Favorite poster from NR's "The Corner"

well i take that back bc she did say women think sex is better when they don't have to think about it. if you think of sex as a painful chore it's not such a great leap anymore

i think they're totally lame but i still lol at them

the great leap onto K.Lo [Mr. Que}

Talk about a painful chore!

i know, right?

well i take that back bc she did say women think sex is better when they don't have to think about it.

^^ only because they are participating in floozy culture with degenerate campus-trained liberal wastrels and not marrying mitt romney don't you see!??!

que stop it!

que stop it! [Mr. Que]

That's what she said!

man whenever she writes about sex or marriage or (iiick) manliness, or (mitt romney) all three, the air of virginal desperation is so so powerful

Yeah, I'm always torn between laughing and feeling sorry for her.

Laughing usually wins though.

i just imagine the serious heavy-hitter asshole dudes (non-goldberg) who post there rolling their damn eyes. can you imagine what an ancient fucking legbreaker like michael ledeen thinks about this woman? christ

i feel like it's gotten worse lately. all of her posts have been like this. maybe she lost the password to her livejournal.

she doesn't really post anything else besides links to other people's articles

unless it's about aborton/sex/marriage

then it's usually just like 1 or 2 lines anyways

<3 que

http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/6815/tricorner.jpg

never forget

that photo is more disgusting than wallogina

'sleeping with' [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
'sleeping with' [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
'sleeping with' [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
'sleeping with' [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
'sleeping with' [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
'sleeping with' [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

:((((((((((((((

if there was a wallok-lo my computer would get ruined by vomit

we've talked about this, but the worst part is her pale chest--terrifying

http://brownstate.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451be1b69e20105357094dd970c-450wi

also the fact that she has a colonial vagina on top of her head

she looks like sloth from goonies imo

Guys, her blouse is open in a vagina shape.

she looks like this thing from the Dark Crystal

http://toughpigs.com/uploaded_images/aughra-702672.jpg

alfred, i think i know what a vagina looks like

http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o135/Eye_of_Isis/sloth-goonies.jpg

I'm trying to tell you that she reeks of sex.

Love the shadow left behind in the no-man's-land of her unibrow. She must start tweezing at like 4am.

K-Lo Sex Reek [Mr. Que]

o-ho ho! she reeks alright!

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/154/klowonderwoman0jy.jpg

oh god she has hooves

where did... why did...

i just don't understand anymore

INVISIBLE PLANE

holy lolz

Little starbursts of joy.

stop

K-Lo Time

does anyone use 'sleeping with' to mean 'raping'? ever?

she was referring to a post further down the page by a former ny post film critic with this line:

That said, drugging a 13-year-old girl and then sleeping with her “consensually” is a very serious crime.

that said, i can't help but lol at her calling sex an "endeavor."

maybe she means that people who have had sex with her have told her it's like having sex with the Space Shuttle Endeavor

Maybe she means that people she's asked to have sex with always say "Never."

this is amazing. i really just don't understand the conservative life-world. this swings from reasonable assessment of facts to the most bizarre unreal assertions and fanciful mind-reading:

Polanski Justice [Jonathan Foreman]

It is true that it is fishy that the Swiss authorities have suddenly decided to arrest a man who a) has a home in their country, and b) has been going in and out of Switzerland for years and the authorities could have easily detained him on one of his many visits to the country since the U.S. made an international search request for Polanski in 2005. Their decision may or may not have something to do with Swiss efforts to suck up to the Obama administration or the U.S. government’s pressure on Switzerland to make its banking system more open to the IRS.

It is also fishy that Los Angeles’s politically ambitious DA, Steve Cooley, has suddenly decided to take up this sad case, and pursue a fugitive who apparently would not have jumped bail if a publicity-obsessed, criminally unethical L.A. judge had not broken a plea-bargain agreement. (See the excellent documentary Polanski - Wanted and Desired for a devastating reexamination of the whole affair).

That said, drugging a 13-year-old girl and then sleeping with her “consensually” is a very serious crime. (It is not statutory rape in its most absurd form as when an 18-year-old sleeps with his 17-year-old girlfriend.) It is a serious crime no matter how talented or famous an artist you happen to be or how much you’ve suffered in your life and regardless the general decadence of the age or your social circle.

So is jumping bail after you have been convicted of a crime.

The French don’t understand this because the French Republic is not yet a genuinely democratic society: It accords (pseudo) aristocratic privilege to famous artists.

(Poland objects to Polanski’s arrest for different reasons, out of nationalism and because Poland’s leaders are profoundly and justly angry with the United States for our disloyalty and ingratitude for Polish support in the war on terror.)

In America we generally do not forgive and forget a serious crime just because a criminal is good looking or well-born or well-connected (unless he is a member of the Kennedy clan) or because he has endured a terrible childhood.

We take the law seriously and work hard to apply it equally So it must be for the brilliant Roman Polanski (who has arguably never faced up to the reality of his crime or apologized for it).

That doesn’t mean that the courts shouldn’t show compassion and mercy once Polanski has been brought back to the United States but it does mean that he should be brought to justice.

— Jonathan Foreman reviewed movies for the New York Post from 1998 to 2004.

ok it makes more sense now. a little. xposts

YOU FORGOT POLAND!

John Derbyshire, a British-American conservative author and columnist for the National Review, has written a new book titled We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism. The book contains a section called “The Case Against Female Suffrage.” Yesterday on his radio show, Alan Colmes asked Derbyshire to articulate his argument.

DERBYSHIRE: Among the hopes that I do not realistically nurse is the hope that female suffrage will be repealed. But I’ll say this – if it were to be, I wouldn’t lose a minute’s sleep.

COLMES: We’d be a better country if women didn’t vote?

DERBYSHIRE: Probably. Don’t you think so?

COLMES: No, I do not think so whatsoever.

DERBYSHIRE: Come on Alan. Come clean here [laughing].

COLMES: We would be a better country? John Derbyshire making the statement, we would be a better country if women did not vote.

DERBYSHIRE: Yeah, probably.

(Via)

I guess he's figuring that this controversy can't help but sell a couple of copies. Hope he's wrong.

Jonathan Foreman reviewed movies for the New York Post from 1998 to 2004

OH JESUS CHRIST THIS MAN TOOK ME CLUBBING IN 1988, ack, sorry. His late father was Carl Foreman, blacklisted screenwriter, BTW.

Ha foreman sorta goes out of his way to inject the crazy into some very reasonable thinking

posts very much in character

Has Derbyshire come out in support of Polanski yet?