Teachers on Strike: Classic or Dud?

I remember the last one. My school got off quite lightly. Relatively few members of NUT which iirc was on strike, as far more of our teachers were members of the NASUWT.

Naturally as we were 15 at the time we envied our peers down the road at another school with a much higher NUT contingent.

NUT? Really?

I think perhaps we need a 'most amusing acronyms' thread.

Good/Unfortunate Acronyms

my mother always used to have a good laff about that.

I remember my father pointing to an NUT sticker in the back of a car which read "If you can read this, thank a teacher" and muttering "If your child can't read this, thank a striking teacher".

Strange week. This is when we file back slowly and set up our classrooms for next week. But our contract expires Sept. 1, and the government is in emergency session to a) freeze wages for two years, and b) make it illegal to strike during that period. Everything feels very much up in the air right now.

God, that sucks. Where do you live?

Toronto--it's a province-wide thing.

I am sitting in the superintendsnt's opening address texting, and it is uh-maz-ing how much rhetoric is being used to avoid mentioning the strike.

Rick Perlstein on Rahm Emanuel, abuser of teachers:

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/stand_against_rahm/

Ontario government passes legislation today: wage freeze, no strikes, takebacks on accumulated sick days. We're taking them to court.

xp'd from chi thread

https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/527223_492590120751714_1425385267_n.jpg

it doesn't fucking matter if your kid learns algebra today, next month, next year or in college

Rahm Emanuel, Arne Duncan and Barack Obama are a coven of idiots on the subject of anything education. I'd love for the NFT to pull their support from O, frankly.

^^ sadly otm
i think obama believes what the other two say, and they are idiots

how long is the school day in chicago currently?

Five hours and 45 minutes, one of the shortest school days in the country.

20% increase in pay for 20% increase in workweek seems kind of like an unrealistic demand (that's not generally how these things work unless you're an hourly wage employee) but I can see it as a negotiation starting point I guess.

God only knows what the starting point was, then, because I think they've been negotiating for 10 months!

Apparently wages are a very minor point of contention. They've more or less agreed to a 16% average raise spread over the next few years: 2% one year, 3% the next, etc.

Good Reuters analysis:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/10/us-usa-chicago-schools-analysis-idUSBRE8890VS20120910

And Ezra Klein crunches the numbers on salaries:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/09/11/how-much-do-chicago-teachers-make/

The school I went to in England ran 08.30-14.15, so sounds the same as Chicago. 20 min lunch and for 3 of the 5 years I was there no after school activities ie sport, drama etc. I think the schedule arose from a teacher's strike.

Klein analysis interesting, but again, this is apparently not really about money. I'm really curious about what kind of middle ground the two sides can find, because there really doesn't seem to be any. Teachers want the right to rehire laid off teachers, presumably a power they want before a rumored 100 further schools are closed. But those schools are apparently at 50% enrollment, due to socio-economic factors beyond the control of both the city and teachers. Should empty schools be kept open? Dunno. Arguably the best option is that you roll those leftover students into other schools, including some charter schools. What other option is there besides opening more schools, which seems counter-intuitive? Or I guess significantly expanding existing, full schools and hiring more teachers, which is probably close in terms of the dollars spent to the same thing. Obviously education is vital, and investment in education essential. Yet all along the high school graduation rate here is hovering around 60% (a significant improvement!) and graduates subsequently completing college in five years or less something pitiful, like 6%. That's not the fault of teachers, or the city. It's the fallout from broader problems that have been left unattended for decades, problems that no strike can solve. It's a mess.

Obviously education is vital, and investment in education essential.

IMO not as obvious as all that

arne is the fucking biggest tool ever

Should say, basic high school readin', writin', 'rithmatic is vital. Or at least should be. But if kids can't be arsed to learn that stuff, then they should just forego high school and do what they were planning to do when they didn't graduate, anyway.

Join ILX?

walked through the protests yesterday, they were using occupy strategies for crowd communication

also saw a few signs that said The Revolution Will Not Be Standardized, which i thought was rather cleverl

not nearly as many people as that photo upthread but still had a few blocks cut off. good to see.

from what i've gathered, as josh says, the salaries are almost moot at this point.

i think the two big things are giving ex-CPS teachers first priority on new teaching jobs and reducing the weight of standardized test scores for evaluating teachers as outlined in the city's proposal. my sense in being there for a minute yesterday was that the latter point is a pretty serious issue.

there's also some minor stuff, like making sure every school has air conditioning (2012!) and making sure that the city doesn't gut support staff at the schools (guidance counselors, therapists etc)

My kids - do any of you have school-aged kids? - go to school in Oak Park, a nice innter-burb with good schools, and virtually none of the elementary school classrooms, at least, have A/C. Kids and teachers deal. Though for all I know everyone will change their mind and go on strike next week.

"support staff" is often code for cushy patronage positions. I will defend teachers to the death, but guidance counsellors are largely scum. And every one of these superfluous counsellors, assistants, "out of classroom" teachers, etc. = one less teacher = larger class sizes.

My understanding is that they want the support staff and more teachers and smaller class size. With a lot of that determined by the power to make hiring/firing decisions, which is asking for a lot, as an entire package. Plus other comfort stuff, like A/C and more money. Which maybe they deserve and maybe they can get, but I don't see it.

Heard a reporter suggest this is a chickens coming home to roost scenario, since by and large Daley gave the teachers whatever they wanted to forestall exactly what's going on now.

Sounds like they might be asking for too much, but tbf so are "reformers" who think we can improve the system and slash funding at the same time.

I think they see slashing funding (ie closing schools) as an improvement.

http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/13824/director_of_private_school_where_rahm_sends_his_kids_disagrees_on_standardi/

Unlike occasional teacher union opponent Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel does not send his kids to public schools. Instead, Emanuel's children attend one of the most elite prep schools in Chicago, the University of Chicago Lab School, where the annual tuition is more than $20,000. (Emanuel has repeatedly refused to answer questions about why he eschews public schools for his children, telling reporters that it is a private family decision.)

The conditions at the University of Chicago Lab Schools are dramatically different than those at Chicago Public Schools, which are currently closed with teachers engaged in a high-profile strike. The Lab School has seven full-time art teachers to serve a student population of 1,700. By contrast, only 25% of Chicago’s “neighborhood elementary schools” have both a full-time art and music instructor. The Lab School has three different libraries, while 160 Chicago public elementary schools do not have a library.

“Physical education, world languages, libraries and the arts are not frills. They are an essential piece of a well-rounded education,” wrote University of Chicago Lab School Director David Magill on the school's website in February 2009.

i love how everyone gets to have an opinion about what teachers do and don't need, and feels the right to be super vocal about it.

"support staff" is often code for cushy patronage positions. I will defend teachers to the death, but guidance counsellors are largely scum. And every one of these superfluous counsellors, assistants, "out of classroom" teachers, etc. = one less teacher = larger class sizes.

― look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:21 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark

yeah, idk. you're also talking about social workers, psychologists

I am married to a public school teacher, so yeah, I have an opinion about it.

I know. I'm not talking about anyone itt -- I'm just generally talking about the national attention this is getting. Ezra Klein looking at salaries, etc. Just an observation. Not being a dick.

Is there any question that private schools are better than public schools, at least in terms of amenities and staff and extracurriculars and whatnot? Like, duh, $20,000 a year per student buys you a lot more than piddling property taxes pay for. I bet Rahm drives a better car than most, too. Besides, politicians - like celebrities and other public figures - rarely (if ever?) send their kids to public schools for obvious reasons.

If the reasons are so obvious, why do people continue to give them a hard time about it, I wonder? Honestly I feel bad for any mayor's kids in any city because they are forced to answer questions that most kids don't really even think about answering, yet people continue to ask the same questions.

The only reason I posted that is because the director of the school is disagreeing philosophically (partic in terms of evaluation) with one of the school's most prominent supporters, which should give at least some weight to the striking teachers' concerns beyond salaries and stuff that people seem to stick on.

Amy Carter went to public schools.

Good memory!

Is there any question that private schools are better than public schools, at least in terms of amenities and staff and extracurriculars and whatnot?

I think this is entirely dependent upon where you live; for example, my old public high school has a fully-functioning machine shop, a cable-access television studio, a 400-seat amphitheater, an Olympic-sized pool, a gymnasium that holds 4 full-sized basketball courts, an agriculture building and an Olympic-sized track. This facility is now the middle school and we have a new high school sitting on 100 acres of land that has multiple pools, an Olympic-sized indoor track that surrounds (iirc) 6 basketball courts, touchscreen electronic dry erase boards in every classroom, multiple computer labs, etc etc etc, I mean there is actually a BRIDGE inside the school connecting the front entrance to the classroom area that crosses over the cafeteria area. The whole thing is just nuts.

It's a nicer facility than some 4-year colleges I've seen.

what the hell

one thing i was struck by when i started living in the midwest is how fucking massive high school campuses are

my HS school in del mar was like that too

hurting 2 otm

some support staff, particularly the special ed ones, are crucial to the school

but a lot of support staff jobs - like counselors and data analysts - are kinda parasitical to the school

and district staff are the worst

i mean i'm sure they're not actually "scum" or bad people, but they suck up $$$ out of proportion to what they give back

100% parity between private schools (and wealthier public schools) and public schools in poor areas may not be achievable, but the debate is really about what the baseline should be. We have a lot of doubletalk about certain areas of education being "inessential" (for your kids) and "essential" (for my kids) going on, is the point of that excerpt, I think.

That's super true, but I'm talking more about the people who jump immediately to, "all unions are bad, eliminate them all", which isn't the answer.

In Wisconsin, if memory serves, a huge number of union members voted against the Scott Walker recall. I don't get it when people vote against their interests, but it does imply something deeper or at least more nuanced at work.

Union members in Wisconsin have a tendency to be socially conservative, Reagan Democrats.

And a lot of people in this state thought the recall was a massive waste of public resources in the service of a small portion of the population.

Public sector unions are not well loved here, even in liberal strongholds like Madison and the city of Milwaukee.

Even my friends who belonged to public unions hated them, and these are 20 something Democratic leaning voters.

Yeah, ime people I know or knew consider it kind of shameful to have to belong to a union b/c of their profession, like it's asking for trouble or a handout they don't want.

Plus I'd guess that there are schools in states without strong teachers’ unions where there are kids doing as lousy on tests as those in union states. Mississippi for example

You would have thought, though, after it got to that point, with all the money spent already, that they could have just swallowed some pride and voted against Walker.

Yeah, ime people I know or knew consider it kind of shameful to have to belong to a union b/c of their profession

This has not been my experience with the teachers I know, can't speak for other professions.

I don't know any union members who are ashamed of being union.

In Wisconsin, if memory serves, a huge number of union members voted against the Scott Walker recall.

I guess it depends what you mean by "huge." Per this coverage

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57447980-503544/how-scott-walker-won-the-wisconsin-recall-election/

union members went for Barrett over Walker 71-29, which is a pretty serious walloping. Wisconsin is about half Democratic and half Republican, and you'd be hard pressed to find a group of voters more solidly Democratic than 71-29. If I remember correctly, that's about the same as the vote breakdown for the city of Madison, and I would not describe Madison as a place with a huge number of Republicans.

So the Republican union members were possibly split?

One of the more fascinating stats about where I live is that apparently only 20% of the population of Oak Park comprises households with K-12 aged kids, which means that the vast majority of homes are paying for services they do not use.

LOL that's how i feel about the fucking FIRE DEPARTMENT

Ha. To be fair, a large role of the fire department is preventative.

so is education, if you think about it

on the civic level they should just rebrand education 'society insurance'

then there'd just be fuckers goin around all, i don't neeeeed insurance, i take care of my mind just fine, and other fuckers that would be all, i'll just go on the internet if i suddenly need to know somethin!

on the civic level they should just rebrand education 'society insurance'

― iatee, Friday, September 14, 2012 1:25 PM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i like this. don't know if school boards in texas would go for it.

in case of nuclear war, we're going to put all the national merit scholars in a bunker

woo-hoo!

wait, where's the bunker

In between the sofa cushions...IN HELL.

Would be interesting to know who's funding that campaign.

― Temporarily Famous In The Czech Republic (ShariVari), Friday, September 14, 2012 8:32 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Some asshole.

― Josh in Chicago, Friday, September 14, 2012 8:37 AM (5 hours ago)

Very much so - it's the Center for Union Facts, one of a number of front groups run by Richard Berman (father of the Silver Jews' David). See http://www.bermanco.com/advertising/print/

it's in north dakota dan, in the basement of NORAD

I just couldn't resist making a Buffy joke, it is actually in North Dakota...IN HELL.

bad news for some ppl: I was a Natl Merit Scholar

good news for everyone who likes watching ppl bicker tho

specially selected corps of deaf navy seals

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/Deafseal.jpg

is that fella listening for nuclear subs

"Preventing conflicts is the work of politics; establishing peace is the work of education" - maria montessori

hippie

that's me

sigh

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/the_corporate_education_agenda_behind_wont_back_down/

I also met an entrepreneur who tried to convince me that the future of education was 3-D. He was in the conference vending hall repping his firm, Elixir XES 3D, which specializes in glassless 3-D video monitors. “With this technology we can bring dinosaurs or presidents or whatever to life!” he said. “Learning can be fun, just like a video game or a 3-D IMAX movie.” He then handed me a paper titled “3-D: The Technology Brought a Pot of Gold to the Motion Picture Box Office. It Has the Potential to Bring ‘Golden’ Learning Back to Our Schools, at Warp Speed.” The paper, which seemed simultaneously geared toward investors, advertisers and school board officials, explained that his super-exciting XES 3D technology is currently in 10 school districts and counting, bringing benefits to both students and advertisers.

what's next, this fool's TED talk?
smdh

industry rule #4080, textbook people are shady, same as it ever was, these bloodsuckers have been around since the day textbook companies and promethean boards were invented

teaching is already in 3D iirc

It has real potential for music class

*3-D trombone slides you*

We start one-day rotating strikes this week across the province. We'll probably be legislated back if a second day for any one board is imminent.

Waiting around for a decision from the Ontario Labour Relations Board tonight on whether our one-day walkout tomorrow is a) a political protest, b) an illegal strike, or c) neither, because they rule against us and we cancel. If it's the second, the Premier says fines or jail time are options. If I go in for some hard time, please, tell the world my story.

We're all still in limbo. Ontario high school teachers have been advised by their union to resume extra-curricular in exchange for...no one's sure, so I was glad to hear today that many of them will continue to boycott. If they buckle, we (elementary panel) surely will in short order.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ydqjqZ_3oc

Good job.

All that creepy jargon on political round-tables--getting your message out, winning the news cycle, etc.--seems more urgent when you're on the wrong end of it in your own life.

We're on work-to-rule right now. We appear to be heading towards something major next fall, but for now, relatively small stuff around provincial testing and report cards. There was a big development concerning the latter today--there won't be any, just a form promotion letter--and as I listened to the way it was being reported on the way home, it was infuriating to hear the other side's position being presented as fact, with nothing from us. What we should be saying seems incredibly obvious to me, but no response, not yet. I'm going to do something tomorrow I've never done in the close to 20 years I've been doing this--call the union and see if I can talk to someone. Basically I want to say, "You need to get someone in front of a camera, and here's what they need to say--you need to do this right away."

I wish I'd written this:

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/cayla-hochberg/tdsb-teacher-report-cards_b_7576696.html

I'll have to keep that in mind next time something's not being said that needs to be said.

So get in front of a camera and say it again. Or whatever you need to do!!

If a TV station stuck a mic in front of me tomorrow, I'd speak up. None outside my house right now--easier said than done. I do get a little nervous commenting about this stuff. Not here, but I just responded to the link above on Facebook, and that little voice in my head was saying "Be careful." I'm not sure if I'm more nervous about how my employer would react to public discussion of this or my union.

surprised this wasn't updated after the WV and OK strikes.

BREAKING: Arizona teachers vote to walk off the job in the first-ever statewide strike to demand increased school funding.

— The Associated Press (@AP) April 20, 2018

surprised this thread wasn't bumped, i mean. anyway, arizona teachers join the fray!

I brought it up a few times in the US politics threads to limited traction. anyway, right on, solidarity, etc.

oh, i mentioned the previous strikes a few times there, too. not exactly the best thread for it, though.

btw: CLASSIC

Have all or any of the strikes (wv, Oklahoma ...) been formally settled yet?

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/12/los-angeles-teachers-protest-ahead-of-likely-strike.html