― milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:01 (seventeen years ago) link
― Eazy (Eazy), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:09 (seventeen years ago) link
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:10 (seventeen years ago) link
Other thing that weirded me out: I was trying to ask him about the "collaborator" roles in that book, like how he saw them on a spectrum from just villainous to maybe deluded and used, and his answer was more or less "Oh, they're just bad people. They're the bad guys."
I dunno, it's possible he just thought we were all really stupid? (The real amazement of the thing was that after the class, my friend David approached, made friends with, and apparently now occasionally hangs out with Roth.)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 23:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 23:50 (seventeen years ago) link
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 00:04 (seventeen years ago) link
Marmot, The Plot Against America's probably a good place to start, yeah. Really gripping, and (naturally) broad in its scope (reaching into American history). It isn't what I'd call a typical Roth book--it veers into 'counterfactual history', but it's not that much of a departure. It's also the only book in which he explores childhood (his own, actually) for an extended amount of pages, which is what makes the book great, I think.
Jhoshea, When She Was Good is mostly 'weird' because Roth is totally (and consciously) writing outside of what he knows. He's a Jewish guy from New Jersey writing about a young Christian girl in the midwest trapped in a totally deterministic world--as if he was trying to be Thomas Wolfe or Sherwood Anderson or something. It's better than most people give it credit for, but it's really not very good, Roth-wise.
― g00blar (gooblar), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 00:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― g00blar (gooblar), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 00:37 (seventeen years ago) link
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 01:53 (seventeen years ago) link
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 01:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 01:59 (seventeen years ago) link
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 04:07 (seventeen years ago) link
also TPAA seemed to have plenty of interesting characters, but only gently interesting. some of the family scenes were pretty exquisitely rendered. as to the collaborators, i mean, they weren't really in any way the center of the book -- what i liked most about the whole way it worked through was the way the "plot" was so much and so little at once, just a step away from what it was and so REALLY just a step away from what it was... the commonplacing of the counterfactual -- seemed like a sideswipe at radical zionist types in the service of rendering the memoiresqe portion more true and vivid -- how it *felt* to be assimilating.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 04:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 04:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 04:14 (seventeen years ago) link
actually, i think one of the things i liked most about the book was its almost worshipful attitude toward FDR - pretty uncool these days, and strangely touching in a hard-to-define way.
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 09:01 (seventeen years ago) link
― g00blar (gooblar), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 10:37 (seventeen years ago) link
I love particularly the last 50-75 pages of that book, from the ridiculous argument with Milton Appel, to the impersonation of the pornographer on the plane, to the GREBT graveyard scene, to the end when he's wandering around the hospital (as a patient), still wanting to be a doctor.
What's great is that the nature of Zuckerman's problem throughout is pretty vague. He's got horrible, chronic pain--from what? He doesn't know. He can't write. Why? He doesn't know. There are lots of reasons given by other characters, but essentially the causes are left unknown. But that doesn't make the pain, or the inability to write, any less real. It makes it MORE maddening in the fact that you don't even know why it's happening. That struck me as a very clever central premise for a book.
― g00blar (gooblar), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 10:46 (seventeen years ago) link
Still my favorite Roth is probably Goodbye Columbus and the vintage short story "Defender of the Faith." Tried to read The Ghost Writer back in the early 80s and hurled it @ the wall.
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 11:37 (seventeen years ago) link
This is, actually, to be found in a lot of Roth books. I think it's Zuckerman who remembers fondly and with nostalgia his parents taking the kids up to a train station to witness FDR's coffin be taken through.
― g00blar (gooblar), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:42 (seventeen years ago) link
g00blar: thanks for the Ghost Writer recommendation. It's in my Amazon shopping cart, and I'll post back here if I have any questions. I'm currently plodding through a copy of the Master and Margarita with terrible typography though, so that could take a while. Don't disappear in the meantime! This is a great thread!
― caek (caek), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 22:45 (seventeen years ago) link
How does it compare to stuff like Steppenwolf or The Stranger? The wiki makes it sound like a more extreme/depraved version of that kind of thing. Either way, I'll see if I can find it next time I'm in my local used book shop.
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 22:58 (seventeen years ago) link
Caek, that's great you're gonna read TGW! It's really nothing like Sabbath, but it's fantastic!
― g00blar (gooblar), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 23:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― G00blar, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 10:07 (seventeen years ago) link
Damn. I thought it was somewhere on this thread that someone mentioned that PR actually admitted somewhere (a conference in france maybe?) that Operation Shylock was all made up. I mean, everybody knows it is, but I'm trying to track down Roth's admission. Anyone?
― G00blar, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:22 (sixteen years ago) link
Re: The Ice Storm, IMDB says, 'The book Janey is reading while sitting on the water bed is "When She Was Good" by Philip Roth.'
― caek, Sunday, 5 August 2007 11:47 (sixteen years ago) link
Did anyone ever think Operation Shylock might NOT have been made up???
― Hurting 2, Sunday, 5 August 2007 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link
(not rhetorical question, I really don't know the history)
― Hurting 2, Sunday, 5 August 2007 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link
i just started the plot against america! yesterday!
― s1ocki, Sunday, 5 August 2007 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link
The Human Stain is awesome!
I haven't read Everyman, but does he end up realizing that Good Deeds are the only worthwhile pursuit? (like the medieval play)
― poortheatre, Sunday, 5 August 2007 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link
can anyone point me to the new yorker article referenced above? or give more specific identifiers i could use to search for it?
This just occurred to me after reading that piece about the pot-smoking ex-orthodox-Jew in the New Yorker -- do you think there's a wider theme in contemporary Jewish literature of overly-self-conscious transgression, perhaps having something to do with the combination of guilt, sarcasm and lack of a hell-sized threat of damnation in Jewish culture?
-- A-ron Hubbard (Hurting)
― W i l l, Sunday, 5 August 2007 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link
Nah, no one did, which is sort of the interesting thing.* I mean, everybody knows it's fiction, but if Roth's never said so--if, in fact, he's sworn up and down that it's non-fiction--how, exactly, do we know? Because I have to write about this shit, it feels sort of unconsidered to just write: "Although Operation Shylock is subtitled 'A Confession', and claims to be a true story, c'maaaaaan."
*Mark Shechner, I think, has probably come closest to trying to take PR at his word--he basically ends up saying that at the end of the day it doesn't matter whether the book is a true account or not.
(But I don't really care about all this shit
― G00blar, Sunday, 5 August 2007 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link
Just started Ghost Writer. Roth really can turn a sentence around, can't he? Questions to follow.
― caek, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 08:45 (sixteen years ago) link
75 years old today.
― G00blar, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 09:42 (sixteen years ago) link
I would have thought you'd had enough of him to last a lifetime!
― Masonic Boom, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 09:47 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah serious. In some ways, I'll never be free.
― G00blar, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 09:54 (sixteen years ago) link
the day after Updike turned 76 huh
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 11:39 (sixteen years ago) link
I read the Zuckerman Bound collection recently. despite upthread dissing The Anatomy lesson was my fav section
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 11:56 (sixteen years ago) link
If anyone wants to read me blabbing about Roth, this thing, which came out in July I think, is finally online.
― Manchego Bay (G00blar), Monday, 17 November 2008 15:37 (fifteen years ago) link
http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i134/dgoobl/JQImage.jpg
― Manchego Bay (G00blar), Monday, 17 November 2008 15:41 (fifteen years ago) link
Roth to publish new novel this autumn, another novel next year.
― f f murray abraham (G00blar), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 19:03 (fifteen years ago) link
“The Humbling,” which is scheduled for the fall, is a novel about an aging stage actor whose empty life is altered by “a counterplot of unusual erotic desire,” the publisher said. The company (which awarded its Houghton Mifflin Literary Fellowship to “Goodbye, Columbus” in 1959) will also release “Nemesis,” a work of fiction by Mr. Roth, above. Set in the summer of 1944, it tells of a polio epidemic and its effects on a closely knit Newark community and its children. That book is scheduled for publication in 2010.
tbh that description sounds like a Philip Roth madlib e.g. coming winter 2009 Philip Roth's "Words Like Arrows" interlaces the story of Daniel Lampel a blah blah blah In 1950s Weequahic blah blah blah overweening mother blah blah blah fictional small-town college blah blah blah parallels to current political situations blah blah blah
still excited though. i thought indignation was good, though hard not to compare with everyman just because of length and setting etc.
― schlump, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 19:37 (fifteen years ago) link
How often do you read Roth? I've read eight-and-a-bit of his now. I feel a bit exhausted at the end of each one, so have to go through a good long rest period before trying him again. So while I think I'd be pretty happy to read no other authors ever again, I don't actually think it would raise my Roth rate very much
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 19:41 (fifteen years ago) link
i think i read the few zuckermans i've gone through in fairly quick succession, but then they start fairly easily. a couple of his are more pageturning than others - the plot against america - but then i know i probably waited a while after the human stain. i'm a little sketchy on my tally of how many i've read because i've set aside a bunch half way through - my life as a man, portnoy, the third? zuckerman book with the zionism and the illness (so glad when i found out that other people couldn't motivate themselves to plough through it either). some of it's psychologically dense enough to feel like you need a rest, for sure.
― schlump, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link
although unlike shipley and jordan and dom i have actually met whiney g weingarten in person for approx 45 seconds
― abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago) link
haw wrong thread!@!
I'm obviously not a normal case, as I read little other than Roth for 4+ years (ok, I had to read a bunch of other stuff, but I had to *always* be reading/thinking about/writing on Roth). I don't feel exhausted at the end of a Roth book, no--although above, I think Laurel(?) said she thought his endings are weird, they tend to leave me exhilarated more than anything else. I guess I can understand that, if you were not a fan of his voice, the books could be exhausting, because that voice is so insistent, so persistent, that you'd just say 'enough already'. But I love his authorial voice, and I can open pretty much any of his books feel pretty much total trust in where that voice might take me.
― f f murray abraham (G00blar), Thursday, 5 March 2009 12:10 (fifteen years ago) link
i really enjoyed that piece you linked, it's really insightful!!!
― urban-suburban hip-hop settings (hmmmm), Thursday, 5 March 2009 12:28 (fifteen years ago) link
Thanks a lot!
― f f murray abraham (G00blar), Thursday, 5 March 2009 12:33 (fifteen years ago) link
I got Exit Ghost in hardback for £1 today (Union Street Poundland, all you Glasgowers - and perhaps other Poundlands across the country). I haven't read anything else by him though I've been meaning to, so 1. can I read this without reading the other Zuckerman books? and 2. if I can, is it a good idea?
― Like, (Expletive) my (expletive). (Merdeyeux), Monday, 18 May 2009 15:13 (fourteen years ago) link
can the next thread about gender issues also be titled "ask me about the work of philip roth"
― mustread guy (schlump), Thursday, 30 January 2014 22:48 (ten years ago) link
That’s a blurb that would sell books: “‘well written but sickeningly filthy’ — H. R. Haldeman.”
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 January 2014 22:53 (ten years ago) link
I recently accused a writer of a particularly bad Tablet Mag piece of "masturbating into a piece of liver"
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Thursday, 30 January 2014 23:08 (ten years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/books/review/my-life-as-a-writer.html?src=me&ref=general
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 4 March 2014 03:56 (ten years ago) link
He comes across as a self important bore in that interview. Still, I definitely agree that measuring a literary work against some prefab ideological framework is not just boring but also isn't "reading" in the highest sense of the word. He makes this argument in a sort of self-serving way and with little awareness or sympathy for the reasons people feel compelled to call out instances where they feel a writer is perpetuating corrosive attitudes though, so fuck him.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 4 March 2014 04:09 (ten years ago) link
i read Indignation recently after seeing the trailer for the movie. I couldn't make heads or tails what the thing was about, so I read it on a plane and enjoyed it quite a bit. Quick read. Saw that there's an American Pastoral movie coming out in October, bit of a longer book, thoughts on that one?
― flappy bird, Friday, 12 August 2016 17:37 (seven years ago) link