Katrina's POLITICAL aftermath (keep the political discussions HERE)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
the Katrina's aftermath thread has broken four digits in posts now. At this point, since the proverbial levees have broken as far as the political cess to follow, that thread should IMHO be left to report on conditions there only.. and political talk should be diverted HERE only (and I'm to blame most for that in the former thread. Apologies.) Keep in mind that there are a few ILXOrs unaccounted for [no longer the case --mod], and it would be best to keep that thread from being overcrowded, in case any news on that front comes through... so!

OK, so this is where we keep the POLITICAL aftermath from Katrina/Gulf Coast devestation discussions...

Apologies in advance for repeating this article, but while it's an editorial, it's a good start as a relatively polite, succinct synopsis of the problems at hand here:

Hurricane Politics -- As Katrina forced President Bush to cut short his vacation, the White House is facing a perfect storm of trouble at home and abroad.

WEB-EXCLUSIVE COMMENTARY
By Richard Wolffe and Holly Bailey
Newsweek
Updated: 10:54 p.m. ET Aug. 31, 2005
Aug. 31, 2005 - On Tuesday, President Bush called an abrupt end to his five-week ?working vacation? at his Texas ranch and announced he would return to the White House two days early to oversee federal response to the devastation of Hurricane Katrina. ?These are trying times for the people of these communities,? Bush said Tuesday during a visit to a naval base in San Diego. ?We have a lot of work to do.?

For the White House, it was interesting timing. Over the last month, administration officials have deflected criticism of Bush?s monthlong stay at his Texas ranch by making the case that technology has made it possible for Bush to run the country from anywhere, even the so-called Western White House. Indeed, the Bush ranch is equipped with highly secure videoconferencing equipment and phones, and, according to White House officials, Bush has made use of them just about every day this month to talk to senior aides back in Washington and other administration officials scattered throughout the country.

Yet Bush usually hasn?t had to go far to reach his top aides. For the last month, Karl Rove, his closest political adviser, and Joe Hagin, Bush?s deputy chief of staff, have alternated turns living in a trailer just down the driveway from Bush?s main ranch house. Other officials have come to the ranch to meet with Bush face to face, including Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Vice President Dick Cheney. All three visited Crawford to discuss war strategy with Bush earlier this month. In other words, Bush?s days in Texas aren?t all that different from his time in the Oval Office, top aides say. Vacation or not, Bush is always running the country no matter where he is. ?When you?re president, you?re president 24/7,? White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan told reporters Wednesday.

So why is Bush going back to Washington now? When asked yesterday what Bush could do in Washington for hurricane relief that he couldn?t do from his Texas ranch, McClellan told reporters no less than five times that it was the president?s ?preference? to return to the White House. Asked if the decision was more ?symbolic? than logistical, McClellan said, ?I disagree with the characterization.?

From the moment Katrina set aim for the Gulf Coast, White House officials have had two other storms on their minds: last year?s devastating tsunami, to which Bush was criticized for responding too slowly, and the political turmoil that Bush faces here at home over the war and the economy. Indeed, August has not been a good month for the Bush administration. White House officials had hoped to capitalize on a slow news cycle to tout the president?s second-term agenda and his accomplishments so far. Yet a spike in casualties in Iraq this month has deepened already widespread worries about the war. That bad news was only compounded by the stampede in Baghdad on Wednesday that left more than 800 Shia pilgrims dead after rumors of a suicide bomber sparked panic.

That dismal news from Iraq, combined with rising gas prices here at home, has sent Bush?s poll numbers plummeting to new lows. An ABC News/Washington Post survey released Wednesday has Bush?s approval rating at 45 percent ? down 7 points since January and the lowest every recorded this president by that particular poll.

Bush and other administration officials repeatedly say they don?t pay attention to polls, but they do admit paying close attention to the images of the war and the presidency that Americans see on TV. That?s partly why Bush abruptly called reporters to his ranch Sunday morning to make a statement about Hurricane Katrina as it inched toward the Gulf Coast states. The message: that Bush was ahead of the storm and would be there to respond to its certain devastation. It was in strong contrast to last December?s tsunami, when Bush didn?t make a public statement about the tragedy until three days later, well after the death toll had reached into the tens of thousands.

As Bush returns to Washington to deal with Katrina?s aftermath, it?s a chance for him to look presidential and to briefly turn public attention from a troubled war to the homefront. Already, the White House has promised to send billions of dollars in aide to the affected region, and tapping into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is expected to shave a few cents off record-high gas prices.

Later this week, Bush is expected to travel to the affected region, where his poll numbers have taken a hit over concerns about the war. In Louisiana, more than a quarter of the state?s National Guard troops are currently in Iraq?a stat that had local officials concerned considering the role the guard typically plays in helping the state weather such storms. A Survey USA poll released earlier this month found Bush?s approval rating in Louisiana had dipped to 48 percent ? down 5 points since July.

Beyond the poll numbers, the Bush administration faces some immediate, urgent challenges?and serious questions about its response to the disaster. For all the president?s statements ahead of the hurricane, the region seemed woefully unprepared for the flooding of New Orleans ? a catastrophe that has long been predicted by experts and politicians alike. There seems to have been no contingency planning for a total evacuation of the city, including the final refuges of the city?s Superdome and its hospitals. There were no supplies of food and water ready offshore ? on Navy ships for instance ? in the event of such flooding, even though government officials knew there were thousands of people stranded inside the sweltering and powerless city.

Then there?s the speed of the Bush administration?s response to such disasters. Just one week ago the White House declared that a major disaster existed in Louisiana, specifically most of the areas (such as Jefferson Parish) that are now under water. Was the White House psychic about the disaster ahead? Not exactly. In fact the major disaster referred to Tropical Storm Cindy, which struck the state a full seven weeks earlier. That announcement triggered federal aid for the stricken areas, where the clean-up had been on hold for almost two months while the White House chewed things over.

Now, faced with a far bigger and deadlier disaster, the Bush administration faces at least two difficult questions: Was it ready to deal with the long-predicted flooding of New Orleans? And is it ready to deal with the long-predicted terrorist attack that might some day strike another of our big cities?

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 18:37 (nineteen years ago) link

chris already a thread that kinda does this, but it seems to have sunk in the new answers.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 September 2005 18:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Here:

Climate Instability + Current Political Situation = Ruin

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 September 2005 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah that's the ticket, tho maybe we should keep this one open too, i dunno.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 September 2005 18:45 (nineteen years ago) link

i want an "assassinate his ass" bumper sticker.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 1 September 2005 18:45 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't really want the sec. service bugging me, personally.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 September 2005 18:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, I was aiming for this thread to be Katrina specific.. and I never knew that thread existed -- and surely it's Katrina specific right now, for obvious reasons. So apologies...

However, if someone wants to add to this thread later, they can just search "Katrina" in ILE search, whereas the former thread isn't as obvious in searching regards.

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 18:48 (nineteen years ago) link

don't know who said it (was it blount? gear said some stuff, too) but the discrepancy between the 9/11 coverage and the katrina coverage is really starting to gnaw on my nerves.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 1 September 2005 18:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Chris Mooney's article in Prospect last May is frighteningly prescient.When the waters recede and people start counting the human and financial cost, there's going to be one almighty shitstorm when people realise how negligent federal authorities have been.

In the event of a slow-moving Category 4 or Category 5 hurricane (with winds up to or exceeding 155 miles per hour), it's possible that only those crow's nests would remain above the water level. Such a storm, plowing over the lake, could generate a 20-foot surge that would easily overwhelm the levees of New Orleans, which only protect against a hybrid Category 2 or Category 3 storm (with winds up to about 110 miles per hour and a storm surge up to 12 feet). Soon the geographical "bowl" of the Crescent City would fill up with the waters of the lake, leaving those unable to evacuate with little option but to cluster on rooftops -- terrain they would have to share with hungry rats, fire ants, nutria, snakes, and perhaps alligators. The water itself would become a festering stew of sewage, gasoline, refinery chemicals, and debris.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Very angry reader emails on CNN. Tons of blame pointed at BushCo. Cafferty makes the point that Congress reconvened faster for the Schiavo affair than for this. Very cynical!

Fushigina Blobby: Blobania no Kiki (ex machina), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:01 (nineteen years ago) link

mr cafferty looked fit to explode.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:02 (nineteen years ago) link

This is really broad, but I had these vague musings about the state of mankind and modern convenience when faced with something like this -- how when the tsunami hit, people mourned, then cleaned shit up (with help, obv) and went back to rebuilding their mud huts and etc.. And if you compare to now, here in the US, how people can't really rebuild their mud huts because they lack the skills to do so, and also because of regulations of basic construction... and the cost of doing so... and the list goes on. modern man v. the noble savage; cost of knowledge wrt survival vs. electricity. Potable drinking water excepted, of course. things like that...

Jimmy Mod Loves Alan Canseco (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Also wondering how much of a leadership vaccum there is in NO right now, and how one might equate that with 9/11 with Giuliani walking down the streets of NY, covered in ash and dust like MacArthur -- how really inspiring that was and how it really seemed like there was someone in command. Perhaps things are just so bad that fingerpointing is inevitable.

Jimmy Mod Loves Alan Canseco (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:13 (nineteen years ago) link

one thing I have repeatedly heard lorded over "first-world" residents by "third-world" residents is that we don't know how to fix or build jack shit. and the criticism is very true and prescient. When we're reduced to third-world status (a course that present policies virtually guarantee), we're going to be woefully unprepared to adapt.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:17 (nineteen years ago) link

fingerpointing at DubyaCo isn't really going to accomplish anything, entirely justified tho it may be. It is too late to get him out of office, he is not going to withdraw from Iraq or make any major policy-shifts - he has no reason to.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:18 (nineteen years ago) link

It is too late to get him out of office

Well, no, it's not... but the question is a big "how?" Gross incompetence, sadly, isn't really an impeachable offence unless he starts naming his horses as secretaries.

Jimmy Mod Loves Alan Canseco (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Let's hope the 2006 Congressional elections go well.

Fushigina Blobby: Blobania no Kiki (ex machina), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Dubya is never going to be impeached over anything. I'd bet ... um... a major metropolitan city on it.

The Congressional Elections will maybe chip away at the Republicans' majority (particularly in the House), but the Democrats are lame ducks at this point. No policy focus, no ideas, no unifying rallying cries. they're fucked. we're fucked. the only people that aren't fucked are DubyaCo.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:22 (nineteen years ago) link

"i want an "assassinate his ass" bumper sticker. "

you're an asshole. i mean i dont like him either, but come on.

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:22 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, then Cheney would be president. whoo-de-doo.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:23 (nineteen years ago) link

No, i'd say it's perfectly reasonable feeling, if illegal...

Jimmy Mod Loves Alan Canseco (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:23 (nineteen years ago) link

i just hope he rots in hell.

renegade bus (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:27 (nineteen years ago) link

i hope he doesn't rot in hell, i hope there isn't a hell or a heaven so "christian" fucktards like him can be denied an answer when they finally die.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:28 (nineteen years ago) link

cafferty: "most of the people stuck in new orleans are black and poor. they couldn't evacuate because they didn't have the means to."

renegade bus (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Cafferty on CNN just addressed the race/issue head on. OMG WOLF BLITZER JUST SAID "SO POOR, SO BLACK"

xpost :D

I love Cafferty; he is really a breath of fresh air for cable news.

Fushigina Blobby: Blobania no Kiki (ex machina), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Round Two: Cafferty vs. Canseco

Dr. Glen Y. Abreu (dr g), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:33 (nineteen years ago) link

you're an asshole. i mean i dont like him either, but come on.

-- JD from CDepot (kicksjoydarknes...), September 1st, 2005 1:22 PM.

btw any athenians reading this thread (WHAT UP EMILY) trying to find a gas station in georgia athens that still has gas, bulldog square on baldwin across from blindpig (where i works) still has some. we're rationing though so don't be dragging some emptied out septic think behind you thinking you got a plan. if you drop by don't say hi to me cuz i can't stand to talk to motherfuckers at work, say hi to me at indierock karaoke tomorrow night. also, funny story: today georgia looked like a zombie movie done slapstick - gaslines longer than ANY i can remember and i can remember the carter administration, people panicking like crazy, wild rumours spreading around, shit hitting the fan minus any real tragedy. crowded store, long line of people waiting to prepay for gas, asshole republican asks 'what's the deal with the gas line?' and i say 'there's talk of a gas shortage, and people are freaking out a bit' and asshole lets out this one asshole scoffing chuckle and then says (and note this motherfucker is trying to have a fucking conversation for some fucking reason and holding up the line) 'there aren't going to be any gas shortages, no stores are gonna run out of gas mark my words. gov. perdue won't let it happen. PRESIDENT BUSH (his emphasis) won't let it happen.' and then some dude in line piped up 'that motherfucker better hope he get's impeached before someone assassinates his ass' and EVERYBODY laffed cept ralph reeder dude. and then he FINALLY took his change and left. god bless america.
-- j blount (jamesbloun...), September 1st, 2005 12:27 AM. (papa la bas)

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:34 (nineteen years ago) link

so who thinks that many in the administration might not, shall we say, mind if a big chunk of the Democratic base of the state disappears or is dispersed, including out-of-state?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:35 (nineteen years ago) link

what do I wish upon Bush, Barbour, Hastert, et al?

VOODOO

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:36 (nineteen years ago) link

so who thinks that many in the administration might not, shall we say, mind if a big chunk of the Democratic base of the state disappears or is dispersed, including out-of-state?

bbbbut what if they increase dem numbers in texas and mississippi?!?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Shakey OTM. The Dems, starting with the Clintons, Kerry, Reid etc, are blameworthy asshole cowards.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:37 (nineteen years ago) link

This probably would have happened similarly had Kerry been president. Kerry might have been quicker, are far more slick in public about this, but there would still be nearly the same amount of despair and futility. I don't think Kerry was planning to immediately bankroll FEMA as a first priority, from what I recall. Then again, there's no point in these "what if" scenarios. sigh.

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:43 (nineteen years ago) link

OMG WOLF BLITZER JUST SAID "SO POOR, SO BLACK"

i heard that. i'll forgive him if he meant to say "the crowd is uniformly poor and black to such a great extent" etc instead of saying "wow these black people are really black," which unfortunately is how it sounds.

renegade bus (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm sure gabb will be the first to lodge three links at me proving otherwise before I post this.

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I think (I hope!) Blitzer meant "black" as in "bleak"... then again, I don't know the context of his speech.

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link

God, Public Enemy could just make one hell of a mean album just from TV samples from the last three days alone.

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link

bbbbut what if they increase dem numbers in texas and mississippi?!?

neither has a Dem Gov or Senator. LA has both, and voted for Clinton twice.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:50 (nineteen years ago) link

this is the article i posted on the other thread, where mike davis lambasts kerry for not reaching out enough to black voters, and attacks dems for being too centrist, and attacks new orleans' city hall for wanting to push the poor blacks out to the margins and make new orleans a theme park for rich tourists. i haven't decided how much i agree, and from what i've read elsewhere it seems like minority voters from poor neighborhoods turned out in DROVES on election day, but surprise surprise the machines "broke" and their votes were never registered. so take that and do with it what you will.

http://www.alternet.org/story/19992/

renegade bus (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:52 (nineteen years ago) link

minority voters from poor neighborhoods turned out in DROVES on election day,

specifically in new orleans, i mean to say.

renegade bus (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:54 (nineteen years ago) link

An act-of-God exit strategy from Iraq:

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2005/08/hurricane-exit-strategy-at-some-point.html

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:55 (nineteen years ago) link

neither has a Dem Gov or Senator.

yeah but ms. didn't have gop gov until recently.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:55 (nineteen years ago) link

This probably would have happened similarly had Kerry been president.

It may be hard to speculate about alternate outcomes but there's obviously a huge difference in philosophy between the two. The Bush administration quite clearly doesn't believe that the federal government has any role in preparing for or preventing these types of disasters and judging by Hastert's comments posted on the other thread I don't think they believe the federal government should have much of a role in rebuilding either. Unfortunately I don't think most American's will recognize this difference in philosophy or know about the dismantling of FEMA.

I don't think you can underestimate the importance of appearances either. The response of a real leader both before and after a disaster may not directly save any lives but the impact of a strong leader can be very important. See the comparison to Giuliani mentioned upthread. Saying Kerry would have been "more slick" makes it sound like the appearance of strong leadership is a negative.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:57 (nineteen years ago) link

neither has a Dem Gov or Senator. LA has both, and voted for Clinton twice.

Well, a lot of southern states voted for Clinton twice though. That doesn't say much. Having both a dem gov and senator says a lot more.. but from what I recall, the dem/repub split in Louisiana is pretty tight. I hope i'm wrong.

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I think (I hope!) Blitzer meant "black" as in "bleak"... then again, I don't know the context of his speech.

Perhaps he's thinking of making an answer track to Outkast's "So Fresh, So Clean"?

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Walter, no doubt. Better to be "slick and decisive" than "sloth-like and 'oh-ok'".

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:59 (nineteen years ago) link

haha - that rudepundit thing is pretty interesting, actually. I doubt anyone will have the nerve to actually put forward that argument ("but its in bad taste! it'll make us look weak on national security" the DemoCentrists will say...)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Perhaps he's thinking of making an answer track to Outkast's "So Fresh, So Clean"?

Maybe he was recalling his favorite forgotten rap duo 2 Black 2 Strong, but said it wrong.

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 19:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh for a screen cap of them.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 September 2005 20:01 (nineteen years ago) link

JimmyMod posted this from the nola.com/blog sidebar thing :

Thursday, September 01, 2005

House Speaker: Rebuilding N.O. doesn't make sense
Thursday, 2:55 p.m.

By Bill Walsh
Washington bureau

WASHINGTON - House Speaker Dennis Hastert dropped a bombshell on flood-ravaged New Orleans on Thursday by suggesting that it isn’t sensible to rebuild the city.

"It doesn't make sense to me," Hastert told the Daily Herald in suburban Chicago in editions published today. "And it's a question that certainly we should ask."

Hastert's comments came as Congress cut short its summer recess and raced back to Washington to take up an emergency aid package expected to be $10 billion or more. Details of the legislation are still emerging, but it is expected to target critical items such as buses to evacuate the city, reinforcing existing flood protection and providing food and shelter for a growing population of refugees.

The Illinois Republican’s comments drew an immediate rebuke from Louisiana officials.

“That’s like saying we should shut down Los Angeles because it’s built in an earthquake zone,” former Sen. John Breaux, D-La., said. “Or like saying that after the Great Chicago fire of 1871, the U.S. government should have just abandoned the city.”

Hastert said that he supports an emergency bailout, but raised questions about a long-term rebuilding effort. As the most powerful voice in the Republican-controlled House, Hastert is in a position to block any legislation that he opposes.

"We help replace, we help relieve disaster," Hastert said. "But I think federal insurance and everything that goes along with it... we ought to take a second look at that."

The speaker’s comments were in stark contrast to those delivered by President Bush during an appearance this morning on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“I want the people of New Orleans to know that after rescuing them and stabilizing the situation, there will be plans in place to help this great city get back on its feet,” Bush said. “There is no doubt in my mind that New Orleans is going to rise up again as a great city.”

Insurance industry executives estimated that claims from the storm could range up to $19 billion. Rebuilding the city, which is more than 80 percent submerged, could cost tens of billions of dollars more, experts projected.

Hastert questioned the wisdom of rebuilding a city below sea level that will continue to be in the path of powerful hurricanes.

"You know we build Los Angeles and San Francisco on top of earthquake issures and they rebuild, too. Stubbornness," he said.

Hastert wasn't the only one questioning the rebuilding of New Orleans. The Waterbury, Conn., Republican-American newspaper wrote an editorial Wednesday entitled, "Is New Orleans worth reclaiming?"

"Americans' hearts go out to the people in Katrina's path," it said. "But if the people of New Orleans and other low-lying areas insist on living in harm's way, they ought to accept responsibility for what happens to them and their property."

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 20:04 (nineteen years ago) link

vid of Cafferty going off

kingfish 'doublescoop' moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 1 September 2005 20:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I ain't that impressed with collective mental acuity of the American public. All throughout my adolescence they thought the Cosby Show was worth watching.

i was with you until that last sentence.

stockholm cindy (winter version) (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Replace it with [insert pet peeve here], jbr.

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:19 (eighteen years ago) link

m. white doesn't care about black obstetricians.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:20 (eighteen years ago) link

What I want to stand for? Oh, please. Save the hysteria for someone who gives a rat's ass, (including the fuck-you's over the deaths of thousands of people in Rwanda during the Clinton Administration. That is what you referenced, isn't it Shakey?)

I have very low expectations because of history. That history is colorfully bipartisan without exception, and it doesn't make me jaded, it just gives me reasonable expectations. I'd love to be more optimistic about the future of this country, but have a hard time knowing where to look. Besides, I've got Entertainment Tonight on Tivo and US Magazine to read anyway.

don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:27 (eighteen years ago) link

"(including the fuck-you's over the deaths of thousands of people in Rwanda during the Clinton Administration. That is what you referenced, isn't it Shakey?"

don't change the subject - I was not a Clinton supporter. Nice attempt at misdirection there tho. you seem fond of that tactic.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:30 (eighteen years ago) link

(tho fwiw, I don't recall Rwanda really "exciting the citizenry" so why were you even bothering to pay attention?)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:32 (eighteen years ago) link

haha look who's talking!

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:32 (eighteen years ago) link

after all, yr line of argument is that if it doesn't involve spectacular personal sexual embarassment, it isn't worthy of concern.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:32 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm so fond of misdirection that I brought up Ken Mehlman?

I CARE ABOUT BLACK KETTLES AND POTS.

don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:33 (eighteen years ago) link

correct me if i'm wrong but don isn't your argument more that if it doesn't involve spectacular personal sexual embarrassment the 'american people' aren't concerned? and shakey you disagree with this why? are you seriously arguing that abramoff has produced more watercooler talk, drudgehits, snl sketches, lame leno jokes than lewinsky? i'm not so sure dude.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:36 (eighteen years ago) link

The neo-cons weren't all that eager to go over and help out in Bosnia or Africa as I recall so they still don't get a pass on Rwanda and using it to relativise their present fetor is too contemtible to even mention without an involuntary snort. Of whiskey.

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:38 (eighteen years ago) link

my referring to Ken Mehlman isn't misdirection - its responding to your expressed desire to see more juicy sex scandals from this administration (insofar as you seem to have forgotten there already was one and it was quickly hushed up).

blount - I'm disagreeing with don's position that those are the only things worth being concerned about or shocked by. I thought this was fairly obvious. I'm not particularly disagreeing with his assessment of what gets the American public's attention.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:40 (eighteen years ago) link

i thought kristol was pretty strongly in favor of intervening in bosnia at the time, 'bold new strong foreign policy!', chiding republicans for lapsing into isolationism, not being BOLD enough. africa could go fuck itself obv.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:42 (eighteen years ago) link

For the record, I'd like to say that I care very deeply about black obstetricians. Some of my bes.... er, never mind.

Don, can we agree that Melissa Rivers should be the first American on Mars? (one way ticket, of course.)

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:43 (eighteen years ago) link

also clinton's been pretty forthcoming about rwanda being the biggest mistake of his administration and gore said they should've acted during the 2000 debates (while bush rebutted 'no that's the one thing you guys got right. fuck africa.')

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Here's a question. I thought it terrible of us not to do anything at the time in Rwanda. Do we think the U.S. military could have realistically done something to stop the slaughter or would it have been exploited as more imperialism and led to even greater anarchy?

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:49 (eighteen years ago) link

not sure greater anarchy would've been possible. i had very very mixed feelings at the time, my understanding is that logistically it presented much greater challenges than somalia (obv the political importance of that can't be overstated, we should remember too that the tossphrase surrounding any military venture at the time was 'is this worth the life of even one american serviceman?', there was a justifiably strict adherence to powell doctrine in military policy, republican grumblings that clinton was turning the military into a humanitarian force, and clinton already in ken starr's sights and at the weakest point of his presidency)(CONSIDERABLE resistance to us action from europe at the time also)(if i remember correctly it was french resistance that kept us out of rwanda and british resistance that kept us out of bosnia)('kept us out of' used loosely obv - we're talking tiny, powerless states, there were the straw on the camel's back more like), that very very little could've been accomplished re: the actual slaughter but much more could've been accomplished re: refugees, general humanitarian efforts. obv the real tragedy of the nineties for america AND the world is that at a time when the us was very very willing to relinquish some of it's world cop status (and ability to act in that manner) the un was ineffectual per usual and europe's response to genocide to within the continent or to its immediate south was to yawn, buy another oasis record, and leave it to the us whether anything would get done. europe had the opportunity to end american hegemony (which would benefit america as much as europe) and passed because it might require actual action (and the ability to act) instead of rhetoric.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 22:07 (eighteen years ago) link

hey shakey: I was being sarcastic w/r to what the hell is important (i.e. things worth "standing up for.") Kind of like I assume your "fuck you" was.

Bush more or less apologized for the government's dismal performance. Yes, this came after he fellated Brownie, of course, but he did pretend to be contrite when pressed. Finally. Kinda rang hollow to me, too. I'm not really sure that I buy Clinton's apology much--hell, there's no way to really spin your way out of genocide in two different countries on two different continents when you're in charge. Political apologies are just that.

As for your question, Rwanda would have been a clusterfuck of the Mongolian order. Were it me, I wouldn't have sent troops in. Which make apologizing for Rwanda all the more hollow--Clinton's decision was probably the right one.

don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 22:09 (eighteen years ago) link

Fuck an apology, how about doing SOMETHING to help rebuild and fortify New Orleans or help evacuees.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 22:11 (eighteen years ago) link

haha don did you literally just damn clinton if he do and damn him if he don't?

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 22:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Jordan, OTM.

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 22:16 (eighteen years ago) link

haha - yeah, I thought the gov't was there to, y'know DO STUFF, not just hand out nicknames and apologies.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2006 22:19 (eighteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...
Two things of interest:

First, advance word of an upcoming Congressional report unsurprisingly trashes everyone in the general chain of command. What is perhaps a touch surprising, or at least intriguing, is that it's a GOP-controlled committee trashing certain chunks of the administration -- Chertoff, 'White House aides' -- as well as the usual on-site targets.

Meanwhile, over in NRO world Deroy Murdock, who to his credit actually has visited the city at least a couple of times since Katrina, has been posting columns every so often noting how poorly the reconstruction effort is going, and is not sparing BushCo -- in fact it seems they're now a particular target of his calmly-stated but still fierce opprobrium. This one I've linked details a plan for recovery that, because it actually involves government intervention, is being opposed by the likes of Cato and, apparently, the White House itself -- and Murdock ain't happy.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 13 February 2006 14:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, fraud is now going to be a talking point.

But the report says FEMA found that 900,000 of the 2.5 million applications for all forms of individual assistance were "potential duplicates."

"Even when FEMA's automated computer system picked out what might be fraudulent applications, payments sometimes were still sent, says the advance testimony of Gregory Kutz, the managing director of the GAO's forensic audits unit.

The controls were so lax that auditors were able to secure a $2,000 relief check by using "falsified identifies, bogus addresses and fabricated disaster stories," and then simply waiting for the money to arrive in the mail, says the report for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times."

don weiner (don weiner), Monday, 13 February 2006 14:42 (eighteen years ago) link

What is perhaps a touch surprising, or at least intriguing, is that it's a GOP-controlled committee trashing certain chunks of the administration -- Chertoff, 'White House aides' -- as well as the usual on-site targets.

why is this surprising? their whole strategy has been to transfer the blame.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 13 February 2006 16:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Who does 'their' refer to in this case?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 13 February 2006 16:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Usually they transfer blame onto a Democrat.

Dan (Surprise!) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 February 2006 16:40 (eighteen years ago) link

http://kthv.com/assetpool/images/0628225616_FEMA_Trailors1.jpghttp://kthv.com/assetpool/images/0628225631_FEMA_Trailors3.jpg

I wish that I could find some aerial shots of this, but the Hope Airport in southwest Arkansas is currently home to 10,000 empty, unused trailer homes that were bought by FEMA for Katrina victims. FEMA says that they're working with private property owners and municipalities and whatnot and blah blah blah. Meanwhile, FEMA began kicking Katrina evacuees out of hotels this month.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 13 February 2006 17:50 (eighteen years ago) link

The White House issues its own report.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 February 2006 15:45 (eighteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...
They had met with reporters in Nashville to promote their upcoming Soul2Soul II Tour

Back to life, back to reality...

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 9 March 2006 20:02 (eighteen years ago) link

A HAPPY FACE

A THUMPING BASS

FOR A LOVING RACE



j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 9 March 2006 20:21 (eighteen years ago) link

two months pass...
I just talked to my mom (who lives in bham, AL) and she said that some of her local morning radio talk show hosts have vowed to cease holding benefit events for new orleans because of the election results because "if they don't want to help themselves, they sure don't need our help"

apparently this is a widespread sentiment in birmingham.

please tell me the rest of the country isn't being this ignorant and selfish just because we prefer an honest black mayor to a dishonest white one.

Fetchboy (Felcher), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 02:32 (eighteen years ago) link

Common sentiments elsewhere include Chris Mathews on Hardball saying 'why should we rebuld there at all,' and folks who say, 'Bush has spent billions there, what do you mean nothing has been done."
Plus "Katrina, that's old news, it's those ILLEGAL immigrants that worry me."

curmudgeon (DC Steve), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 12:28 (eighteen years ago) link

Help me write a platform for New Orleans

curmudgeon (DC Steve), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 12:33 (eighteen years ago) link

RealClearPolitics lectures the media, as is its wont.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 13:27 (eighteen years ago) link

That darn liberal media is always focussed on the empty half of the glass--Thank you Real Clear Politics...I look forward to their analysis of the recent articles on the Army Corps of Engineers.

curmudgeon (DC Steve), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link

Hehehe.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 15:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Wow. Rereading last September's commens made me ill all over again. And hurricane season begins in two weeks.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 16:19 (eighteen years ago) link

And to think that in three months, it will only be the FIRST anniversary of Katrina. joy.

It seriously feels like it's been 5-7 years ago.

I'm getting ill thinking that Katrina isn't going to get anniversary coverage at all on the major networks, but 9/11 will again, thanks to a certain Oliver stone movie.. (again, not to underplay 9/11, but the outrage from 9 months ago should be just as remembered as the outrage from 9/11.)

Have I mentioned that I STILL have a friend unaccounted for from Katrina? He's a young dude i met when I first moved to Seattle in 2001. He and a bunch of friends moved to NOLA in early 2002, so it was brief, but we kept in touch online.

Before Katrina hit, every one of my friends contacted everybody on their myspace list saying "We're OK.. except one person."... I didn't want to bring it up, because I didn't want to lapse into permanent panic attack mode. We knew that he didn't have a car, he was really down and in a bad way (became a junkie) and only mentioned that he'd find "his own way out.".. not the best way to phrase it, to be honest.

If he surivived, dude, I hope you're happy having erased your identity completely and the carings of the people who loved you and are happy right now.

If not, I hope it was quick.

((((((DOPplur)))n)))u))))tttt (donut), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 18:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I still remember the picture of the body of the old man in the lawn chair at the dome, and I think of my friend having died that way. I haven't been able to get that image out of my head.. even though chances are, it didn't pan out that way.

My friends tried to contact being at the NYT for pictures, and they responded saying they didn't know at the time if their friend was caught in one of the pics... so who knows.

((((((DOPplur)))n)))u))))tttt (donut), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 18:23 (eighteen years ago) link

My friends tried to contact being at the NYT for pictures

Sorry, "My friends tried to contact photographers at the NYT for pictures"

For the record, since the infamous vandalism of the W stickered car in Redmond, I have seen only one W sticker in greater Seattle since... I've only seen three more W stickers in between: the two days I was in Los Angeles for Xmas 2005.

((((((DOPplur)))n)))u))))tttt (donut), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 18:27 (eighteen years ago) link

three months pass...
Is that his caring face? He looks like he's wondering "my... is that a mole on his nose?"

StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 19:27 (eighteen years ago) link

nice try dudes

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 19:33 (eighteen years ago) link

I'd like someone to introduce a nonbinding resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that W should go live in an electricity-less FEMA trailer in the Lower 9th Ward. In hurricane season.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 19:34 (eighteen years ago) link

five months pass...
Reviving because Bush II didn't say a single thing about New Orleans in his state of the union speech.

At this point, the Feds are so bolluxed up that I believe they could only make things worse. However, there's a lot of justified anger out there because Bush/Rice want to give $770 million to Lebanon but can't be bothered to spend a dime on NOLA.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 25 January 2007 21:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, if only New Orleans wasn't a 'welfare swamp enlivened by occasional transsexual hookers' like Mark Steyn sez, then I'm sure all would be taken care of. Alas.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 25 January 2007 21:33 (seventeen years ago) link

seven years pass...

Ray Nagin found guilty of corrupution charges

Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 February 2014 20:04 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.