I suspect the people who voted for her were not thinking "yeah Labour's done well but let's try this bird, what the hell".
― Matt DC, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:05 (eighteen years ago)
"No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." http://i.thisislondon.co.uk/i/pix/2008/04/01a_28_Borisfront_415x275.jpg Not only that - they look like a pair of gormless sixth formers.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:17 (eighteen years ago)
I just went out to vote. The streets made me think of the GLC, of the passing years, of all that has happened, the municipal and suburban world I have known. The polling station with its quiet responsibility, its temporary moral seriousness. The sense of civic virtue in those who staff it. I took my time making the crosses, fearful of somehow getting it wrong. I placed a cross next to Ken Livingstone's name - then had to check repeatedly that I had got it right, as though constantly checking I hadn't left my keys behind. I voted Green second, because I like her and them; I know it won't count, but hope that they will know how many second votes they got. For London member, Green; for local member, Labour.
... It all moved me, voting. And I looked around the streets and thought, everyone else is doing it too - people in London surely care about this election. Perhaps this is, in some technical sense, Ken Livingstone's last day as Mayor - or perhaps that has even already gone. I am grateful to him, for his political efforts since I was a little boy.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:18 (eighteen years ago)
-- Matt DC
why can't that work with sian berry
― Frogman Henry, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:19 (eighteen years ago)
Just saw Mike on the Wallasey Cathedral. Bafflingly brilliant, as always.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:20 (eighteen years ago)
friends voting for boris is the worst :(
― ledge, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:22 (eighteen years ago)
"No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin."
Of course, Bevan's opinion of Labour in power was only one step above the Tory party.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:25 (eighteen years ago)
people in London surely care about this election
I wasn't exactly fighting thru the crowds on my way to the polling station this morning.
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:30 (eighteen years ago)
Have you, or anyone outside South Africa post-apartheid, ever fought through crowds to get to a polling station?
I believe that people in London care.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:34 (eighteen years ago)
Though I wish more of them felt the way I do.
I believe for every drop of rain that falls a flower grows.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:35 (eighteen years ago)
YouGov has it, at final polling, as Johnson 53 Livingstone 47. Which, sadly, sounds about right.
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:37 (eighteen years ago)
"I believe for every drop of rain that falls someone gets wet" (Spike Milligan)
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:38 (eighteen years ago)
Last one to leave for Stevenage please remember to turn out the lights.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:40 (eighteen years ago)
If a drop of rain falls in the middle of the forest, does it make someone wet?
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:40 (eighteen years ago)
I voted around 7:20am; around the same time as I did in 2004, I believe. In 2004, I don't recall seeing a soul enter/exit the place during the 100m walk up Chevening Road, while I was in there or on my way out. This time, I saw six people. So, there you go. 185% turnout.
― Michael Jones, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:42 (eighteen years ago)
Don't know if somebody's pondered this upthread or not: could a high-profile, blunder-strewn Boris mayorship actually dent the Tory's ratings before the next general election?
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3006/2436824909_de50172c4a.jpg
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:49 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3850640.ece
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:50 (eighteen years ago)
could a high-profile, blunder-strewn Boris mayorship actually dent the Tory's ratings before the next general election?
Maybe, still DO NOT WANT. Reminds me of people saying that Bush beating Kerry would be a good thing in the long run cos a 2nd Bush term would be so bad, the Dems would sweep Congress in '06. Which more or less happened but we still had another term of Bush.
― Michael Jones, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:50 (eighteen years ago)
I considered that but it's clutching at straws really. Don't think he'd be in long enough to do major damage to a Cameron election campaign.
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:52 (eighteen years ago)
I think BJ is a bit like W.
One person who said that 2004 result was good: Slavoj Zizek, in a long letter to the LRB, which for some reason they felt compelled to print.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:52 (eighteen years ago)
I was looking for crumbs of potential comfort, not a game plan.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:52 (eighteen years ago)
I remember the day after that 11.2004 election, the sense of desolation - talking to people like it was the end of the world. I suppose I later came to feel that it wasn't. But of course it was still a terrible result, and two terms is two more than W should ever have had.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:53 (eighteen years ago)
Another 110 posts and we'll have beaten the US election thread for the week.
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:54 (eighteen years ago)
I've been feeling a long-drawn out sense of desolation since about 6 weeks after the 1997 general election.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:55 (eighteen years ago)
I think it's been established in the public mind that there's a degree of separation between the Mayor and the national party, so a Boris cock-up may not necessarily harm Cameron.
Still, I don't think Cameron will allow Boris to make a balls-up of it, and Boris will be much more beholden to Cameron than Ken has been to Blair/Brown.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:57 (eighteen years ago)
I wasn't necessarily thinking of out-and-out cock-ups so much as a nice reminder to the country at large that New Conservatives aren't quite as touchy-feely as Cameron would like to paint them.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:00 (eighteen years ago)
Who could possibly think he would make a good mayor? I'm honestly befuddled. It seems like such a frivolous way to vote.
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:02 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, Britain's never struck me as a country in thrall to celebrity.
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:03 (eighteen years ago)
people = shit
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:03 (eighteen years ago)
Tracer, I don't know if you were in London at the time but there was a fairly wide-held view in 2000, particularly in the media, that Ken would be an absolute disaster as Mayor, that he wouldn't be able to run a major City, that it would be all gaffes and empty gestures etc. It didn't stop him getting elected and proving people wrong - I'm still worried about a similar thing happening with Johnson though.
Lol the thought of the country in general caring about 'touchy feely' at this point in time. "At least they're not Labour" is going to become the new "at least they're not the Tories", especially among voters too young to remember a Tory government.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:04 (eighteen years ago)
I don't think touchy-feely is much of a vote winner in Middle England these days anyway
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:06 (eighteen years ago)
Tho it might persuade a few "Liberals" to vote Tory
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:07 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah that's all pretty much true. The majority of the population is probably small c conservative, and Labour's attempt to shift what conservatism means a couple of millimetres to the left has probably only been skin deep. This is a depressing train of thought tho, really depressing. It generally leads straight down to gin and cackling about people getting the government they deserve, as grimly rightly points out.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:09 (eighteen years ago)
What attempt?
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:09 (eighteen years ago)
Seriously, millimetres.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:10 (eighteen years ago)
In what direction tho?
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:11 (eighteen years ago)
Allegedly more important news issues according to the BBC at the moment: babysitter to get retrial re. killing a kid, Austrian Pedodad round the twist, Maddy Maddy Maddy.
This country really will get the government it fucking deserves.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:15 (eighteen years ago)
I think there was an attempt to carry out some micro-redistribution of wealth which was unfortunately scuppered by their absolute terror of confronting big capital. The minimum wage is, cautiously, an improvement on how things were before. None of this is much use at all, but that's a slivver of clear blue water between them and the Tories.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:17 (eighteen years ago)
Considering one of Brown's last actions as Chancellor was to cut income tax for everyone except low earners, as a vote-wining ambulance ball to his future self as Prime Minister, I'm not sure even the line that people now accept higher overall taxation in return for improved public services stands.
New Labour have slashed their own consensus, if indeed this consensus existed in the first place. If we're honest the reason they won in the first place was because the Tories ballsed up the economy and then spent the next five years fucking and bribing anything that moved.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:17 (eighteen years ago)
Well maybe another 20 years of electoral kickings will sort the party out but I doubt it. lol democracy
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:20 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, forget all that rubbish and tell me more about Haifa Wehbe
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:20 (eighteen years ago)
Also, if we accept that post-Thatcher global capitalism is now so dominant in Britain that no government can really go against it (big assumption but run with me), then Blair's was the first 'new' government in this environment. We don't actually know how much further to the right the Tories will run, given the opportunity.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:20 (eighteen years ago)
people upthread using toynbees microscope again
― laxalt, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:21 (eighteen years ago)
For Britain subsititute England of course
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:22 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, sorry, I forget about Scotland.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:24 (eighteen years ago)
much as i love wee fat eck and his gang, he's hardly "going against global capitalism", is he? hello mr trump. hello what's left of the oil. etc.
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:25 (eighteen years ago)
Who said he was? Who is? Osama bin Laden? Stop Scottish independence or you will really be in the shitter, for now and eternity
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:26 (eighteen years ago)
"You" being the English, of course
― Tom D., Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:27 (eighteen years ago)