The talk show host went off on Aiken Monday morning on "Live With Regis and Kelly," saying "I don't think he was respectful in any way." She said Aiken was hostile toward her when they shared co-hosting duties on Friday's show.
She especially took issue with Aiken putting his hands over her mouth during an interview. She said you don't do that, even if it's for a laugh.
Ripa told Clay his actions were a "no, no," adding "I don't know where that hand's been, honey."
Regis Philbin said he's shocked the pair didn't hit it off, saying, "In my wildest dreams would I ever think that one day you would have a feud with Clay Aiken."
On The View" Tuesday, Rosie O'Donnell said Ripa's remark about Aiken's hand was homophobic. Aiken has been dogged by speculation about his sexuality but he's never answered.
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 20:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― anticon jemima (ooo), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 20:58 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 20:59 (nineteen years ago)
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 20:59 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)
xpost scott no
― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)
Wow, so you basically think that people who kill out of self-defense are the same as, say, Ted Bundy? I mean, there's context. That can go either way: speak in defense of the person who killed or against him/her.
I think it's hilarious Kelly said:"I don't know where his hand's been." Certainly not homophobic, just extremely silly.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:05 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=16838
ralph nader's still the bigger asshole, though.
jorel channelling gabbneb?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)
roffles.
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)
― wordy rappinghood (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Hall
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
-- Dr Morbius (wjwe...), November 21st, 2006 9:08 PM. (Dr Morbius) (later)
no, channelling everyone who would like to punch him (and by extension, you) for giving us 8 years of dubya. thanks, dick.
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
(i liked this thread better when it was about rodeo, hockey and football)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)
I still think a crowd that came to see Paul Rodriguez is selectively offended.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)
― anticon jemima (ooo), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)
belaboring the point, but people who legitimately kill in self-defense are often not convicted of murder. "convicted murderer" is someone who, whatever their claims of context or extenuating circumstances, has been judged guilty of murder.
anyway, in this case, there's no contextual basis for saying richards is not a racist. i'm sorry if it pains people to call people who give racist rants "racist," but for the word to have any meaning i think we probably have to.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:47 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:49 (nineteen years ago)
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
― stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:07 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:18 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:19 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:21 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Through a twenty deep screen of humourists (noodle vague), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:32 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:38 (nineteen years ago)
― nate p. (natepatrin), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 23:42 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:00 (nineteen years ago)
Like Jacques Cousteau diving in the sea, Richards says, "Masons must search the deepest parts of themselves, within any organization, to discover the uniqueness of their life unfolding."
Richards is not alone in his convictions. Past Grand Master Jack Levitt recently wrote: "Freemasonry's truths are covered with symbolism and its insights with allegory. It is necessary to look behind the fact to see the truth and beyond the symbol to see the reality."
And as Richards would say, the reality is you. "A Freemason is a man building up himself, coming into his own to highlight the individual that he is," he says.
When I ask Richards what symbol in Freemasonry strikes him as being especially important, he says, "When you go into our Lodge, on the back of the Tiler's chair are the words 'Know Thyself.' That's important. That is the ultimate message to all Freemasons; to truly know who you are."
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)
"The real Kramer is indeed of Jewish heritage -- not that there's anything wrong with that."
Weird.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:11 (nineteen years ago)
1) why couldn't "cracker" be as bad as the n-bomb? i mean, right, it's not referring to a history of rape, murder, subjugation--it's just referring to a history of raping, murdering, and subjugating. i mean "you're a subhuman" vs. "you're a cancer on the planet." how are these not reciprocal versions of the same fuck you? how does the latter not claim the indisputably higher "you're morally worthless" ground?
2) if only blacks get to use the n-word, perhaps only blacks should have the right to officially damn white users thereof?
― literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:28 (nineteen years ago)
― literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:30 (nineteen years ago)
Not to be contentious, but something like the Kill Bill thread was way worse in the argument department. This thread was quiet meditation comparatively.
xpost Though I could be proven wrong yet.
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:31 (nineteen years ago)
― literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:34 (nineteen years ago)