defend the indefensible: glenn fucking greenwald

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

ugh, the worst, right? anyway, i just really wanted to share this lustrous takedown of him from some guy's blog i don't know:
http://jacobinism.blogspot.co.il/2013/05/drooling-self-love-dime-store-third.html

One will search Greenwald’s writing for coherence in vain because, although he espouses moral relativism when it suits his agenda, as we’ve just seen, he’ll vehemently disown it with his very next breath. His is not a thoughtful, principled commitment to a philosophy he’s prepared to defend or apply consistently. Rather, his geopolitical outlook might be best described as a half-understood kind of dime-store Third Worldism; a gruesome combination of a thoroughgoing Western masochism with an ostensible compassion for the wretched of the earth that masks the same racist condescension and contempt typified by the worst kind of colonialist paternalism.

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:32 (seven years ago) link

hes cooler than you

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:35 (seven years ago) link

isms in my opinion aren't good

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:36 (seven years ago) link

it was funny when the exile would troll him by only referring to him as "glenn greenwald of the libertarian cato institute"

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:38 (seven years ago) link

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OoUEP8atZl4/UY8Z5RFJ5mI/AAAAAAAAALg/ftL1Q9ZSCTc/s1600/greenwald.jpg

he looks like an older mark zuckerberg here

iatee, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:38 (seven years ago) link

Principled, consistent, systematic political philosophers do not become pundits. Greenwald's inconsistencies merely validate his membership in that group. Apart from that shocking accusation, all the rest of the takedown quoted above is pure vilification. iow, it is a less witty version of what Greenwald does for a living. pot calling out the kettle.

Aimless, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:39 (seven years ago) link

no no I meant it as a compliment

iatee, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:40 (seven years ago) link

By calling him the "worst", you are being as simplistic as he sometimes is.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:40 (seven years ago) link

I think he is a bad writer but I agree with most of the points he makes.

Michigan seems like a dream to me now (Treeship), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:41 (seven years ago) link

good thing i'm only making threads on ilx and not opining for a major newspaper xp

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:42 (seven years ago) link

Mordy does simplistic a lot, with relish

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:42 (seven years ago) link

mordy doesnt like glenn-chan because he refuses to kiss israel's feet and lips and buttlips. let's just be real about it

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:43 (seven years ago) link

well that's why he's the worst!

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Mordy, I've only read the Thatcher article, show me what he wrote that you didn't like?

cardamon, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:44 (seven years ago) link

Like any pundit he's useful when you need him to prove your point. Explaining how presidential administration quietly or openly chip away at civil liberties is his strength; he lacks the subtlety to explain what makes civil liberties worth preserving and the style that would make him consistently readable. Like all brands, he's taken for granted.

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:45 (seven years ago) link

^ i agree with this

Michigan seems like a dream to me now (Treeship), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:48 (seven years ago) link

"thoroughgoing Western masochism" = we hadda kill those people, dammit.

Works well for Israel, too.

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:50 (seven years ago) link

like most men, he looks vile in cargo shorts

http://www.out.com/sites/out.com/files/GlennGreenwald1.jpg

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:51 (seven years ago) link

goddamn his husband

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:52 (seven years ago) link

He looks better in cargo shorts than glenn does

Michigan seems like a dream to me now (Treeship), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 17:54 (seven years ago) link

goddamn to hell colored flip flops.

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:13 (seven years ago) link

lol this thread

greenwald is occasionally (ok, more than occasionally) long-winded but he is easily the best political blogger of the last decade.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:18 (seven years ago) link

treeship mostly otm

also i think we've gone over this ground p thoroughly in the last 5 years

also that blog you linked to really sucks!

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:25 (seven years ago) link

harry's place, LGF, euston manifesto in the blogroll... labor hawks, man, 2004 in effect

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:27 (seven years ago) link

mordy didn't you love greenwald until a few years ago

mordy's not an obama stan but i did sort of notice that he lost a lot of fans around 2009 or so, weird

who lost fans, GG, obama or mordy?

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:30 (seven years ago) link

i did love greenwald until a few years ago - i remember when i forced myself to unsub from his rss feed. this was when he was still at salon.

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:31 (seven years ago) link

Hmm. It seems to me that the only reason Greenwald is perplexed by accusations of relativism is that he doesn't understand what the term means. [goes on to define moral relativism]

yes thanks much fucker

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:33 (seven years ago) link

anyway he's at his best when he just writes about the law and doesn't try to pundit so much, and once you read like 100 of his columns you pretty much know what he's going to think about everything and he becomes less necessary to read on a daily basis. he's definitely a necessary force for good in the world of political writing. even if i don't need to read him anymore, i wouldn't want a blogosphere without him

have to say some of the clones he's produced are pretty dire, like him otm more often than not but with even less style and just clearly not as smart or well-researched. forget these dudes names atm but it's not important, they're like slate writers or something. also goes without saying his commenters are generally the scum of the earth but i haven't read any of his comments in years either

i used to find his writing very interesting - he'd present new material (especially legal material) that i wasn't familiar with, he'd analyze it very insightfully, etc. now he just rants and writes arguments about how ideologically impure everyone but he is. also i think he's doubled down significantly on the wrong side of liberalism. like when he asked recently why Israeli can bomb Syria without condemnation when obv if Syria bombed Israel ppl would be hysterical. obv equivalencies like that are immediately intellectually suspect (um, Assad has been lobbing shit into Israel for months w/out much attention), but also it's just this really facile kind of geopolitical analysis. at some point he traded in what he was good at - legal analysis - for ideological tirades. i think it really destroyed any value he held.

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:35 (seven years ago) link

lol at that 'lustrous takedown,' which includes gems like this:

Those of us who recognise the universal importance and desirability of the above, have little difficulty in ascribing inferiority to a culture that is - conversely - obscurantist, theocratic, misogynistic, racist and oppressive, such as that of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

dismissing a 'culture' (rather than a government) as 'inferior' sounds pretty racist to me.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:35 (seven years ago) link

cultures aren't synonymous w/ races

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:37 (seven years ago) link

maybe it's culturist tho!

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:37 (seven years ago) link

yeah i mean it's kind of a dickish thing to say no matter how you slice it.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:37 (seven years ago) link

nah, some cultures obv suck

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:37 (seven years ago) link

i am a big fan of both gg and mordy, i am sad they can't be friends

Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:38 (seven years ago) link

they can walk in flip flops and shorts together

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:38 (seven years ago) link

now he just rants and writes arguments about how ideologically impure everyone but he is

eh he inserts enough qualifiers and equivocations to suggest otherwise, but he IS fond of adverbs

A deeper shade of lol (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:39 (seven years ago) link

feet and lips and buttlips

I love you

Greenwald has also criticised the US detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba on the grounds that they deny those held there the protection of the rule of law and due process. But if these are markers by which it is possible to judge the American administration's commitment to human rights, why are they not also suitable markers by which to judge that of the Iranian or Syrian regimes, whose behaviour by these standards is demonstrably much worse? And if these markers are deemed legitimate points of universalist comparison by Greenwald, then why not others such as the emancipation of women, and the protection of LGBTQ rights? And why the reluctance to judge, and where necessary indict, cultures accordingly?

oh, the bush years. remember this shit? lol

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:40 (seven years ago) link

i do think GG used to be better than he is now -- he rarely surprises me anymore. i usually skip the pieces where he just complains about cable news. this was one of his better pieces from the last couple years:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/02/obama-civil-liberties-history

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:41 (seven years ago) link

let's summarize Mordy's points:

tuchus

ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:41 (seven years ago) link

i did make fun of mordy's cargo shorts once which i regret

i think JD's point that he's the best political blogger of the past decade (ever?) is pretty tough to argue with; even if you dislike his more recent punditry (something i can sympathize with), his strengths make him on balance pretty invaluable. you can even just choose to remember the good times

Greenwald can only withhold judgement of Iran's dismal human rights record or Syria's campaign of sectarian slaughter by affirming that Persians and Arabs are simply not culturally suited to the liberties and protections derived from Enlightenment thought to which Westerners rightly feel they are entitled. Instead, they must be perceived as childlike, simple and sometimes savage peoples whose cultural proclivities demonstrate a preference for subjugation, violence, injustice and fear over liberty and peace, and who are incapable of understanding egalitarian concepts of human rights due to their uniquely 'Western' character.

goole, Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:43 (seven years ago) link

maybe the best domestic blogger critic of america but he's so outclassed by like every other geopolitical blogger

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:43 (seven years ago) link

the blue and the dim of feet and lips and buttlips
i would spread my lips on those buttlips

i think that's pretty otm. i've felt for a long time like there's a racism of low expectations at play in post-colonialism + cultural relativism xxp

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:44 (seven years ago) link

like stephen walt is hardly a friend of israel but he's so much more worth reading than greenwald. he actually writes new material and has insights that seem valuable. and he doesn't rant.

Mordy , Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:45 (seven years ago) link

nah, some cultures obv suck

― Mordy , Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:37 PM (27 seconds ago) Bookmark

agreed, for example the racist settler state known as Israel

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:45 (seven years ago) link

Greenwald has also criticised the US detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba on the grounds that they deny those held there the protection of the rule of law and due process. But if these are markers by which it is possible to judge the American administration's commitment to human rights, why are they not also suitable markers by which to judge that of the Iranian or Syrian regimes, whose behaviour by these standards is demonstrably much worse? And if these markers are deemed legitimate points of universalist comparison by Greenwald, then why not others such as the emancipation of women, and the protection of LGBTQ rights? And why the reluctance to judge, and where necessary indict, cultures accordingly?

oh, the bush years. remember this shit? lol

― goole, Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:40 PM (3 minutes ago)

ha wait, who's the relativist now?

gg has said on numerous occasions that he focuses on the US because he's a US citizen. seems pretty simple

Greenwald's lost much of his credibility with me since 2016.

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 May 2020 16:45 (one month ago) link

Putin's leadership is both a reaction to and result of the restructuring of the Russian economy in the 90s under Yeltsin, which had a lot of western "advisors" in play at times. He's friendly with the oligarchs, but comes across as more nationalist and populist (?)

I think if you wanted to see where the US was going regarding the power of the moneyed class and public sentiment, Russia as a blueprint isn't completely wrong

mh, Monday, 18 May 2020 16:49 (one month ago) link

I think the way I broke down Greenwald to a friend is that he is not wrong, he just says the most obnoxious part loudly, only admits points other people concentrate on are valid if ephemeral as an aside when he's forced to, and is generally an asshole.

He's generally not wrong, but his framing generally makes his work inaccessible to anyone who doesn't have a lot of the background he takes for granted and accepts as sociopolitical canon

mh, Monday, 18 May 2020 16:56 (one month ago) link

he is frequently wrong, in every sense of the word

no (Left), Monday, 18 May 2020 17:04 (one month ago) link

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

mh, Monday, 18 May 2020 17:08 (one month ago) link

there's a reason SCOTUS is now hearing an argument to keep Deutschebank records locked up. It's because the President has been laundering oligarch money for decades, and I guess coicidentally (?) was amenable to a host of anti-Europe policies that seem only to benefit companies like Gazprom.

Framing this in the context of Cold War hangover and "anti-Russia" sentiment is missing the point. It has nothing to do w/ ideology or borders and everything to do w/ a ganglike consortium of energy- and war profiteers.

yes, this i can get with. but the narrative pushed at the time was related to espionage and blackmail.

treeship., Monday, 18 May 2020 17:20 (one month ago) link

my ideology is profit

mh, Monday, 18 May 2020 17:24 (one month ago) link

treeship, do you feel like the Mueller report documented nothing of substance?

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Monday, 18 May 2020 17:42 (one month ago) link

part 1 outlined the "interference," which, i mean, i don't think that is why trump won. part 2 outlined "obstruction" but there wasn't an underlying crime he was covering up related to russia; he was covering up a host of crimes unrelated to russia, because he is a career criminal.

the investigation should have been about trump's finances, not "election interference." the "russian troll farms" were at best amplifying narratives generated by our own right wing media. and there is yet no direct evidence that russia was behind the email hacks. and even if they were why is that connected to trump?

treeship., Monday, 18 May 2020 18:01 (one month ago) link

putting russia at the center of this whole thing just muddled the issue, and it did seem like it arose because certain actors in the government wanted to exploit opposition to trump by directing that energy toward their own geopolitcal aims.

treeship., Monday, 18 May 2020 18:05 (one month ago) link

Here is a long, detailed dismantling of Greenwald's tendentious horseshit. I don't expect anyone here to read it, but it exists.

Last week, Glenn Greenwald did a podcast defending Bill Barr’s efforts to overturn the prosecution of Mike Flynn (here’s a transcript; the italicized language below is my correction of that transcript). A whole slew of people wrote me in alarm over some of the claims he made in it. After some reflection, I decided to do a post showing how the public record that Glenn claims to have consulted in his podcast at least undermines some of his claims, and in places utterly refutes it.

but also fuck you (unperson), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 21:48 (one month ago) link

Greenwald responded to a Wheeler post on Twitter with such a self-absorbed, defensive ad hom, god he is such an asshole sometimes.

Doesn't deserve the way he's been treated by Jair Bolsonaro admin, but he shoots himself in the foot both here and his commentary on Russiagate

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 22:25 (one month ago) link

Here is a long, detailed dismantling of Greenwald's tendentious horseshit. I don't expect anyone here to read it, but it exists.

Can we hear this from someone who doesn't have a history of ratting out confidential sources to the FBI maybe? Those in bed with US intelligence agencies are rarely honest or objective about their historical abuses of power and that tedious diatribe from Wheeler is no exception. Especially when she concludes it with a ghoulish barb against Snowden of all people.

Sabre of Paradise (trevor phillips), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 22:59 (one month ago) link

you could, y'know, actually look at the sources she cites (many of which are links to government and court records) and actually determine if her claims are backed by her sources, rather than doing the jedi-handwave method of saying "she did this thing I don't agree with so the whole article is invalid".

besides, most of the facts in that takedown could be obtained by anybody with a Google account.

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 23:04 (one month ago) link

like I get side-eyeing articles written by people who have a bad recent track record, but by that rubric, I could just as easily piss on Greenwald's as well

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 23:07 (one month ago) link

for a second i thought "Can we hear this from someone who doesn't have a history of ratting out confidential sources to the FBI maybe" was a reference to greenwald lol

Mordy, Tuesday, 19 May 2020 23:13 (one month ago) link

who the hell is this delicious troll named trevor phillips? Is he cute? Does he comment on music threads? I'm delighted to meet him.

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 23:16 (one month ago) link

you ppl really never get tired of this

brooklyn suicide cult (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 23:48 (one month ago) link

true, I never get tired of criticizing bad journalism

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 23:51 (one month ago) link

or men who say good female bloggers are "in bed" with sources, especially when he can't capitalize his name

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 23:59 (one month ago) link

true, I never get tired of criticizing bad journalism

That's surprising when you're endorsing work from a blogger who again, hands her damn sources over to the FBI lmao.

rather than doing the jedi-handwave method of saying "she did this thing I don't agree with so the whole article is invalid".

Is this not exactly what you and basically everyone in this thread has been doing with Greenwald since 2013? And not for something he did but rather the tone in which he writes articles on his website and messages on twitter??

Alfred, you don't even capitalize or punctuate the end of your sentences hon, you're in no position criticize. ;)

Sabre of Paradise (trevor phillips), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 00:14 (one month ago) link

My last post addressed to you I did, and you're the one who missed the comma. I think Greenwald claims those for his own.

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 00:16 (one month ago) link

Are you really using the 10th grade "lol you made a grammar mistake ergo everything you've ever said is suspect" gotcha?

And doing so in a sentence where you omitted a preposition?

God yr dumb

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 00:18 (one month ago) link

Xpost obv

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 00:18 (one month ago) link

omg is Trevor Phillips Glenn Greenwald?

Yanni Xenakis (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 00:22 (one month ago) link

wouldnt be out of character

no (Left), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 00:26 (one month ago) link

I think all of you might be esby

silby, Wednesday, 20 May 2020 00:59 (one month ago) link

im esby

lumen (esby), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 01:14 (one month ago) link

bring back brodie

I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 01:14 (one month ago) link

bring back banaka

mh, Wednesday, 20 May 2020 01:24 (one month ago) link

the most absurd part of this is that trump eventually did 'collude' with a foreign power -- ukraine! and he was impeached for that! so it was all completely for nothing.

― treeship., Monday, May 18, 2020 2:30 PM (two days ago)

glenn greenwald also opposed impeaching trump, as i'm sure he'd be happy to explain in a different 2-hour youtube video

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 01:33 (one month ago) link

Especially when she concludes it with a ghoulish barb against Snowden of all people.

Snowden’s a sanctimonious prick “of all people”

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 20 May 2020 02:35 (one month ago) link

or men who say good female bloggers are "in bed" with sources

Oh, come the everloving fuck on. He said "in bed with US intelligence agencies."

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 05:33 (one month ago) link

YouTuber Lindsay Ellis said something tangential about GG the other day on Twitter, and he popped into her mentions like Beetlejuice and accused her of being either illiterate or a liar. He spends an inordinate amount of time name-searching himself so he can look for opportunities.

Bougy! Bougie! Bougé! (Eliza D.), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 13:42 (one month ago) link

🖼
YouTuber Lindsay Ellis said something tangential about GG the other day on Twitter, and he popped into her mentions like Beetlejuice and accused her of being either illiterate or a liar. He spends an inordinate amount of time name-searching himself so he can look for opportunities.


It’s boring quarantined in the jungle but you’d think the dozens of dogs would keep him busy.

Boring, Maryland, Wednesday, 20 May 2020 13:53 (one month ago) link

can we get him to post here

turn the jawhatthefuckever on (One Eye Open), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 14:54 (one month ago) link

new-era Google metrics makes baiting outsiders really hard :(

Yanni Xenakis (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 15:49 (one month ago) link

But we have a lot master baiters around here

Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 16:51 (one month ago) link

some of the very best

Yanni Xenakis (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 18:02 (one month ago) link

Cool, cool: Richard Esposito, co-author of the Intercept story that landed Reality Winner in federal prison, is now the head of the NYPD's press office.

A co-author of a controversial report at The Intercept that landed its source in prison now works as the head of the New York Police Department’s press office.

The former journalist, Richard Esposito, had embedded for a long period inside the NYPD, developing close ties to US police agencies that were clear before The Intercept chose to work with him. However, the news website apparently did not see Esposito’s cop-friendly behavior as disqualifying or even suspicious.

Esposito and his longtime friend and colleague, Matthew Cole, a full-time reporter at The Intercept, were co-authors of a 2017 report on National Security Agency allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election. The reporters disclosed sensitive information to US government agencies, which led to the outing of their confidential source, former NSA contractor Reality Winner, and her eventual imprisonment for five years.

Although this scandalous story was the only piece Esposito published at The Intercept, he was somehow assigned an official company email address as well as an author page that has since been removed from the website without explanation.

The same duo, Esposito and Cole, played an integral role in the arrest and imprisonment of another source, CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou, several years before they worked with The Intercept.

but also fuck you (unperson), Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:54 (one month ago) link

one month passes...

Inevitable.

Should the populist left work with the populist right where they have common ground, or shun them? https://t.co/8QcagioB7Z by @ggreenwald

— The Intercept (@theintercept) June 25, 2020

but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, 25 June 2020 17:50 (one week ago) link

this is so February

TikTok to the (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 June 2020 17:53 (one week ago) link

look at that art lol

reggae mike love (polyphonic), Thursday, 25 June 2020 18:09 (one week ago) link

who are those people

all cats are beautiful (silby), Thursday, 25 June 2020 18:37 (one week ago) link

Greenwald in Brazil: the right is evil, they send me and my family death threats, they murdered a black trans woman politician friend of ours.
Greenwald in the US: maybe Steve Bannon is cool?

Rik Waller-Bridge (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 25 June 2020 18:39 (one week ago) link

a few comments make the duh point that greenwald spends so much time deriding dems for compromising with untrustworthy republicans, instead of his preferred strategy which is apparently compromising with untrustworthy republicans

Mordy, Thursday, 25 June 2020 19:05 (one week ago) link

You know what you never hear discussed on the right? Calls to form an alliance with socialists. They’re busy trying to crush us while we debate whether or not we should be friendlier to them.

— Sam Sacks (@SamSacks) June 25, 2020

Yanni Xenakis (Hadrian VIII), Thursday, 25 June 2020 19:40 (one week ago) link

Does Greenwald think he’s a member of the “Populist Left”?

Boring, Maryland, Thursday, 25 June 2020 20:08 (one week ago) link

yes

Rik Waller-Bridge (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 25 June 2020 20:09 (one week ago) link

congrats to GG for getting a trump retweet

mookieproof, Sunday, 5 July 2020 05:50 (yesterday) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.