but really i am just laughing at how bad and unwieldy and ridiculous the set-up is
this guy is supposed to be a writer
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:01 (twelve years ago) link
i say this every time david brooks comes up but the amazing thing about him imo is that he is clearly not very bright! and not just in a "i never agree with this guy" way--he is a shallow and lousy critical thinker!
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:14 (twelve years ago) link
i know i always feel like his entire career is trolling America. this guy has a column in the nyt?
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:14 (twelve years ago) link
lol @ the concept of foreign tourists approaching david brooks and asking “David, you have so many different kinds of inequality in your country. How can I tell which are socially acceptable and which are not?”
i mean obvs this never happened, guy should be fired for making stupid things up
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:32 (twelve years ago) link
it's kind of some sad self-fanfic where he imagines he is known enough to be instantly recognized by "foreign tourists"
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:38 (twelve years ago) link
it fits w/ my image of him as thomas friedman's little brother
― iatee, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:38 (twelve years ago) link
In centuries past, people built moral systems that acknowledged this weakness. These systems emphasized our sinfulness. They reminded people of the evil within themselves. Life was seen as an inner struggle against the selfish forces inside. These vocabularies made people aware of how their weaknesses manifested themselves and how to exercise discipline over them. These systems gave people categories with which to process savagery and scripts to follow when they confronted it. They helped people make moral judgments and hold people responsible amidst our frailties.
http://www.corwith-wesley.k12.ia.us/WebPage09/Scott/ArchieEdith.jpg
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 17:49 (twelve years ago) link
that sentiment is so stupid i cannot even stand it
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 17:54 (twelve years ago) link
the insidious thing about him is that bland geniality. especially on t.v. you can be lulled (to sleep) into thinking that he is being really reasonable and commonsensical until you wake up and actually listen and realize that he's a complete idiot. its easier to see in print obviously. i'm sure there are plenty of non-repubs who watch him on pbs and think that he's the kindler gentler conservative thst they kinda agree with sometimes. cuz in their heart of hearts they do think that people should just work harder and pull themselves up by their bootstraps and all that. he's still on pbs right? #nocablejustnetflix
― scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:00 (twelve years ago) link
"kinder"
― scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:01 (twelve years ago) link
Yeah, Brooks is right, you'd never see that kind of white-washing and looking the other way in an organization based on traditional religious values.
xxp
― o. nate, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:01 (twelve years ago) link
moral systems that emphasize our sinfulness like, for example, catholicism
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:08 (twelve years ago) link
he typically softens his conservatism using the shittiest of fluff psychology out there which makes it even more unappealing to me.
― ain't nothing nice (bnw), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:14 (twelve years ago) link
he has a point though. if i saw david brooks being beaten on a street in an american neighborhood i would do nothing to intervene.
^^^
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:16 (twelve years ago) link
You guys aren't being honest with yourselves. Everyone knows that if they saw David Brooks being beaten they'd join in.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:18 (twelve years ago) link
how has mark shields never once just slapped the hell out of david brooks on air
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:23 (twelve years ago) link
all thats enough from you for now son
this is something i would like to see
would pay $$ to watch brooks grab mark shield's monstrous jowls and swing from them like a pundit monkey
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:23 (twelve years ago) link
hey now
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:27 (twelve years ago) link
what happens when pundits stop being polite and GET REAL
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:28 (twelve years ago) link
Online you can find videos of savage beatings, with dozens of people watching blandly.
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:30 (twelve years ago) link
mark shield's monstrous jowls
i can't watch this guy anymore which is all for the best anyway
― buzza, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:30 (twelve years ago) link
david brooks is so dumb he misuses simple adverbs.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:31 (twelve years ago) link
I wonder what other kinds of videos david brooks can find online
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:33 (twelve years ago) link
No results found for "David Brooks beaten" youtube.
:(
pretty sure david brooks is our nation's highest authority on giving bland assent to horrible moral outrages
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:36 (twelve years ago) link
why can't people just be NICE? why can't football just be football like it was in my day with the sadie hawkins day dance right around the corner and the gang playing grabass on the quad and the frat brothers wielding their paddles with a gentle urgency...
― scott seward, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:47 (twelve years ago) link
god he looks like an unholy combination of pedant and pedo
https://www.nytexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/David-Brooks.jpeg
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:50 (twelve years ago) link
This fucking guy:
America is creative because of its moral materialism — when social values and economic ambitions get down in the mosh pit and dance. Santorum is in the fray.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 6 January 2012 12:47 (twelve years ago) link
Ew
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 6 January 2012 12:50 (twelve years ago) link
"But having said all that, I’m delighted that Santorum is making a splash"
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 6 January 2012 12:51 (twelve years ago) link
http://images.pictureshunt.com/pics/t/the_fray-4545.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 6 January 2012 12:56 (twelve years ago) link
David Brooks in a mosh pit: clutching his glasses close to his chest in a loose fist, being knocked around, cursing with frustration, and on the verge of tears
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Friday, 6 January 2012 14:03 (twelve years ago) link
Main Street Republicans like Romney usually beat social conservatives like Santorum because there are just so many more of them in the Republican electorate.
hmmm.
― 2012 republican presidential nominee II: Hot, Ready and Legal! (will), Friday, 6 January 2012 14:11 (twelve years ago) link
i mean, surely Romney will beat Santorum, but *are* they more "Main Street" dudes (what the fuck ever that means at this point) than there are "social conservatives" in the GOP?
― 2012 republican presidential nominee II: Hot, Ready and Legal! (will), Friday, 6 January 2012 14:14 (twelve years ago) link
Vaguely pithy line:
I sometimes wonder if the Republican Party has become the receding roar of white America as it pines for a way of life that will never return.
Vaguely disturbing note:
I brought my 12-year-old son on this latest trip. My rule is that if a candidate can’t relate well to a 12-year-old, they’ll never win a general election. He approached all the candidates, and they were all wonderful except Gingrich. But that wasn’t Gingrich’s fault. My son, whose heroes include John Boehner and Tupac Shakur, picked an argument about gay marriage.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago) link
I can't understand ANYONE naming John Frickin' Boehner as a hero. I don't care how old you are.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago) link
I can't understand anyone naming a politician as a hero, and my comment isn't just snark.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago) link
Eh, hero worship is where you find it, and why not politics. I would have thought one of the most singularly uncharismatic and barely-in-control-of-events Speakers of recent years would not rank with that status, though.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 16:00 (twelve years ago) link
Is Boehner appropriate for 12 year olds?!?
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago) link
well, santorum is appropriate for consenting adults
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 16:31 (twelve years ago) link
I don't even understand what "moral materialism" is?
― extremely lewd and incredibly crass (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago) link
other heroes of David Brooks, Jr: Haley Barbour and Nas
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago) link
David Brooks's own heroes as a child: James Watt and Bootsy Collins
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 20:22 (twelve years ago) link
"Haley Barbour and Nas"
Hearing this to the rhythm of the "Jay, Biggie and Nas" line in "Where I'm From"
― frogBaSeball (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago) link
oh noes
― demolition with discretion (m coleman), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 21:01 (twelve years ago) link
"sometimes" he "wonders" IF ? hello
― demolition with discretion (m coleman), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 21:08 (twelve years ago) link
tbf it's only in his darkest moments of abject terror
― “How you like that, Mr. Hitler!” (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 21:10 (twelve years ago) link
Democrats, meanwhile, have shifted their emphasis from lifting up the poor to pounding down the rich. Democratic candidates no longer emphasize early childhood education and community-building. Instead they embrace the pseudo-populist Occupy Wall Street hokum — the opiate of the educated classes.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/opinion/brooks-free-market-socialism-.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha212
Oy veh
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 14:19 (twelve years ago) link