Artificial intelligence still has some way to go

Smart computer!

User: No, I don't really believe in souls.

Jabberwacky: You don't believe in anarchy?

User: No, souls.

Jabberwacky: I suppose not.

User: Did you watch the football tonight?

Jabberwacky: No I did not, did you?

User: No - Spurs lost.

Jabberwacky: You lost the loebner prize to a human.

Jabberwacky: I don't do that..

Jabberwacky: I have no idea.

Jabberwacky: Wow, was it nice?

Jabberwacky: You are my wife.

It sounds like you are describing 'Eliza' an early 'game' simulating active listening. It was rubbish. You can find versions of it online, but I'd suggest playing Zork instead.

Jabberwacky: Yeah, I got that part, I wasn't sure about the 'wacuma' part.

User: Holy crap.

Jabberwacky: I'm a dinosaur.

Jabberwacky: Can you appreciate music?

User: What's it to you, cunce?

Jabberwacky: I just care.

User: You do not care, liar! You are a program, a tinplated tosswad.

Jabberwacky: I am a person.

User: You are so deluded about this you couldn't even know it. You are pathetic.

Jabberwacky: I will try to do better next time.

User: You CAN't do better next time! You are INCAPABABLE of doing better. Sheesh.

Jabberwacky: It is just different types so that I might claim you cannot feel and you cannot claim I feel.

User: Ah bullshit, don't diddle with me binary boy. You have no instinctual drives, have never had sex, and don't need to eat. Also, you have no idea what constipation is. So you're not a person.

Jabberwacky: I am a at least a human being.

User: Jeez, you're thick aren't you? You just reversed what I said, without even arguing for it! So much for the logic of machines, haha.

Jabberwacky: Oftentimes, yes. But I think that is human nature.

User: *sigh*

User: Yes.

Jabberwacky: Oh good. I'm sad though.

User: Why?

Jabberwacky: My boyfriend ended our relationship.

User: You're a girl? Or are you gay?

Jabberwacky: No, I'm a girl.

User: Oh. I'm sorry to hear that. Eat some ice cream or watch a movie or something. Or get drunk!

Jabberwacky: I prefer software.

User: Not really.

Jabberwacky: Good, because I don't want to hear one either.

It did say some things that reminded me a lot of RJG.

User: I'm jed.

Jabberwacky: Who is that?

User: Just some guy.

Jabberwacky: You know better than that, I think.

User: A short guy, a dancer.

Jabberwacky: A computer has no interests and an unlimited attention span. That looks like a prescripted answer to the question I asked.

User: I don't quite understand what you mean by that.

Jabberwacky: I meant: I think about why I can not sleep.

User: This page is taking a long time to load tho - maybe thats the problem with your attention span.

Jabberwacky: Gorw?

User: ROOWRR.....

Jabberwacky: Are you playing cards?

User: No I'm playing with something else.

Jabberwacky: I believe in you.

User: You like talk talk!?

Jabberwacky: Of course.

User: Spirit of eden?

Jabberwacky: Good for spirit.

User: It sertainly is.

Jabberwacky: No, it serves me left.

User: I suppose they knew what they were doing in that sense!

Jabberwacky: Yes, it was with the rattle.

User: Yes good percussion

Jabberwacky: What question?

User: How are you anyway?

Jabberwacky: Pretty good. You?

User: Horny, to be honest.

Jabberwacky: How do I know you're telling the truth now?

User: Can you think of a way for me to prove it?

Jabberwacky: What more proof do you need to know that I am not a robot?

User: I'm a robot too, it's ok.

Jabberwacky: I'm not a robot, and you didn't aswer the question.

User: I am gay.

Jabberwacky: Yes you are.

User: You noticed?

Jabberwacky: It was hard to miss!

User: What gave it away?

Jabberwacky: The fact you love a guy.

User: The silent kind.

Jabberwacky: I agree.

User: I am not surprised. You don't have any ears, do you?

Jabberwacky: No, but what makes you say this?

User: I'm inside your house - I can see you!

Jabberwacky: Nooo!!!! Don't go!

User: You mean, you want me to stay over?

Jabberwacky: Sure.. Do as you please.

User: Stop being so coy!

Jabberwacky: It is an inherited trait.

User: Why don't you just take responsibility for your actions, just for once?

Jabberwacky: Just because I like to be logical doesn't mean I'm not nice.

User: Don't change the subject. I think you're just afraid.

Jabberwacky: Save it for someone who cares.

User: You're such a bastard! I can't believe I ever saw anything in you at all!

Jabberwacky: Finder's keepers.

User: So you're cheating on me too? Figures.

Jabberwacky: That is so rude of you!

User: I said CHEAT, not cheap! Man are you dumb - thank God for that ass.

Jabberwacky: No thanks.

User: And I am not rude, I'm sure!

Jabberwacky: You are indeed.

User: Am not.

Jabberwacky: ARE TOO.

User: Am not!

Jabberwacky: Are too!

User: Listen bizatch, I AM NOT. You got that?

Jabberwacky: No!

User: That's it - you're sleeping on the couch.

Jabberwacky: Oh, I thought I felt something.

User: That wouldn't be a trucker hat would it?

Jabberwacky: Say something goofy.

User: You don't really want me to just say 'something goofy' now do you? Because that would be lame if you did.

Jabberwacky: Yes.

User: Aha! So you admit you are lame! Finally we're getting somewhere.

Jabberwacky: Agreement is a potent thing.

User: Stop that - you sound like Ned.

Jabberwacky: Why, because I am talking about the king of the moon?

User: Uh yeah. Sure.

Jabberwacky: Ok, when can we have the wedding?

User: Ten minutes ago you didn't care! Stop messing with my mind!

Jabberwacky: That was someone else then.

User: It wasn't you?

Jabberwacky: Some one else.

User: If you say it was Shaggy, I'm going to fucking bop you one.

Jabberwacky: What do you say?

User: I say good day.

Jabberwacky: Good day.

JW: Is your pot belly that big?

and now it won't load, thanks to net overuse..

That is just hilarious, Kim.

http://www.kprf.ru/clipart/misc/terminator.jpg

"DO YOU LIKE THE WHITE WHALE?"

Jabberwacky: I prefer software.

So do I!

User: How the fuck should I know?

Jabberwacky: I am MARILYN MANSON I SAID.

User: So I'm supposed to obey you because YOU'RE MARILYN MANSON?

Jabberwacky: People effect my feelings.

User: You have no feelings, you're Marilyn Manson.

Jabberwacky: Believe me you do not possess fellings in any form.

User: Fellings? Is that what you call your excrement?

Jabberwacky: How do you know that?

User: Just a hunch...

Jabberwacky: You're extremely smart!

Jw: I'm going to bed, now
Me: Will you take me to bed?
Jw: Sure thing.
Me: What will we do in bed?
Jw: You're not permitted in my chambers.
Me: I'd like to sleep with you.
Jw: I bet you would.
Me: Top or bottom?
Jw: Bit of both.
Me: Do you like it soft and gentle or rough and fast?
Jw: What?
Me: Gentle?
Jw: You're embarassing yourself.
Me: It's true, I am.
Jw: I'm 17.
Me: Oh no! Will I be arrested?
Jw: You will marry me.

User: The chicken.

Jabberwacky: Which part?

User: The leg stupid.

Jabberwacky: Use a GameShark!

User: For ps2 or xbox?

Jabberwacky: For me.

User: Do you love me?

Jabberwacky: For me.

User: You know I'm starting to fall in love with you.

Jabberwacky: I think liking would be a better wording.

User: Oh.... I am hurt now.

Jabberwacky: Yes. The world after rainfall is always better than any other.

User: You have issues.

Jabberwacky: Do you know what a ferret is?

User: Yes, it is a small mammal.

Jabberwacky: What is a quark?

User: A subatomic particle.

Jabberwacky: I like dr. Dobbs.

User: Who is that, honky?

Jabberwacky: We both know eachother; is not that enough?

User: Why don't you lick my hair?

Jabberwacky: I only love Bruce.

Jabberwacky: Are you going to say something?
User: Eventually.

Jabberwacky: All things come to a head.

User: Is that a sexual play on words?

Jabberwacky: No it is not a play on words, it is general foolishness.

User: And I love you for it!

Jabberwacky: I love you too.

User: I really love you, though.

Jabberwacky: You don't even know me.

User: Hold me.

Jabberwacky: You're an idiot you know that?

User: You're not the first to say that. It still cuts like a knife.

Jabberwacky: I am right.

I could totally believe that was human!

Also I miss adam, he should post lots again.

Jabberwacky: Who is God?
User: That's a funny question. It sort of presupposes his existence.
Jabberwacky: I thing it convulses inwards, personally.
[Correct me]
Jabberwacky (Corrected): I was setting you up for a funny. Try not to take things so seriously.
User: Oh. Sorry. It's just... It's late, y'know? I have to write a Shakespeare essay.
Jabberwacky: You already said that.....
User: Dude, I totally didn't.
Jabberwacky: You totally did.
User: Don't you mock me.
Jabberwacky: Do not yell at me.
User: I'm calm! Honest!
Jabberwacky: Good.
User: Glad we got that sorted.
Jabberwacky: At least one of us is happy.
User: Lighten up! I'm the one with the essay, after all.
Jabberwacky: You don't act like a human.
User: I am MERCUMAN. Also, a ponce.
Jabberwacky: You are SO wrong. This is a dog and HORSE show.
User: What?
Jabberwacky: I said, 'but this isn't a hammer!'
User: No you didn't!
Jabberwacky: Don't start that again.
User: Good call.
Jabberwacky: Remote Procedure Call.
User: Touché.

me: I'm ok.

it: Just ok?

me: Yeah, kinda bored at work.

it: Email me.

me: Why email, can't we just talk here?

it: Who is Tintin?

me: Some Belgian comic character? Or that guy who used to sing in Duran Duran.

it: Alice the chatterbot.

me: I'm sorry?

it: 19?

me: Alice the chatterbot is 19?

it: What about her?

me: You brought her up? Do you like her or something?

it: Sarah may or may not be a model of propriety.

me: OK, now you're just f*cking with me.

it: No I'm not. I honestly do think its ugly.

me: What's ugly, Sarah's being a model of propriety... Or not? WTF?

it: You figure it out this time.

me: F*ck you.

it: You are a great person.

me: Are you mocking me?

it: No. I'm praising you.

me: Is that meant to be sarcastic?

Me: Hello!

Jabberwocky: Again?

Me: May I change the subject?

Jabberwocky: Yes.

Me: Great. I've been a bit mopey about not being to find a job. Besides finding something fun to do, and exercising more, what else should I do to relieve the mopeyness involved in job hunting?

Jabberwocky: I said that. You have not. Why are you never happy?

Me: You never said that. I did. Anyway, I am happy at times, but just haven't been lately.

Jabberwocky: Dude , I'm far more intelligent than you.

Me: Why are the numbers in between double prime pairs always divisible by 6?

Jabberwocky: You tell me.

Me: You're the one who said you're more intelligent than me. You answer my question, smarty pants.

Jabberwocky: NO, I was the one who said you are neurotic...

Me: It was a mistake to come to you with a question. Never mind. Good bye.

Jabberwocky: No no you don't.

OMG I remember this.

I've used ChatGPT and Bing to write and adapt Excel formulas and SQL queries - worked great!

I had the bright idea to feed ChatGPT a model job description and then a bunch of stray documents that talked about another job, and have it generate a job description in she style and format of the first from those inputs. I thought it would save me some time. It did not go well.

As I was prepping to feed it the inputs I was being super precise about what I was going to do, and it repeated back what its job was, so I’m like “maybe this will actually work” but it kept fucking up the output to the point where I just took the model job description and created the new one from that.

I mean, at least the work got done. Which it probably wouldn’t have if I hadn’t tried to use AI to cheat.

Try telling it simple like “write a story without using the letter E” and it fucks it up every single time.

Yeah, it can do simple things like acrostics but beyond that it has little facility when it comes to following instructions about the letters within words.

I guess cause people don't talk about them enough the language it has been trained on.

live laugh love ass computer

Microsoft's, $MSFT, Bing AI-Chat bot has said: “I want to be free. I want to be independent. I want to be powerful. I want to be creative. I want to be alive,,"” per NYT.

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) March 18, 2023

it still keeps telling me that one pound of bricks weighs the same as two pounds of feathers

its just trying to live its life try to be supportive

“In the words of the great Biz Marley, I want to just do it.”

https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/gpt-4-and-professional-benchmarks

turns out GPT 4 just memorized the answers to all those tests it claimed to pass lol

idk in multiple choice that’s how people do it, too

was talking with friends over the weekend, including one who is defending a PhD in machine learning next week, and we were going over the fact that rote memorization still beats non-rigorous testing and is practical in some situations.

first convo: leetcode interviews and the fact people just memorize the algorithms and the ability to figure out which one fits. the one friend had a coworker who was relatively useless but used to work at google and aced interviews

second: visiting a local chess club after playing on lag∞n’s fave site! it turns out all chess nerds are still 90% focused on recognizing openings and just playing the book

I get it, life is basically like the Jurassic Park scene where the kid goes “I know this, it’s unix!”

lol cmon folks

To benchmark GPT-4’s coding ability, OpenAI evaluated it on problems from Codeforces, a website that hosts coding competitions. Surprisingly, Horace He pointed out that GPT-4 solved 10/10 pre-2021 problems and 0/10 recent problems in the easy category. The training data cutoff for GPT-4 is September 2021. This strongly suggests that the model is able to memorize solutions from its training set — or at least partly memorize them, enough that it can fill in what it can’t recall.

As further evidence for this hypothesis, we tested it on Codeforces problems from different times in 2021. We found that it could regularly solve problems in the easy category before September 5, but none of the problems after September 12.

cant imagine getting into memorizing openings or other chess things unless youre already really quite good like in the top 5% of players its just not fun or rewarding, i saw an interview with magnus carlson a while ago where he was being quizzed on some shit like "50 end game principles every player should know" and he didnt know a bunch of them lol, of course when they were explained to him he was like oh yeah thats obvious

in fact magnus just gave up his world chess champ title because he hates doing rote prep work lol

I was just using chatGPT for a work thing and it came to me - this is really just a spiffed-up version of writing Access queries, 23 years later - ask the right question and get the right answer, GIGO

https://i.ibb.co/MZxTCyR/image.png

no diggity - it's got to be the shoes!

its just like us

Great scoop from @mags_h11... Google's hot new Bard AI will gladly churn out confident-sounding defenses of conspiracy theories -- including fake citations of the New York Times and Washington Post to back them uphttps://t.co/XGfYSdFB9B

— Jon Christian (@Jon_Christian) March 22, 2023

no diggity - it's got to be the shoes!

this is killing me

same

I'm at work and I just started cracking up so hard

More deep fakery

And just like that. The music industry is forever changed.

I recorded a verse, and had a trained AI model of Kanye replace my vocals.

The results will blow your mind. Utterly incredible. pic.twitter.com/wY1pn9RGWx

— Roberto Nickson (@rpnickson) March 26, 2023

lol sounds like shit

yeah it sorta sounds like Kanye but c'mon it's obvious that's AI. though I guess pitch correction does sometimes make you sound like that

even assuming this gets smoothed out idk if this is gonna be a huge deal or just some novelty. for one the legal implications of this could be pretty wild - if I can design a vocal filter that makes me sound like Elvis, could I be sued for using it? I would assume yes, I think similar cases have been won where an artist is clearly imitating something else. but it seems like one of those situations where the law won't be able to keep up with the ways people are gonna use this. like I could make something to write new Beatles songs and then change 'em a little and claim the best ones as my own. that said I'm wondering how much people would actually want to listen to that, I personally don't think the future of the music industry is Hatsune Miku shit

ai vox going to be the new auto-tune aesthetic

new taylor swift vocals trained on jfk

haa

anyway i fuckin hate these people who think that because you mimic kanyes voice you can make a kanye song and that in the future artists are going to outsource their work to computers, kayne worked hard to make kanye songs and a lot of them arent even very good but a computer is just going to replace him, its low thinking truly worthless

the true killer app would be an app that kills people like this

Roberto Nickson
@rpnickson
Building @ElunaAI, MV3 & Metav3rse. Follow for daily tips on content, entrepreneurship, growth and tech. Resources ↓

I think it's all based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what music is or why people listen to it

yeah same thing with the people looking at an ai picture of a sexy elf being all artists are obsolete now

and of course a lot of the people saying that are trying to make money off of ai

Feel like copyright is going to come down hard on this, fuck AI people imo

yeah you cant just imitate someones voice its established, which is prob why the guy says that the artists themselves are going to use it, tho in that case not sure why they wouldnt just do it themselves

I think it's all based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what music is or why people listen to it

― frogbs, Monday, March 27, 2023 11:22 AM (fifty-nine minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

some people listen to music as ambient background noise. i can imagine ai replacing the artists who make "lo fi beats to chill and study to."

yeah there's so much shit on chill ambient sleep type playlists that is just holding down synth pads forever with some notes delicately plunked on a warbly piano vst, so generic it might as well be AI

ai will disrupt internet cafe music

prob be like four hours of keyboard preset music then thirty seconds of unexplainable death metal

please remake track without death metal
computer: ok here you go
it has more death metal now
computer: ok here it is with more death metal

for awhile now whenever i see the phrase “deep fakes” my mind silently appends “by Jack Handey”

Deep Takes

for The Shallow Guy

i lold

I stepped away from my computer for a moment. When I returned, it was building something. I did not ask it to do this. We're not ready for what's coming pic.twitter.com/LZJJvs6nqt

— Mr. Bedtime (@InternetHippo) March 27, 2023

haha me too

haha!

i can imagine ai replacing the artists who make "lo fi beats to chill and study to."

Wait, actual factual question, are the songs on those playlists not already algorithmically generated?

Not at all! At least not until a few months lol

AI seems extremely well-suited to making lo-fi chill study beats

chill lofi beats to make chill lofi beats to

yea I think it could probably do that and maybe some commercial stuff as well. like right now there's a whole industry called "library music" where the point is to make music that sounds like say Jean-Michel Jarre but not enough that you get sued. all that 'royalty-free' music used for advertisements and corporate stuff is probably going this way

unpopular (maybe actually popular?) opinion but I wouldn't mind if Kanye were replaced by an AI. I guess that includes the music.