Anyone reading this? I'm about one-third of the way through.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:32 (fifteen years ago) link
Anyone?
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:41 (fifteen years ago) link
There's been some talk on the revived thread.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:42 (fifteen years ago) link
Neal Stephenson predicted MySpace and down.
this book is so huge it came to the office in a freakin boxa box!
― terminator boyfriend (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:44 (fifteen years ago) link
I'm about a third of the way through. It's a little slow-going, but I'm intrigued enough to keep reading.
― schwantz, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 21:29 (fifteen years ago) link
a BOX
― gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 21:29 (fifteen years ago) link
why is it so giant
― terminator boyfriend (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 21:59 (fifteen years ago) link
i tried to read the first pageimpossible
― terminator boyfriend (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:00 (fifteen years ago) link
did you OPEN the box first??
― gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:02 (fifteen years ago) link
because he's a dick about it
― you don't make friends with salad (Jordan), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:03 (fifteen years ago) link
i'm enjoying this far more than either of the system trilogy books i read, so far
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:22 (fifteen years ago) link
This sounds pretty great given that I am a philosopher and a mathematician. I read Snow Crash a while back but nothing else by this guy, but this sounds right up my alley.
― it's a great breakup balllad sung by Bill Champlin (Euler), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:45 (fifteen years ago) link
You will probably love this one.
― schwantz, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:46 (fifteen years ago) link
Dude's in Portland tonight, going to talk at the Bagdad Theater in about 90 mins. Will report back.
― kingfish, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 00:39 (fifteen years ago) link
ask him why it's so long
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 00:42 (fifteen years ago) link
ask him about the box
― robertwolf8080, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 01:02 (fifteen years ago) link
I loved Cryptonomicon but was completely baffled by Quicksilver...would you recommend Anathem so far?
Dude writes in LONGHAND. The manuscript for Quicksilver is at the SciFi Museum in Seattle. Longhand! I can't imagine how he doesn't publish anything other than short pamphlets! Imagine the calluses...
― VegemiteGrrrl, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 01:06 (fifteen years ago) link
ask why the box is so big
― gr8080 (max), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 01:06 (fifteen years ago) link
Being a big thinker, he needed something big to think out of.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 01:08 (fifteen years ago) link
did you ask abt the box
― terminator boyfriend (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 17:25 (fifteen years ago) link
like why its so big
― gr8080 (max), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 17:25 (fifteen years ago) link
Did the box come full of his longhand manuscript, is maybe why, did you ask?
― Abbott loves her turtle (Abbott), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 19:17 (fifteen years ago) link
I'm also curious why it's so big (the box)
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 19:30 (fifteen years ago) link
his next book should be about boxes. and their bigness.
― terminator boyfriend (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 19:54 (fifteen years ago) link
http://store.slushee.ie/images/slushee_big_box.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 19:57 (fifteen years ago) link
― The 69, 666, 420th Beatle (latebloomer), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 22:58 (fifteen years ago) link
It's curious that this is so big. But I like the setup. I'm pretty sure there's lots of academic/geeks who've wanted to go into an atheist monastery just to get shit done.
― /-\|/-\|/-\ (stet), Sunday, 21 September 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link
it is a good book. or maybe two of them: the convent part and the space part. i read an advance copy, and i have to say it is a pretty swell release, espesh the early philosophy-lite stuff.
― remy bean, Wednesday, August 20, 2008 1:50 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban
the CD that comes with it is ... i know, by eno (right?) ... but kind of terrible, even unlistenable.
― remy bean, Wednesday, August 20, 2008 1:52 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban
oh, wait David Stutz, a former Microsoft techie now involved in early classical music—and an HBC member—composed and produced the effort, which is being considered for widespread release. "It's a pseudo-liturgical use of mathematics and higher thinking," Stutz says. Actually, to the untrained ear it sounds like the neo-Gregorian chanting that accompanies ritual baby sacrifice in horror films.
i am sorry david stutz. i do not have an untrained ear -- i just think it is ... too schematic or something.
― remy bean, Wednesday, August 20, 2008 1:54 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― remy bean, Sunday, 21 September 2008 20:08 (fifteen years ago) link
I haven't heard about this, I'll have to get my hands on it soon. I liked the Baroque Cycle so much because it was set in a period of history I love, but this will still probably be interesting.
― Maria, Sunday, 21 September 2008 23:45 (fifteen years ago) link
so ya didn't like it huh
― surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:17 (fourteen years ago) link
I keep meaning to read this and then forgetting about it
― as strikingly artificial and perfect as a wizard's cap (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:21 (fourteen years ago) link
i read the latest a few months ago. it's good - well written - but ultimately it feels like three different books
1) mathy portrait of the artist as a young man2) paul theroux on a different planet3) rama w. monks
― remy bean, Monday, 15 September 2008 17:40 (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this (from another thread) is otm except it neglects to mention the awesomosity of those three ideas.
― surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:24 (fourteen years ago) link
I thought it was just a bit dull...there was an interesting setup but it wasn't really much fun beyond that, the way his other books tended to be, and given that criticism it was way too long. It didn't have much of a spirit of adventure carrying through the way the Baroque Cycle did.
― Maria, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:37 (fourteen years ago) link
I think it had a huge spirit of adventure! But it was a very scientific and philosophically minded spirit. I guess if you liked the history aspect of the baroque cycle (which I haven't read) then this might not have appealed so much.
― surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:51 (fourteen years ago) link
I am 200 pages into it and love it. Not unlike reading Eco: "I can't wait to find out what happens next...though I'm not sure I could actually explain what's happening now." Something about the way this is written, much like Cryptonomicon, you just follow where he leads you. The minutiae is interesting rather than daunting.
Maybe after this I can go back and try Quicksilver again.
― VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 28 January 2010 04:41 (fourteen years ago) link
I enjoyed this but found it really hard to reread for some reason...it might just be the way I tend to reread stuff (in miscellaneous chunks and favorite-parts), where here you really have to be sort of fresh on the monkly discourse and all the funny names for stuff. But a pretty great yarn and some good show-stoppers. Definitely owes a lot to Eco, but that may just be me reading this within a couple months of Name of the Rose. Eco obviously does a better job of keeping you in the thought patterns of medieval monks, but Stephenson seems to take the general tactic of writing the monks as being nerds, more or less, and running with that.
I will say that while the big ideas were all lots of fun to chew on, somehow his stock plot/character material really wore thin for me on this one. The romance in particular was everything that was flat and annoying about Hiro/Juanita, Randy/Amy, and Jack/Eliza. Try something else please!
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 28 January 2010 05:13 (fourteen years ago) link
but Stephenson seems to take the general tactic of writing the monks as being nerds
haha a common Stephenson ploy
haven't read this but I want to
― i'm with stupid ☞ (dyao), Thursday, 28 January 2010 05:29 (fourteen years ago) link
I am 200 pages into it and love it
Neal Stephenson does write a great first 200 pages.
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 28 January 2010 05:33 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah, that's the thing with this: all the stuff about monastic life and w/e is pretty good stuff, but once it actually got to the ~plot~ my interest waned
― his power told him (about the fish) (gbx), Thursday, 28 January 2010 05:46 (fourteen years ago) link
like the world he created was great, but he did with it wasn't as great
I dunno, on one level I like that it sort of moved forward from there, like that was the training levels and now we're in the real game, but it's sort of a shame that (as in Snow Crash really) the future is basically like today, complete with church moms and outdoors nuts. Dude really loves to write scenes of people driving around in the far north, I guess.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 28 January 2010 06:02 (fourteen years ago) link
i liked this a lot.
― randomized what nots (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 January 2010 06:51 (fourteen years ago) link
My only problem is I have a head like a sieve and the names of things are killing me. I keep forgetting what stuff means...glossary is already dogeared and I've barely scratched the surface.
― VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 28 January 2010 07:03 (fourteen years ago) link
I liked that the *SPOILER* 'alien' dude who helps them toward the end is a French dude from earth *END SPOILER*
― randomized what nots (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 January 2010 07:06 (fourteen years ago) link
Loved this, don't think I've felt so caught up in a fictional world since Mieville's Bas-Lag stuff.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Saturday, 3 July 2010 13:34 (thirteen years ago) link
Or possibly the Mortal Engines books.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Saturday, 3 July 2010 13:35 (thirteen years ago) link
New one, _Reamde_ is out today. First chapter dragging like hell.
― stet, Tuesday, 20 September 2011 22:00 (twelve years ago) link
Nothing about this photo surprises me:
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17o77krgcocv6jpg/original.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 14:26 (eleven years ago) link
Heh...I like this guy's books, but he's always given me a strange "would not bro down with" vibe.
― Trey Imaginary Songz (WmC), Wednesday, 30 May 2012 14:38 (eleven years ago) link
His idea of cosplay would appear to be a power-metal version of Neurosis.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 14:47 (eleven years ago) link
Just picked this up, cheap as chips, from a charity shop. (so no big box)
(and I was actually looking for Cryptonomicon but nm)
― PressAnarchyToContinue (Ste), Wednesday, 19 July 2017 12:50 (six years ago) link
He has a new one out with Nicole Galland called The Rise and Fall of D.O.D.O. which I completely stumbled across in a bookshop. There really needs to be a Songkick-style service for authors.
Anyway, it's a time travel-y romp which features lots of his schtick (Sumerian, 16th century Holland, sword play etc) but with the usual deep digressions either entirely redacted or knowingly omitted.
― stet, Thursday, 17 August 2017 18:51 (six years ago) link
(contains spoilers)
so almost at the end of this and gbx above otm,
There is no need for this book to be so giant, given the full course of the story and events. I honestly don't know how he's managed that.
The whole aliens from space plot itself was too thin, and I was dissapointed by that as the first few chapters had me hooked. Plus he really skimps on the details when there's any kind of 'action'.
Well not terrible, enjoyed reading most of it. Glad it's almost over so I can get back to PKD and some Gibson stuff I haven't read yet.
― Ste, Monday, 20 November 2017 12:51 (six years ago) link