agreeing with morbs omg
― strongo hulkington's ghost dad, Thursday, 1 September 2011 00:59 (twelve years ago) link
i feel dirtier than anything j.g. ballard ever cooked up
"Crash" is awesome if only for the pull-quote emblazoned on the DVD: " ...sex and car crashes ..." I chalk the movie up as a failed attempt at filming the unfilmable, a la "Naked Lunch," but like that one is has a lot going for it.
I've pretty much found something to like or love in all his films, save "Spider," which I never finished, and "M. Butterfly," which I've never seen. I think his somewhat overlooked masterpiece may be the short "Camera."
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 September 2011 01:21 (twelve years ago) link
Hey, look!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQlQgzRyBfY
I've never seen History, for exactly the criticism Clemenza levels at it –– it seems technically skilled, elegant, and dull. I'll take unskilled, ugly, and interesting any day; somebody like Araki or Korine, even if I end up hating the film.
― notorious ilx wet noodle (remy bean), Thursday, 1 September 2011 02:21 (twelve years ago) link
"technically skilled, elegant, and dull"
are yo usaying the first 2 ensure the 3rd?
I don't much like it, but it springs to life occasionally (eg, on the stairs).
I've avoided Eastern Promises, for the violence.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 September 2011 02:31 (twelve years ago) link
Well, I'd hold out for the hat trick (skilled, elegant, and exciting) but ... I wouldn't be watching a lot of movies. What I mean is that if I'm deciding between two films, and one of them is technically skilled and classically beautiful and looks a little inert, it would be a trailing second choice behind a movie that appears ugly, amateur, and exciting. I guess my main film-selecting rubric (especially given my background in LA) weighs dramatically/narratively interesting films more heavily than technically sparkling and well-composed ones.
― notorious ilx wet noodle (remy bean), Thursday, 1 September 2011 02:37 (twelve years ago) link
I also hate being "shocked" or "moved" by watching people doing new iterations of old terrible things to each other. My taste doesn't see it as enlightening, just as shit-wallowing. I love Cronenberg's early career, but he lost me with Spider, and History of Violence didn't seem to be the film to bring me back into the fold.
― notorious ilx wet noodle (remy bean), Thursday, 1 September 2011 02:40 (twelve years ago) link
the bello-viggo stuff IS great, and led to me being disappointed that bello hasnt appeared in anything substantial since then...
US prime suspect! cautiously optimistic over here.
aaaand 'the cooler' heh
― goole, Thursday, 1 September 2011 02:42 (twelve years ago) link
"The Cooler" was 2 years earlier, even.
― Halal Spaceboy (WmC), Thursday, 1 September 2011 02:55 (twelve years ago) link
Remember Hello in Towelhead? No? You're lucky then.
― Status Update...in my Seether? (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 1 September 2011 03:09 (twelve years ago) link
Bello. Stupid phone.
"Cosmopolis is an upcoming drama film starring Robert Pattinson and directed by David Cronenberg"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmopolis_%28film%29
― owenf, Thursday, 17 November 2011 01:45 (twelve years ago) link
"do the worm on acropolis. slamdance cosmopolis."
― encarta it (Gukbe), Thursday, 17 November 2011 01:51 (twelve years ago) link
on Freud, Jung etc:
http://www.villagevoice.com/2011-11-16/film/freudian-trip-in-dialogue-with-david-cronenberg/
has anyone seen that Last Jew in the World short that's mentioned?
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 November 2011 03:25 (twelve years ago) link
I can guiltily say I enjoyed Cosmopolis as a book and await Cronenberg's treatment
― mh, Thursday, 17 November 2011 14:51 (twelve years ago) link
NYC retro in a few weeks kicks off w/ appearance by the man himself:
http://www.movingimage.us/films/2012/01/21/detail/david-cronenberg/
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 21:44 (twelve years ago) link
I'm really bummed that we're heading to a city big enough to show his new one, but two weeks before it opens. ;_;
― Steamtable Willie (WmC), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 00:23 (twelve years ago) link
i watched rabid p recently -- was impressed @ how many set ups, etc there were, it seemed v v professional for an "early" work. think i like shivers more though
also cronenberg talks abt marilyn chambers boyfriend being around the set @ carrying a gun -- i think this is artie mitchell right? idk i thought that was interesting
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 01:21 (twelve years ago) link
Rewatched Eastern Promises over the festive season and liked it as much as the first time round. Going to rewatch A History Of Violence before the Freud/Jung one reaches here in February.
― only NWOFHM! is real (krakow), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 09:02 (twelve years ago) link
There was definitely money behind Rabid. Even the choice of Chambers...I remember reading that the producers or whomever really thought it was going to be a big smash. Cronenberg wanted Sissy Spacek for the role.
― dan selzer, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 15:29 (twelve years ago) link
yeah Shivers is better
― The Silent Extreme (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 17:49 (twelve years ago) link
finally seeing A Dangerous Method on Tuesday
― max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 February 2012 00:12 (twelve years ago) link
On the differing "impossible adaptations" of Naked Lunch and Crash
http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/migrating-forms-20120203
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 February 2012 01:34 (twelve years ago) link
I should rewatch Crash. I really like Cronenberg's Naked Lunch!
― valleys of your mind (mh), Friday, 10 February 2012 01:42 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DCFB-WPe9Ic
― just sayin, Thursday, 22 March 2012 07:50 (twelve years ago) link
HAahah .... ok but guys what was that fucking dinosaur was doing there.....hats off 2 u robbiiiee love uRafarish1 26 minutes ago
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, 22 March 2012 09:05 (twelve years ago) link
holly freaking molly!!! is this R-rated or what?? .. It'd be so awkward to watch this with my buddies. They will think that I am sexually addict...lol!!jpattzlovevampz 2 hours ago
*HYPERVENTILATES* ROBERT! ooh I am so dead just looking at him in this teaser trailer! gshivy123 2 hours ago
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, 22 March 2012 09:07 (twelve years ago) link
Well I'm sad now I'm only eleven can't see it :( get the trenchcoatMissBethanyCullen 1 minute ago
― Number None, Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:09 (twelve years ago) link
Back on track.
― Eric H., Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:20 (twelve years ago) link
nah, I don't see many boring horror tropes there
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:40 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.criterion.com/current/posts/2193-notes-from-a-videodrome-test-screening
― Michael B Higgins (Michael B), Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:59 (twelve years ago) link
^3rd time this has been posted
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:09 (twelve years ago) link
Is it just me or has David Cronenberg, in an inversion of the Soderbergh formula, been making intellectually-minded critical favorites in order to gain the room in his career to produce what he REALLY loves, schlock exploitation flicks
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:17 (twelve years ago) link
'cause those are what brings in bank
― Eric H., Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:19 (twelve years ago) link
man this looks sick as hell. i dont even like the book and had no expectations for this, but now...
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:42 (twelve years ago) link
for real
― just sayin, Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:29 (twelve years ago) link
daaaaaaamn
― original bgm, Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:04 (twelve years ago) link
what are the "schlock exploitation flicks"?
― Number None, Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:05 (twelve years ago) link
I like the book! This teaser video makes it look like it's going to be a lot less sedate than Delillo's prose.
― mh, Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:10 (twelve years ago) link
I finally saw A Dangerous Method and it was ok but not as great as I hoped? Really low-key for Cronenberg.
― mh, Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:11 (twelve years ago) link
but see, Spelrein's head never exploded nor did Jung ever stomp anyone's eye out.
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:13 (twelve years ago) link
was hoping for more messed-up sex or sexual tension I guess
― mh, Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:20 (twelve years ago) link
my fan edit has ten minutes of Videodrome edited into the middle for no particular reason
NN - Shivers? Videodrome? Dead Ringers? Crash? OK maybe "schlock exploitation" was the wrong phrase but more like.... sensationalist genre films are what he "gets" to do after making critically lauded mainstream movies, which is like the reverse of the normal directorial jujitsu
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:45 (twelve years ago) link
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:42 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago) link
What?
― Walter Galt, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:01 (twelve years ago) link
<3 & lol @ DON DELILLO flashing in neon
― johnny crunch, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:03 (twelve years ago) link
^^^^
looks way more exciting than Delillo's boring books
― the sir edmund hillary of sitting through pauly shore films (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:24 (twelve years ago) link
Paul Giamatti as the nemesis is a little too easy, but I'll wait n' see
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 April 2012 21:29 (twelve years ago) link