OD | sphere: -4.25 | cylinder: -1.00 | axis: 020OS | sphere: -4.25 | cylinder: -1.00 | axis 160
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:43 (fourteen years ago) link
Holy cow.
― she is writing about love (Jenny), Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link
And what's yours?
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:48 (fourteen years ago) link
pffffft
-10.00 in both eyes
― Mr. Que, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:48 (fourteen years ago) link
left to right, -8.0 and -8.5, ish, with -1.25 and -1.0 astigmatism (one of them's 85 degrees, forget the other one)
― acoleuthic, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:50 (fourteen years ago) link
Right: sph: -4.50 cyl: -1.25 axis: 040Left : sph: -4.50 cyl: -1.25 axis: 155
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:50 (fourteen years ago) link
Also, right eye has prism: 1 deg base: out (whatever they mean)
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:51 (fourteen years ago) link
OD: Power -7.00 | Cyl -0.75 | Axis 010OS: Power -6.00 | Cyl -1.25 | Axis 180
― mookieproof, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link
My glasses would be weak on snoball, and his would be strong on me, but looks like we could both make it down the street.
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link
Right: sph: +0.50 cyl: -1.00 axis: 035Left : sph: -0.50 cyl: -0.50 axis: 150
A little bit short-sighted in one eye, a little bit long-sighted in the other.
― nate woolls, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:54 (fourteen years ago) link
o_O
― acoleuthic, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:54 (fourteen years ago) link
-6.5, -7.5 dunno which is which, dont have contacts so dont really think abt it.
― plax (ico), Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:55 (fourteen years ago) link
My eyes are just bad enough so I have to wear glasses, and just awkward enough to make contacts not worth it.
― nate woolls, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:56 (fourteen years ago) link
Wear your specs with pride.
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:56 (fourteen years ago) link
i can't wear glasses anymore--i get more bang for my buck with contacts
― Mr. Que, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:00 (fourteen years ago) link
At -10 in both eyes, I'd really look into surgery. No, seriously.
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:02 (fourteen years ago) link
[controversial moderator edit] xpost
― acoleuthic, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:03 (fourteen years ago) link
i would still probably have to wear glasses. i think -10 is pushing it as far as lasik goes.
― Mr. Que, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:03 (fourteen years ago) link
my sister is -8 in both and they told her she cant have surgery, hope its not the same for me
― plax (ico), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link
Maybe Minority Report surgery then. Just get some new eyeballs.
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:05 (fourteen years ago) link
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t214/ZachRScott/RENOUNCEDOG.gif
― acoleuthic, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:06 (fourteen years ago) link
right eye: sphere -6.50 | cyl -1.25 | axis 180
left eye: sphere -5.75 | cyl -2.25 | axis 173
― De que estas hablando? (Tannenbaum Schmidt), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:08 (fourteen years ago) link
Oh thank god...evil guide dog!
― kate78, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:13 (fourteen years ago) link
That dog will only guide you down the wrong path.
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:33 (fourteen years ago) link
The path to SIN and RUIN and DESTRUCTION
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:35 (fourteen years ago) link
Ok maybe you're right. That sounds like kind of a lot of fun.
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:36 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah i (at -7.0) asked my doc once about LAZERS and he said well, only if you have a really thick eyeball. i think -10.0 might be right out.
anyway, a friend of mine has had an unpleasant outcome to lazers and i'm pretty happy with disposable contacts so
― mookieproof, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:46 (fourteen years ago) link
working outdoors + glasses is so nasty in hot weather, I'm tempted by LAZERS but, yow, two grand.
― my full government name (WmC), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:49 (fourteen years ago) link
Fortunately Kenan looks really good in glasses.
I have 20/15 vision, so I have nothing else to add in this thread.
― Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link
Well then. I certainly appreciate your input. :)
― kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link
lolling about in the middle of the night without my lenses in i realise i am totally fucked should i ever lose one. should really get some backup glasses but haven't owned a pair in several years. bit of an effort tbh.
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Monday, 5 April 2010 04:05 (fourteen years ago) link
right: -1.75 -050 084left: -1.75 -025 095
― ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Monday, 5 April 2010 04:09 (fourteen years ago) link
Right Eye:Sphere -1.50Cylinder -0.50Axis 7
Left eye
Sphere -1.25Cylinder -0.75Axis 180
PD 59
― just1n3, Monday, 5 April 2010 04:18 (fourteen years ago) link
can someone break down what all these numbers mean
― just1n3, Monday, 5 April 2010 04:21 (fourteen years ago) link
pd is distance between your pupils
― ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Monday, 5 April 2010 04:33 (fourteen years ago) link
measured in mm. I tried reading the wikipedia entry on prescription eyeglasses but it was all whoosh. just know degree (the first one) refers to the power of magnification it something
― ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Monday, 5 April 2010 04:34 (fourteen years ago) link
Right: sph: -3.00 cyl: -4.50 axis:100Left : sph: -3.75 cyl: -4.00 axis: 82.5
Presume it's astigmatism in both eyes that makes it difficult to judge a straight line....I often track a spreadsheet line along with my finger to make sure.
― Bob Six, Monday, 5 April 2010 09:39 (fourteen years ago) link
"Sph" or "Sphere" means how close the eyeball is to being a perfect sphere shape. Negative numbers mean the eyeball is slightly shorter when measured from front to back = short sighted. Positive numbers mean the eyeball is slightly longer = long sighted. "Cyl"/"Cylinder" and "Axis" define how much astigmatism there is and where it is, respectively.
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Monday, 5 April 2010 09:43 (fourteen years ago) link
interesting astigmatism fact: did yall know that El Greco is sometimes thought to have had astigmatism and that's why all his figures are so distorted?
― plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 11:30 (fourteen years ago) link
I only know my sph: +0.0 in both eyes. They didn't tell me the others and told me to go forth in peace.
― caek, Monday, 5 April 2010 11:33 (fourteen years ago) link
They didn't tell me the other numbers, I mean. Not the scores for my other eyes. I only have two eyes and anyone who says otherwise is lying.
― caek, Monday, 5 April 2010 11:36 (fourteen years ago) link
Right Sph = -3.00 Cyl = -1.00 Axis = 65Left Sph = -3.25 Cyl = -0.75 Axis = 110
I've worn glasses since I was 12 and my prescription hasn't changed much for ages. Nasty creeping feeling that the next few years will include the onset of some longsightedness too, and a one-way journey to The Land of Bi-Focals.
― Bill A, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 07:59 (fourteen years ago) link
I've worn glasses since I was 8 (I'm now 36) and in the last 10 years I've got slightly less short sighted.
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:34 (fourteen years ago) link
-2.25-2.5
can't remember which way round. My eyes don't change much, they've been around -2 for 2 years. And I have mild astigmatism in one eye, but again I can't remember which one, because I don't actually notice it.
― Colonel Poo, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:38 (fourteen years ago) link
heh that should say around -2 for 20 years...
-1.75 L-2.5 R
don't know any other numbers. wear glasses all the time, but probably don't really need to bar driving and tv.
contacts for sport, socialising
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:41 (fourteen years ago) link
Wow, I am -0.75 in both eyes (just had eye test, excited abt having some numbers to post cz I couldn't read my previous optician's handwriting - lol etc) and I thought I was pretty shortsighted, but it's the smallest on the thread yet? No more being shamed when the other half expects me to see a picture on his monitor 6ft away and has to zoom in about 5 times until it fills the screen and then I usually still have to admit that I don't really know what I'm looking at.
I can get by w/o glasses round the flat, but I try not to leave the flat without them on cz I have trouble reading signs and can't tell if I know anyone more than 2 feet away, what the front of the bus says in time to hail it, etc. Can't drive but wouldn't be allowed to learn without glasses.
(R Sph:-0.75 Cyl:-0.75 axis:95 / L Sph:-0.75 Cyl:-1.25 axis:94, for anyone compiling ILXor Myopia Top Trumps)
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:55 (fourteen years ago) link
can't tell if I know anyone more than 2 feet away
this is the worst part of it by far.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:10 (fourteen years ago) link
OD | sphere: -3.50 | cylinder: -1.25 | axis: 090OS | sphere: -3.50 | cylinder: -1.00 | axis 105
A little worse than I stated previously, but not too bad. I've remained pretty steady the past ten years, with only subtle changes from prior rxs.
― kate78, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link
xpost solution is just waving to everyone who could possibly be someone you know.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:35 (fourteen years ago) link
sometimes if i look at ILX without my glasses i will see a post by "earlnash" and read it as "sarahell"
― 💠 (crüt), Thursday, 12 December 2019 01:55 (four years ago) link