More 9/11 conspiracy theory action ahoy -- with pictures!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
And actually, this one is pretty good in terms of making you scratch yer head.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Here's hoping the authors don't eventually bring in the Rosicrucians, though.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

You know, I wondered about the extent of the damage at the time, and wound up just sort of calming myself by assuming that the Pentagon is probably just special; you have to assume it's built to withstand damage a bit better than the average building. Still, though.

Hopefully this is one of those cases where there's some really fascinating physical/mechanical process that explains everything, much like the whole "why did the towers fall" conspiracy.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Or...

DG, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Bill K. of VHF Records just passed this along, which I think makes for a good explanation:

"The woman I share an office with was almost hit by the plane as she drove up washington blvd that morning (our office is a couple of miles from the Pentagon). she ran in and told me about it, and then 15 or 20 mins later it was on the news as "an explosion." I am pretty sure she was not an inside member of a vast conspiracy.

Having driven by then Pentagon shortly there after and many times since, I can tell you that the size of the hole and the amount of blackened concrete was considerable, the pictures don't really give you the scale b/c the width of the bldg makes it seem very low in comparison. They've closed the gap up now, they are trying to get it all fixed as soon as possible, I guess."

My own problem with what this theory getting at was -- what *did* happen to the plane? (Cue talk of shooting down jets over the ocean or whatever.)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I saw this the other day and it had me wondering. If what is suggested was the case and it was, ay a truck full of diesel soaked fertiliser or some such, why did the US government feel the need to cover it up and more to the point what happened to the plane that was supposed to have crashed into the pentagon? This theory begs more answers than it provides but it doesn't half make you scratch you're head.

(My new browser has a spell checker for forms, never more shall I misspell on ILE, but first I have to teach it british English)

Ed, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

you're?

mark s, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

As it stands, Ed, I prefer yer conspiracy of exploitation and presentation stance, ie that what happened would result in a fair amount of planning among Interested Sources to pitch the story one way or another to lead to other ends.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Oh goody, I love it when my assumptions turn out to be grounded in reality: it's the super-reinforced wall that explains it. I think the trick to the photographs is that the width of the outer ring seems much less than the length of an airplane, making you feel like the plane should have either cleared through a few rings or left bits on the lawn. But, instead, it appears to have compressed itself pretty squarely against the outermost wall. And then exploded.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I'd like to know why the creator of the conspiracy site is surprised about the lack of nice big identifiable chunks of plane. It seems pretty obvious to me.

DG, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

And where does the assumption come from that the plane was flying level with the ground when it hit?

bnw, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well, that would be about true, wouldn't it? It's noted that it hit the ground before the building, meaning it would have basically skidded into the wall head-on.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Nitsuh, if that theory was true, why are there no skid marks trailing along the ground BEFORE hitting the first outer ring? There wouldn't be any, from a plane heading into the Pentagon at an angle. As the rebuilding is only in the early stages, I'd not be surprised if a piece of wing, engine or whatever was found embedded in the ground, years later.

I'd love to know where the conspiracy site guy got his pics from. They are quite clear, and mega-detailed.

Nichole Graham, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

And nicely cropped to make a wonky point.

DG, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/pent.html

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0203/S00051.htm

Queen G, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I seem to recall the plane was coming in pretty vertical when it hit. Like a 45 degree angle.

bnw, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

This link keeps getting mailed to me from a friend, but he isn't doing it. I think it's just using his address book.

misterjones, Friday, 15 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

one month passes...
I think a plane hitting the lawn at an speed would create a big fucking skidmark. And the a huge motherfucking explosion. I dont think there would be any green grass left in the area.

LosWoozle, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah but crabgrass, nothing gets rid of crabgrass

mark s, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

three weeks pass...
Seems logical. What I've heard is that those planes could be remote controlled from the ground. If they could be remotely controlled, they why would the government not stop them from hitting their targets, if they weren't themselves controlling them into the buildings?

Which also brings up a point of why there was never a fighter plane in the air, yet when a small aircraft runs low on cabin pressure, a fighter jet is there within 15 minutes?

Brian Karcher, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jesus Christ this story is old -

http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

J Blount, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

If you freeze frame Joise and The Pussycats at exactly the right moment (decent frame advance/jog dial features advised), you can just make their plane look like it's heading straight for the WTC.

Graham, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

two months pass...
The photos are simply nor clear enough to form conclusions like "there should be a peice of fuselage at a certain location on the lawn otherwise the government did it". In every picture, not surprisingly, the building is obscured by emergency vehicles and water being sprayed at the structure from firetrucks etc.

As far as the extent of the damage, I had always thought for some reason that the pantagon was actually built to withstand a direct nuclear strike, at least with the kind of atomic weapons payloads that were available when it was constructed.

Brad Richards, Sunday, 4 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

one year passes...
http://www.wfmu.org/hova/images/cher.jpg

Dada, Sunday, 7 December 2003 04:34 (twenty years ago) link

four months pass...
I thought all that was total nonsense until I juts found this

hmmm (hmmm), Thursday, 15 April 2004 10:32 (twenty years ago) link

Wouldn't it just've been easier to fly a fucking plane into a building instead?

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 15 April 2004 10:55 (twenty years ago) link

My favorite Bible quote:

Moses saw GOD in a burning Bush.

Kinda gives it that added extra edge...

Super-Kate (kate), Thursday, 15 April 2004 10:57 (twenty years ago) link

Daddino otm. Most of the 9-11 conspiracies, including this one, are pretty silly. The only thing that gets me is the Flight 77 passenger list. I'm not inclined to believe the conspiracies it could imply, but it does seem rather strange.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 15 April 2004 13:06 (twenty years ago) link

what was the flight 77 passenger list thing?

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 15 April 2004 13:16 (twenty years ago) link

The relatively small number of passengers in the first place, and the large number, among other things, who were current or former military (Navy especially) or defense contractor employees, including a number who did work or had worked in the Pentagon. Not necessarily surprising for a flight leaving early in the morning from Northern Virginia, but it does seem odd. I'll elaborate more at some point later.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 15 April 2004 13:21 (twenty years ago) link

thanks.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 15 April 2004 13:28 (twenty years ago) link

four months pass...
http://pages.infinit.net/noc/pentagon.swf

now i'm just more confused... certainly, the missing footage alleged in this slideshow needs to surface.

stevie (stevie), Thursday, 2 September 2004 11:01 (nineteen years ago) link

two years pass...

i just found out one of my friend's is a hardcore 9/11 conspiracy theorist. we just now became e-friends and his profile page looks like some presidential assassin's. otherwise, he's a cool, nice, normal guy.

i sent him the link to this Popular Mechanics article and he hasn't responded.

(I guess I've felt similar when speaking with devout Christians, but I've dared to attack them.)

poortheatre, Sunday, 1 July 2007 04:00 (sixteen years ago) link

er, haven't dared to attack them.

poortheatre, Sunday, 1 July 2007 04:01 (sixteen years ago) link

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/ has been pretty good, but the best article arguing against WTC controlled demolition comes from the professional demolition folks at Implosion World. (PDF link)

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 1 July 2007 06:58 (sixteen years ago) link

lol Americans.

everything, Sunday, 1 July 2007 08:31 (sixteen years ago) link

lol everything

El Tomboto, Sunday, 1 July 2007 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL @ Americans

LOL @ Teh W0lrd

lol I can't help it

lol I cant

El Tomboto, Sunday, 1 July 2007 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

<i> i just found out one of my friend's is a hardcore 9/11 conspiracy theorist. we just now became e-friends and his profile page looks like some presidential assassin's. otherwise, he's a cool, nice, normal guy.

i sent him the link to this Popular Mechanics article and he hasn't responded.<i/>

Did you, in the interests of a balanced debate, also include links to any of the many articles observing Popular Mechanics' failure to address the issues which feed so much 9/11 conspiracy theory?

Your friend might be more responsive then...

angle of d..., Monday, 2 July 2007 00:37 (sixteen years ago) link

you fucking idiot trolls

El Tomboto, Monday, 2 July 2007 00:43 (sixteen years ago) link

nah, i don't really care too much; this isn't a debate. anyone that believes in some sort of 9/11 conspiracy has some serious problems.

poortheatre, Monday, 2 July 2007 01:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i believe in fake concocted evidence like the passport that flew out of the plane and the WTC, through the flames and landed conveniently on the street. LOL

Heave Ho, Monday, 2 July 2007 03:38 (sixteen years ago) link

anyone that believes in some sort of 9/11 conspiracy has some serious problems.

Isn't that the Fox news technique? It is! That's what they say anytime someone suggests something they disagree with. "Crazy". Crazy is really the latest rage in put-downs, even by people who don't think about it as a "strategy," like Murdoch's team.

Just now, I feel you were being totally sincere without intention of being offensive. But, really? "Serious problems?" I don't see the connection. That means a lot of the firefighters and police who were there are wackjobs. That reminds me of when people say that "people just can't accept the reality that terrorists got the better of us." Really? To me, it's far easier and comfortable to accept that the bad guys did us harm than it is to even begin to fathom that our own government might do this to us as a false flag operation.

There is a lot of bullshit that went down that has seriously never been addressed. Heave Ho's point is just one. That's total bullshit. Or, I mean, do you think it's sane to suggest that everything was pulverized except a passport. They couldn't find a black box, but they found a passport? And the FBI list of hijackers? Or the florida dentist who was poisoned that was going to testify about the men he suspected were terrorists and was trying desperately to alert the FBI? I don't see why anyone would have to be crazy to suspect some conspiracy here.

Take a look at that documentary "The Power of Nightmares" and see if it still seems so far-fetched. It's not something slapped together like Loose Change by a bunch of college kids. And it gives a good, clear picture of how neocons think. If you have to be nutso to suspect a conspiracy, then it seems like there are a lot of crazy people out there. I mean, isn't it almost half of America now that believes our government at least knew about it and didn't do anything as a pretext for war? Not to mention the suspicion around the world? I mean, I can predict a response like, "Yeah, look how many people voted for Bush" to make the point that people are just idiots, so it's not surprising that so many believe in a conspiracy, but I'm sure a lot of very smart people voted for Bush, too.

Also, I just want to make mention that a lot of people who believe there is a conspiracy simply don't talk about it for fear of being called crazy, but they will anonymously check the appropriate mark on a poll. I don't think you have to challenge your friend or call people crazy just because it is the popular opinion. How does it help the situation for people to be on the side of government secrecy? Obviously, there's some secrets, so help put pressure to get the full story. Why help the government keep it's secrets? Rupert Murdoch isn't paying you to do that. When you look at the millions of dollars that have been spent on other investigations, 9/11 is an insult to our intelligence. $5 million without a definite official conclusion on many issues. Just dropped. And here you are helping these people to say, "Go away, go away, just leave us alone." I don't understand this. Why don't rational, responsible people want to know the full story?

dean ge, Monday, 2 July 2007 04:28 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.rightwinged.com/images/photoshops/moonbat.jpg

scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2007 04:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Moonbat, that's a total Fox insult which is generally followed by hanging up on a caller.

dean ge, Monday, 2 July 2007 04:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Does that make me 3x the Charlie Sheen Charlie Sheen is?

dean ge, Monday, 2 July 2007 04:52 (sixteen years ago) link

drugs will set u free

elan, Monday, 2 July 2007 04:55 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm a scientologist

dean ge, Monday, 2 July 2007 04:56 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/KoXiPrJ.jpg

here come the ROOSDer
yeeeeeeah you know he ain't gonna die

rallizes mcguire (unregistered), Saturday, 13 June 2015 17:53 (eight years ago) link

wife and kids, household pet
fuel didn't melt that steel I bet
the answer screams to me from somewhere

(...Lorax...)

Hammer Smashed Bagels, Saturday, 13 June 2015 18:50 (eight years ago) link

aligning herself with conrad there wins, bold move

designated hitler (darraghmac), Wednesday, 17 June 2015 21:27 (eight years ago) link

There are lots of links and quotes in earlier posts that I jumped the gun on. If I had the ambition to start a clean thread on 9/11, I would focus more on the shit-stain America leaves on its flag by covering its ass. ROOSD is still the most sound collapse propagation model explaining the descent of the WTC 1 & 2. Seeing people get fussy over it was laughable because they didn't know why they were fussy so much as they felt they had to be.

The Once-ler, Wednesday, 17 June 2015 22:15 (eight years ago) link

People making jokes about ROOSD was less laughable. Mainly because their jokes were on par with dad humor or dumb puns that give ilxors the giggles. (Not that there's anything wrong with that. I wish I could laugh as easily.)

The Once-ler, Wednesday, 17 June 2015 22:29 (eight years ago) link

(Perhaps it's not about laughing easily so much as having a different sense of humor. I'll have to test this elsewhere.)

The Once-ler, Wednesday, 17 June 2015 22:34 (eight years ago) link

lmao

π” π”žπ”’π”¨ (caek), Wednesday, 17 June 2015 23:46 (eight years ago) link

hm

jennifer islam (silby), Thursday, 18 June 2015 02:58 (eight years ago) link

People making jokes about ROOSD was less laughable. Mainly because their jokes were on par with dad humor or dumb puns that give ilxors the giggles. (Not that there's anything wrong with that. I wish I could laugh as easily.)

― The Once-ler, Wednesday, June 17, 2015 10:29 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

mine was the best

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 18 June 2015 05:38 (eight years ago) link

I wish I could laugh as easily.

something tragic about this line

appropriation and whatnot (stevie), Thursday, 18 June 2015 09:06 (eight years ago) link

crack yr fromage

― thoughts you made second posts about (darraghmac), Monday, 8 June 2015 07:57 (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

fear of a nakh pan itt (wins), Thursday, 18 June 2015 09:42 (eight years ago) link

I've said my piece on it itt

designated hitler (darraghmac), Thursday, 18 June 2015 10:42 (eight years ago) link

prob wanted to limit the damage surrounding real estate, tbf

even blue cows get the girls (darraghmac) wrote this at 2011-09-04 11:42:09.000

Burlington Coat Factory did 9/11

how's life, Thursday, 18 June 2015 11:02 (eight years ago) link

two years pass...

dean did you know there's another internet underneath this one? you can't see it, but it's there, it runs on "port 6667," and it's used by the illuminati to relay coded messages

― El Tomboto, Monday, July 2, 2007 10:46 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

Neanderthal, Monday, 14 August 2017 04:34 (six years ago) link

eight months pass...

if there's an ILX hall of fame, this exchange belongs in it:

max, I rather not say because I might be trying to get a job with the perpetrators ;)

― U2 the musical by Spiderman (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:42 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Walgreen's did it?

― Looking Man (Abbbottt), Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:42 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

fuck the NRA (Neanderthal), Monday, 23 April 2018 00:52 (six years ago) link

I don't bother looking into 9/11 conspiracies anymore because the one-sided, lackluster, 9/11 investigation was a joke that the government got away with. Going "out on a limb" and fully investigating Saudia Arabia's involvement was never going to happen.

But why should America have taken the investigation more seriously? What good would it be to open a can of worms by investigating links between Saudi perpetrators and the Saudi government?

He said captain, I said wot (FlopsyDuck), Monday, 23 April 2018 14:04 (six years ago) link

My hunch is that Saudi Arabia wasn't *directly* responsible for 9/11. We know they basically planted the seeds that grew into it, but I don't know if it was their intention to specifically direct an attack of that scale against the U.S. I'm not sure what their interest would be in that, except in a general way to draw us into their regional conflict. But I don't know that us attacking Iraq and Afghanistan really advanced their interests. Maybe a resident ME expert can tell me what I'm missing.

It also seems plausible to me that SA had some idea that Al Qaeda was planning something, even if they didn't direct it. They must have been monitoring these groups.

Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Monday, 23 April 2018 14:42 (six years ago) link

if the KSA was directly involved with 9/11 it backfired spectacularly as it put baghdad in iran's orbit and shifted the balance of power in the middle east to iran.

Mordy, Monday, 23 April 2018 14:58 (six years ago) link

It is very odd that the people who masterminded /11 were all wealthy young Saudis. Moreso that - correct me if I'm wrong - such people havent since been perpetrators in any terrorist attacks have they?

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Monday, 23 April 2018 23:53 (six years ago) link

Frustrated, well-educated young men are exactly the group that perpetrates most terror attacks. And Mohammed Atta was Egyptian.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 24 April 2018 09:00 (six years ago) link

Frustrated, well-educated young men are exactly the group that perpetrates most terror attacks

mumford & sons, for example

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 24 April 2018 09:51 (six years ago) link

Clap Your Hands Say Allah

fuck the NRA (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 24 April 2018 12:42 (six years ago) link

Clap Your Hands Say Yahweh

Frederik B, Tuesday, 24 April 2018 12:58 (six years ago) link

melt your beams say what?!

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 24 April 2018 13:03 (six years ago) link

Frustrated, well-educated young men are exactly the group that perpetrates most terror attacks. And Mohammed Atta was Egyptian.

I don't know, seems to be a hell of a lot of feckless losers and petty criminals involved too.

(Henry) Green container bin with face (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 April 2018 13:17 (six years ago) link

one year passes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98

Bstep, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 09:49 (four years ago) link

makes u think

Homegrown Georgia speedster Ladd McConkey (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 09:57 (four years ago) link

but does not make u click

Pinche Cumbion Bien Loco (stevie), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 10:10 (four years ago) link

then fuck off

Bstep, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 11:10 (four years ago) link

great revive (h/t BG)

Captain ACAB (Neil S), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 11:11 (four years ago) link

ffs

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 11:19 (four years ago) link

bstep if you want to talk about 9/11 conspiracies maybe a better way to start a conversation would be an actual post outlining your thoughts instead of flopping out over four hours of youtube videos onto the thread and then telling people who engage with you to fuck off

Homegrown Georgia speedster Ladd McConkey (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 11:30 (four years ago) link

great revive (h/t BG)

h/t to pomenitul shurely

Homegrown Georgia speedster Ladd McConkey (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 11:30 (four years ago) link

cogent arguments won't melt steel belligerence

Pinche Cumbion Bien Loco (stevie), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 12:40 (four years ago) link

9/11 is a joke iirc

Dr. Teeth and the Women (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 12:46 (four years ago) link

Why would we not want to click on videos from the Corbett Report, a show that featured Stefan Molyneux as a "guest host"?

Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 14:37 (four years ago) link

So get up get get get get down
9/11 is a joke in this town

ill fuckin put a paste on those (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 15:04 (four years ago) link

CaptainLorax???

Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 18:29 (four years ago) link

naw he's a good poster now i kid. anyway fp'd

Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 18:29 (four years ago) link

fp-ing over 9/11 is nagl imho

Dr. Teeth and the Women (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 19:00 (four years ago) link

jet fuel can’t melt sb’s

Homegrown Georgia speedster Ladd McConkey (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 19:06 (four years ago) link

not a good lunch

ill fuckin put a paste on those (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 19:26 (four years ago) link

Nothing ruins a lunch quite like once again witnessing some fiend engaged in a 9/11 fp-fest. Get a room.

Dr. Teeth and the Women (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 19:33 (four years ago) link

CORRECTION:

https://imgur.com/nlkTKrH

turn the jawhatthefuckever on (One Eye Open), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 19:36 (four years ago) link

https://i.imgur.com/nlkTKrH.jpg

turn the jawhatthefuckever on (One Eye Open), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 19:38 (four years ago) link

lolssss

Ste, Wednesday, 5 February 2020 20:16 (four years ago) link

im a fan of conspiracy theories, i find them interesting. i generally don't believe them - i think jfk was shot by oswald alone - but i enjoy the whole recounting of those suspicious facts that make you possibly question the official story. 9/11 conspiracy is a huge snooze for me though.

i remember watching football once with a schizophrenic hippy who voted green party (here in canada) and two alberta oil workers (small c conservatives, probably voted tory), and they could all agree that you'd be crazy to think the planes brought the towers down. i didn't try and disabuse them of their opinion, because what's the point?

frederik b. godt (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 5 February 2020 22:00 (four years ago) link

two years pass...

I think a plane hitting the lawn at an speed would create a big fucking skidmark. And the a huge motherfucking explosion. I dont think there would be any green grass left in the area.
― LosWoozle, Tuesday, May 7, 2002 8:00 PM bookmarkflaglink

yeah but crabgrass, nothing gets rid of crabgrass
― mark s, Tuesday, May 7, 2002 8:00 PM bookmarkflaglink

stank viola (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 19 October 2022 16:58 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.