People Who Only Read Literary Fiction, The New York Times, The New Yorker, Harpers, Vanity Fair, Instyle, Us, And Metal Magazines

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I failed geometry 3 times in a row.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:21 (nineteen years ago) link

I love you and your instantly recognizable subject lines. And BTW, reading that combination of literature means you are an ungodly freak but that you deserve to teleport yourself to Siberia in Manhattan tomorrow night (you can do that, right?).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:24 (nineteen years ago) link

I wish! harpers and the new yorker have been sad lately. thank god for Instyle.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:29 (nineteen years ago) link

although i did like the essay on "transgressive lit" in the new Harpers. But then I am all for Labute-bashing.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:30 (nineteen years ago) link

While you are reading this stuff, Scott, do you have your radio tuned to the hushed tones of NPR?

Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:34 (nineteen years ago) link

I used to read Vanity Fair and Harpers (and US Vogue) like it was the bible. I stopped reading altogether - unless it's on a comp screen. :-( I feel dumbing down by the second.

nathalie barefoot in the head (stevie nixed), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:39 (nineteen years ago) link

i can't listen to npr anymore. i haven't since the election. these two things MAY be connected.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:49 (nineteen years ago) link

i have a hard time taking ANYTHING in the real world seriously since the election. i don't even read the times like i used to. i never ever look at the op-ed page anymore. i'm all about the food section on wed. though. and the arts sections. and the magazine and the book review on sun. the magazine has been sad lately too though. being a big fiction reader, i hardly ever look at the science/circuits sections.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:53 (nineteen years ago) link

i have a hard time taking ANYTHING in the real world seriously since the election.

I'm glad I'm not the only one. I love US Weekly now, and even seeing Utne on the shelves at a local bookstore makes me fairly melancholy. I still listen to NPR, but mostly because I don't want to be completely current-events-ignorant, and I find it to be the most soothing of news outlets.

BRITNEY SPEARS FATTEY SHOCKAH

sugarpants: the luscious ingenue (sugarpants), Thursday, 24 March 2005 15:05 (nineteen years ago) link

I knew this would be your thread.

Maria D. (Maria D.), Thursday, 24 March 2005 15:33 (nineteen years ago) link

You also read The Believer cover to cover.

Maria D. (Maria D.), Thursday, 24 March 2005 15:35 (nineteen years ago) link

oh yeah! i like that one.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 March 2005 15:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I also read GQ & Esquire every month so that i can stay on top of any wristwatch and/or steak house innovations. but all of these would have made for an unwieldy thread title. and we can't have that.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 March 2005 15:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I wake up to NPR. I read the New Yorker (cartoons-Talk of the Town-Shouts & Murmurs-Fact-Current Cinema, whatever's left, in that order since I was about 16), Salon, and the TLS (when I'm flush enough to subscribe). I also peruse my girlfriend's Vogue and W and VF, if she buys it. I check out the International Herald Tribune, Le Monde and the NY Times every day online. I was woefully inadequate at trig.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Replace "Metal" with "Vogue" and that's me, to the letter. I did very well at trig, but spent most of geometry drawing cartoons with m@rk @d1sson, who now teaches English in Japan.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:18 (nineteen years ago) link

I AM glad that at least some are finally getting it. this is pretty much me [well, not exactly, but almost. i read the economist when i get the chance, as well as other political crap. and history stuff, when i can.[pp], and i sucked at trig.

hypotenuse? what?, Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:23 (nineteen years ago) link

I was woefully inadequate at trig.
Pick Hit: "Triggin' In The Riggin'!"

Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:24 (nineteen years ago) link


This is the opposite of me. I'm lowbrow - I like to read about sports and look at people's clothes. And I loved geometry.

Shatterproof Glass (dymaxia), Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:42 (nineteen years ago) link

"I like to...look at people's clothes", on my floor!

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:49 (nineteen years ago) link

you should write a book. i bet it would be interesting.

youn, Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:52 (nineteen years ago) link

But Scott, how can you not take things in the world seriously? Things are SERIOUS! There are heroes of the baseball diamond taking steroids! There is that poor woman on life support the liberals want to kill!

(by the way do you ever read Weird Tales? It's fun to read that while listening to Morbid Angel.)

emerald consultant, Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Michel,
Le paradis, c'est les vêtements tombés des autres.

Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 24 March 2005 17:00 (nineteen years ago) link

So who are the math geeks on this board? Come on, I saw some of your SAT scores...

Shatterproof Glass (dymaxia), Thursday, 24 March 2005 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Ken,

When Christian Dior asked his dad for some start up money after the war, his father is reported to have said (and I paraphrase of course), "Sure son, though I have to say that at your age I was more interested in taking women's clothes off."

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 24 March 2005 17:13 (nineteen years ago) link

The grades:

literary fiction: A+
NYTimes: B-
New Yorker: B+
Harpers: C
Vanity Fair: D
InStyle: F
US: A-
Metal Magazines: B+

don weiner, Thursday, 24 March 2005 17:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Esquire >>> GQ

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Where does High Times fit into this hierarchy?

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:49 (nineteen years ago) link

You also read The Believer cover to cover

The Believer rocks - I keep forgetting to subscribe. My favorite subscription is the New York Review of Books.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:49 (nineteen years ago) link

It's well-established that People Who Only Read Literary Fiction, The New York Times, The New Yorker, Harpers, Vanity Fair, Instyle, Us, And Metal Magazines are psychopaths.

RS, Thursday, 24 March 2005 18:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Where does The Minus Times fit into this hierarchy?

a psychopath, Thursday, 24 March 2005 19:05 (nineteen years ago) link

i would just like to take this time to sya, that ppl who read men's magazines, are douches. i mean seriously.

another anonymous guy eh?, Thursday, 24 March 2005 19:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Esquire: A
GQ: B

don weiner, Thursday, 24 March 2005 19:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Are you saying "see ya," up there, or misspelling "say"? Because then I'd know better if you're saying men's magazines make good douches or people who read them are. I care for some reason.

Mayor Maynot, Thursday, 24 March 2005 19:57 (nineteen years ago) link

dude milo have you seen the new gq?

gq>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>esquire (this issue only)

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 24 March 2005 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I almost went with an Alba disclaimer. I've progressed from ignoring both to reading them at the bookstore to buying them (even though GQ kind of sucks in every way, esp. design). Next up: subscription.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:07 (nineteen years ago) link

I read part of the New Yorker at Borders today. Outside of SFJ's grime article, it made me want to take up chewing tobacco and vote for a Bush.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

the last couple months of the new yorker have been weirdly bad. or maybe it's just me. they need more menand. or somebody. i dunno, the long things that they've printed i've just had no desire to read. and david denby must die. sorry, but it's true. he actually -SERIOUSLY- said that people who watched Constantine in the theatre (and liked it, i guess) were doing the devil's work cuz they were encouraging blasphemy of Christianity!!!???(!!!???). he's like friggin' medved with snob appeal. these kill bill=the decline of western civ hacks gotta go.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Meh, I don't get the NYer hate at all, but you can effin' torture Denby to death as far as I'm concerned.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, Denby's gotta go. At least Anthony Lane is funny, even if I don't trust his judgment.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 24 March 2005 22:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Blount, even Alba's near nudity can't save the layout/design of that mag--the FOB section is dismal and cloying and awful. The Greenspan article was pretty inspired, though.

don weiner, Thursday, 24 March 2005 23:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Anthony's taste is a tad different than mine but he's very amusing to read and I'll take that over identitical taste any day.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 24 March 2005 23:03 (nineteen years ago) link

"I wake up to NPR."

I really had to stop listening to NPR in the morning. It is just not healthy to get good and pissed off right after waking up. One's first words of the day should not be yelling a groggy "fuck you" at or about some government peckerhead on the radio. I wait until my drive home to listen, as it just seems a bit more healthy and they seem to be more likely to do a 10 minute piece on fly fishing or some town that has a big pancake race on All Things Considered.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Can any of my fellow New Yorker readers explain to me why Shouts & Murmurs is consistently SO MUCH WORSE than the rest of the magazine? How can a staff with such good taste in writing have such a lame sense of humor?

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:54 (nineteen years ago) link

the atlantic >>> harper's. sad but true.

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Friday, 25 March 2005 03:14 (nineteen years ago) link

when harper's is good it's very very good though.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 03:20 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't agree that Atlantic is better than Harper's at all. Granted, I don't read the Atlantic as regularly as I read Harper's, but that's because when I have read it, it hasn't inspired me to come back regularly. The angle on foreign policy issues is usually way too right-wing for one thing. (Harper's, admitedly, is uneven, but it's consistent enough that I find it worth subscribing to.)

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 03:35 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah i buy the atlantic maybe once a year if that - i bought the talk radio one cuz of lingering dfw fanhood, the langewiesche wtc ones. i buy harper's often enough i really should subscribe.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 03:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm w/ Scott that the NYer is going through a boring phase (although I am sympathetic a "NYer is ALWAYS boring" argt.)

C0L1N B... (C0L1N B...), Friday, 25 March 2005 03:46 (nineteen years ago) link

What was the talk radio article, James? (I only ask becuase of lingering Dr. Joy Brown fanhood)

C0L1N B... (C0L1N B...), Friday, 25 March 2005 03:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I used to read MIT Technology Review, the New Yorker, Harper's, The Economist, the Atlantic, and Wire or URB just about cover-to-cover nearly every issue.

Now I read The Register, Slashdot, Engadget, Worthplaying, Joystiq, Securityfocus, Penny Arcade, Achewood, and the free paper they hand out in the morning at the Metro stations, the Washington Post Express. My coworkers Patr1ck and Le0la keep me abreast of world events by reading FARK and BoingBoing headlines out loud in the office sometimes.

Soon my brain will look like this:

And shortly after that occurs I plan to complete my MS!

TOMBOT, Friday, 25 March 2005 03:48 (nineteen years ago) link

I also used to listen to NPR a lot but I sold my car.

TOMBOT, Friday, 25 March 2005 03:48 (nineteen years ago) link

haha i haven't actually read it yet! i just got it two days ago and have been 'busy' ha. i used to check the atlantic online a good bit but now it's all crazy 'subscribers only' stuff.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 03:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Hmmm....

I read New Republic, Atlantic Monthly (30% of time), Variety, Hollywood Reporter, Cahiers du Cinema, Wired, New Yorker, Smithsonian, National Geographic, and occasionally the Economist. No radio. I used to watch NOW w./ Bill Moyers, but it's not good anymore.

Remy (x Jeremy), Friday, 25 March 2005 03:52 (nineteen years ago) link

my subscriptions: ReadyMade, Dwell, Time and US News/World Report (I've been receiving these for years, never paid a dime), Juxtapoz, Shots

usually read: 1/2 GQ, Esquire, PDN (Photo District News), various photo mags, Film Comment, a couple of indie film mags (MovieMaker, etc.), Mass Appeal

sometimes:The Progressive/The Nation/Mother Jones when they have something good, ArtForum and their ilk when they have something worth reading and also to curse their profiles of art collectors

I like to look at the pretty ads: Fader

thankfully a lot of the magazines I like are bi-monthly or quarterly

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 25 March 2005 04:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I used to like ArtForum, but there was a period of like two years in which there was nothing that interested me. At all.

Remy (x Jeremy), Friday, 25 March 2005 04:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I read this thread title and said "Wow, that's me!". No, it's Scott. And I know Scott, and wouldn't ever expect to mistake him for me.
Anyhow, the Atlantic is too dense for me,(I'm too dense for the Atlantic), whereas Harper's has such amusing snippets, and it's fun to see something thematic played out in each issue.
This issue contained all artwork titled "Untitled...." followed by a title. I've never gotten that. "Untitled" and then the title. Is it some art conceit that is a reference? Am i sadly being left out of an enormous joke?
My boyfriend brings home the leftover magazines from Whole Foods, where he works, after they have gone out of date. The covers are torn off, which makes it kinda fun, because it could be anything from Jane to Yoga Journal. (He also brings home the leftover food, after it has gone out of date, so I feast each morning on slightly squishy fruit. Sometimes he brings home things with no labels, and then we have to figure out what it is. Especially fun with canned goods. Oh, the fun and mysterious life of the grocery guy's wife.)
I liked The Sun for about five months, and then it felt too sincere. Not so with Vanity Fair, which is fun because the contents page is approx. one quarter of the way into the magazine. It's fun to try to find it by just hurling VF onto the floor and seeing where it opens.
I used to be addicted, privately, to People, but US is way better these days. new thread title "US kicks Peoples ass!". Imagine the interpretations!
Online I like Salon and LiP media.
My mom gives me her copies of Smithsonian, which is a rarefied world. Also Archeology Today, or something like that.
And I actually finish about one tome of literary fiction per week as well! I'm not sure how much of anything I'm taking in. It's more like an extreme obsessive/compulsive disorder than actual reading.
I also love The Believer, but can't yet afford to subscribe. My old favorite magazine was SPY.
(ps xo to Scott and Maria and Rufus. I will try to make the baby shower.)

aimurchie (aimurchie), Friday, 25 March 2005 06:03 (nineteen years ago) link

At one point I did read Harpers, Atlantic Monthly, the Times, New Republic, Teh Nation, McSweeney's, and a couple others. Now it's just down to The Times on weekends, New Yorker, and (gag) New York magazine, which my aunt insisted on getting me a subscription to against my will.

Harper's was good for the Readings section, but otherwise it was often crap. Lewis Lapham needs to be shot.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:02 (nineteen years ago) link

"I read part of the New Yorker at Borders today. Outside of SFJ's grime article, it made me want to take up chewing tobacco and vote for a Bush. "

why.

what is the best leftist mag people? IF i get an economist subscrip for my birthday lke i WANT, i wd like to get some kind of balancing act going there.

famous amos, Friday, 25 March 2005 16:15 (nineteen years ago) link

DON'T get the nation! it really will turn you republican. just out of spite. what a hand-wringing sob-sister incestuous-bedfellow excuse for a magazine.it's almost like an in-house zine for 20 annoying people and their friends that just HAPPENS to be sold on newsstands. except when douglas wolk has a music review in it or something. and greider still has a brain. but the rest of those people should be put on a slow boat to antarctica.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, The Nation kind of stinks, hence my subscription not being renewed for a long time. It's not as bad as The Progressive, though, which is like Nation-lite.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:39 (nineteen years ago) link

scott, that's a bit extreme (obviously?). There is some good reporting in the Nation. I can't say I'm very happy with the direction it has taken lately, but there's enough good reporting and commentary (although I could generally do without the regular columnists) that I still subscribe. It has been kind of bad lately though. . . Back in the 80's when I was in high school it had a sober look to it. I don't know what it's trying to look like now.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:55 (nineteen years ago) link

I do feel like I remember even maybe six or seven years ago it had more of a hard investigative bent.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 25 March 2005 16:58 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm thinking of subscribing to New Left Review. Go ahead and laugh, but I just read a fantastic article on Haiti from that journal. (On the downside though, I'm not too impressed with the editor, Tariq Ali--I think he's the editor--and I don't want to pay for Alexander Cockburn's writing.)

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I only buy metal magazines for the free CD's.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:02 (nineteen years ago) link

Naomi Klein publishes in the Nation and Harper's and she's been doing some great reporting over the last couple years.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I bought the Star Wars edition of Vanity Fair, that was a few years ago, now.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link

they need more reporting. less opining. they need to start making news. they have the forum! they waste way too much space on the hand-wringing. or long articles on CAN YOU BELIEVE WHAT HE'S DOING NOW kinda things. yes, i can believe it. dig up some dirt, for pete's sake!

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link

I went to a Z Media conference run by the folks who publish Z Magazine. They were constantly snarking about the Nation not being left enough. Lots of harumphing about the Nation not having enough Noam Chomsky. There was a workshop on magazine design. Z Magazine's design is abysmal. The editor basically told us that magazines that look good rouse the suspicion of the left. Her message was keep it ugly.

Maria D. (Maria D.), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link

The Nation looks ugly too but I think it's doing it to cross over.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:07 (nineteen years ago) link

I started subscribing to Z again, and of course I agree about the horrible graphic design. I thought it was based on a premise of letting everybody do everything/anything, rather than just the best at the top. However. . . they seem to have no compunction about publishing star writers (which is one reason I read it).

I love Chomsky more than most people seem to any more, but he's just one writer. I don't understand focusing that much on his absence from the Nation.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:10 (nineteen years ago) link

(As if Noam Chomsky were Walter Cronkite or something. I mean "as much as most left/left-leaning people who read books and magazines about politics.")

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:11 (nineteen years ago) link

The editor basically told us that magazines that look good rouse the suspicion of the left. Her message was keep it ugly.

HAHA. God forbid it should appeal to anyone outside *The Left*.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Besides, what about Mother Jones and Utne? They look ok. But then again, they're flaky crap.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:14 (nineteen years ago) link

scott, I agree about the Nation. More real reporting please. Or even better analysis and commentary. They are squandering their position as a leading liberal-to-left magazine.

x-post

Mother Jones sometimes has good stuff (water privatization, corporate campaign financing), but not enough to make me subscribe. Utne is atrocious.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, I suppose MJ is better than Utne. I tend to get them confused sometimes.

Re: The Nation, Scott OTM. My guess, though, is that it may partly be a budget issue, i.e. reporting costs more money than opining. But I lost all respect for The Nation when in their music issue a couple years back they had each staffer print their top 10 "desert island discs." Katrina Vanden Heuvel likes Bob Dylan SHOCKA!

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:19 (nineteen years ago) link

susan watkins is editor of nlr, RS, not tariq ali (though ta is on the edit board)

i'm not entirely sure what being editor really means, there: perry anderson owns and runs it, tho i guess probably doesn't oversee day-to-day stuff

zmag is a cia front to undermine the left by promoting utterly lousy writing style as the only acceptable radical approach

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:25 (nineteen years ago) link

zmag is a cia front to undermine the left by promoting utterly lousy writing style as the only acceptable radical approach

I like a lot of the writing. Maybe I'm sick. Actually, I haven't even been reading it lately. I like John Stuart Mill's prose--does that make me strange?

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:29 (nineteen years ago) link

haha no jsm could write!!

some zstuff is fine, esp. one-offs, but the more prolific a contributor is, the more tedious - or just generally awful - their prose seems to become

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm going to go read all those Z magazines that I haven't read (which is every one I've gotten since I re-subscribed) just to be contrary.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link

one month passes...
So is there anything like the Nation or Z out there that doesn't look like crap? I really have been hating the cover of the Nation lately. (I think the Schiavo cover was inappropriate. If she became a public figure of sorts, it was not by her own choice.) Z Magazine is full of idiotic, poorly drawn (or overdrawn, if that makes sense) political cartoons that generally aren't remotely funny. (I don't even like good political cartoons that much.)

RS_LaRue (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 10:55 (eighteen years ago) link

one year passes...
Has anyone read the article on Bill Clinton in this week's issue of the New Yorker? Pretty evenhanded, I'd say, although, at first, I thought Remnick didn't like Clinton, particularly, personally, but I think he was just wary of his outsize personality. I did get the feeling that Remnick really doesn't want Hillary Clinton to run. I even began to think it could be a mutually reinforcing obligation for everyone who supports her.

youn (youn), Saturday, 16 September 2006 22:13 (seventeen years ago) link

six years pass...

A friend talking about Vanity Fair:

it always follows that formula. "but john didn't care about the women. he had the women. john wanted to feel important. and when he wanted to feel important, he needed medication. his medication: Nicaraguan cocaine."

you needed energy. when you needed energy, you needed coke. when you needed coke, you called jim wasserman.

everything's gotta be a narrator from a really terrible scorsese movie

Cunga, Thursday, 10 January 2013 00:18 (eleven years ago) link

three years pass...

in 2013 though:

Of all the new careers one might expect for a 55-year-old former publishing executive, part-time record producer is not the most likely.

Yet there was James Truman one night last winter, standing in the Boom Boom Room on the top floor of the Standard Hotel, sipping a vodka gimlet as he awaited a performance by Sebastien Leon, the young musician with whom he had been working for 18 months.

The two met in Mustique a couple of years back. Mr. Truman was staying with his friend Bryan Ferry, and went into a restaurant at which Mr. Leon showed up, guitar in hand, to serenade the crowd. They bonded over a love of Serge Gainsbourg, and in short order Mr. Truman booked a studio. There, they recorded a debut album filled with melancholy songs, many about the recent demise of Mr. Leon’s marriage.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/fashion/james-truman-a-crown-prince-in-a-new-kingdom.html

scott seward, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

Mr. Leon was somewhat surprised it took as long as it did to complete the album, but as he put it after his show, “James is very busy.”

That he is. In just the last eight years, since resigning from his perch at Condé Nast, Mr. Truman has taken on a somewhat surprising array of projects. He is a creative adviser to Francis Ford Coppola on his wine business and growing hotel empire; with the hotelier André Balazs, he has been running an organic farm upstate called Locusts on Hudson, which supplies organic foods to the Standard Hotel; and with Sunny Bates, an entrepreneur involved in the TED Conference, he started a short-lived circus that Ms. Bates described as a “kind of mashed-up TED, Burning Man and the circus coming into town.”

scott seward, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

wow, i started this thread before my sci-fi awakening.

scott seward, Wednesday, 6 July 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

eleven months pass...

Texas Monthly is so awesome. Well, what i read from it online anyway. And they have the best website. Every magazine should look at their website and then copy it.

scott seward, Saturday, 24 June 2017 04:24 (six years ago) link

i can't listen to npr anymore. i haven't since the election. these two things MAY be connected.
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:49 PM (twelve years ago)

diff election but this is true for me also :(

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 24 June 2017 05:03 (six years ago) link

Economist, Financial Times, subscribe to but only selectively read NYT and WaPo, VideoScope, Screem, Filmfax, Shock Cinema, Rue Morgue, and most of Marvel's output. Occasionally also Make, Education Next, and (unsurprisingly, perhaps) ADDitude. There's probably something wrong with my brain but I'm okay with it.

President Buttstuff (Old Lunch), Saturday, 24 June 2017 05:19 (six years ago) link

i have to break down and get a stupid subscription to the stupid washington post. i never thought i'd have to do it but i guess i do. thanks, trump.

scott seward, Saturday, 24 June 2017 13:50 (six years ago) link

the only print mag i still read is decibel. and that's because they send me a copy. i was reading tape op because i got one of those free subscriptions. i never thought i would be such a magazine-less person. i was such a magazine person!

scott seward, Saturday, 24 June 2017 13:53 (six years ago) link

I want to move next to OL so I can loot his recycling bins

El Tomboto, Saturday, 24 June 2017 13:57 (six years ago) link

people who only read extensively footnoted history books, wikipedia articles, and cracked.com

Rodney Stooksbury for President (rushomancy), Saturday, 24 June 2017 15:40 (six years ago) link

I get a free subscription to Down Beat because I vote in their critics' poll (and have written a couple of articles for them). I read The Wire digitally. I read individual articles from the Washington Post and, less frequently, the New York Times via incognito browser windows. That's about all I have time for these days.

grawlix (unperson), Saturday, 24 June 2017 16:07 (six years ago) link

Back when I was commuting into NYC every weekday I used to buy the New Yorker almost every week. Now I don't even remember to look at their website to see if there's anything I might want to read.

grawlix (unperson), Saturday, 24 June 2017 16:08 (six years ago) link

i stopped my new yorker subsription when i realized I had 2 years worth of unread editions and I would never ever catch up

akm, Saturday, 24 June 2017 16:43 (six years ago) link

maria gets the maria delivered to the house and i never even look at them! so weird. i used to read them cover to cover years ago.

scott seward, Saturday, 24 June 2017 18:09 (six years ago) link

maria get the NEW YORKER delivered to the house...

scott seward, Saturday, 24 June 2017 18:10 (six years ago) link

I wish to point out that I have never contributed a word to this thread. btw, I wish to point out that this post in no way contributes anything to this thread.

A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 25 June 2017 02:57 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.