US Politics, February 2018: Our country was founded by geniuses, but it’s being run by idiots

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

sigh.....

fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Thursday, 1 February 2018 06:20 (three weeks ago) Permalink

A spokesman for Nunes responded to Schiff's letter by calling it an "increasingly strange attempt to thwart publication of the memo," saying changes were made that were "minor edits to the memo, including grammatical fixes and two edits requested by the FBI and by the Minority themselves."
close dialog

Receive Fareed Zakaria's Global Analysis
including insights and must-reads of world news

Email address
Activate Fareed's Briefing
By subscribing you agree to our
privacy policy.

"The vote to release the memo was absolutely procedurally sound, and in accordance with House and Committee rules," Nunes spokesman Jack Langer said. "To suggest otherwise is a bizarre distraction from the abuses detailed in the memo, which the public will hopefully soon be able to read for themselves."

But senior Democratic committee official disputed that characterization of the alterations to the memo and said they did not resolve the factual problems that have been raised by the FBI or Justice Department.

"The changes are not cosmetic and almost all of them are unrelated to concerns about sensitive information. Instead, they try to water down some of the Majority's assertions," the official said. "While the Minority has continually pointed out flaws in the majority document, we have not requested any changes because we feel the whole document is fundamentally flawed."

fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Thursday, 1 February 2018 06:22 (three weeks ago) Permalink

good thread title

flappy bird, Thursday, 1 February 2018 06:35 (three weeks ago) Permalink

If Hope Hicks does down what 25 year olds will be left to run the government

officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 1 February 2018 07:00 (three weeks ago) Permalink

BARRON

Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 1 February 2018 07:11 (three weeks ago) Permalink

in case you were wondering, Trump's claim that his SOTU got the "highest ratings ever recorded", is in fact not true

frogbs, Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:21 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Is there a website compiling the Trump utterances which are factually accurate? Or is it not worth creating a website featuring so little content?

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:26 (three weeks ago) Permalink

good mourning!

morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:36 (three weeks ago) Permalink

#SOTU TV Viewers:
2018: 45.6M
2017: 47.7M*
2016: 31.3M
2015: 31.7M
2014: 33.3M
2013: 33.5M
2012: 37.8M
2011: 42.8M
2010: 48.0M
2009: 52.4M*
2008: 37.5M
2007: 45.5M
2006: 41.7M
2005: 38.4M
2004: 43.4M
2003: 62.1M
1993: 66.9M* (largest TV audience)

*Not an official SOTU pic.twitter.com/OZlUHmGQp4

— Fox News Research (@FoxNewsResearch) February 1, 2018

I don't know what's stranger, that Fox News is fact-checking Trump or that every speech that beat his was somehow "not an official SOTU"

frogbs, Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:41 (three weeks ago) Permalink

2003 and 2010 don't have an asterix

fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:43 (three weeks ago) Permalink

oh. then, the first one I guess

frogbs, Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:45 (three weeks ago) Permalink

"not an official SOTU" = the speeches delivered by new presidents to joint sessions of Congress; hence why they happened in 2017, 2009, and 1993 (and presumably 2001 etc)

(the blues version in his Broadway show) (crüt), Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:48 (three weeks ago) Permalink

People want to hear the first statements by new presidents, then their interest drops off. Trump will never beat these ratings.

Frederik B, Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:49 (three weeks ago) Permalink

sad

j., Thursday, 1 February 2018 14:53 (three weeks ago) Permalink

so we're really not gonna sanction russia (!) for interfering in the 2016 US presidential election?

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 1 February 2018 15:00 (three weeks ago) Permalink

not to defend the dorks at all, but my understanding is that they are already being sanctioned, just not getting extra sanctions. And the sanctions have not been lifted.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 February 2018 15:03 (three weeks ago) Permalink

People want to hear the first statements by new presidents, then their interest drops off. Trump will never beat these ratings.

Nobody tell Two Scoops why W in 2003 was so high then.

Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 1 February 2018 15:25 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Harold & Kumar have the answer to that iirc.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 1 February 2018 15:26 (three weeks ago) Permalink

so we're really not gonna sanction russia (!) for interfering in the 2016 US presidential election?

sanctions mostly hurt ordinary citizens and shouldn't be encouraged imho

https://www.worldfinance.com/special-reports/the-impact-of-economic-sanctions

Simon H., Thursday, 1 February 2018 15:34 (three weeks ago) Permalink

i'm worried about sanctions the Yam regime are putting on we the people

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 February 2018 15:48 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Why, the penny drops!

Mark Meadows says he's talked w/ Dems about how the border wall is offensive to some Latinos & now wants to make sure we "secure our border without sending a bad message"

— Liz Goodwin (@lizcgoodwin) February 1, 2018

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 1 February 2018 15:53 (three weeks ago) Permalink

I thought the whole point of the wall was to offend Latinos.

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 15:59 (three weeks ago) Permalink

File under "news shocking to nobody":

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/01/politics/nunes-memo-donald-trump/index.html

fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:03 (three weeks ago) Permalink

i don't understand what's so bad about the white house co-authoring a congressional memo that casts aspersions on an investigation into the white house's obstruction of justice when it comes to investigating conspiracy with a foreign adversary to interfere with an american election. aren't both sides bad?

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:15 (three weeks ago) Permalink

there are some very fine people on both sides

Pumpkin Soup and Mandy Patinkin (Hadrian VIII), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:20 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Have there been any indications that Mueller is investigating Nunes? Because I can't help but wonder what he's getting out of all of this.

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:21 (three weeks ago) Permalink

a tugjob

fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:27 (three weeks ago) Permalink

People want to hear the first statements by new presidents, then their interest drops off. Trump will never beat these ratings.

Which is why he's considering not running for reelection, but resigning and then running again. So he'll be a new president again. All about ratings, baby.

make sure we "secure our border without sending a bad message"

Maybe paint some pictures of tacos and other Mexican stuff on the wall?

I heard about a Chinese restaurant that became a Mexican restaurant, but they liked the art, so they painted sombreros on the pandas on the window.

https://i.imgur.com/J4bFtuY.jpg

Just a suggestion.

I'm my own emotional support animal (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:35 (three weeks ago) Permalink

if he resigns, he'll prob get huge ratings.

hoooyaaargh it's me satan (voodoo chili), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:38 (three weeks ago) Permalink

WH saying Trump has read the memo; not sure how that's possible unless it's been converted into a book-on-tape

fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:40 (three weeks ago) Permalink

It's a picture book with his photo on every other page to keep him focused. 'There I am again!'

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:49 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Did Putin sign off on the memo, y/n?

Moodles, Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:51 (three weeks ago) Permalink

apparently the memo is only 4 pages, which is 3 pages longer than Trump's attention span. but maybe he did it in chunks.

hoooyaaargh it's me satan (voodoo chili), Thursday, 1 February 2018 16:58 (three weeks ago) Permalink

The only way that memo could be read by him would be tweeting it at him in 400 character parts. Or print it on his toilet paper for, y'know, when he's tweeting.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:17 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Trump: (mutters to self while slowly scanning memo with a pained expression) Devin, what's this word?
Nunes: That's 'collusion', Mr. President.
Trump: 'Collusion', right, right. (continues muttering) What about this one?
Nunes: The word is 'FBI'.
Trump: And that one?
Nunes: That's your name, Mr. President.

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:24 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Trump: Okay, I've seen that one before. And this word?
Nunes: That's a smear of steak sauce, sir. It's all over your hands.
Trump: But what word is it?

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:26 (three weeks ago) Permalink

This is about what I would figure, making it even more of a muddle:

DEVELOPING: The White House has agreed to some redactions in the FISA memo at the FBI’s request, per multiple WH officials.

— Peter Alexander (@PeterAlexander) February 1, 2018

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:32 (three weeks ago) Permalink

i hope everyone just takes a deep breath and remembers how careless that crooked nasty woman was with classified information

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:35 (three weeks ago) Permalink

The redactions are only going to set off the monkey house all the louder.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:39 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Well, exactly. As well as making a short and apparently contextless memo even shorter.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:44 (three weeks ago) Permalink

i hope something exciting happens soon... trump bores me

flappy bird, Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:45 (three weeks ago) Permalink

I'm sure Trump's followers will accept, with their trademarked grace and quiet dignity, the FBI-requested redactions in this memo about the FBI's conspiracy to destroy America.

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:49 (three weeks ago) Permalink

i hope something exciting happens soon

famous last words

hoooyaaargh it's me satan (voodoo chili), Thursday, 1 February 2018 17:50 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Pres. Trump says Sen. Orrin Hatch told him he was a better president than Washington and Lincoln

— Phil Mattingly (@Phil_Mattingly) February 1, 2018

mookieproof, Thursday, 1 February 2018 18:01 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Exciting!

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 1 February 2018 18:02 (three weeks ago) Permalink

lol if anyone would remember those dudes it would be Hatch

sleeve, Thursday, 1 February 2018 18:07 (three weeks ago) Permalink

I'm all for free speech but anyone who makes a claim like that in seriousness should be jailed for life.

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 18:28 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Or, in this case, immediately stripped of his Senatorship, at the absolute least.

Senior Soft-Serve Tech at the Froyo Arroyo (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 February 2018 18:29 (three weeks ago) Permalink

He wss high when he said it

Moodles, Thursday, 1 February 2018 18:31 (three weeks ago) Permalink

Re: new charges against Manafort, it sounds a lot like Mueller seeking more leverage to turn him state's evidence. I still think Manafort is banking on getting the Arpaio red carpet out of the jailhouse door treatment. Why wouldn't he?

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 18:41 (yesterday) Permalink

I don’t think the CNN interview is great reporting (pretty standard tv news thing though). It’s just not remotely “McCarthyism”, regardless of whether or not the right wing is going to us that term to describe it or not.

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:03 (yesterday) Permalink

xpost Because there are also investigations pending in New York and Trump can't pardon him for state crimes?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:04 (yesterday) Permalink

This is extremely alarming: GOP Sen. Jim Risch says Trump is willing to start a "very, very brief" war with North Korea that will lead to "mass casualties the likes of which the planet has never seen. It will be of biblical proportions." https://t.co/zUYz1OLrFf pic.twitter.com/Y8i6G72yg1

— Jon Schwarz (@schwarz) February 21, 2018

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:10 (yesterday) Permalink

It's of course still possible that Trump's bluffing and Risch's words about Trump starting a war that's “one of the worst catastrophic events in the history of our civilization” are part of the bluff. But that's still insanely dangerous. https://t.co/zUYz1OLrFf

— Jon Schwarz (@schwarz) February 21, 2018

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:10 (yesterday) Permalink

“one of the worst catastrophic events in the history of our civilization....BUT”

jesus

Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:33 (yesterday) Permalink

is coming

frogbs, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:39 (yesterday) Permalink

It will be massive and catastrophic, but very brief, so kind of a wash, really.

Moodles, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:42 (yesterday) Permalink

^ solitary posts that singlehandedly describe the experience of being human

frogbs, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:43 (yesterday) Permalink

Radiation clouds would transverse the earth for months, so it would not be quite so brief as the advertisement promises.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:45 (yesterday) Permalink

a blast from the past

http://time.com/5003623/paul-manafort-mueller-indictment-ukraine-russia/

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:45 (yesterday) Permalink

risch seemed to refer to his notes over and over during that (either that or he just really looks like to look at his stomach when addressing an audience). did he really need notes to say "the likes of which the planet has never seen. It will be of biblical proportions"? like those were the prepared words that he had to get exactly right?

i remember the corned beef of my childhood (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:47 (yesterday) Permalink

xxxxp the dirac delta function of life

the late great, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:48 (yesterday) Permalink

I didn't even recognize who the heck this guy was, now I see he's the other Idaho senator. Figures.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 19:58 (yesterday) Permalink

potayto, potahto

Evan, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 20:01 (yesterday) Permalink

if the past is prologue maybe the north korea holocaust will kick off in september

The rollout of the strategy this week, they said, was planned long before President Bush's vacation in Texas last month. It was not hastily concocted, they insisted, after some prominent Republicans began to raise doubts about moving against Mr. Hussein and administration officials made contradictory statements about the need for weapons inspectors in Iraq.

The White House decided, they said, that even with the appearance of disarray it was still more advantageous to wait until after Labor Day to kick off their plan.

''From a marketing point of view,'' said Andrew H. Card Jr., the White House chief of staff who is coordinating the effort, ''you don't introduce new products in August.''

officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 20:02 (yesterday) Permalink

literal blast from the past

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 20:03 (yesterday) Permalink

@SenToomey was asked about impeachment talk surrounding the PA Supreme Court on their gerrymandering decision. He calls it conversation that has to happen. pic.twitter.com/RAkRdQHVdX

— Sean Kitchen 🌹 (@RCPress_Sean) February 21, 2018

ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 20:04 (yesterday) Permalink

Enjoying the unfolding squashing of Manafort

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/mueller-asking-if-manafort-promised-banker-white-house-job-return-n849916

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 20:22 (yesterday) Permalink

saw a few people point out on twitter that mortgage horsetrading is extra fishy because it not the behaviour of a man who doesn't need to draw a salary from the trump campaign (manafort supposedly worked for free).

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 20:41 (yesterday) Permalink

Looks like the White House may have pre-screened the kids who got to talk to the President.

"We're going to do something about this horrible situation...We're going to get things done," Trump says to begin his meeting with Douglas students and others.

— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) February 21, 2018

Millennial Whoop, wanna fight about it? (Phil D.), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 21:39 (yesterday) Permalink

He's sitting there getting yelled at, which is a nice sight.

morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 21:46 (yesterday) Permalink

Shot:

"It's school safety. It's not about gun laws right now. Let's fix the schools," says the grieving father, Andrew Pollack.

— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) February 21, 2018

Chaser:

pic.twitter.com/JM1olR8rF0

— RonaldRump (@Ronald__Rump) February 21, 2018

Millennial Whoop, wanna fight about it? (Phil D.), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 21:51 (yesterday) Permalink

I believe the man's grief is as real as real as can be, but clearly he just wasn't pulled out of a hat. Emma Gonzales and David Hogg sure aren't in that room.

Millennial Whoop, wanna fight about it? (Phil D.), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 21:52 (yesterday) Permalink

shot/chaser about a dead girl v good zing

It's not delivery, it's Adorno! (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 21:52 (yesterday) Permalink

It's not a shot/chaser about a dead girl, it's about this president once again stage managing everything to reflect his own greatness.

Millennial Whoop, wanna fight about it? (Phil D.), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 21:55 (yesterday) Permalink

Trump's crib notes during the WH gun violence listening session: "5. I hear you" pic.twitter.com/XRI0X78b5U

— David Mack (@davidmackau) February 21, 2018

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 22:55 (yesterday) Permalink

6. Breathe

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 22:57 (yesterday) Permalink

At least Reagan could inject emotion into his 3X5 card scripts.

morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 22:57 (yesterday) Permalink

Does he have 45 on his cuffs?

koogs, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 22:59 (yesterday) Permalink

cool cufflinks, helps him remember who he is in a way he can understand

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:00 (yesterday) Permalink

also note that was clearly written on the first notepad they could find (THE WHITE HOUSE) when they realized he was going to fuck it up ten minutes before it started.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:01 (yesterday) Permalink

tbh i'm also struggling to hear any of those lines coming out of his mouth. maybe "what would you most want me to know about your experience?" but only because i'm imagining him delivering it with the tone of "what do you want me to do about it?!"

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:03 (yesterday) Permalink

Yeah seinfeldian emphasis on the ME?

Planck Blather (darraghmac), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:05 (yesterday) Permalink

maybe "what would you most want me to know about your experience?"

i figure he'd just improvise on it, maybe "what would you most want to know about my experience? i went to wharton, great school, did very well..."

i remember the corned beef of my childhood (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:07 (yesterday) Permalink

1) Not his handwriting; Hicks or Sanders
2) It's a cliche at this point, but tiny fingers - that sheet looks like it has roughly the dimensions of a bookmark
3) Tie dangling past his crotch, sitting in his usual defecatory posture

grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:07 (yesterday) Permalink

anything that aims to take David Brooks down a peg or three is worthy.

Simon H., Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:14 (yesterday) Permalink

surprising no one, it seems the shithead president's hot take is to get rid of gun-free zones near schools and possibly arm teachers, if they are well-trained. That should do the trick.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:55 (yesterday) Permalink

that was a friend of a friend's take last week and I told him it was the dumbest idea I'd ever heard.

fuck the NRA (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:58 (yesterday) Permalink

it'll go well when teachers, already weary from being underpaid and taxed with being forced to teach to tests, are now expected to be armed guards. so they'll leave the field and in 20 years, "teachers" will be ex-bouncers who are 6'6, 240 pounds, armed to the teeth, and only teach "street smarts"

fuck the NRA (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:59 (yesterday) Permalink

i've got a sneaking feeling this does not end well

Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:02 (thirty-five minutes ago) Permalink

http://www.wcjb.com/content/news/Levy-County-School-District-addresses-planned-walk-outs-474646963.html

nice tone deaf message guys, hit a home run w/ that one

fuck the NRA (Neanderthal), Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:03 (thirty-four minutes ago) Permalink

The District stated in a Facebook post, "while students have a First Amendment right of freedom of speech, it cannot be done so in a manner that is disruptive to the school environment."

ah yes, the famous "no school disruption" clause in the first amendment

i remember the corned beef of my childhood (Karl Malone), Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:06 (thirty-two minutes ago) Permalink

It looks like Ivanka wrote her dad's notes on how to handle himself during the "student listening session" . The photo on the left is from @CKaster took. pic.twitter.com/ifiFHT1L5i

— Ray [REDACTED] (@RayRedacted) February 21, 2018

Millennial Whoop, wanna fight about it? (Phil D.), Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:08 (thirty minutes ago) Permalink

my friend's son doesn't go to the school but she already told him if he gets suspended for walking out from the one he does go to, she is fine w/ that.

xpost god I hate this country and the manbaby trying to run it

fuck the NRA (Neanderthal), Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:08 (twenty-nine minutes ago) Permalink

bless the teens

Simon H., Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:11 (twenty-six minutes ago) Permalink

quite an amazing effort. some 71 odd meetings with legislators set up (those were the ones that were accepted, many more attempts were rejected).

Meanwhile...

Florida State Rep. Matt Caldwell is one of the 71 lawmakers who voted yesterday against debating a possible weapons ban. He has an A+ rating from the NRA.

"I think the worst scenario — the absolute worst scenario — is that we go out, and we ban guns and we tell everybody that we've solved this problem, and we haven't," he told CNN. "And then you're going to have another attack and people are going to ask, 'Why? I thought we solved this with this gun ban.' And that didn't do anything to change the circumstance."

Today, he's meeting with some of the school shooting survivors who traveled to Tallahassee to advocate for gun control and other reforms to end gun violence.

"You'll see, I'm wearing the ribbon for Parkland in remembrance," he told CNN.

go fuck yourself dude.

fuck the NRA (Neanderthal), Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:13 (twenty-four minutes ago) Permalink

I would love to see some these kids perform a protracted, Occupy-style protest in front of their statehouses and city halls. I'd send them all the pizzas I could afford.

Millennial Whoop, wanna fight about it? (Phil D.), Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:14 (twenty-four minutes ago) Permalink

The District stated in a Facebook post, "while students have a First Amendment right of freedom of speech, it cannot be done so in a manner that is disruptive to the school environment."

ah yes, the famous "no school disruption" clause in the first amendment

― i remember the corned beef of my childhood (Karl Malone), Wednesday, February 21, 2018 7:06 PM

To be fair, though, the first amendment isn't absolute in schools (though it probably should be). Fraser and Tinker and Keysian and Hazelwood make it pretty clear that first amendment rights are limited by:

1) the extent of the disruption created by the speech
2) offensiveness of the speech w/r/t local standards
3) if the speech is contrary to the school's educational mission

I think it is incumbent on the SCHOOLS to clarify and support their policies in advance of the walk-out, and to work with student leaders/activists rather than staying mute and acting punitively during the protests.

rb (soda), Thursday, 22 February 2018 00:21 (sixteen minutes ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.