article, show me what he wrote that you didn't like?

cardamon, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:44 (five years ago) Permalink

Like any pundit he's useful when you need him to prove your point. Explaining how presidential administration quietly or openly chip away at civil liberties is his strength; he lacks the subtlety to explain what makes civil liberties worth preserving and the style that would make him consistently readable. Like all brands, he's taken for granted.

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:45 (five years ago) Permalink

^ i agree with this

Michigan seems like a dream to me now (Treeship), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:48 (five years ago) Permalink

"thoroughgoing Western masochism" = we hadda kill those people, dammit.

Works well for Israel, too.

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:50 (five years ago) Permalink

like most men, he looks vile in cargo shorts

http://www.out.com/sites/out.com/files/GlennGreenwald1.jpg

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:51 (five years ago) Permalink

goddamn his husband

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:52 (five years ago) Permalink

He looks better in cargo shorts than glenn does

Michigan seems like a dream to me now (Treeship), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:54 (five years ago) Permalink

goddamn to hell colored flip flops.

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:13 (five years ago) Permalink

lol this thread

greenwald is occasionally (ok, more than occasionally) long-winded but he is easily the best political blogger of the last decade.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:18 (five years ago) Permalink

treeship mostly otm

also i think we've gone over this ground p thoroughly in the last 5 years

also that blog you linked to really sucks!

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:25 (five years ago) Permalink

harry's place, LGF, euston manifesto in the blogroll... labor hawks, man, 2004 in effect

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:27 (five years ago) Permalink

mordy didn't you love greenwald until a few years ago

mordy's not an obama stan but i did sort of notice that he lost a lot of fans around 2009 or so, weird

you are not a better writer than f. scott fitzgerald. you are not a b (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:29 (five years ago) Permalink

who lost fans, GG, obama or mordy?

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:30 (five years ago) Permalink

i did love greenwald until a few years ago - i remember when i forced myself to unsub from his rss feed. this was when he was still at salon.

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:31 (five years ago) Permalink

Hmm. It seems to me that the only reason Greenwald is perplexed by accusations of relativism is that he doesn't understand what the term means. [goes on to define moral relativism]

yes thanks much fucker

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:33 (five years ago) Permalink

anyway he's at his best when he just writes about the law and doesn't try to pundit so much, and once you read like 100 of his columns you pretty much know what he's going to think about everything and he becomes less necessary to read on a daily basis. he's definitely a necessary force for good in the world of political writing. even if i don't need to read him anymore, i wouldn't want a blogosphere without him

have to say some of the clones he's produced are pretty dire, like him otm more often than not but with even less style and just clearly not as smart or well-researched. forget these dudes names atm but it's not important, they're like slate writers or something. also goes without saying his commenters are generally the scum of the earth but i haven't read any of his comments in years either

you are not a better writer than f. scott fitzgerald. you are not a b (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:33 (five years ago) Permalink

i used to find his writing very interesting - he'd present new material (especially legal material) that i wasn't familiar with, he'd analyze it very insightfully, etc. now he just rants and writes arguments about how ideologically impure everyone but he is. also i think he's doubled down significantly on the wrong side of liberalism. like when he asked recently why Israeli can bomb Syria without condemnation when obv if Syria bombed Israel ppl would be hysterical. obv equivalencies like that are immediately intellectually suspect (um, Assad has been lobbing shit into Israel for months w/out much attention), but also it's just this really facile kind of geopolitical analysis. at some point he traded in what he was good at - legal analysis - for ideological tirades. i think it really destroyed any value he held.

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:35 (five years ago) Permalink

lol at that 'lustrous takedown,' which includes gems like this:

Those of us who recognise the universal importance and desirability of the above, have little difficulty in ascribing inferiority to a culture that is - conversely - obscurantist, theocratic, misogynistic, racist and oppressive, such as that of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

dismissing a 'culture' (rather than a government) as 'inferior' sounds pretty racist to me.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:35 (five years ago) Permalink

cultures aren't synonymous w/ races

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:37 (five years ago) Permalink

maybe it's culturist tho!

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:37 (five years ago) Permalink

yeah i mean it's kind of a dickish thing to say no matter how you slice it.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:37 (five years ago) Permalink

nah, some cultures obv suck

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:37 (five years ago) Permalink

i am a big fan of both gg and mordy, i am sad they can't be friends

Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:38 (five years ago) Permalink

they can walk in flip flops and shorts together

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:38 (five years ago) Permalink

now he just rants and writes arguments about how ideologically impure everyone but he is

eh he inserts enough qualifiers and equivocations to suggest otherwise, but he IS fond of adverbs

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:39 (five years ago) Permalink

feet and lips and buttlips

I love you

Oral Sex in Sharp’s Ridge Park (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:39 (five years ago) Permalink

Greenwald has also criticised the US detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba on the grounds that they deny those held there the protection of the rule of law and due process. But if these are markers by which it is possible to judge the American administration's commitment to human rights, why are they not also suitable markers by which to judge that of the Iranian or Syrian regimes, whose behaviour by these standards is demonstrably much worse? And if these markers are deemed legitimate points of universalist comparison by Greenwald, then why not others such as the emancipation of women, and the protection of LGBTQ rights? And why the reluctance to judge, and where necessary indict, cultures accordingly?

oh, the bush years. remember this shit? lol

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:40 (five years ago) Permalink

i do think GG used to be better than he is now -- he rarely surprises me anymore. i usually skip the pieces where he just complains about cable news. this was one of his better pieces from the last couple years:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/02/obama-civil-liberties-history

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:41 (five years ago) Permalink

let's summarize Mordy's points:

tuchus

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:41 (five years ago) Permalink

i did make fun of mordy's cargo shorts once which i regret

i think JD's point that he's the best political blogger of the past decade (ever?) is pretty tough to argue with; even if you dislike his more recent punditry (something i can sympathize with), his strengths make him on balance pretty invaluable. you can even just choose to remember the good times

you are not a better writer than f. scott fitzgerald. you are not a b (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:42 (five years ago) Permalink

Greenwald can only withhold judgement of Iran's dismal human rights record or Syria's campaign of sectarian slaughter by affirming that Persians and Arabs are simply not culturally suited to the liberties and protections derived from Enlightenment thought to which Westerners rightly feel they are entitled. Instead, they must be perceived as childlike, simple and sometimes savage peoples whose cultural proclivities demonstrate a preference for subjugation, violence, injustice and fear over liberty and peace, and who are incapable of understanding egalitarian concepts of human rights due to their uniquely 'Western' character.

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:43 (five years ago) Permalink

maybe the best domestic blogger critic of america but he's so outclassed by like every other geopolitical blogger

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:43 (five years ago) Permalink

the blue and the dim of feet and lips and buttlips
i would spread my lips on those buttlips

you are not a better writer than f. scott fitzgerald. you are not a b (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:44 (five years ago) Permalink

i think that's pretty otm. i've felt for a long time like there's a racism of low expectations at play in post-colonialism + cultural relativism xxp

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:44 (five years ago) Permalink

like stephen walt is hardly a friend of israel but he's so much more worth reading than greenwald. he actually writes new material and has insights that seem valuable. and he doesn't rant.

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:45 (five years ago) Permalink

nah, some cultures obv suck

― Mordy , Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:37 PM (27 seconds ago) Bookmark

agreed, for example the racist settler state known as Israel

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:45 (five years ago) Permalink

Greenwald has also criticised the US detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba on the grounds that they deny those held there the protection of the rule of law and due process. But if these are markers by which it is possible to judge the American administration's commitment to human rights, why are they not also suitable markers by which to judge that of the Iranian or Syrian regimes, whose behaviour by these standards is demonstrably much worse? And if these markers are deemed legitimate points of universalist comparison by Greenwald, then why not others such as the emancipation of women, and the protection of LGBTQ rights? And why the reluctance to judge, and where necessary indict, cultures accordingly?

oh, the bush years. remember this shit? lol

― goole, Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:40 PM (3 minutes ago)

ha wait, who's the relativist now?

gg has said on numerous occasions that he focuses on the US because he's a US citizen. seems pretty simple

you are not a better writer than f. scott fitzgerald. you are not a b (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:46 (five years ago) Permalink

seems a fair assessment

( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Monday, 27 August 2018 19:19 (three months ago) Permalink

yes great post

k3vin k., Monday, 27 August 2018 23:30 (three months ago) Permalink

Reading the article reminded me, for the hundredth time this year at least, that cynics are really soured romantics, and some of the factual mistakes on which Greenwald's corrected, not to mention the dogmatism, are the sort of thing I expect from twenty-five-year-olds who won't let a point go. I don't believe he's a Russian plant or a nefarious agent, but when a resourceful pundit and expert synthesist of data like Greenwald still implies that Trump's election was a required shock to the system, I think, "Well, great, buddy, I understand why you live in Brazil with your twenty-four dogs and flip-flops."

The Silky Veils of Alfred (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 August 2018 23:39 (three months ago) Permalink

That an intelligent person of good conscience and progressive voting record could believe that American greatness is a bunch of bullshit yet still (a) vote for Clinton (b) think American republicanism did not need the shock to the system incarnated in Trump has not occurred to him.

The Silky Veils of Alfred (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 August 2018 23:41 (three months ago) Permalink

yes all of that otm

Dan S, Monday, 27 August 2018 23:47 (three months ago) Permalink

needed vs deserved

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Monday, 27 August 2018 23:48 (three months ago) Permalink

Thought you were a lapsed Catholic Morbs.

faculty w1fe (silby), Monday, 27 August 2018 23:54 (three months ago) Permalink

Anyway, I've read Greenwald since 2004. On my own blogging he was a formidable and formative influence; when I didn't vote for Obama in 2008 I had him to thank for the psychological ballast. But, as good king Don Henley said, don't look back, you can never look back.

The Silky Veils of Alfred (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 August 2018 23:55 (three months ago) Permalink

there is a sizeable slice of the Dem rank-and-file who are fantasizing about Biden/Booker/Harris 2020 so they can, as Dennis Perrin says, go right back to sleep.

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 28 August 2018 00:00 (three months ago) Permalink

I agree w j0rdan.

wayne trotsky (Simon H.), Tuesday, 28 August 2018 00:02 (three months ago) Permalink

I have no way of gauging the rank-and-file, whom I often assume are synonymous with "DNC."

The Silky Veils of Alfred (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 August 2018 00:03 (three months ago) Permalink

no such thing as "Dem rank and file." that would imply a proper party-ness they do not possess

wayne trotsky (Simon H.), Tuesday, 28 August 2018 01:06 (three months ago) Permalink

Its like if the dude who kept warning us about the impacts of climate change wont stop sounding celebratory that miami is underwater or complaining about the history of the arriving fema trailers.

And also the hurricane is a racist sexist fascist sentient storm.

Ok that is some bad analogism still, fuck that guy

Hunt3r, Wednesday, 29 August 2018 02:48 (three months ago) Permalink

im dying that morbs still brings up dennis perrin

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 29 August 2018 05:27 (three months ago) Permalink

GG seems not too far removed from d’souza-style ‘lincoln was a republican/dems are the real racists’ arguments. that troll life has got him in its sway

also the thing with the tennys player is just weird

mookieproof, Wednesday, 29 August 2018 09:19 (three months ago) Permalink

j0rd, meet me in DC and we can have lunch with him :)

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 August 2018 11:26 (three months ago) Permalink

also this is my last post in this thread, it's been cancer

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 August 2018 11:27 (three months ago) Permalink

lol ok doc

k3vin k., Wednesday, 29 August 2018 20:06 (three months ago) Permalink

greil marcus weighs in:

I think there are strong reasons to believe that Glenn Greenwald, like Edward Snowden, is either a Russian agent or an agent of influence—someone who believes he or she is operating independently but for various reasons, which could involve apparently independent financing or patronage, access to privileged information, facilitation through cut outs, and so on, is in fact promoting stories, arguments, individuals, and policies his or her controllers want promoted. The argument that there is no difference between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is, from either a right or left perspective, lunacy—unless you believe there is no difference between the US and Russia, which is to say that you believe that democracy, as practiced in the US and much of the West, is a hoax, and that politics is only a point-by-point choice between autocracies and kleptocracies.

When I read Greenwald in Salon, I thought he merely demonstrated textbook symptoms of paranoia, in particular over-sourcing every assertion, argument, statement of apparent fact, as if to say I KNOW YOU DON’T BELIEVE ME BUT LOOK AT THIS THE PROOF IS HERE YOU CAN’T DENY IT! I think that’s still an essential part of his political personality, but I think now there’s far more going on.

https://greilmarcus.net/ask-greil-2/

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 7 September 2018 18:37 (three months ago) Permalink

like Edward Snowden

stopped reading

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 September 2018 18:38 (three months ago) Permalink

Welcome back!

The Silky Veils of Alfred (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 September 2018 18:40 (three months ago) Permalink

I thought he merely demonstrated textbook symptoms of paranoia, in particular over-sourcing every assertion

citations are for paranoids, blithe accusations of treason in unsupported subclauses are for rock critics

difficult listening hour, Friday, 7 September 2018 18:47 (three months ago) Permalink

Tennis is really having a bad influence on him. He is anti-Serena as well, it seems.

Frederik B, Sunday, 16 September 2018 10:09 (two months ago) Permalink

Yeah he tweeted out some statistics showing that male tennis players have been more frequently penalized for Serena's transgressions than female players have. Then Nate Silver tweeted back that he was not taking into account the rate at which each sex is penalized - in other words maybe male players transgress far more often, which results in them being penalized more.

Josefa, Sunday, 16 September 2018 14:34 (two months ago) Permalink

male tennis players have been more frequently penalized for Serena's transgressions than female players have

This is an...interesting argument (But probably a typo in there)

Karl Malone, Sunday, 16 September 2018 14:41 (two months ago) Permalink

Or wait, you probably just mean penalized for doing things similar to whatever Serena did, sorry

Karl Malone, Sunday, 16 September 2018 14:43 (two months ago) Permalink

Exactly. Sorry my bad

Josefa, Sunday, 16 September 2018 14:44 (two months ago) Permalink

Ford’s own words regarding Feinstein’s decision deliberately ignored by Glenn so he can both sides the Dems with what the GOP did w Garland. Cool cool cool. Not at all an irredeemable piece of shit.

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Friday, 28 September 2018 15:28 (two months ago) Permalink

That must be maddening, watching expats support a fascist when they have no skin in the game. pic.twitter.com/S05bHbCpDB

— All Hallow’s Eve Not All Hallow’s Steve (@agraybee) October 8, 2018

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Monday, 8 October 2018 18:45 (two months ago) Permalink

lollll

shwarmaduke (symsymsym), Monday, 8 October 2018 19:26 (two months ago) Permalink

Glenn's latest on Brazil where naturally he blames 'the establishment" more than Bolsonaro or those who support Bolsonaro's extremist views

To be sure – as is true of Trump, Brexit, and the rise of right-wing extremism throughout Europe – some substantial minority of Bolsonaro voters are motivated by classic bigotry, racism, anti-LGBT animus, resentment toward the indigenous population, and just a general tribal anger that seeks scapegoats for their plight. But many, probably most, are none of those things.

Many, instead, are motivated by legitimate grievances toward an establishment ruling class that has failed them on all levels, that expresses indifference if not outright contempt for their suffering and loss of hope, that they blame, often with good reason, for enacting policies that have destroyed their futures while refusing to accept any responsibility for it. And once that framework is adopted, any perceived enemy of that ruling class becomes their friend, or at least someone whose vows of destruction become more appealing than vows to preserve the system they justifiably despise (the reality is that Bolsonaro (like Trump), with his Chicago-trained neoliberal economic guru, will serve the economic interests of the establishment with great devotion at the expense of his working-class voters, but the perception of his anti-establishment animus is what matters).

https://theintercept.com/2018/10/08/brazils-bolsonaro-led-far-right-wins-a-victory-far-more-sweeping-and-dangerous-than-anyone-predicted-its-lessons-are-global/

curmudgeon, Monday, 8 October 2018 19:35 (two months ago) Permalink

that All Hallow's idiot is in Chappaqua, hmmmmmm

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 October 2018 19:37 (two months ago) Permalink

also this is my last post in this thread, it's been cancer

― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, August 29, 2018 4:27 AM (one month ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

princess of hell (BradNelson), Monday, 8 October 2018 19:40 (two months ago) Permalink

Christ, u guys love these schoolyard callouts huh? *depantses Brad*

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 October 2018 19:43 (two months ago) Permalink

i post that that shit all the time, it's part of my fuckin routine, just like Nerdstrom's is being a paid DNC asshole

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 October 2018 19:44 (two months ago) Permalink

i would suggest the rest of you actually quit the thread, tho

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 October 2018 19:45 (two months ago) Permalink

Are you going to defend him or

I have measured out my life in coffee shop loyalty cards (silby), Monday, 8 October 2018 19:52 (two months ago) Permalink

excerpt above simply describes fascism; idk how else yall think it works unless it's just "people are hateful bigots and nothing can be done"

difficult listening hour, Monday, 8 October 2018 20:10 (two months ago) Permalink

Shot shot chaser chaser etc etc pic.twitter.com/1tYEyJ0mR0

— Regina 🌊💪 (@regwag2003) October 8, 2018

Man if this keeps up he's going to have to move to a walled mansion in a *third* country

— asterix.asterix (@hashallthehash) October 8, 2018

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Monday, 8 October 2018 20:10 (two months ago) Permalink

one month passes...

This thread is one of the saddest things ever:

Do you guys want to see the most sad, petty & online man on this awful website?
Yesterday @CharlesPPierce rt'ed the great (& prescient) parody account, @GlemGreenwald. So fast forward to this morning, when "someone", out of the blue, creates a Charlies Pierce parody account pic.twitter.com/rGVniiaYTn

— Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 (@Wilson__Valdez) November 24, 2018

Frederik B, Sunday, 25 November 2018 10:52 (two weeks ago) Permalink

yeah glenn's attempt at parody was pretty sad

k3vin k., Sunday, 25 November 2018 17:10 (two weeks ago) Permalink

yeah glenn's attempt at parody was pretty sad

grawlix (unperson), Sunday, 25 November 2018 20:00 (two weeks ago) Permalink

Spoke too soon — now he's paying to promote his own tweets... that contain screenshots of... his own tweets. pic.twitter.com/01JUwSneks

— Charles Davis (@charliearchy) November 25, 2018

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Sunday, 25 November 2018 21:07 (two weeks ago) Permalink

glennception

iatee, Sunday, 25 November 2018 21:28 (two weeks ago) Permalink

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtgtXF0VAAAriC5.jpg

grawlix (unperson), Monday, 3 December 2018 18:31 (one week ago) Permalink

whenever i see a poster on a bus stop for that dumb fantastic beasts film i keep reading it as "the crimes of Greenwald"

( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Monday, 3 December 2018 18:33 (one week ago) Permalink

lol

Frederik B, Monday, 3 December 2018 21:31 (one week ago) Permalink

same

flappy bird, Tuesday, 4 December 2018 05:30 (one week ago) Permalink

Glenn do you think you’re ever bothered by trivial excesses

— Quinoa🖕Appropriator (@MattAlwaysWrong) December 5, 2018

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 5 December 2018 16:16 (one week ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.