Roman Polanski, or pardon me but your poll is in my neck.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1115 of them)

buttwhy?

Mark G, Friday, 2 October 2009 08:29 (sixteen years ago)

ILX = Fox News = Democratic Party base

QED

― A Patch on Blazing Saddles (Dr Morbius), Friday, October 2, 2009 2:49 AM (4 hours ago)

most compelling defense of polanski i've read yet

goole, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:24 (sixteen years ago)

We all really BUTThurt for you.

― Alex in SF, Thursday, October 1, 2009 7:48 PM

Trust me, I'm a proctologist.

Bill Magill, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:12 (sixteen years ago)

Jonah Goldberg, tickled:

I am delighted by the Roman Polanski controversy. Don’t get me wrong: I am horrified and disgusted by what the acclaimed director did — and admitted to — but there is an upside.

Just to recap, Polanski drugged a child put in his care for the purposes of a photo shoot. He tried to bully her into sex. She said no. He raped her anyway. He pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse but fled the country before sentencing, allegedly for fear the judge wouldn’t keep his end of the plea bargain. He spent the subsequent three decades living the life of a revered celebrity in Europe. He never returned to America because there was a warrant for his arrest. In a bit of ironic justice, he was apprehended en route to Zurich to receive a lifetime-achievement award. That ceremony will apparently go on without him.

So what do I like about the controversy? Well, for starters, that there is one at all. I think it is fascinating beyond words that this is open to “debate.”

Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 13:12 (sixteen years ago)

Pretty appalling to be "delighted" by this issue.

Bill Magill, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:15 (sixteen years ago)

Says the guy who has helped contribute to the obfuscation over whether waterboarding, stress positions et al. are torture.

xp

a wicked 60s beat poop combo (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 2 October 2009 13:26 (sixteen years ago)

Kinda hard to rape someone unless they say no, isn't it?

Niles Caulder, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:34 (sixteen years ago)

puts a new spin on 'if you have to ask....'

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Friday, 2 October 2009 13:36 (sixteen years ago)

Nice that Jonah can find an "upside" to this.

The ever dapper nicolars (Nicole), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:10 (sixteen years ago)

every cloud has a silver lining

steamed hams (harbl), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:12 (sixteen years ago)

Chris Rock OTM as usual:

http://jezebel.com/5372888/chris-rock-on-roman-polanski-its-rape-rape

thirdalternative, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

lolz @ the OJ line

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

This is amazing:

"My personal thoughts are let the guy go," said Peg Yorkin, founder of the Feminist Majority Foundation. "It's bad a person was raped. But that was so many years ago. The guy has been through so much in his life. It's crazy to arrest him now. Let it go. The government could spend its money on other things."

Where was the support for Gary Glitter? Where?!

thirdalternative, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)

Sorry dude: Rosemary's Baby > Rock n Roll Pt. 2

Fox Force Five Punchline (sexyDancer), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

^OTM

Nate Carson, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)

Listening to "Roman P" again now on Spotify, it really is a thing. "Little girls... caused you... your GREATEST MISTAKE". It was always >>>> "Godstar" btw.

anatol_merklich, Saturday, 3 October 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/10/the-polanski-affair

tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 4 October 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gm09100220091003115729.jpg

am0n, Friday, 23 October 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)

oscar on hgh

everybody loves am0n (J0rdan S.), Friday, 23 October 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)

does he also get the oscar for rape-rape

richard belzer (jeff), Friday, 23 October 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)

Why is Richard Gere accepting the Oscar?

existential eggs (Abbott), Friday, 23 October 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

Hmm:

BREAKING - Polanski will be released on a bond payment of 4.5 million francs, extradition to US still pending

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

Just in time for the release of The Fantastic Mr. Fox!

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)

Looks like he's still in jail regardless.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

Swiss authorities have said Polanski would face as many as two years in prison if he is returned to Los Angeles

I presume that's a typo, and that 'if' should read 'before'.

Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)

five months pass...

Throughout my seven months since September 26, 2009, the date of my arrest at Zurich Airport, where I had landed with a view to receiving a lifetime award for my work from the representative of the Swiss Minister of Culture, I have refrained from making any public statements and have requested my lawyers to confine their comments to a bare minimum. I wanted the legal authorities of Switzerland and the United States, as well as my lawyers, to do their work without any polemics on my part.

I have decided to break my silence in order to address myself directly to you without any intermediaries and in my own words.

I have had my share of dramas and joys, as we all have, and I am not going to try to ask you to pity my lot in life. I ask only to be treated fairly like anyone else.

It is true: 33 years ago I pleaded guilty, and I served time at the prison for common law crimes at Chino, not in a VIP prison. That period was to have covered the totality of my sentence. By the time I left prison, the judge had changed his mind and claimed that the time served at Chino did not fulfil the entire sentence, and it is this reversal that justified my leaving the United States.

This affair was roused from its slumbers of over three decades by a documentary film-maker who gathered evidence from persons involved at the time. I took no part in that project, either directly or indirectly. The resulting documentary not only highlighted the fact that I left the United States because I had been treated unjustly; it also drew the ire of the Los Angeles authorities, who felt that they had been attacked and decided to request my extradition from Switzerland, a country I have been visiting regularly for over 30 years without let or hindrance.

I can now remain silent no longer!

I can remain silent no longer because the American authorities have just decided, in defiance of all the arguments and depositions submitted by third parties, not to agree to sentence me in absentia even though the same Court of Appeal recommended the contrary.

I can remain silent no longer because the California court has dismissed the victim’s numerous requests that proceedings against me be dropped, once and for all, to spare her from further harassment every time this affair is raised once more.

I can remain silent no longer because there has just been a new development of immense significance. On February 26 last, Roger Gunson, the deputy district attorney in charge of the case in 1977, now retired, testified under oath before Judge Mary Lou Villar in the presence of David Walgren, the present deputy district attorney in charge of the case, who was at liberty to contradict and question him, that on September 16, 1977, Judge Rittenband stated to all the parties concerned that my term of imprisonment in Chino constituted the totality of the sentence I would have to serve.

I can remain silent no longer because the request for my extradition addressed to the Swiss authorities is founded on a lie. In the same statement, retired deputy district attorney Roger Gunson added that it was false to claim, as the present district attorney’s office does in their request for my extradition, that the time I spent in Chino was for the purpose of a diagnostic study.

The said request asserts that I fled in order to escape sentencing by the U.S. judicial authorities, but under the plea-bargaining process I had acknowledged the facts and returned to the United States in order to serve my sentence. All that remained was for the court to confirm this agreement, but the judge decided to repudiate it in order to gain himself some publicity at my expense.

I can remain silent no longer because for over 30 years my lawyers have never ceased to insist that I was betrayed by the judge, that the judge perjured himself, and that I served my sentence. Today it is the deputy district attorney who handled the case in the 1970s, a man of irreproachable reputation, who has confirmed all my statements under oath, and this has shed a whole new light on the matter.

I can remain silent no longer because the same causes are now producing the same effects. The new District Attorney, who is handling this case and has requested my extradition, is himself campaigning for election and needs media publicity!

I can no longer remain silent because the United States continues to demand my extradition more to serve me on a platter to the media of the world than to pronounce a judgment concerning which an agreement was reached 33 years ago.

I can remain silent no longer because I have been placed under house arrest in Gstaad and bailed in very large sum of money which I have managed to raise only by mortgaging the apartment that has been my home for over 30 years, and because I am far from my family and unable to work.

Such are the facts I wished to put before you in the hope that Switzerland will recognize that there are no grounds for extradition, and that I shall be able to find peace, be reunited with my family, and live in freedom in my native land.

Roman Polanski

am0n, Monday, 3 May 2010 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

http://gossip.whyfame.com/files/2009/10/roman_polanski4.jpg

am0n, Monday, 3 May 2010 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

my only thought in reading that statement is: this is why folks need lawyers.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:41 (sixteen years ago)

I can now remain silent no longer!

midcentury Modern (Lamp), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:43 (sixteen years ago)

i crave pizza no more!

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:44 (sixteen years ago)

now u crave young flesh?!

midcentury Modern (Lamp), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:45 (sixteen years ago)

I can't shutup anymore

am0n, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:46 (sixteen years ago)

It is true: 33 years ago I pleaded guilty, and I served time at the prison for common law crimes at Chino, not in a VIP prison.

serving time in non-VIP prison is cruel and unusual punishment

velko, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:47 (sixteen years ago)

Very Important Prison

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:47 (sixteen years ago)

P.S. Sorry for raping that girl.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:48 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.vipshowgirls.com/images/introT2.jpg

velko, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:48 (sixteen years ago)

p.p.s. catch me if u can ;-) xoxo

am0n, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:51 (sixteen years ago)

I can remain silent no longer because Macbeth didn't get a single vote in this sham poll!

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 01:25 (sixteen years ago)

I can remain silent no longer, at the very least because I have yet to have been drugged and sedated.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 01:43 (sixteen years ago)

Uh oh, Roman

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 14 May 2010 22:33 (sixteen years ago)

she can remain silent no longer am i right

all i wanna do is poll poll poll poll and zing and discuss mia (history mayne), Friday, 14 May 2010 22:53 (sixteen years ago)

God strike me down for being a hateful, cynical bastard, but I was looking at imdb when I saw this and then I looked at her profile and there's nothing listed since 2003. Otoh, the allegations wouldn't surprise me one bit.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 14 May 2010 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

Allen, 74, said Polanski, who is fighting extradition from Switzerland to the United States to face sentencing in a 1977 child sex case, had paid a high price for his actions and that it was time to draw a line under the case.

"It's something that happened many years ago... he has suffered.... He has paid his due," Allen told French radio station RTL.

"He's an artist, he's a nice person, he did something wrong and he paid for it. They (his critics) are not happy unless he pays the rest of his life. They would be happy if they could execute him in a firing squad," he said.

"Enough is enough," he added.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100515/en_afp/entertainmentusfilmpolanskipeople

velko, Sunday, 16 May 2010 22:12 (sixteen years ago)

really surprised that he resisted a nazi reference there

contl;drizer (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 16 May 2010 22:13 (sixteen years ago)

srsly sucks that directors/actors I like will defend this scumbag

Woody's not that surprising, I guess. But Michael Mann? Why you gotta do me like that?

a cross between lily allen and fetal alcohol syndrome (milo z), Sunday, 16 May 2010 22:36 (sixteen years ago)

word

http://gawker.com/5540368/polanski-petition-provides-helpful-list-of-frances-biggest-creeps

this sucks too: varda and assayas i like

all i wanna do is poll poll poll poll and zing and discuss mia (history mayne), Monday, 17 May 2010 10:05 (sixteen years ago)

he has suffered.... He has paid his due

he has?

huggable snuggable teddy bear (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 May 2010 15:55 (sixteen years ago)

you're forgetting he's a nice person

velko, Monday, 17 May 2010 15:58 (sixteen years ago)

"Public opinion polls in France consistently show between 65% and 75% of the population want to see him extradited to the United States."

Filmmaker, Author, Radio Host Stephen Baldwin (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 May 2010 16:00 (sixteen years ago)

"There are a million people out there in the United States, robbing banks... shooting people and selling narcotics. And they're going after a 75-, 77-year-old man who has for years has caused no trouble who's lived a good life," Allen added. "I feel they are wasting a lot of money to do this and it is not necessary...it is self-aggrandising and it's money foolishly spent."

Concluded Allen: "They should take the money they spent on the Polanski case and go after drug dealers and rapists."

velko, Monday, 17 May 2010 16:03 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.