what if... social media is cut out for us
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:44 (three years ago) link
I think the Aeon one is trying to say that 'virtue signalling is bad not good' (if anyone needed a tl;dr, there it is).
― pomenitul, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:46 (three years ago) link
my stance against reading articles continues to pay dividends
― silby, Wednesday, May 27, 2020 11:36 AM (three minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
was waiting for this post
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Wednesday, May 27, 2020 8:41 AM (five minutes ago)
:*
― silby, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:46 (three years ago) link
what i got out of the laura oyster article is here are some examples of how authors' novels were shaped in various ways by the depiction of anxiety about being a "good person" which is triangulated according to an acute self-awareness that their morality will be judged widely and visibly by their audience on social media
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:55 (three years ago) link
this is actually a perfect example but not for the reasons claimed it is; after reading the article my basic stance was "this was a decent article, I'm glad I read it, I should look up some of those other books," but now I am questioning that stance because it does not seem to be aligned with the correct one, nor do I trust that I'm right
― like, I’m eating an elephant head (katherine), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:56 (three years ago) link
What do you think?
― pomenitul, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:57 (three years ago) link
I don't fucking know because what I think is apparently the wrong thing
― like, I’m eating an elephant head (katherine), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:57 (three years ago) link
yr ego balloon needs inflating!
― Mordy, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 15:59 (three years ago) link
I don't think "how should a person be" (apparently discussed in the article I won't read) is written in the context of social media scrutiny at all!
― silby, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:01 (three years ago) link
katherine I definitely recommend all the Ben Lerner novels and both Jenny Offill novels and How Should A Person Be? because they are all funny and good. Probably Motherhood is good too, it's on my shelf and I just haven't gotten to it yet. I think the things this article is concerned about are most present in The Topeka School, which, perhaps not by coincidence, is the least successful of Lerner's books, I would start with 10:04 (or, better, How Should A Person Be?, which is just wonderfully and radically its own thing, and when you are trapped in a social-media-mediated self-consciousness spiral the best prescription is a radically alternate perspective)
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:05 (three years ago) link
Motherhood is really good too! It's sort of secretly about the Holocaust though.
― silby, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:07 (three years ago) link
Leaving the Atocha Station is no less apposite to this discussion and very much worth everyone's time as well.
― pomenitul, Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:08 (three years ago) link
I've read most of those except the ben lerner
― like, I’m eating an elephant head (katherine), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:09 (three years ago) link
Oh sorry for wrongly imagining otherwise!
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:32 (three years ago) link
If you've read all those books and thought the Oyler was on point maybe it's me who's missing it!
glad some ppl think it's funny to ask if Ammonium Nitrate would be a great metal band name the day after Beirut.
was unusually dickish to this person cos it was in poor taste
― XVI Pedicabo eam (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 5 August 2020 16:01 (three years ago) link
I hate when you notice you have less mutual friends than before with someone because it means nearly always someone has removed you and even though you know logically that it doesn't mean anything, it still stings your ego a bit. I like to think that I'm not so unlikable that my mere online presence (which can be muted) is so unpleasant. OTOH these days I only seem to share pro-feminism and pro-trans rights articles I've enjoyed reading, so maybe it's for the best these people remove themselves from my social media circles
― boxedjoy, Thursday, 6 August 2020 10:39 (three years ago) link
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-19/onlyfans-to-block-sexually-explicit-videos-starting-in-october
if i were smarter and knew how to program, launching an onlyfans knockoff that is JUST explicit video seems like a goldmine
― think “Gypsy-Pixie” and misspelled. (We are a white family.) (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 19 August 2021 19:45 (two years ago) link
"We have decided that our role in distributing sexually explicit videos is morally and ethically wrong and something we want no further part in. That is why we are only going to engage in this harmful and exploitative activity for another, oh, let's say 45 days, so we can all get comfortable with the idea. We don't want to be rash."
― it is to laugh, like so, ha! (Aimless), Thursday, 19 August 2021 19:55 (two years ago) link
I'll admit to being out of the loop but...isn't OnlyFans basically just OnlyExplicitVideos?
― Marty J. Bilge (Old Lunch), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:05 (two years ago) link
yes
― ciderpress, Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:12 (two years ago) link
this isn't related to the link forksclovetofu posted, but how does everyone "keep up" with social media?
am i getting old or not using it right?
i try to read local and world news every day. it sometimes takes me up to two hours and i still feel like i only skimmed through a lot of articles. i may have too many interests, though?
i would say i'm not cut out for social media because it seems like an endless stream of information. add that you have to learn how to parse people's meaning according to whatever character they're playing or their personality, and things just become so complicated.
i only use facebook but don't have any personal details or pictures up. it's mostly to keep in touch with friends, because we don't all live in the same city anymore. i have less than 20 friends on there.
― Punster McPunisher, Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:12 (two years ago) link
and just when Rachel Dolezal set up her account no less
― Mr. Cacciatore (Moodles), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:23 (two years ago) link
damn, rachel dolezal joining onlyfans made them ban porn. i mean it scans.
― Linda and Jodie Rocco (map), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:30 (two years ago) link
tumblr banning porn and then this are honestly shocking to me. really didn't realize how institutionalized sexual repression is in the u.s. i kind of thought the internet ended all that, lol. like, my personal journey was the one that everyone else went on. nope!
― Linda and Jodie Rocco (map), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:32 (two years ago) link
the word will literally burn up before americans aren't horrified by their own sexuality
― Linda and Jodie Rocco (map), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:34 (two years ago) link
world
onlyfans shutting down the sexy vids has everything to do with them having issues getting funding and nothing to do with a moral stance.
― think “Gypsy-Pixie” and misspelled. (We are a white family.) (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:34 (two years ago) link
why do you think they are having issues getting funding?
― Mr. Cacciatore (Moodles), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:44 (two years ago) link
exactly
― Linda and Jodie Rocco (map), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:48 (two years ago) link
too many butts
― there's too much fucking shit on me (Neanderthal), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:48 (two years ago) link
The Bloomberg and Axios articles say they are. Apparently, some investment firms are prohibited from investing in adult businesses, and others just don't want to.
Here's the thing: OnlyFans had over a billion dollars in net revenue last year. Why the fuck do they even need outside investors?
― but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:52 (two years ago) link
And my follow-up question: What do they think they're going to do for money after this? Nobody goes to OnlyFans for non-explicit content. Do they think celebrities are gonna flood in and make it something like Cameo? Cause that's never gonna happen. This is just a stunningly bad idea.
― but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, 19 August 2021 20:53 (two years ago) link
I missed this poll, but my answer is (increasingly) no.
― Legalize Suburban Benches (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 19 August 2021 21:00 (two years ago) link
I don't think it's venture capital that's the reason. I have a friend doing her phd on the online porn economy and she pointed me to:
Potential legal trouble: https://www.vice.com/en/article/4avpe3/ann-wagner-fosta-onlyfans-csam-doj-letter
MasterCard recently changed their rules for "adult businesses": https://www.xbiz.com/news/258606/heres-what-the-new-mastercard-rules-mean-for-adult-sites-producers
All equally speculative I suppose, but these seem more convincing to me
― rob, Thursday, 19 August 2021 21:39 (two years ago) link
The Evangelical women trying to make onlyfans disappear don’t realize if I lose that income I’ll start fucking their husbands for money again— Sydney Leathers (@sydneyelainexo) August 19, 2021
― but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, 19 August 2021 22:18 (two years ago) link
Don't know why that link posted twice; in a follow-up tweet, she called out Ann Wagner by name.
― but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, 19 August 2021 22:19 (two years ago) link
My theory: pivot to OnlyFeet incoming
― Woolf & Stein 3d (wins), Friday, 20 August 2021 05:48 (two years ago) link
A good Twitter thread that explains a lot:
A lot of people are getting the OnlyFans story wrong, and the reality of it is a lot more damaging and concerning to both the livelihood of sex workers and online freedom in general.— Post-Culture Review (@PostCultRev) August 20, 2021
― but also fuck you (unperson), Friday, 20 August 2021 12:11 (two years ago) link
Thanks for that background, it’s illuminating.
― think “Gypsy-Pixie” and misspelled. (We are a white family.) (forksclovetofu), Friday, 20 August 2021 13:29 (two years ago) link
We are making a few changes at OnlyFans pic.twitter.com/MiD2tlZcK1— Vinny Thomas (@vinn_ayy) August 19, 2021
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 20 August 2021 19:36 (two years ago) link
moving in a nude erection
― kinder, Friday, 20 August 2021 20:05 (two years ago) link
https://myystar.com/MYYSTAR_PRESS_RELEASE.pdf
― think “Gypsy-Pixie” and misspelled. (We are a white family.) (forksclovetofu), Monday, 23 August 2021 19:53 (two years ago) link
^in which Tyga tries to piggyback onlyfans
― think “Gypsy-Pixie” and misspelled. (We are a white family.) (forksclovetofu), Monday, 23 August 2021 19:54 (two years ago) link
^in which Tyaga tries to piggybareback onlyfans
― but also fuck you (unperson), Monday, 23 August 2021 20:13 (two years ago) link
ok then: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-25/onlyfans-drops-plan-to-ban-sexually-explicit-content-amid-uproar
― rob, Wednesday, 25 August 2021 13:48 (two years ago) link
fucked around, found out, decided to continue to fuck around
― think “Gypsy-Pixie” and misspelled. (We are a white family.) (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 25 August 2021 13:53 (two years ago) link
What did they expect the reaction to be?!?
― Legalize Suburban Benches (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 25 August 2021 14:19 (two years ago) link
Nope
― calstars, Saturday, 25 November 2023 02:05 (five months ago) link
Not really
― The Triumphant Return of Bernard & Stubbs (Raymond Cummings), Saturday, 25 November 2023 02:40 (five months ago) link