bell_labs, was it on KRON? I was wondering how they'd edit <i>those scenes</i>.
― Leee, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link
It kind of was some melrose-place like tv show for the first hour.
― The Yellow Kid, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link
i don't know, i think it was on the CW or something? they must have edited out a bunch of sexy stuff. it didn't click with me that it was "actually" a david lynch movie until the part with extended acapella roy orbison song.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:26 (sixteen years ago) link
what does CW stand for?
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link
CW = former WB, i have no idea what it stands for
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link
It's a David Lynch movie from the moment the lights go down and the Angelo Badalamenti strikes up.
― Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link
Mrs. Dancer thinks it's "Cunt Watch"
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, I saw it on Channel 9 here, and I gather I missed some steamy girl-on-girl action and a most unsexy masturbation scene in which Naomi Watts basically hatefucks herself (or so I'm told by my neighbor). '
Still, I'm mightily creeped out by the film.
― Alex in NYC, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link
those scenes are key
― chaki, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link
also, urgent
― gabbneb, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link
hairpie blurred out for DVD also: Lynch's one-chapter-only insistence basically resulted in a DVD that now no longer plays past the first hour or so. awesome :(
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link
it's Lynch's Lovesexy.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:53 (sixteen years ago) link
When I think of the glory days of the internet that salon article usually comes to mind first. WE'RE DOIN IT GUYS! WE'RE SOLVING MULHOLLAND DRIVE!
― Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link
thats weird
― chaki, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link
That film is weird and nobody last century would have convinced their editors to let them analyze it.
― Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link
what?
― chaki, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link
I see what you did there.
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link
Chaki I was half kidding about the glory days. All the same no mainstream print media would ever devote so much space to a Lynch dissection.
― Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link
you've obviously never read Cinemafantastique!
― chaki, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link
we need to watch this every now and then
― W4LTER, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link
Ya gotta love the man.
― Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 00:57 (sixteen years ago) link
is Cinemafantastique still around?
― latebloomer, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 08:51 (sixteen years ago) link
i met lynch once, really sweet guy, he was very patient with my drunken fanboy friend
― gershy, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 08:54 (sixteen years ago) link
you always talk in the sec person about yrslf? ;-)
― nathalie, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 10:36 (sixteen years ago) link
He came into my office at my last job. Evidently, he's "really into cows" at the moment.
― Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 13:16 (sixteen years ago) link
still never seen this movie, because it is not part of the Friday the 13th series
― J0hn D., Wednesday, 5 December 2007 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link
fair enough.
― Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link
It will be when Freddy vs. Betty comes out
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link
that youtube clip is great
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link
I guess all the girl-girl kissy scenes are completely removed from bowdlerized broadcast cuts?
I still can't look/think about that homeless Trent Reznor guy without a ton of anxiety.
― Leee, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link
likewise. As one reviewer said, it gets in your head and STAYS THERE. Although now I'll never look at Trent Reznor the same way again.
― Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link
I had a DVD of the original TV pilot version - it was ok, didn't have the atmosphere of the movie at all. Maybe would have worked for Twin Peaks fans, though.
― milo z, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link
this movie is way overrated, i was so disappointed when i finally saw it. "blue velvet" is light-years better.
― J.D., Wednesday, 5 December 2007 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link
no
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 21:37 (sixteen years ago) link
? Blue Velvet is way clumsier
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.indiewire.com/biz/lynchcow1.jpg
― The Yellow Kid, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.davidlynch.de/lynchcow2.jpg
― The Yellow Kid, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link
Blue Velvet is not light years better. Why is it light years better?
― W4LTER, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link
adheres to conventional thriller narrative structure...? (just guessing)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link
i mean "blue velvet" is driven by a strong story and has countless indelible moments and still leaves me feeling like i've witnessed something astonishing and complex. MD just leaves me feeling like i've seen a long string of marginally related scenes that don't add up to anything. what exactly do you guys get out of it?
― J.D., Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link
well, the lights go down, and you go into this WORLD...
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link
More multi-plot TV pilots should be given "it was all a dream" endings and released in theatres!
― da croupier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link
could any other director get away with that kind of ending? Rob Reiner didn't.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link
MD just leaves me feeling like i've seen a long string of marginally related scenes that don't add up to anything.
Huh? Really? It seems pretty straightforward, honestly.
― rogermexico., Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link
Blue Velvet has never struck me as particularly complex - its a "coming of age"-type story about a young guy discovering the dark underbelly of America, etc. It has a clear beginning, middle, and end; a villain; a classic "femme fatale", etc. "Mulholland Drive" is so much more dense and intricate - involving the mutability of identity, the Hollywood "dream" (of making it big, of being in a movie, of being someone you're not); its about creative control, obsession, and denial; the nature of recorded media... so many things in there.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link
Including thirty minutes of "and you were there, and you were there, and you were there..."
― da croupier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link
Other pilot producers must be SO fucking jealous of this movie.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link
Lynch has always had a thing for the Wizard of Oz
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link
Hmm...Do you have theories about Gravity's Rainbow?
― Bob Six, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link
gravity's rainbow is about transcendence
― akm, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link