US Politics, July 2024 - "Will you just drop out, man?"

all Steve Ditko comics sent in get a perfect 10

Justice: We become totally unhinged if Donald Trump is not elected in November. pic.twitter.com/7dTBhAkW0i

— Acyn (@Acyn) July 16, 2024

Wait for when the camera zooms out.

Tucker Carlson purportedly told Trump last month that if he picked Rubio and not Vance as VP he might get assassinated by the deep state, @jonathanvswan & @maggieNYT report pic.twitter.com/A1T72e4pFl

— Andrew Prokop (@awprokop) July 16, 2024

lol xyzzzz

"A great candidate... for me to poop on."

https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/upload/c_crop,d_placeholder_euli9k,h_1688,w_3000,x_0,y_0/dpr_1.5/c_limit,w_655/fl_lossy,q_auto/v1714885394/Dog_akawkk

Not gonna lie, I'm finding myself growing more and more anxious about this election and what will follow. Like obviously terrified of the implications of another Trump presidency, but increasingly terrified about the immediate aftermath of Biden winning. I sincerely think we're going to see multiple mass shootings in the first half of November, it's going to be a terrifying time to be an American, even more than usual.

We're as likely to see mass GOP lawsuits should Biden win.

“I sincerely think we're going to see multiple mass shootings in the first half of November”

wtf

dont we have multiple mass shootings every month

I mean, this is America, I think you could safely pick any month on the calendar and say that. It's not really a bold prediction in this gun obsessed country?

But, yes, if Biden wins, I think there will be a marked increased in political violence. I don't think this is a controversial take.

and if Trump wins?

Then just our "normal" amount of mass shootings during our slide into full-on fascism, which will see a different stripe of political violence. But it won't be the pure chaos of "totally unhinged" armed Trump supporters.

rolling "biden's gonna win in november" containment thread

Trump and his folks are absolutely convinced they're winning this election. For good reason. If it turns out they don't they will never accept it.

I mean, the MAGA crowd has been openly dog-whistling calls for violence for years now, should they lose, I don't know why it's controversial in the least to mention my anxiety around that.

I don't think people are saying it is controversial. They are saying shit is going to pop off/not pop off almost regardless.

lol ivy

The possibilities of political violence that worry me most aren't so much at the national level — always possible, but logistically harder to pull off — as at local levels across the country and especially in red states. Under either a Biden or Trump presidency, I can imagine ongoing targeted harassment of disfavored local politicians and groups (like, Pride centers in Southern cities, media outlets, mosques, immigrant rights groups), from broken windows all the way up to shootings and bombs. The successful anti-abortion terrorism campaign — which had already limited access many places even before Dobbs — is one recent template, but of course you can also look back to the KKK and others.

The number of right-wing gun nuts and "tactical" bros out there itching for a chance to hurt people is considerable. Even if they never get their "Day of the Rope," I'll be surprised if they don't make themselves more of a presence.

And as with the KKK in its heyday, those kinds of militia violence let the official realms of conservative power maintain plausible deniability — tut-tutting and probably even arresting and charging specific actors — while enforcing a broad social compliance via fear. Old tactic, obviously.

I mean, what exactly are they waiting for? why aren’t they starting shit now?

xp ah ok your last post does elucidate!

Yeah, I thought there would have been more already, post-Jan. 6. Maybe they need some kind of "permission" granted, either by Trump's election (enforcing the new order) or his defeat (the corrupt system must be torn down).

And maybe it'll never reach a boil, who knows. I just feel like you don't stockpile that many guns and engage in that much violent fever-dreaming without something popping off.

kinda lost to the sands of time but there used to be a lot more political violence in america not that long ago, saw some thing where in one year in chicago in the 70s like 12 cops were ambushed and shot there were highjackings all sorts of weird little bombings and so forth, i can understand why people think that were gonna be looking at a rise in political violence specifically from the right due to the very fash stuff going on, but worth noting it hasnt really happened yet despite all the saber rattling for the better part of a decade, kinda easy considering what a bad place this country is in politically to be like violence in the streets of course but not sure thats actually where were at for any number of reasons, robust police state people mostly being internet gangsters etc, the police themselves are more worth worrying about than civilians imo, and worth noting that even in situations where you do see a lot of political street violence the more pervasive harm is being done in various government buildings

^^^

We used to see more congressmen dying in duels or almost bludgeoned to death. Fun times!

when you put it that way it sounds p good

Sometimes Senators still get beat up by their neighbors

most Republican voters are cowards, the ones willing to get rowdy all gathered on 1/6 and it worked out poorly for all of them, I really don't think another thing like that is in the cards. maybe I'm wrong. 4 years is a lot of time I suppose.

Biden, unable to read the teleprompter, stops, squints, leans in, and mangles his own major policy he's rolling out - telling the crowd he's capping rent raises at no more than $55. It's actually 5%.pic.twitter.com/CdFzGN1oWb

— Branko Marcetic (@BMarchetich) July 17, 2024

bernie really has biden in a vise

*AOC pantomiming throat-slitting, holding up 5 fingers twice in succession*

https://bsgeneralstore.com/products/hillbillies-need-no-elegy

We used to see more congressmen dying in duels or almost bludgeoned to death

in the streets

most Republican voters are cowards, the ones willing to get rowdy all gathered on 1/6 and it worked out poorly for all of them, I really don't think another thing like that is in the cards. maybe I'm wrong. 4 years is a lot of time I suppose.

― frogbs, Wednesday, July 17, 2024 10:46 AM (one minute ago)

yeah I think/hope this is true. most MAGA freaks are materially comfortable enough to not really want to ruin their lives doing violent crimes when it comes down to it.

also while right-wing protests & actions are never policed like left-wing ones, if Biden wins I'd think someone with authority would start prepping for another 1/6 or two

no fuck that, $55 is correct, he said it, hold him to it.

in fact, all rent should be $55 only

how much could one rent possibly cost

I paid $55 for my rent the other day, fucking inflation.

55 burgers, 55 fries, 55 dollars in rent

Minutemen or Sammy Hagar on the brain.

Bernie working to move the Overton window is a great idea, so long as we have 2026 and 2028 elections.

― papal hotwife (milo z)

i know we love our narratives, and yeah it's easy to look at 2021 and say "beer hall putsch", but come on, is that really plausible? like is trump in 2025 really going to be more powerful than trump in 2017?

i mean going back to what i said in the trump thread, the issue isn't that trump is _strong_, it's that the democrats are _weak_, and bernie pushing for the democrats to commit more strongly to left-wing ideas is... i mean me personally, i think it's _necessary_ for the democrats to stand for _something_ besides "donald trump is bad". i mean if we're gonna do facile historical analogies, for 20 years america had a party that ran on the platform of "andrew jackson is bad" that didn't take a coherent stance on the, like, single most important or pressing thing in america. the jacksonian democrats had an unabashedly pro-slavery policy, and the whigs were like "um, uh... we can see both sides of the issue, really." which was and is a grossly inadequate response. the democrats _need to meaningfully stand for something_.

The possibilities of political violence that worry me most aren't so much at the national level — always possible, but logistically harder to pull off — as at local levels across the country and especially in red states. Under either a Biden or Trump presidency, I can imagine ongoing targeted harassment of disfavored local politicians and groups (like, Pride centers in Southern cities, media outlets, mosques, immigrant rights groups), from broken windows all the way up to shootings and bombs. The successful anti-abortion terrorism campaign — which had already limited access many places even before Dobbs — is one recent template, but of course you can also look back to the KKK and others.

The number of right-wing gun nuts and "tactical" bros out there itching for a chance to hurt people is considerable. Even if they never get their "Day of the Rope," I'll be surprised if they don't make themselves more of a presence.

― Blitz Primary (tipsy mothra)

i've talked about this before and i'll keep talking about it. being a victim in a mass shooting is a _a very real consideration_ for me. the main thing that worried about me the shooting is that it's pride over here this weekend, and violence, well, often begets violence. the republicans stoke all this fearmongering about trans people, that we're an existential threat to america or something, and, well. there are a lot of trans people here, and there are also a lot of people with a lot of guns who are taking what the republicans are saying very seriously. queer people have already been targeted in mass shootings. and out here, pride is this weekend. queer people are going to be out in force.

i'm not interested in being a martyr. i'm not interested in dying for what i believe in. i'm interested in living for what i believe in. all i can say is that i'm gonna show up this weekend, i'm gonna be working a booth for my employer, and i'm gonna keep showing up. and we'll keep doing our best to keep each other safe. but yeah. a mass shooting against trans people in portland, i'd say that's a lot more likely than trump cancelling elections in 2026.

is trump in 2025 really going to be more powerful than trump in 2017?

Well, it gets back to something I was talking about upthread — Trump in '25 will be the same guy, but the political landscape is much different. The degree to which red states have rolled well into authoritarian territory already in the last eight years, and the degree to which federal courts have allowed them to do so, makes for a much friendlier environment to a national authoritarian push. Under Biden, the federal government has litigated against several of those efforts, sometimes with success, and in other cases has found workarounds to keep federal funding flowing to various programs even after Republican states have tried to cut it off.

Plus also obviously you have Project 2025, there's a real concerted vision now for moving the U.S. into full-on authoritarianism — which legs of which chairs need to be sawed off, which people need to be installed where, which bogus legal doctrines they're going to try to use. None of that existed in 2017 or if it did the people pushing it were random cranks kept to some degree in check by "the grownups" in the administration. Now the cranks are completely in charge of the party.

So yeah, Trump's not different, but the circumstances are.

All that said, I expect implementation of many of those would-be diktats to be chaotic and stupid and to engender pushback and blowback of all kinds. A lot of the people in charge of these things will be bozos, and their ideas are bad and unpopular. So that there will be some roadblocks on the path to their glorious Christian Nationalist future.

Well, it gets back to something I was talking about upthread — Trump in '25 will be the same guy, but the political landscape is much different. The degree to which red states have rolled well into authoritarian territory already in the last eight years, and the degree to which federal courts have allowed them to do so, makes for a much friendlier environment to a national authoritarian push. Under Biden, the federal government has litigated against several of those efforts, sometimes with success, and in other cases has found workarounds to keep federal funding flowing to various programs even after Republican states have tried to cut it off.

Plus also obviously you have Project 2025, there's a real concerted vision now for moving the U.S. into full-on authoritarianism — which legs of which chairs need to be sawed off, which people need to be installed where, which bogus legal doctrines they're going to try to use. None of that existed in 2017 or if it did the people pushing it were random cranks kept to some degree in check by "the grownups" in the administration. Now the cranks are completely in charge of the party.

So yeah, Trump's not different, but the circumstances are.

All of this completely ignores the fact that blue states have gotten a hell of a lot bluer in the last eight years — it started as resistance to Trump's first-term bullshit, but it flourished under Biden. I don't see New York or New Jersey or Massachusetts or California (you know, the states that drive the US economy) allowing themselves to be Alabama-ized in the coming years. I would expect resistance and pushback that's an exact mirror image of what assholes like Greg Abbott and Tate Reeves have pulled on Biden.

Yep, the blue states will push back, sure. But the overall US political environment is much more friendly to Trump now than it was in his first term, because the entire GOP apparatus down to state and local parties is much more enthusiastically authoritarian and Trump-oriented than it was in the first term. That revolution continued happening after he lost in 2020, and the convention this week is the absolute certification of that. Christian nationalism and authoritarianism have been present in the party for a long time, but they ARE the party now.

That doesn’t mean Trump will just be able to do whatever he wants. But he spent a lot of his term as a quasi-isolated figure even within his own administration. That is obviously not going to be true in round two. He will have lots of eager helpers both inside the administration and in Republican-controlled territories all over the country.

All that said, I expect implementation of many of those would-be diktats to be chaotic and stupid and to engender pushback and blowback of all kinds. A lot of the people in charge of these things will be bozos, and their ideas are bad and unpopular. So that there will be some roadblocks on the path to their glorious Christian Nationalist future.

― Blitz Primary (tipsy mothra)

yeah, this is my experience here. ok, project 2025, sure. trump had all of the legal authority he needed in _2017_ to make america an authoritarian state. i mean my experience is that the trump administration sent people in unmarked cars to kidnap people of the streets of portland in 2020. and people started calling them out for it on twitter and then they denied it and then like a day later admitted it and then said "well we're sending DHS troops to restore order in portland" and then in portland we were like "uh nobody invited you" and then they said "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" and left. like this is not an effective authoritarian regime

have things changed in the last four years? yes. a number of state laws have passed making it illegal for me to pee. how on _earth_ do they expect to enforce that law? some states have set up hotlines to report cases of suspected gender affirming care, and those hotlines were immediately overrun by calls from dissidents practicing civil disobedience. great, trump can legally do anything he wants, but i mean... he already _has been_. this is some "the south will rise again" shit. like you rose again. you're in power. you control things. they control things _now_, i'd argue, because the democrats aren't effectively opposing anything they do. and people are saying, what, if trump becomes president, things are going to get _really_ bad? because they're going to change some policies to make it not illegal to do the stuff they're _already doing_ under biden?

maybe i'm wrong. overall, though, i do find it more likely that i'll be shot this weekend. and i don't find it terribly likely that i'll be shot this weekend.

That doesn’t mean Trump will just be able to do whatever he wants. But he spent a lot of his term as a quasi-isolated figure even within his own administration. That is obviously not going to be true in round two. He will have lots of eager helpers both inside the administration and in Republican-controlled territories all over the country.

― Blitz Primary (tipsy mothra)

it's the republican-controlled areas. it's texas. it's florida. they're not _safe_ for trans people. like actually not safe. i got friends who live in texas and they got it much, much worse than me. anybody who can get out is getting out. people show up in portland from texas every week. refugees. nobody acknowledges it, nobody will say it, but they're refugees, they're desperate, they're homeless, they're out on the street. it's gotten a lot worse over the past four years. all of the things so many people are worried about happening if trump becomes president again, they're _already happening_ and it's frustrating because most people _don't_ recognize what's happening, don't recognize the extent of it. if in florida or texas or whatever they started putting trans people in camps, would the federal government act to stop them? because i don't believe they would.

would the _american people_, by and large, be ok with that? fuck no. fuck. no. if people were more informed about what's happening, what the republicans in republican-controlled areas are _doing_... when i tell people they're horrified. they can't imagine it happening. and that does worry me, i guess. but it doesn't worry me that much, because when i tell people what's happening, they _listen_ and they _believe me_. a lot of times, you know... people don't believe things because they can't imagine it being true. what's happening now... when people know what's happening, they believe it.

they control things _now_, i'd argue, because the democrats aren't effectively opposing anything they do. and people are saying, what, if trump becomes president, things are going to get _really_ bad?

I mean, deputizing federal troops to round up and deport 1 million immigrants a year would be a pretty big deal in and of itself! There are things he could have done or tried to do in his first term but he didn't do because he didn't know he could or he had people around him saying he couldn't. This will be a different and much more aggressive administration.

Now, can they actually DO a lot of this stuff? Just on a logistical basis, a lot of it will be hard even if they navigate or neuter the courts. (e.g. I think deporting 1 million people a year is a total Stephen Miller fantasy. But they can definitely fuck with a whole lot of people.) Plus also see above about how many of these people are opportunists and/or fools. They are not going to sweep in like some well-oiled efficient operation. And everything will remain subject to Trump's whims, too.

But this isn't going to be first-term Trump part 2. It will be different.

Again the schedule F plan to fire thousands of senior civil servants will devastate the economy of the community I work for and the lives of friends. And Trump tried to do it just as he was leaving office the last time