turn the last Timelord into the last Cyberman
Did I miss something?
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Thursday, 27 February 2020 10:01 (four years ago) link
Just speculation - the puzzle of the episode is "who is Brendan?" - he could be the Da out of Derry Girls, but he might also be Ashad.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 27 February 2020 10:28 (four years ago) link
Ah okay - even if he's a Time Lord, there are two others in this episode, another one in this series, and an entire planet of them onscreen in this ep though, which rather threw me
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Thursday, 27 February 2020 20:15 (four years ago) link
That Matt Smith clip feels v bittersweet
I mean, even the throwaway ravens line is better than 99-100% of the past two seasons
Otm re the novel by the way. It’s like all good Moffat and very little bad Moffat (ok, Osgood chapters notwithstanding)
― Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 27 February 2020 20:59 (four years ago) link
yeah that clip mercilessly drove home the diminished circs of the current show
man jenna coleman was so so so good
― umsworth (emsworth), Thursday, 27 February 2020 21:35 (four years ago) link
novelisation of Day of The Doctor is one of my very favourite Doctor Who things.Just read “Chapter 10” (the fourth chapter) and yeah, this is definitely the best Who novelisation ever, probably the best Who novel ever, and maybe the best piece of Dr Who ever
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Friday, 28 February 2020 01:42 (four years ago) link
Sooooooo...
― Kate (rushomancy), Sunday, 1 March 2020 23:43 (four years ago) link
Ehh.
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Monday, 2 March 2020 02:08 (four years ago) link
Pretty impressive that they got JJ Abrams to write, and Barry Letts to direct, an episode in 2020 though
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Monday, 2 March 2020 02:10 (four years ago) link
just thought i'd check. y'all get back to hatin', i'm out again
― Kate (rushomancy), Monday, 2 March 2020 02:14 (four years ago) link
ngrrgh
― Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Monday, 2 March 2020 02:25 (four years ago) link
Interesting: the Doctor being special because of how they choose to actDull: the Doctor being special because they're some sort of chosen one
― Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Monday, 2 March 2020 02:26 (four years ago) link
Who is Ashad? they implied that he's the timeless child due to the same flashback events in a different setting, but then he's not, so idkWho is the Timeless Child? the cartmel masterplanWhy where the Cybermen torturing other Cybermen? no explanationWhat was the lie of the Timeless Child? the timelords never mentioned the child, so this lie didn't existHow did the Doctor save humanity from the destruction she herself created? she didn't
― wasdnuos (abanana), Monday, 2 March 2020 02:46 (four years ago) link
The purpose of the Cartmel plan was to add more mystery to the series. That's not going to happen when all of the details are dumped out in expositional speeches that don't affect the current story. Impressive that Chibnall's been at it so long and he's still writing for radio.
Chibnall still doesn't understand the nonviolence idea. It's OK to make a genocide button, just as long as you hand it over to someone else to push it. I got A.E. van Vogt vibes from that weapon. Next stop, NRA.
― wasdnuos (abanana), Monday, 2 March 2020 04:22 (four years ago) link
It's bonkers that so many Moffat eps got injuriously filleted down to 43 minutes when Chibnall gets 49 every week, and just fills it with three members of the cast describing what's happening to each other, instead of using moving pictures and editing to communicate to the audience
This week Chinballs got 70 minutes - just seven minutes less than global event & massive multi-platform profit centre Day Of The Doctor - and filled 87% of it with one character standing still against non-existent backgrounds, being told exposition that doesn't actually affect the story in any way whatsoever.
--
((oh lol xpost, I had the tab open from abanana's previous post))
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Monday, 2 March 2020 05:02 (four years ago) link
http://www.eruditorumpress.com/blog/the-timeless-child-review/
that ranking!
― wasdnuos (abanana), Monday, 2 March 2020 08:01 (four years ago) link
Enjoyed this mostly but Catweasel coming in to take the Doc's place while the Master just stood there was pretty poor. Maybe I'll rewatch to understand the point of the Irish popo thing because still don't.
― nashwan, Monday, 2 March 2020 08:23 (four years ago) link
My biggest grian was reserved for the reveal of the title of the next episode.
― nashwan, Monday, 2 March 2020 08:31 (four years ago) link
What happened to all the humans catweazle had already put through the portal?
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 2 March 2020 11:25 (four years ago) link
They fell into a plothole
― Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Monday, 2 March 2020 11:47 (four years ago) link
They just go to random places in the universe, possibly dying in the process iirc
― nashwan, Monday, 2 March 2020 12:01 (four years ago) link
So after a while, the portal was like, "fuck it, i'm only sending people to galifrey from now on?"
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 2 March 2020 12:05 (four years ago) link
Yeah I was thinking the portal wasn't always linked to the same place.But the Master had lined it up to go along with his plans. Seemed to be that the old guy who was left as the last person watching it had been there alone for decades or something like that.
― Stevolende, Monday, 2 March 2020 12:06 (four years ago) link
Catweazle didn't go "whoa, that's a new planet, it's never looked like that before through the mystic portal" so the 'normal' destination is clearly Gallifrey.
The biggest takeaway for me is that flying towels are cleverer than the entirety of Time Lord society.
― Doubling down on out of date information (aldo), Monday, 2 March 2020 12:18 (four years ago) link
obvs this episode was bollocks but this
How did the Doctor save humanity from the destruction she herself created? she didn't
was especially stupid
the timeless child retcon didn't really bother me, it's an idea that seems tailor-made for ignoring or retconning. nu-who has done so many "surprise doctor!" stories now, i'm not sure how this works as a long-term story generating tool (outside of comics - would be great for comics)
i did wince every time sacha dhawan said "tecteun". and it was a *lot* of times
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 2 March 2020 12:30 (four years ago) link
That his last line in the first part, isn't it?
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 2 March 2020 12:42 (four years ago) link
Was it? It was lost for me multiple times in all the exposition then.
Might also have been handy for him to say something like "every time it opens up it looks different" (which I concede he may well have done).
― Doubling down on out of date information (aldo), Monday, 2 March 2020 14:26 (four years ago) link
just checked and his line is "I've never seen it look like that before" but it's p buried under electronic drums and cyber-clonking marching noises
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Monday, 2 March 2020 17:45 (four years ago) link
DW-TTC: (One of may fave bad lines this season was in last week’s episode, where a portal is described as *always* opening on a new and random location ever time. And when its guardian sees it open he looks and says “It’s never looked like that before!”) #tweetnotes— Andrew Ellard (@ellardent) March 2, 2020
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 2 March 2020 19:26 (four years ago) link
god this sounds so bad
― umsworth (emsworth), Tuesday, 3 March 2020 03:48 (four years ago) link
it's definitely much worse than you're imagining.
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Tuesday, 3 March 2020 07:12 (four years ago) link
It's difficult to get across Sacha Dhawan's performance in text, for a start.
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 3 March 2020 08:59 (four years ago) link
Thought the concesnsus was that he was one of the few good things about it?
― chap, Tuesday, 3 March 2020 09:29 (four years ago) link
I don't even know where I'd find the consensus, I just come here. But yeah, even with a dead script to work with, he was terrible.
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 3 March 2020 09:45 (four years ago) link
Stupid to even begin looking for logic in this mess, but WHY DID PRE-HARTNELL MARTIN DOCTOR'S TARDIS LOOK LIKE A POLICE BOX?
― Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 00:23 (four years ago) link
Also, WHEN did the Doctor have these Irish metaphor-memories? Never saw that happen.
Chibnall's awful fucking writing, argh, fuck.
― Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 00:28 (four years ago) link
oh, i didn't even get that brendan was never the cyberman. way to mask that story -- changing the setting to earth but leaving in the immortality. couldn't possibly leave the setting as a place where people actually regenerate.
― wasdnuos (abanana), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 01:37 (four years ago) link
When Brendan/Doctor fell, exactly as The Timeless Child/Doctor did, wouldn't he have regenerated to a new form, also exactly as...? Just one quibble out of so many. So much exposition, like watching cutscenes instead of being in the game. At least expectations are lowered for next season.
― the body of a spider... (scampering alpaca), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 02:38 (four years ago) link
snap poll -at this point would it be kinder if it was cancelled?
also, is there a good reference for whatever weird and wrong considerations/negotiations saw Chibnall given the top job? i've seen it implied that he wasn't actually that keen. was moffatt involved in the "succession planining"? the lack of vision of installing Chibnall is matched only by the lack of vision he is bringing to the show.
feels like all this is karmic blowback for dissing pip and jane baker, now Chibnall is suffering under the curse of JN-T. the time was clearly right for a genuinely new voice/vision from outside the gene pool - not someone who occasionally wrote the occasional 11th-best episode in any given season.
― umsworth (emsworth), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 03:04 (four years ago) link
When Brendan/Doctor fell, exactly as The Timeless Child/Doctor did, wouldn't he have regenerated to a new form, also exactly as...?
Maybe, but he wasn't real and never happened anyway - "these Irish metaphor-memories"
nah. it's still fine if it's bad for a while as long as it then gets good again. the biggest problem is that Chibnall's so slow that his three seasons are probably going to take us through 2022, and they then might want to re-sign him to keep the 60th anniversary in a "safe pair of hands."
(reminder/update that at the end of five years into the Chibnall era, with Spyfall being a Parts 1&2 and Regurgitation Of The Daleks likely airing in 2021, we'll now only be at 20 Chibnall-run stories broadcast, and 14 by Moffat.)
also, is there a good reference for whatever weird and wrong considerations/negotiations saw Chibnall given the top job? i've seen it implied that he wasn't actually that keen. was moffatt involved in the "succession planining"?
We don't know anything much, no. BBC powerbods planned to cancel it after Davies & Gardner, assuming that nobody else could run it, and just do one-offs if they ever felt like it. RTD was very involved in making sure the series continued instead.
Apparently both Davies and Moffat were consulted re Chibnall being offered the gig, but we dunno if they both said "HE'S THE ONLY ONE WHO CAN DO IT" or "sure, our friend whom we have both hired and who has over 15 years showrunning experience seems employable." It absolutely shows a desperate paucity of imagination, and a failure to understand the show, but it's a good bet it was Broadchurch being a big hit that made him look like the candidate, not anyone actually watching his episodes.
(For mine, Mathieson looked like the best bet to take over and make a series with a varied tone, lots of fun ideas, and exciting new writers. It's a bummer that he hasn't had anything at all produced since, let alone had any showrunner experience, that could put him in the frame for next time.)
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 05:51 (four years ago) link
wouldn't he have regenerated to a new form
if you want to go down the regeneration lane: how did the Master make a living cyber-army out of Time Lords who were all definitely properly and absolutely dead? and how did they then start regenerating again after they were shot dead, again, with cyber-guns? (and why do the Cybermen build themselves so flimsy that they die from one zap of their own weapons, if they're meant to be a conquering army?)
obv any single 15-second chunk of this episode falls apart to this degree after 3 seconds of consideration
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 06:03 (four years ago) link
wow I sat this season out because I got sorta busy but it sounds like it really went off the rails
― avellano medio inglés (f. hazel), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 06:27 (four years ago) link
grim https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-chris-chibnalls-best-episodes-ranked/
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 4 March 2020 07:02 (four years ago) link
xp It's almost like Bob Holmes was right when he abandoned the idea of Cyber Lords for The Five Doctors as being unworkable.
― Doubling down on out of date information (aldo), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 07:41 (four years ago) link
It's nice that Ryan's dyspraxia got cured again.
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 09:26 (four years ago) link
Chibnell really is the worst choice they could've made on an artistic level. I would've thought Gatiss would've been a much more obvious successor, and for all his flaws at least would've injected more vision and personality into his seasons? Quite baffled they didn't go with him.
OTOH rating are still decent, right?
― chap, Wednesday, 4 March 2020 09:35 (four years ago) link
Ratings are decent, not "good" but perfectly fine. Appreciation Index scores have slipped, though, and the show's mainly ranking in the top thirty programmes rather than the top ten.
Gatiss didn't really want to do it by the time the job came up, having by then seen what a massive ballache the executive part of the job is, what it requires in terms of being a public figure, and how mentally and physically exhausting the creative side of the role is, after one of his best mates and closest collaborator had been doing it for seven years. Plus it would have gotten in the way of him taking stage acting jobs and painting lessons. (Dare say he would have said yes if asked tho, the big old nerd.)
Even when he'd pitched for the gig in 2001 or w/e it was as part of a team of three - he's never had the hubris to imagine that he's an endless font of loads of different Dr Who stories that aren't basically "old-timey horror classics but with a different monster in"
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 10:30 (four years ago) link
he's never had the hubris to imagine that he's an endless font of loads of different Dr Who stories that aren't basically "old-timey horror classics but with a different monster in"
This would be a good trait for a showrunner! He'd be open to fostering and incorporating other writers' ideas. And as an overall direction I wouldn't mind the show leaning more towards horror.
Can't believe the state of things has led me to stan for an imaginary version of Mark Gattis.
― chap, Wednesday, 4 March 2020 11:01 (four years ago) link
This is fun - DWM in 1999 asking Davies, Moffat, Cornell, Gatiss, Roberts (and Lance Parkin) what they'd do if bringing Dr Who back to TV for a modern audience
― Fantastic. Great move. Well done (sic), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 20:58 (four years ago) link
emsworth, thank you for new dn
― karmic blowback for dissing pip and jane baker (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 4 March 2020 21:10 (four years ago) link