Taking sides: UK vs US

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Americans: talk too loud, invade countries, don't let you smoke in restaurants, don't know much about other cultures, have crap coffee

British: no water pressure in their showers, not exactly unfriendly but hard to get to know, public transport and restuarants too expensive, boringly brag about how much they drink

Tough call but if I had to live in one of these countries, the U.S. wins on account of the weather

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 11:57 (twenty years ago) link

This is really about Sydney and Melbourne, isn't it?

Madchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:00 (twenty years ago) link

U.S. wins on account of the weather

Methinks there might be quite a erm range of weather over there? Their books are bound better; ours have better covers.

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:01 (twenty years ago) link

not exactly unfriendly but hard to get to know

That's what makes us so great!

Freedom Dupont, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:05 (twenty years ago) link

This is my Kingdom, and I'll not have you knocking it!

Her Royal Highness Queen Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:06 (twenty years ago) link

"This is really about Sydney and Melbourne, isn't it?"

Damn! You're probably right. Sydney = L.A., Melbourne = London

I just can't stand endless drizzle, it makes me want to commit suicide.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:09 (twenty years ago) link

Move to Seattle then. WHOOOOOOPPPPPPSSSSSSS!!!!!!!

Skottie, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:11 (twenty years ago) link

the UK cos we are the world leaders in crockery drainage


stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:11 (twenty years ago) link

Stop squeezing me for your facking green fairy liquid that you don't even rinse off!
http://www.entertainmentcaterers.com/images/leprechaun.jpg

Skottie, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:13 (twenty years ago) link

My ex-girlfriend's English, and when I met her she only showered about three times a week. Is this normal among the peoples of the British Isles?

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:15 (twenty years ago) link

That's preposterous. No one showers that often.

Skottie, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:17 (twenty years ago) link

We take baths, old boy.

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:17 (twenty years ago) link

on account of the low water pressure. Of course the low water pressure depends on how far below the treatment works you are. Gravity is still a fantastically cheap and efficient way of distributing water, you don't believe me, go look at a river.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:20 (twenty years ago) link

Friday night is bath night.

Madchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:24 (twenty years ago) link

When I lived briefly in London, in Willesden to be more precise, there was no proper bathroom at all in my shared flat. There was a portable shower thing in the kitchen that looked like a portaloo. Hot water seemed to be a random occurrence, and water pressure was reduced to a slow drip. Anyway, it all gave me a much clearer insight into British stiff upper lips and British attitudes to hygiene.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:26 (twenty years ago) link

Having lived in Willesden and seen the way that Australians slept about twelve to a room, it may be that most of the hot water was used up, probably washing off the vomit after going down the spotted dog.

chris (chris), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

Americans live twelve to a county. That's why we need lots of cars and all of the oil in the middle east.

Skottie, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:30 (twenty years ago) link

You see, this wild concept of "most of the hot water was used up" does not compute with me. I've always lived with a constant supply.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:31 (twenty years ago) link

yeh ffs you can hardly base your notions of British attitudes to hygiene upon your experience as an Australian living in North West London. your landlord was probably not British and never even visited the place for starters. my new house has two bathrooms and a power shower. gosh how upscale.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:32 (twenty years ago) link

like barry

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:33 (twenty years ago) link

I liked London, I hated Willesden. There was something depressing about it.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:33 (twenty years ago) link

I don't have anything near permahotwater, but then I live in a converted boatshed. Which gets rather damp and cold. We won the war, you know.

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:34 (twenty years ago) link

i agree that Willesden (tho really i mean Harlesden, stoopid Junction) is depressing

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:35 (twenty years ago) link

It's a $hithole mostly, although there are a few nice bits, like the parks and .... erm....
Willesedem that is, not Enriques house

chris (chris), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:35 (twenty years ago) link

The junction and everything between it and Old Oak Common and North Pole is a thing of Wonder.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:36 (twenty years ago) link

There was something depressing about it.

Could it have been the 11 other vomit-covered australians in your room?

She may be Australian, she may be the alien. Send her to me.

Skottie, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:37 (twenty years ago) link

"We won the war, you know."

We helped. But we didn't compromise on our constant hot water supply.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:37 (twenty years ago) link

You see, this wild concept of "most of the hot water was used up" does not compute with me. I've always lived with a constant supply.

But it's not a foreign concept to Americans, either, even if you've lived much of your life in a two-story suburban house with a boiler the size of a Dalek.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:37 (twenty years ago) link

(Actually, larger than Dalek...)

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:38 (twenty years ago) link

i've found that the weather in london is way nicer than it is in michigan. far more mild. and i'd rather take a couple months of drizzle compared to driving off the roads for months on end during the various blizzards.

we have a neat electric shower thingy so we always have hot water. actually, this bathroom is the largest ever.

however, american breakfasts are fantastic. they just don't 'get' waffles here. same with tex-mex food

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:38 (twenty years ago) link

Haha, it has just occurred to me that my six most recent houseguests (3 of whom are Australian and 1 American) have witnessed my SERIOUS mould problem in the bathroom (no need for pets, I have billions of little friends living around my bath and many more on the ceiling where I can't reach with bleach) and experienced my dodgy combi boiler which should provide constant hot water, but which has a habit of going icy cold when you're covered in shampoo and shower gel. I do have a mixer tap in the kitchen though.

Madchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:42 (twenty years ago) link

"Could it have been the 11 other vomit-covered australians in your room?"

When it comes to drinking to the point of throwing up, I really don't think we have anything to teach the British. I'll see your Australians in Willesden and raise you 3,000 brawling, lobster-red pommie yobs in Bondi!

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:43 (twenty years ago) link

Is that before or after we win the rugby?

Madchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:45 (twenty years ago) link

DAMN, I'VE JINXED US, WE WILL BE GUBBED BY WALES NOW, SOB!

Madchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:45 (twenty years ago) link

The junction and everything between it and Old Oak Common and North Pole is a thing of Wonder.

i hate it because there are currently roadworks (LIKE EVERYWHERE BLOODY ELSE ON MY REGULAR LONDON ROUTES) obscuring the 266 bus stop. and there should be an Old Oak station for North Acton to interchange with thus giving me access to the Silverlink without having to get that fecking bus (they always insist on changing drivers just 2 stops after i get on).

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:46 (twenty years ago) link

Knowing Willesden as you seem to, i am sure that it is fair to assume that the rest of the UK is exactly the same as your experience! jeez!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:46 (twenty years ago) link

"Is that before or after we win the rugby?"

Unfortunately, I don't think we Aussies have it in us to win this year. But England's been a bit disappointing too. I've a funny feeling the French might come through.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:47 (twenty years ago) link

"Knowing Willesden as you seem to, i am sure that it is fair to assume that the rest of the UK is exactly the same as your experience! jeez!"

What! You're telling me Willeden isn't a microcosm of your great British nation?!

I lived in Oxford as a kid. I've travelled around the country a bit. The pissy shower thing is a cultural constant.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:50 (twenty years ago) link

Are Americans really loud? I've never noticed it before.

Mandee (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:53 (twenty years ago) link

you've been very unlucky with your showers then An Australian. i've never had one that bad.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:54 (twenty years ago) link

that said, given our apparent love for water conservation perhaps it's a good thing.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:55 (twenty years ago) link

Me either!

x-post

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:55 (twenty years ago) link

Are Americans really loud? I've never noticed it before.

You need to live somewhere touristic like... Oxford... where it is unnaturally misty and rainy and damp (and beautiful, romantic, mysterious etc)

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:56 (twenty years ago) link

Well, I won't let my egregiously poor experience with British plumbing diminish my admiration for your fine country. Once global warming really gets going, I'll gladly come back and live somewhere that's not Willesden. Clapham maybe.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:59 (twenty years ago) link

*sigh*

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:00 (twenty years ago) link

the other end of the Antipodean Arc :)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:01 (twenty years ago) link

Once global warming really gets going, I'll gladly come back and live somewhere that's not Willesden. Clapham maybe.

If we let you!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:03 (twenty years ago) link

Clapham is Australian? I didn't know that. I have this funny feeling that a population exchange is under way. There seem to be more Brits in the Eastern Suburbs of Sydney than Australians.

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:05 (twenty years ago) link

(imagines pinkpanther with placard and megaphone outside Clapham Housing Association)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:06 (twenty years ago) link

"If we let you!"

You can't stop me. I hold a UK passport. Mwa-ha-ha!

An Australian, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:07 (twenty years ago) link

anyhow to focus on the question at hand, I love so much about my country, yet there is hardly any such thing as Indian take-away to be found in it outside of NYC, so England wins easy. Hell, if all England disappeared except for the Curry Mile in Manchester, it'd still win pretty handily.
What crap. We have a neighborhood like that in Chicago. And since I've been to London, I know I'm not missing much in that department.

Kerry (dymaxia), Saturday, 8 November 2003 15:48 (twenty years ago) link


"Ann, you need to go out to the country, then the rural folx attribute any weirdness to being a city girl. Then they tar and feather you.

-- oops (don'temailmenicelad...), November 7th, 2003."

Actually, I was born and raised out in bumblefuck, Wisconsin, where I didn't get half the "what-the-fuck-is-wrong-with-your-freaky-ass?" bullshit that I get from uptight shit-driving SUV-obsessed Chicago fucks. Unfortunately, the weather back home was even more miserable than it is here, and I couldn't find a job to save my life. "Average" northwoods people are, in my experience, weirder and in a lot of ways more open minded than most suburban art students could ever be in their wildest fantasies.

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Saturday, 8 November 2003 22:26 (twenty years ago) link

haha - ts: momus vs. pat buchanan (ie. scots vs. irish)(irish win btw)

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 8 November 2003 22:36 (twenty years ago) link

also, how come people who bitch about the amount of aid the us gives israel don't bitch about the amount of aid the us gives egypt? oh right, jews

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 8 November 2003 22:38 (twenty years ago) link

I mean in terms of 'ugly alliances to criticise the us for' israel's pretty far down the list (behind saudi arabia, egypt, russia, the uk)

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 8 November 2003 22:39 (twenty years ago) link

but hey, jews

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 8 November 2003 22:39 (twenty years ago) link

Blount - Momus's stance has absolutely bugger all to do with anti-semitism really and more to do with fashionable targets among the Left at any given time (Israel is a perennial favourite, obviously, possibly with good reason).

Enrique OTM upthread wrt Palestine/Chechnya. WRT Saudi/Egypt - taking sides - brutalising your own people vs brutalising a percieved Other.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 9 November 2003 00:51 (twenty years ago) link

Blount must really love the feel of that Pat Buchanan ventriloquist's doll on his knee, because he keeps getting it out.

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 9 November 2003 00:59 (twenty years ago) link

Momus's stance has absolutely bugger all to do with anti-semitism really and more to do with fashionable targets among the Left at any given time (Israel is a perennial favourite, obviously, possibly with good reason).

'Fashionable' suggests the left is just following hemline trends. Well, I guess an electrified perimeter fence imprisoning people in a tiny fraction of their own land is a 'hemline' of sorts.

But again I have to ask, just what would Sharon have to do before we could condemn his actions without being called 'anti-semitic'? At what point would his identity as brute and bully trump his 'master identity' as jew and therefore, apparently, 'eternal victim'? Or can that point simply never be reached?

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:16 (twenty years ago) link

Nobody likes to think about Israel because it inevitably raises two wrist-slitting questions: 1.) Oh help, will the human race ever learn ANYTHING or will the new students always get hazed just because the seniors got hazed when they were younger? and 2.) Are people ever genuinely disinterested when it comes to anything that isn't trivial?

If you gather: in light of WWII, already an international historical obsession, the painful irony of the current situation is what makes U.S. military aid to Israel both so easy to obsess over and hard to think rationally about. PANT! PANT! JEW-HATER!!!!!!!

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:18 (twenty years ago) link

see also: us aid to turkey (ie. is it just the irony factor of 'victims turned oppressors' that makes everyone harp on the us-israel relationship while giving much shadier relationships a free pass)(does the us give armenia aid? what's armenia's human rights record?)(ie. when certain people with already sketchy backgrounds single out israel and ignore turkey, russia, egypt, the uk, etc. you gotta wonder 'well what's the diff. between israel and these others? oh right, jews')

cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:26 (twenty years ago) link

that said ann very otm with 1) (some sort of historical abused child syndrome?)

cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:27 (twenty years ago) link

Try, if you will, this little exercise in parallel world brainstorming. Let's imagine a world where we delink 'Angrael'. The US backs away from Israel and Britain backs away from the US. Maybe it's an implementation of that 'humble foreign policy' Bush promised in his election debates, or maybe it's a sort of horrified recoil as the three states recognise how their interdependence pushes them into neo-imperialism. The reasons don't matter. Let's just say it happens.

Now, you may come up with different results, but in my model the Israelis are forced to develop a self-sustaining economy that's actually attuned to the small Mediterranean country they're in. They're forced to get along with their neighbours. Something similar happens in Britain, which has to integrate into Europe. Not a bad world, that.

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 9 November 2003 02:00 (twenty years ago) link

Or Israel makes its money by selling its sophisticated weaponry to every tin pot dictator that can pony up the cash.

nickn (nickn), Sunday, 9 November 2003 02:08 (twenty years ago) link

Or Britain does

cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 9 November 2003 02:10 (twenty years ago) link

While we're at it, could somebody get the French to slip into some more seductive diplomatic technique? Or at least explain to Chirac that Bush has been called a moron so many times that insulting his intelligence does nothing but egg him on at this point. (UberCynic sez he and his bank accounts already know that.) It would be so nice to see somebody slipping around with velvet ego-mufflers and silky admonitions...

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Sunday, 9 November 2003 02:40 (twenty years ago) link

'Fashionable' suggests the left is just following hemline trends. Well, I guess an electrified perimeter fence imprisoning people in a tiny fraction of their own land is a 'hemline' of sorts.

But again I have to ask, just what would Sharon have to do before we could condemn his actions without being called 'anti-semitic'? At what point would his identity as brute and bully trump his 'master identity' as jew and therefore, apparently, 'eternal victim'? Or can that point simply never be reached?

Momus, I basically agree with you here... I don't think many people are denying that Sharon is an brutal heavy-handed mass-murdering fucker. But surely you'd agree that Israel/Palestine as a problem is given media coverage disproportionate to that of, say, Congo or Chechnya or, indeed, Turkey or Egypt. This is as much to do with media fashion than anything else (I'll exclude Zimbabwe here, because in terms of 'causes', that is the Israel of The Right).

Ultimately, I don't believe it really has as much to do with the fact that there are Jews involved as the very visible presence of the US in the background. Maybe 'fashion' is the wrong word, but there are certain whims and trends prevalent on the more cynical side of the Left - removal of Saddam Hussein was a very popular cause among Socialists up until the point when the US-UK decided they didn't like him any more.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 9 November 2003 12:17 (twenty years ago) link

Equally, Momus's concentration on the US-UK's imperialist impulses and that the UK should integrate more with good old pacifist Europe overlooks the not-exactly-small problem of France's imperialist impulses.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 9 November 2003 12:19 (twenty years ago) link

i think the americans customs officials are very interesting. i was unprepared for the zealousness and zeal with which they do their job. the other countries i have been to have been cordial at customs, so it was quite a shock when i came to the us for the first time.

when i arrived i was interviewed for about 20 minutes, i was told i didnt have enough clothes for my duration and that this was suspicious, one of the officials was concerned about the david foster wallace book i was reading, and asked me some questions about that also.

there were many questions about my job

i came away with the impression that the vigour they put into their job was more to do with them thinking i was going to become an illegal alien than anything to do with my potential terrorist ambitions.

i also do not believe that it is productive to argue with oops on this kind of matter. although oops is a friendly and respectful person much of the time, i'm not sure that his ability is so strong in this kind of area. although it is unclear whether this is an intentional device or not, i have found the absence of flexibility or ability to listen means that discourse becomes impossible. i think his pronouncements are nice to look at, but are not really worth engagement

charltonlido (gareth), Sunday, 9 November 2003 12:37 (twenty years ago) link

Ha - Momus declares that Israel controls the U.S. and Britain (or whatever that spiel was supposed to mean); J0hn D. calls him on it ("is everybody gonna let Momus's Prime-Minister-of-Malaysia schtick just slide right on by?"); and Momus spazzes out with a flurry of threads:

Once and for all, to say that Sharon's Israel is currently totally out of line in penning the Palestinians into a virtual cage in their own land is not to be anti-semitic!

Heh - but that's not what you said, of course.

The 'objectification' line didn't fly on the bukkake thread, and the 'hands off Sharon, he's jewish!' line won't fly on this one. Your Victim Politics benefits no-one, J0hn, and especially not the people you so kindly designate 'victims'.

Heh - that's not what J0hn said, either.

Why so defensive, Momus? Why so furiously backpedaling from your initial claim?

Sam J. (samjeff), Monday, 10 November 2003 00:03 (twenty years ago) link

You really should work for Fox News, Momus, you've got the rhetorical style down perfectly: create a smoke screen of furious attacks on things your opponent didn't say, and defenses against accusations he didn't make. (You've also shown yourself to be skilled at calling people who disagree with you immoral hypocrite "sickos.")

Sam J. (samjeff), Monday, 10 November 2003 00:09 (twenty years ago) link

i also do not believe that it is productive to argue with oops on this kind of matter. although oops is a friendly and respectful person much of the time, i'm not sure that his ability is so strong in this kind of area.

Well said Gareth, and it brings up a small aside I feel worth mentioning.

I came away from that whole exchange thinking "shit, I hope I never say something I word a little badly on this board, I'll obviously be ripped to shreds and judged for it, even if it is plain arguing certain political semantics isnt my strong point".

I next to never engage in these so-called "intelligent" arguments, the ones some people wish there were more of - because some of you make it extremely intimidating to do so, with your demands every little ambiguity be stamped on and floodlit.

Just, I dunno - keep that in mind, maybe? *shrug*

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 10 November 2003 00:36 (twenty years ago) link

Momus declares that Israel controls the U.S. and Britain (or whatever that spiel was supposed to mean)

If you don't understand, don't paraphrase. 'Angrael' is my name for an alliance between Israel, the US and the UK. On the one hand 'Angrael' is just a sci-fi cautionary tale. In other ways, it's all too real.

Taking sides: Angrael versus Europe?

Momus (Momus), Monday, 10 November 2003 00:46 (twenty years ago) link

Angrael v Europe: WWII... backwards.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 10 November 2003 00:49 (twenty years ago) link

I love it when people come up with clever names they hope will catch on. It reminds me of Paul Ince insisting that his teammates call him 'the Guv'nor'.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 November 2003 01:08 (twenty years ago) link

He said tackling was better than sex.


Momus is like my stereotype of a college student except he has done the reading for 7 or 8 more degrees.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 10 November 2003 01:18 (twenty years ago) link

Ah yes - that got me wondering about the sexual equivalent of the sliding tackle and the professional foul.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 November 2003 01:26 (twenty years ago) link

Momus is like my stereotype of a college student except he has done the reading for 7 or 8 more degrees.

Nonsense, I've hardly read anything. I'm like a college student, only 20 years older and with a more stupid hairstyle.

http://www.imomus.com/dailyphoto101103.html

Momus (Momus), Monday, 10 November 2003 01:38 (twenty years ago) link

You should have seen some of the mature students on my course. Really, you'd have fitted in great.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 November 2003 01:40 (twenty years ago) link

They were a pain in the arse in seminars, though.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 November 2003 01:41 (twenty years ago) link

Momus is the Lenny & Squiggy of ILx

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 10 November 2003 01:44 (twenty years ago) link

http://lennysquiggy.tvheaven.com/Sounds/perverts.wav

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 10 November 2003 01:45 (twenty years ago) link

If we can isolate this thread (because I haven't read any of oops' other misdeeds) I am still greatly confused as to why people are ripping oops apart. His comment was a pretty general and much heard one in terms of terrorism and just immigration and customs enforcement. I have to ask ridiculous, kind of easily misinterpretted to be offensive questions all the time to foreign nationals, even Swedes and Canadians.

Carey (Carey), Monday, 10 November 2003 02:07 (twenty years ago) link

fucking swedes trying to bring in their filthy meatballs.

Carey (Carey), Monday, 10 November 2003 02:08 (twenty years ago) link

Swedish Islamic Death Commandos II: When Laplanders Attack!

Coming to a theatre near you.

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Monday, 10 November 2003 02:14 (twenty years ago) link

They were right to give Gaz the 3rd degree though - those damn sydneysiders, you can't trust them with ANYTHING ;)

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 10 November 2003 02:27 (twenty years ago) link

whaaa? i was just about to agree with your comments upthread Trayce, but now? *hmmph*

i thought the thread was pretty light-hearted up to that point, and oops jibe was just a jibe...and then *kapow*, er, what?

gaz (gaz), Monday, 10 November 2003 02:36 (twenty years ago) link

btw - a pedantic point, but had it been introduced earlier maybe all of the shouting wouldn't have happened: the WTC terrorists did not go through Customs as the flights they hijacked were all DOMESTIC flights.

hstencil, Monday, 10 November 2003 02:57 (twenty years ago) link

I mean like DUH.

hstencil, Monday, 10 November 2003 02:58 (twenty years ago) link

but to answer the question, I have not been to the UK but I think I'd like it a lot (aside from that not rinsing the dishes thing).

hstencil, Monday, 10 November 2003 02:59 (twenty years ago) link

Sorry gaz, you know I'sa just joshin ;)

Good point stence - also, gaz did (quietly) point out his customs experience was in 1994, well before any of this current terrorist hoo-ha.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 10 November 2003 03:13 (twenty years ago) link

yeah I know, just felt like being a pedant.

And for bitchiness' sake, I'll point out that I've had my stuff rudely searched by Spanish airport security upon leaving two times now, but hey I still love Spain and would go back in a minute if I could. One rude person in a country /= all people in a country

hstencil, Monday, 10 November 2003 03:16 (twenty years ago) link

and that wasn't directed at anyone in particular, just saying.

hstencil, Monday, 10 November 2003 03:22 (twenty years ago) link

The customs officers in the UK were hilariously uninterested in me. I told them I had food to declare (well, it was vegemite and bikkies) and they laughed and said "this isnt Australia you know - just go through!".

I wasn't sure wether to be relieved or insulted! =)

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 10 November 2003 03:23 (twenty years ago) link

I mean in terms of 'ugly alliances to criticise the us for' israel's pretty far down the list (behind saudi arabia, egypt, russia, the uk)

What the fuck planet are you on?

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 10 November 2003 10:42 (twenty years ago) link

Trayce, it wasn't really the original comment that caused the fight, more Oops's persistent inability to acknowledge that what he posted might have some dubious connotations. Admittedly, the fact that I think the guy is an utter prick did colour my reactions somewhat.

Ricardo (RickyT), Monday, 10 November 2003 11:13 (twenty years ago) link

seven years pass...

I don't understand what's so goddammed funny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gzj1OF7d9m4

 (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 26 July 2011 15:06 (twelve years ago) link

I mean, they're the ones who drink tea from gas cans.

 (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 26 July 2011 15:06 (twelve years ago) link

five years pass...
one year passes...

OK, fine. Limeys win.

https://i.imgur.com/8fMzRjL.jpg

pplains, Saturday, 20 January 2018 04:06 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.