BIG TROUBLE in little china: C/D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (179 of them)

I just don't understand why. This film isn't even that good.

Drop soap, not bombs (Ste), Monday, 1 June 2015 23:24 (eight years ago) link

after three or so viewings i feel comfortable reiterating that this film is pretty awesome but not in a single way that any remake would possibly capture. i mean this is true of most remakes but this one in particular is just baffling.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 1 June 2015 23:28 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, it's a good film but I agree just not worth remaking. Also without Russell's humour I just don't see any point.

Drop soap, not bombs (Ste), Monday, 1 June 2015 23:44 (eight years ago) link

(that's what I meant by 'not that good', not that its shit, just not really great)

Drop soap, not bombs (Ste), Monday, 1 June 2015 23:45 (eight years ago) link

yeah i imagine they would retain the plot, but who cares about the plot?

not really a "good movie" IMO but interesting as a suggestion of where US genre cinema might have gone had it borrowed more heavily from contemporaneous HK stuff.

he quipped with heat (amateurist), Monday, 1 June 2015 23:52 (eight years ago) link

Awesome? That seems to be rating it on the high side. Obviously, the film is about as deep as a saucer and not meant as anything more than a good way to waste a couple of hours. It certainly succeeds on those terms.

Aimless, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:00 (eight years ago) link

What the fuck? I watch this film every night. FPd all of you.

what sounds 'cutting cheese' in 2015? (how's life), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:08 (eight years ago) link

the remake of btilc was p much "the mummy" tbh

thoughts you made second posts about (darraghmac), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:13 (eight years ago) link

Russell was great at balancing dumb action movie swagger with self-aware dorkiness. I like the Rock as a choice, but it will be a totally different film.

I thought it was really great because it was a post-Ghostbusters/Star Wars take on b-movies, with all the special effects and cool supernatural stuff. It was like a Kung Fu mix of Indiana Jones and Rambo.

©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:15 (eight years ago) link

So much of what's lovable about the film is Russell's goofery and John Wayne impression, the way everybody is really emphatically talking past/at each other in this absurd situation, and the generally gleeful ridiculousness of the script, set amidst lots of charming practical effects and sets and stuff. The story is just a dumb setting for that, it's not like it's a classic tale that you can sorta imagine maybe being good brought up to date with a new cast. Or could have sorta imagined, once, but no longer can after the past eons of terrible generic remakes.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:27 (eight years ago) link

i enjoy this movie, but i also enjoy gunga din and i that would be a really fucking stupid movie to remake as well

da croupier, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:32 (eight years ago) link

feel like the original has a "just hangs together, barely" aspect to it that a remake will surely crush

, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:33 (eight years ago) link

dude is already doing a jack burton imitation in a lot of movies anyway

da croupier, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:34 (eight years ago) link

also this movie wasn't remotely a hit when it came out - is the rock dying? is this his make-a-wish foundation request?

da croupier, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:38 (eight years ago) link

you'd think the smarter road if you want to make a nu-carpenter remake with the rock would be snake plissken

da croupier, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:42 (eight years ago) link

Escape From Witch Mountain

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:45 (eight years ago) link

haha yeah i did realize after the fact he's already done some VERB FROM A PLACE movies. But still, remaking a cult dystopia hit makes a lot more sense today than remaking a cult camp kung fu flop

da croupier, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 00:50 (eight years ago) link

Dr. Casino otm, loveable goofery and gleeful ridiculousness are v apt.

Aimless, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 01:02 (eight years ago) link

the key to the movie is that wang rules and if they miscast him/diminish his importance nothing else will matter

mookieproof, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 01:04 (eight years ago) link

When is the buckaroo banzai remake happening

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 01:11 (eight years ago) link

The thing is, an an Escape to Witch Mountain reboot hardly makes a ton of commercial sense either! Though apparently it did pretty good. Maybe the rock has just committed himself to using his stardom to force forgotten properties of his youth back onto the American public. Buckaroo Banzai not so unlikely really.

The lamest thing about remake-topia is that it never actually enables a proper do-over a movie to bring out its best ideas. Like, I just watched D.A.R.Y.L. recently (dunno why I'm picking that, maybe witch mountain made me think of it), and it's got many charms but many faults, and I just caught myself thinking "why can't the Rock remake D.A.R.Y.L. instead?" which is crazy because obviously it would just be awful and certainly missing everything I found really lovable out it (mainly: gentle early 80s woodsy suburban milieu, kids dressed exactly like me at that age).

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 01:15 (eight years ago) link

otm about Wang. Also Egg.

©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 01:18 (eight years ago) link

also lo pan

i dunno, seems kind of like trying to remake rocky horror (which it seems is also happening)

mookieproof, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 01:33 (eight years ago) link

maybe they can make it funny and exciting this time

the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 01:37 (eight years ago) link

Dr c, the original escape to witch mountain was a hit with two sequels. Remaking that makes a lot more commercial sense than this.

da croupier, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 02:17 (eight years ago) link

Second sequel was direct-to-TV, but yeah, true, hit. But it still has to be one of the more obscure big-studio properties to get a remake in the last decade, right? Up there with Dark Shadows at least - I can't recall one time in my adult life that anybody has ever brought up the original films to me or anything, they had basically zero pop-cultural presence when The Rock's movie was greenlit. Darby O'Gill, your number's gotta come up soon!

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 02:47 (eight years ago) link

Excuse me; I am of course thinking of Merlin Jones.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 02:50 (eight years ago) link

Well dark shadows was 100% a makeawish foundation movie the Depp burton brand spent some cred on, but Disney is always looking to revive kiddy properties. Escape from witch totally fit in with their steez.

da croupier, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 03:18 (eight years ago) link

Disney also made a witch mountain TV movie in the 90s

da croupier, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 03:19 (eight years ago) link

all the more argument for corporate synergy to bend The Rock's revival of Snake Plissken into a Witch Mountain followup, is all I'm saying

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 03:22 (eight years ago) link

I hope Carpenter and W.D. Richter get as much money as they can from this and release their own Rifftrax-style alternate commentary track.

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 05:21 (eight years ago) link

the dark shadows thing was kind of out of nowhere. the last time that show had much currency was when, well, it was briefly (unsuccessfully) revived in the post-twin peaks era. i guess they thought "vampires! twilight!" a greenlit it? the tone of the film had basically nothing to do with the old TV show, anyway.

he quipped with heat (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 23:11 (eight years ago) link

http://www.ew.com/article/2015/06/08/dwayne-johnson-john-carpenter-big-trouble-remake

“I loved reading the reactions from the fans, that they were so polarized – I’m the same way,” the star told EW at Saturday night’s taping of the Spike TV Guys Choice Awards. “My response is: know that I come to the project with nothing but love and respect for the original, which is why we want to bring on John Carpenter.”

...“I loved the original when I was younger and I loved the main character – all the characters,” said Johnson, who will fill the role Kurt Russell played in the earlier film. “It felt like if we surrounded ourselves with the right group of people, the right writers who loved the movie too and wanted to honor it, bring on John Carpenter in some capacity … If we did that, then we have a shot at hopefully making something good.”

“Let’s see what feels good, what we can come up with and then go from there,” Johnson said. “And as we write it, if the whole thing starts to stink up, then we thank everybody for their efforts and accept this just couldn’t make it.”

da croupier, Tuesday, 9 June 2015 00:47 (eight years ago) link

points for admitting the possibility of this stinking up

da croupier, Tuesday, 9 June 2015 00:48 (eight years ago) link

chris pratt would be a better choice for jack burton

jbn, Tuesday, 9 June 2015 02:03 (eight years ago) link

nah too obviously a doofus

resulting post (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 9 June 2015 02:22 (eight years ago) link

i mean chris pratt basically ~is~ jack burton

resulting post (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 9 June 2015 02:23 (eight years ago) link

Trade paperback of the boom studios comic is coming out today. Has anybody kept up with it? I only read the first issue and wasn't into it at all.

http://www.amazon.com/Big-Trouble-Little-China-Vol/dp/1608867161

how's life, Tuesday, 9 June 2015 08:52 (eight years ago) link

three months pass...

I know, there's a problem with your face

deejerk reactions (darraghmac), Monday, 28 September 2015 11:52 (eight years ago) link

The thing is to make them drop their guard.
I'll Try
The thing is to look stupid.
He does!

how's life, Monday, 28 September 2015 14:13 (eight years ago) link

eight months pass...

Boring

flappy bird, Thursday, 23 June 2016 02:35 (seven years ago) link

This perfectly illustrates the problem with overly abbreviated communication. Yes, it may save time and keystrokes to say "Boring", but more accurately, what you meant to say was, "Personally I found this to be boring." This kind of amplification and expansion, while time consuming, also has the effect of removing the idiocy from what you said and replacing it with a measured and true statement of fact.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 23 June 2016 02:42 (seven years ago) link

oh

flappy bird, Thursday, 23 June 2016 05:38 (seven years ago) link

Maybe they found the BIG TROUBLE part to be boring, because yeah, the BIG TROUBLE is maybe a little boring, but the rest of the movie rules.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 23 June 2016 12:14 (seven years ago) link

We gotta run
Run into the mystic night
Run until they take us away
Take us away!
Taaaake us awaaaaaay!

forksdippedmayo (how's life), Thursday, 23 June 2016 12:40 (seven years ago) link

This perfectly illustrates the problem with overly abbreviated communication. Yes, it may save time and keystrokes to say "Boring", but more accurately, what you meant to say was, "Personally I found this to be boring." This kind of amplification and expansion, while time consuming, also has the effect of removing the idiocy from what you said and replacing it with a measured and true statement of fact.

Yup. Love ILX most when it's a discussion board, not Comic Book Guy terse opinions.

This movie's a regular rewatch for me, and I still laugh/marvel at bits I've seen a dozen times before: Jack shooting the ceiling in the big fight and knocking himself out, lipsticked while facing Lo Pan, Egg at the opening when lightning travels around his hands, etc.

Re: the first comic trade, I liked it a lot, once I got used to the exaggerated art. BTiLC ending with the beast clinging to the truck always bothered me, preferring resolution, so it was nice to have that settled. There are 3-4 later trades listed on Amazon. I'll be buying those eventually.

Thought I found about the Funko Pop BTiLC figures here, but didn't run across a mention, rereading this thread. So FYI. There's a glow-in-the-dark Lo Pan that's not shown on that page, but might still be available elsewhere.

the body of a spider... (scampering alpaca), Thursday, 23 June 2016 14:12 (seven years ago) link

It played last night at the Senator theater in Baltimore. I didn't find out about it until too late.

forksdippedmayo (how's life), Thursday, 23 June 2016 14:13 (seven years ago) link

three years pass...

https://media.giphy.com/media/hUgYyZwFNvr4A/giphy.gif

mookieproof, Friday, 7 February 2020 00:28 (four years ago) link

OTM

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 7 February 2020 00:39 (four years ago) link

I take every evocation as an invitation, and you're welcome

https://youtu.be/D03E9kUTTtQ

Sammo Hazuki's Tago Mago Cantina (Old Lunch), Friday, 7 February 2020 01:11 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.