Conservapedia - An encyclopedia you can trust

liberal hoaxes are the worst kind of hoax imo

Does Mr. Schlafly enjoy the esteem of his fellow Christian-conservatives?

These people are so illiterate that they don't know their own conservative traditions. They don't do any favors for true conservatism. It makes one want to become a REAL conservative just to teach these junk food morons what conservatism really is.

On the one hand, you imply - in bullying fashion - that your politics are superior. How can they be superior when you are incapable of reading a college-level political science book?

I enjoy reading literate conservatives, even if I don't agree with them.

For example, we have two statements about Freud - one is literate and fair, one is not. I assume they come from the same place.

Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) was the founder of psychoanalysis, an atheist and pseudoscientist. Despite the scientific rejection of most if not all of his theory, Freud remains powerfully influential among amoral and atheist scientists.

If you want to convince people you are correct, calling adherents or admirers of Freud "amoral" and "atheist" is not the way to do it.

"Freud did more than perhaps any other man to insidiously conflate atheism with science, religion with mysticism, more than LaPlace, Darwin, or even Marx... While groundbreaking, his theories set back psychoanalysis for more than half a century.

While I may or may not agree with this, it is at least thought-provoking.

A "ghetto blaster" is slang for a large and powerful stereo radio-DVD player.

dvds!? :|

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/transformers/images/thumb/f/fe/G1_Blaster_toy.jpg/250px-G1_Blaster_toy.jpg

If you want to convince people you are correct, calling adherents or admirers of Freud "amoral" and "atheist" is not the way to do it.

Aren't a lot of Conservapedia's users Andrew Schafly's students? I don't think winning over people who aren't already conservative is really the purpose of the site.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_insights

that didn't work but i really wanna see it!

haha, i think it's because their site is currently down

what is it??

http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:UXGFO5TMaN4J:www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_insights

poll?

http://conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_insights

see also

http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_insights

"Freud did more than perhaps any other man to insidiously conflate atheism with science, religion with mysticism, more than LaPlace, Darwin, or even Marx... While groundbreaking, his theories set back psychoanalysis for more than half a century.

While I may or may not agree with this, it is at least thought-provoking.

― u s steel, Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:34 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark

Um, you can't really "set back" a field that you founded.

http://liberapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Ethnic_Cleansing

maybe noit deserving of its own thread, but some lols here: Dickipedia - A Wiki of Dicks

not

http://www.conservapedia.com/Fan_heater

haha!

i don't get it

OK.

It's a 'conservative' wikipedia. They create their own alternate reality, where their own opinions and attitudes are reinforced without fear of contradiction. But, to have this nirvana of comfort, they have to have references and definitions of all those other things that do not have political affiliations, otherewise another wiki is needed that might mean reality intrudes.

Conservapediaman sternly handing down his relatively neutral definition of a fan hater and grunting "yeah I'll give you that one"

that was supposed to say fan heater, please nobody make a shit joke about that

a "fan hater" -- like eric cantona!

If you boo your own players, you are a fan hater (fan heater!)

^^ kind of reminds me of that time Clough chinned a disgruntled Forest fan and Private Eye said it was a case of the shit hitting the fan

Thought that was going to be about armed football hooligans.

i didn't know that lord byron was a nazi hero???

― Tracer Hand, Monday, 28 January 2008 22:33 (1 year ago) Bookmark

Ha! I was just reading the metapedia article on Byron and thinking this is very strangely written and not insanely right wing at all and then I noticed they had just cut it from the Encyclopedia Britannica.

He's still on their main page as well, curiously.

This is just the beginning folks! I am confedent that we will witness a landslide victory for Republicans in 2010! B.H. Obama approval rates are dropping much faster than President Bush in his first year, and the trend has only just began. The fact is that a large majority of Americans are Conservatives and that will show in 2010, hopefully with Governer Palin at the helm!! Full steam ahead to a better America! Patriot1505 21:25, 3 July 2009 (EDT)

I'd guess Palin will head up or become chief spokesmen for a high profile, non-profit advocacy group for children with disabilities, like the Special Olympics for example. This will make her virtually bullet-proof from liberal attacks and hate speech. And hoperfully this will help call attention to the mean spirited hypocrisy of so-called comedians, satirists, and other liberal hate mongers. Rob Smith 19:42, 5 July 2009 (EDT)

good luck usa, christ

good luck christ, usa

can't believe they are still trumping the lenski case on their front page - it was the most classic example of comprehensive pwnage in the history of right wing nutjobbery!

Lenski's paper was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a professional society of scientists with a strong bias towards atheism and evolutionism.

Heehee, them wacky scientists with their rational thought and stuff.

The social media tracking website Surchur reveals that fifteen out of twenty of the newest YouTube videos mention Conservapedia in a positive light. [13] Conservapedia is considering expanding its YouTube presence in the near future. Please subscribe to the YouTube channel Conservapediavideos today!

wut

we've only just begaaaaaaaaaan

can't believe they are still trumping the lenski case on their front page - it was the most classic example of comprehensive pwnage in the history of right wing nutjobbery!

― last night i dreamt somebody shoved me (ledge), Tuesday, July 7, 2009 11:00 AM (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

wussup with this?

[/i]

ooooookay

A comprehension gap is the length of time between a correct assessment and incorrect knowledge or blatantly wrong belief(s).
For example, a person believes there is nothing wrong when it comes to abortion. Later in life, the person starts to feel partial birth abortion is wrong. Over the years, this person will become involved with religion. He is told abortion is wrong and he starts to believe it. Then he has a full conversion when he feels abortion is the evil murder of innocent children in the womb. The duration between 'nothing wrong when it comes to abortion' and the correct assessment 'abortion is evil murder', is called the comprehension gap.

oh, wow, that one's amazing.

evil murder!!!!

"the duration between 'this is my opinion' and 'I am a fire-breathing zealot who can't see past his own nose,' is called the comprehension gap."

Thankfully I come to my senses quickly when it comes to having the right opinion on stuff, so my comprehension gap is pretty small.

http://www.conservapedia.com/File%3ASmelliesdoublecrochet.jpg

YOU ARE HEREBY WARNED!

"Abortion is the induced termination of a pregnancy. Abortion is a billion-dollar industry in the United States and Western Europe except for Ireland, Malta and Poland, where it is generally illegal. God warns in His word that a nation that sheds innocent blood will not prosper. (Deuteronomy 19:11-13)"

omg, so THIS is the cause of the financial crisis!

"About 80% of women who see an ultrasound of their unborn child decide not to abort. Millions of women who had an abortion later suffer psychologically or physically from it, and support groups exist to help. Many victims of abortion find healing by speaking out against, and discouraging, similar harm to other mothers and their children."

And the compulsory Reagan quote (classic!):
“I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born. -- Ronald Reagan"

So true.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Abortion

http://www.conservapedia.com/File:Smelliesdoublecrochet.jpg

Conservapedia was, I understand, created to be an academic resource that avoided some of the pitfalls of Wikipedia, such as anonymous editing (which I am glad this encyclopaedia avoids). However to be an effective academic resource, and certainly if it wishes to achieve a status of being able to be cited in academic work, then academic conventions need to be adopted, such as rules of citation, use of CE over AD, and copyright. None of these things are the preserve of liberalism, or some kind of liberal agenda. They are simply however the minimum standards that any publication needs in order to gain academic credibility. I don't make these rules, I am merely stating what I have seen to be the case in academic publications, which is what an encyclopaedia is meant to be. --Krysg 08:46, 29 November 2008 (EST)

Krysg, your contributions have been meager here; your name hides behind anonymity; and your suggestion that "CE" instead of "AD" is necessary "in order to gain academic credibility" is absurd. Unless you raise the quality and quantity of your contributions and statements, this will be my last reply to you. Pursue your quest to spread "CE" (which denies the historical basis of the calendar) far and wide somewhere else, not here. Godspeed.--Aschlafly 10:48, 2 December 2008 (EST)

Why is CE necessary? CE IS the preserve of liberalism, as who else would change a 2000 year old system (and moreover, one which works and everyone is used to) to appease 1% of the population who haven't yet realised that AD and BC is supposed to offend them? AD and BC offend no-one, and the craven liberals who seek to appease all minorities at the expense of majorities are imagining things. AGAIN. CE has no academic credibility; before CP, I had never heard of it and hope never to hear of it again. I find the idea of CE offensive, but who will defend my rights? Not liberals. NeilEG 12:53, 2 December 2008 (EST)

CE and BCE were introduced to ease discussions in academia with those of other faiths where forcing the purely Christian dating would be offensive. Markr 11:00, 2 December 2008 (EST)

Markr, you're not fooling anyone here. "AD" is historically correct and if anyone is offended by it (which is doubtful), then they are unsuitable for learning history. CE and BCE are transparent attempts to censor Christian history.--Aschlafly 11:19, 2 December 2008 (EST)

http://www.conservapedia.com/images/f/fb/2_61_ultrasound.jpg
When an Ohio woman looked at an ultrasound she expected to see a developing baby. Instead, she saw what she believes to be an image of Jesus Christ

me, I see one of those little skull-faces from Seasons in the Abyss (upper left, sideways)

definitely some goatse.cx action top left (with very looong thin white arms)

wussup with this?

I dunno, wussup? if you haven't come across it before, just read the entry, extra lulz on the talk pages.