What are Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Flaws?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

ok, enough is enough. she gets a thread.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:20 (one year ago) link

haha nice callback title

sleeve, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:21 (one year ago) link

cool now we have four US politics threads

legislative fanboy halfwit (Οὖτις), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:21 (one year ago) link

She's fairly disrespectful to our president, for a start.

But people get sick on earth in their human form (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:22 (one year ago) link

she's so awesome she makes everyone else look bad

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:22 (one year ago) link

excellent title

bhad bundy (Simon H.), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:22 (one year ago) link

if people don't want to use it, they won't

Karl Malone, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:22 (one year ago) link

xp

Karl Malone, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:23 (one year ago) link

sharp knees

mh, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:23 (one year ago) link

american

||||||||, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:24 (one year ago) link

If she's able to maintain her political stance (and especially if she winds up being an effective legislator) I would be very comfortable casting a prez vote for her once she's eligible to run.

But people get sick on earth in their human form (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:25 (one year ago) link

i think she's wonderful. one thing i especially like about her is that she seems adept at forming a posse of like-minded legislators. she's good at sharing her political fame and recognition and using it to boost others.

Karl Malone, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:26 (one year ago) link

in before someone suggests she's nominated for president
xp fuck just missed it.

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:26 (one year ago) link

name has 5-4-2 syllable pattern: last name should have three syllables

mh, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:26 (one year ago) link

left-handed, so she's pretty much limited to 1B or the outfield

mookieproof, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:27 (one year ago) link

Alexandria / Ocasio-Cortez is / a living haiku.

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:27 (one year ago) link

the main reason for this thread is that she is an excellent twitterer, so maybe her daily handful of zings can go here instead of the other threads.

however, if i worry about anything with AOC, it's that one day she's going to slip up in some major way, probably on twitter. the right wing is foaming at the mouth to take her down because they recognize what a beacon she's already become.

buuuuut, the great thing about AOC is that i would have more confidence in her than just about anyone else to bounce back quickly from a hypothetic major twitter fuckup. as our wise president says "we'll see what happens"

Karl Malone, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:29 (one year ago) link

Left-handed? Excellent.

suzy, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:38 (one year ago) link

yeah i was going to say how bad can she really fuck up on twitter that will make what these assholes say about here matter to anyone but them?

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:39 (one year ago) link

about her*

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:39 (one year ago) link

She cares too much

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:40 (one year ago) link

her ability to get the right to constantly self-own without even doing anything is incredible. at first I thought the "they're terrified of her" thing was overblown but they clearly are. not just because she's so far left but also because I don't think she's willing to "play ball" the way people like Schumer and Obama were. plus the fact that she's young and massively popular will only encourage more like her to come out of the woodwork which could shape US politics for decades to come. she's only been in office for a month but she already feels like an icon.

frogbs, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:44 (one year ago) link

God, does this woman have a gazillions tons of hope resting on her shoulders or what?

Wee boats wobble but they don't fall down (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:48 (one year ago) link

I look forward to many years of right-wing sputtering about the outrageous policy positions of this lefty commie socialist who okay is very attractive but that's not the point because she's going to destroy this country perhaps even with her smoldering good looks.

But people get sick on earth in their human form (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:48 (one year ago) link

I think the biggest thing she can achieve, especially in the near term, is to inspire more like minded young politicians to run.

Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:50 (one year ago) link

however, if i worry about anything with AOC, it's that one day she's going to slip up in some major way, probably on twitter. the right wing is foaming at the mouth to take her down because they recognize what a beacon she's already become.

they already have. You should read "smart" conservatives like Charles Cooke and Noah Rothman patiently explaining like Paul Muni as Zola how her plans are untenable. They don't get how she's using conservative methods since the Reagan-Poppy era: float a trial balloon, then watch as people accommodate.

Your sweetie-pie-coo-coo I love ya (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:50 (one year ago) link

she came out too fully formed as an awesome politician and therefore must actually be either an alien or a veteran operative in disguise

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:50 (one year ago) link

fwiw I maintain muted expectations about what she can actually achieve in the system but so far she has exceeded them

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:51 (one year ago) link

https://libcom.org/news/abolishing-ice-funding-it-07012019

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:51 (one year ago) link

she's already exceeded expectations. no one was talking about a Green New Deal or a 70% top rate before she came along.

frogbs, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:52 (one year ago) link

imo her strength so far has been to say exactly enough, or to respond with tongue-in-cheek fact checks about her stances without jumping into clusterfucks

having someone with actual policy stances without a political or even social past deep enough to sabotage dialogue in favor of ad hominem attacks is a net positive. media and public commentary almost demands a personality or face to link policy to, because policy is abstract and complicated and presenting an individual makes the job easier. if she's that person, have at it

it's a refreshing change from the right-wing version in the tea party goons, who had notional policy ideas and were 90% horrible personality and demagoguery

mh, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:53 (one year ago) link

https://libcom.org/news/abolishing-ice-funding-it-07012019

― xyzzzz__, Thursday, February 7, 2019 1:51 PM (forty-eight seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is kind of bullshitty. She voted for the bill to reopen govt.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:53 (one year ago) link

btw it does pain me to bring up the "Trump of the left" thing but it does occur to me that she's *actually* good at all the political stuff that people thought Trump was good at

frogbs, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:54 (one year ago) link

xp

This was not a catch-all bill to reopen the federal government, which has been shut down for weeks while Trump refuses to sign a budget until he gets funding for a border wall. That was a different vote. No, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi scheduled an entirely separate vote solely on funding the Department of Homeland Security.

sleeve, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:54 (one year ago) link

Alfred's post reminds me of an article about perpetual ratfucker Gingrich, who was wildly successful at his goals until the day he wasn't

mh, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:55 (one year ago) link

iirc she has changed her tack on how she votes for bills like that one. she recently was the sole dem holdout on another funding bill I believe?

bhad bundy (Simon H.), Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:56 (one year ago) link

yeah I was gonna say that libcom link falls more under "legit critique of a particular action" than a "flaw" and if she's already moved on from that stance then so much the better.

sleeve, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:58 (one year ago) link

the way Congress operates you kind of have to either vote for some bad things or not vote for some good things because it all comes in the same bill. I don't think she'd actually vote against abolishing ICE if such a thing were to come up.

frogbs, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:58 (one year ago) link

Cool thanks I wasn't really buying it too much (basically if you fuck with electoralism lib com goes after you)

But that's the only thing I've seen (and I almost always only entertain critiques of left-politicians from the left)

I was reading this piece on her call with Corbyn and she was swayed a bit on the allegations he is an anti-semite. That's more a product of doing too much twitter where everyone tweets to you with their agendas.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2019/02/how-to-think-clearly-about-anti-semitism-controversies-in-the-labour-party

But if the worst thing is that she might tweet something that isn't so good at times then she's doing amazing.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 7 February 2019 18:58 (one year ago) link

they already have. You should read "smart" conservatives like Charles Cooke and Noah Rothman patiently explaining like Paul Muni as Zola how her plans are untenable. They don't get how she's using conservative methods since the Reagan-Poppy era: float a trial balloon, then watch as people accommodate.

― Your sweetie-pie-coo-coo I love ya (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, February 7, 2019 1:50 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Trump methods too. You float something outrageous (end birthright citizenship), everyone goes "THAT'S PREPOSTEROUS" and then the "smart" and "reasonable" people say "well actually lots of countries don't have birthright citizenship at all." Now you've shifted the debate into your territory, and maybe you can't change the constitution in that particular case, but you've weakened resistance to tighter immigration laws.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:00 (one year ago) link

I realize a lot of people *say* that Trump does this, but I don't think that's true - were there not a bunch of so-called smart conservatives who insisted that the "wall" was just a metaphor for "strong border security", which he's rejected over and over again because he actually wants a big dumb physical wall?

frogbs, Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:03 (one year ago) link

I'm still laughing at this tweet chain where her chief of staff was clued in not to take a meeting with known grifters (original post deleted but you get the jist)

This guy is a dingbat grifter, take the time to do 3 seconds of googling bro

— Dan (@dankmtl) February 4, 2019

mh, Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:03 (one year ago) link

man alive otm way upthread. It’s almost spooky how skilled and self assured she is this early in her career. Like a Mozart or Tiger Woods of politics.

Trϵϵship, Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:05 (one year ago) link

frogbs otm, that would be the real overton window shifting strategy, but Trump literally doesn't understand it and is obsessed with numbers

If he were to get six billion he's still not building a wall, he's saying "we built it" and just tossing the money at the border patrol/DHS and never calling them to check to see where it went

he's stuck on six billion = wall

mh, Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:05 (one year ago) link

I realize a lot of people *say* that Trump does this, but I don't think that's true - were there not a bunch of so-called smart conservatives who insisted that the "wall" was just a metaphor for "strong border security", which he's rejected over and over again because he actually wants a big dumb physical wall?

― frogbs, Thursday, February 7, 2019 2:03 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Trump personally is a mental and emotional child. I mean Stephen Miller and the like.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:05 (one year ago) link

man alive otm way upthread. It’s almost spooky how skilled and self assured she is this early in her career. Like a Mozart or Tiger Woods of politics.

― Trϵϵship, Thursday, February 7, 2019 2:05 PM (fifteen seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I literally told a friend I thought she could be president back when we weren't even sure if she could win her primary. I don't attribute that to any special insight, it's plain to see.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:06 (one year ago) link

She’s actually impressive in an age of mass disillusionment.

Trϵϵship, Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:08 (one year ago) link

I mean decisively taking down a well-liked establishment dude like Crowley with like 5% of the funding and no corporate endorsements whatsoever is legit one of the most impressive political accomplishments I've ever witnessed

frogbs, Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:08 (one year ago) link

for sure

although "well-liked" might be a stretch -- I think he was a bit complacent and absent from his district, leaving more of an opening than realized. But def well-connected in queens overall. I mean, chair of the queens democratic party, mr. machine.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:10 (one year ago) link

I like her a lot and think she has a bright future, including a possible path to the presidency if she chooses to pursue it (which is a bit difficult to do from the House, historically). There is, of course, still plenty of time for her to flame out or not deliver on big legislative priorities, but so far she's been very sure-footed and she has excellent priorities and communications skills.

legislative fanboy halfwit (Οὖτις), Thursday, 7 February 2019 19:10 (one year ago) link

I mean yeah, isn't that called WINNING?

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 29 October 2020 18:15 (two days ago) link

Pff, Trump would have walked out wearing the clothes because he's *smart.*

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 29 October 2020 18:17 (two days ago) link

lol there was some hater talking about how that means she's a fake leftist and like 1) no one owns the clothes they wear in a cover shot, 2) people who key in on nice clothes or nice food as the focus of their opprobrium are horrible idiots, espoecially when the 630 billionaires in the us can each presumably buy at least 71428 of those outfits.

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 29 October 2020 18:26 (two days ago) link

"But aren't those TOPPINGS on your pizza?!"

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 29 October 2020 18:36 (two days ago) link

truffle fries iirc

assert (MatthewK), Thursday, 29 October 2020 18:40 (two days ago) link

They've tried the expensive clothing/haircut/etc. line for two straight years - I don't think it even seems to work with their base? Laura Ingraham was contractually obligated to tweet that but even she knows it's a dud.

Donald Trump Also Sucks, Of Course (milo z), Thursday, 29 October 2020 19:00 (two days ago) link

"She looks nice" is not really the strongest line of attack.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 29 October 2020 19:03 (two days ago) link

Nothing that throws mud at your target is a dud, no matter how tiny the amount that sticks, because the right will keep throwing it, every hour of every day, and the effect is cumulative. If you keep it up constantly enough then it all devolves into a vague cloud of negativity than hangs about your target in the minds of your audience, as "I've heard so many bad things about her some of it must be true."

the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless), Thursday, 29 October 2020 19:05 (two days ago) link

"She dressed up" for a public appearance is not "so many bad things," though. This isn't 'being involved in shady land deals' shit.

Donald Trump Also Sucks, Of Course (milo z), Thursday, 29 October 2020 19:09 (two days ago) link

If the frame around it is cast as reflecting poorly on her character, it is filed under 'bad thing' in your brain, even if you aren't really paying much attention because it doesn't seem important. The framing plays to your emotional response and emotions play a key role in how facts are perceived and recalled. Even a weak smear, weakly received, reinforces the negative emotional aura around AOC. They do this shit because it works.

the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless), Thursday, 29 October 2020 19:34 (two days ago) link

Honestly I think this line of attack is pure sexual anxiety aimed at people who feel attracted to her and need to form a theory of how they've been tricked into doing so.

They need a healthy way of dealing with these feelings like posting to the "ws of shame" thread.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:20 (two days ago) link

There was a tankie dude on Twitter going after a random woman a few months ago for making a nice-looking charcuterie board out of meats and cheeses she bought at Aldi because she was privileging bourgeoisie aesthetics so I wouldn't have been surprised if that tweet had come from a left-wing guy and not a right-wing woman

shout-out to his family (DJP), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:28 (two days ago) link

I've posted this before but I think lot of the weak attacks on AOC really do stem from the fact that they like her so much and would kill to have anyone like that in their party

frogbs, Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:30 (two days ago) link

a tankie dude on Twitter going after a random woman a few months ago for making a nice-looking charcuterie board out of meats and cheeses she bought at Aldi

I want to preserve this clause

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:35 (two days ago) link

The attack tweet about expensive clothes that AOC was responding to was from Laura Ingraham, who doesn't attack AOC because she is jealous of her, but because she is a professional operative carrying out a program of deliberate propaganda against AOC and the left.

the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:35 (two days ago) link

"Leftie likes expensive stuff" is an evergreen right wing attack

Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:38 (two days ago) link

right but there is a reason so much of that propaganda focuses on one particular person

frogbs, Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:39 (two days ago) link

Alfred it was funny as hell:

i never thought i'd see the day when neatly assembling deli meats and cheeses with a bit of bread on a flat surface was deemed "unethical rich people food" but here we are pic.twitter.com/c716WAPe8M

— Elizabeth May (on semi-hiatus) (@_ElizabethMay) August 4, 2020

shout-out to his family (DJP), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:39 (two days ago) link

Socialist Bernie Sanders Wears a $700 Jacket While Complaining About Rich People
By Maria Perez On 1/2/18 at 7:14 PM EST

Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:44 (two days ago) link

Wow I’m fancy as fuck cuz I love a charcuterie board too! Xp

(•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:45 (two days ago) link

"basically a ploughman's lunch" is bullshit as defense because a ploughman would prefer Oscar Meyer bologna sandwiches and a bag of Fritos

Patriotic Goiter (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:46 (two days ago) link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ploughman's_lunch

a (waterface), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:01 (two days ago) link

is The Hyperbole a new dance or something

error prone wolf syndicate (Hadrian VIII), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:03 (two days ago) link

wassup waterface

shout-out to his family (DJP), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:15 (two days ago) link

The attack tweet about expensive clothes that AOC was responding to was from Laura Ingraham, who doesn't attack AOC because she is jealous of her, but because she is a professional operative carrying out a program of deliberate propaganda against AOC and the left.

― the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless), Thursday, October 29, 2020 8:35 PM (forty-one minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

this is not the only attack out there, there is at least one other from a liberal pov, a woman iirc.

it's incredibly stupid and embarrassing that there are as many hot takes as there are today about someone who is trying to "change things" also wearing and possibly even liking nice clothes.

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:22 (two days ago) link

i get ia about people who focus on sensual indulgences like clothes or food as some kind of moral or political disqualifier for left-wing people. american puritanism at its pettiest and most vacuous.

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:26 (two days ago) link

I don't really think the right hate her for being pretty, I think they hate that they are attracted to her while at the same time she is "the wrong kind of woman with the wrong kind of values" or something. Clearly the right have no problem *supporting* people like Sarah Palin even while openly sexualizing them. It's not that they can't stand a hot woman, they can't stand a hot disobedient woman.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:27 (two days ago) link

I got sucked into some youtube conservative commentator's very unfunny spiel on "Smokin Hot Justice Amy Coney Barrett" the other night - it was extremely pathetic and also seemed to imply that she's the *right* kind of attractive woman.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:28 (two days ago) link

otm it's the default mode of ogling for conservative men, the same energy you see in the ads at the bottom of websites that feature a desirable/objectivized woman in the photo and say things like "try not to be furious at her lies" or w/e xp

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:33 (two days ago) link

this is not the only attack out there, there is at least one other from a liberal pov, a woman iirc.

This is the one you mean; it's embedded in the Medium piece linked upthread.

AOC on the cover of Vanity Fair. The clothes are estimated to cost $14,000. So happy that AOC is upholding the long established hypocritical tradition of Socialists who believe Socialism is for poor while they enjoy the fruits of Capitalism. pic.twitter.com/g8iTa1my1q

— Sunanda Vashisht (@sunandavashisht) October 29, 2020

but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:34 (two days ago) link

Um, hate to break it to you but the $50 uniqlo sweater you're wearing is much more the "fruit of capitalism" than the $14,000 one-of-a-kind suit.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:35 (two days ago) link

right?

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:36 (two days ago) link

the "journalist" who posted that "critique" also follows up with a tweet addressed to the "triggered" which makes me think she's working a ratfucking angle

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:43 (two days ago) link

*looks at self* oh god i'm an aoc stan aren't i

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:43 (two days ago) link

she's a modi/trump supporter who gives 2 fucks what she says

Politically homely (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:45 (two days ago) link

Isn't socialism about everyone sharing the gains rather than only a few wealthy people? So AOC wearing fine clothes that were shared with her fits.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:50 (two days ago) link

xpost otm, typical "oh you're so socialist, you should be living in squalor!"

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:51 (two days ago) link

It's just another example of lazy thinking that only is a "gotcha" for mouth breathers
A la "latte liberals", Hollywood elite against guns but have armed security, for immigration but don't house immigrants themselves

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:53 (two days ago) link

"you're so pro-life, why u goin to a funeral!"

Lover of Nixon (or LON for short) (Neanderthal), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:53 (two days ago) link

Tressie McMillam Cottom:

I believe that in this worldview, which is the dominant one, beauty is seen as the only legitimate capital that women are allowed possess. But beauty is supposed to serve power’s interests. When beauty occurs in an “unruly body”, such as a non-white person’s body, then it is an existential threat.

I believe the right’s attacks on AOC (and a few of the left’s to be honest) are a visceral reaction to their inability to control what they see is her only legitimate source of power.

They hate her because she is pretty.

jaymc, Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:55 (two days ago) link

she's just another shill reinforcing the message so it sounds more like a chorus. the point isn't that AOC is a disobedient woman. the point is that she must be undermined because of her message and this is a handy vehicle to do that which doesn't amplify her message by attacking it directly.

You'll notice the attacks aren't "she wants working people to get better health care, but that will mean raising taxes, which makes her a horrifying socialist". The best attacks are those that don't mention any part of her political agenda, but simply label her as an enemy of 'our kind', or mock her, or insinuate wrongdoing without citing evidence. These are designed as inoculations against her general attractiveness, both personally and politically.

the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:59 (two days ago) link

tressie mcmillam cottom otm

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 29 October 2020 22:00 (two days ago) link

I mean, it's kind of all of the above, because we're simultaneously talking about why the barons of capital oppose her, why the riding mower bourgeoisie hate her, and why the religious right hate her, and how the first group can rouse the second and third against her. I mean the #1 reason she is a target is that she is a popular and charismatic socialist who has had unlikely amounts of political success and is still very young and promising. The other reasons are useful to get people riled against her though.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 29 October 2020 22:11 (two days ago) link

tressie mcmillam cottom dyac

DJI, Thursday, 29 October 2020 22:38 (two days ago) link

take 1 look at right-wing editorial cartoons about AOC and you’ll see there are plenty of republicans who don’t think she’s pretty. they draw her with buckteeth, flies circling her etc. frankly “they secretly think she’s hot” kind of a weird angle imo

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Friday, 30 October 2020 08:46 (yesterday) link

in my experience calling a girl annoying is guy for "im gonna try and fuck that chick". its an instant break up in my book.

-- sunny successor, Wednesday, March 5, 2008

edited for dog profanity (sic), Friday, 30 October 2020 09:02 (yesterday) link

Republicans are Very Mad (again) about my appearance. This time they’re mad that I look good in borrowed clothes (again).

Listen, if Republicans want pointers on looking your best, I’m happy to share.

Tip #1: Drink water and don’t be racist

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) October 29, 2020

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 30 October 2020 16:41 (yesterday) link

she’s the fucking best at this.

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Friday, 30 October 2020 17:09 (yesterday) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.