^this
I keep thinking about the Kavanaugh hearings during all this.
― keen reverberations of twee (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 16 February 2024 03:46 (two years ago)
Yes you said what I mean but better
― felicity, Friday, 16 February 2024 03:47 (two years ago)
No! :-)
― keen reverberations of twee (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 16 February 2024 03:48 (two years ago)
But Kavanaugh’s performance made him even less credible
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 16 February 2024 04:06 (two years ago)
It was pretty roundly mocked as well
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 16 February 2024 04:07 (two years ago)
And it made no difference
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 February 2024 04:13 (two years ago)
Kavanaugh's audience wasn't a solitary judge, but a Republican controlled Senate who for their political safety were going to vote for his confirmation even if he'd started jumping up and down on the table screaming profanities at his Democratic questioners.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Friday, 16 February 2024 04:15 (two years ago)
They’re not entirely comparable , and yet my mind juxtaposes them as telling panels of the national collage.
― keen reverberations of twee (collardio gelatinous), Friday, 16 February 2024 04:23 (two years ago)
xp i believe i understand everyone's points re ms willis, and thanks for the patient splains. i continue to root for her strongly. i'm not disappointed, not my job, i am just sorta surprised. no gifts to those bastards pls.
― a single gunshot and polite applause (Hunt3r), Friday, 16 February 2024 04:28 (two years ago)
It really is such Karening and "hey look over there" bullshit and should not be a thing.
― felicity, Friday, 16 February 2024 05:00 (two years ago)
Trial level judges have seen a lot and will be more understanding. If the judge is good he should rule no disqualificatiom and just let them make their record for the appellate court to deal with.
― felicity, Friday, 16 February 2024 05:02 (two years ago)
One can both think she shouldn't be disqualified and she did herself no favors (with her decisions on and off the stand).
Having a "romantic relationship" (in the parlance of the questioning) with a coworker, especially one that might arguably be classified as a direct report, is incredibly dumb, regardless of the situation. It might not blow up on you, but it very easily can.
I felt bad for her having to discuss some of these matters on the stand.
Of course the entire thing is completely cynical - Trump is a cornered, desperate animal willing to thrash anyone to break free.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Friday, 16 February 2024 12:45 (two years ago)
Yeah, I don't know what the HR department is like in the Fulton County court system, but at my job, we have to participate in a training every other year that drives this home.
― peace, man, Friday, 16 February 2024 14:15 (two years ago)
I think this Judge (McAfee) has showed himself to be fair and averse to bullshit, so even if Willis was snippy, I think the Judge would probably give her the benefit of the doubt.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 February 2024 14:17 (two years ago)
I agree the optics are not the best, but I don't know if I'd go so far as to say lawyers should never date coworkers. There are specific ethics rules around it. The Obamas met at work. Many lawyers I know met their SO at work.
Then again I live in LA and it's more culturally relaxed than NYC (ime)
― felicity, Friday, 16 February 2024 14:23 (two years ago)
Oh, I know it goes on in the real world - all the time!. My wife works at a large firm and has partners who have married attorneys they met at work (who no longer work at the firm, thank god). It's just kind of a, to be crass, don't shit (fuck) where you eat situation, for me.
Obviously hope the judge does not disqualify her and she goes on to convict Trump for his obvious crimes.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Friday, 16 February 2024 14:44 (two years ago)
Day 2 of this nonsense about kicking off now
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Friday, 16 February 2024 14:47 (two years ago)
That there is a Day 2 is ridiculous.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Friday, 16 February 2024 14:49 (two years ago)
to be fair, the judge did say up front that he expected the hearing to take two days, but it's ridiculous it's happening at all
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Friday, 16 February 2024 14:52 (two years ago)
apologize in advance, this is mostly restatment of my prev, but my experience says that if you stay right with the judge, and you have not violated the law wrt conflicts, and she sounds clear from what i've read/heard, she should be fine. but stay right with the judge, no matter your justifiable fury. she is a pro, she knows this, i tend to think her steps are intentional here. i do not know her history with this judge or her opinion of this judge and i'm confident she has both, but counselor-- stay right with the judge here pls.
― a single gunshot and polite applause (Hunt3r), Friday, 16 February 2024 16:14 (two years ago)
I think she may have previously been the judge's boss
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Friday, 16 February 2024 16:15 (two years ago)
lol i stayed out of court but ppl who both know and are way better'n me always said "you get credibility with a judge one time only. don't fuck it up."
― a single gunshot and polite applause (Hunt3r), Friday, 16 February 2024 16:18 (two years ago)
fani's dad is on the stand.
― scott seward, Friday, 16 February 2024 16:26 (two years ago)
Willis’ father explains why he always keeps cash. pic.twitter.com/mnfYDAsyC5— Acyn (@Acyn) February 16, 2024
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 February 2024 17:25 (two years ago)
It's notable that a couple things he said like "always keep 6 months worth of cash on hand" and the description of the safes he has in the house match exactly with Fani Willis' testimony. I don't think there can be any doubt that the way that both Wade and Willis described how she paid for everything in cash is true.
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Friday, 16 February 2024 17:37 (two years ago)
BTW, the live chat on the Atlanta News First stream that I've been watching is an utterly insane non-stop flurry of racist comments, extremely ugly
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Friday, 16 February 2024 18:03 (two years ago)
At the risk of sounding flip 1) are you surprised and 2) surely there's a way to watch without having to see anyone's chat
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 February 2024 18:16 (two years ago)
It's only if you stream it on YouTube, and there is absolutely an option to hide the chat.
― peace, man, Friday, 16 February 2024 18:20 (two years ago)
Totally forgot, isn't the Engoron decision coming today?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 February 2024 19:56 (two years ago)
Supposedly.
― Cow_Art, Friday, 16 February 2024 19:56 (two years ago)
Judges tend to ignore their self-imposed deadlines if they become inconvenient. Or so I hear.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Friday, 16 February 2024 19:58 (two years ago)
300+ million dollar fine in the NYC case
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:03 (two years ago)
370!
― I painted my teeth (sleeve), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:05 (two years ago)
i havent been keeping a total all the money hes been ordered to pay but it seems like a lot
― lag∞n, Friday, 16 February 2024 20:08 (two years ago)
He's going to have to look in the sofa cushions
Or send out a few more emails
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:10 (two years ago)
banned from new york for 3 years.
― scott seward, Friday, 16 February 2024 20:11 (two years ago)
Should be a physical ban imo
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:12 (two years ago)
yeah, banned from doing business for 3 years. i guess he could still go catch a broadway show.
― scott seward, Friday, 16 February 2024 20:13 (two years ago)
The former president denied any wrongdoing, calling the case "a fraud on me."
― lag∞n, Friday, 16 February 2024 20:13 (two years ago)
President Diarrhea and his lick spittles consistently whine and moan about how he is being treated unfairly, unlawfully, the deep state is fucking him and real murricans over…
But if you, and only you, an individual participating in ILX who hates Pres Diarrhea and MAGS fuckheads and their cretinous culture with every fiber of your being, found out that there was indeed a deep state conspiracy, which uses unfair/unlawful means to prevent him from assuming the presidency again, would you approve of it? This would mean that he would be irrelevant going forward from now until the day he suffers a grotesque and painful malady resulting in his death. Would you be okay with him being rendered ineffective by completely illegal subterfuge?
― veronica moser, Friday, 16 February 2024 20:15 (two years ago)
* lady gaga voice *
FRAUD. ON. ME.
― Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:15 (two years ago)
xp Yes, I believe I would.
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:16 (two years ago)
Link with more
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/ny-fraud-case-damages-pay-millions-judge-engoron-rcna135283
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 February 2024 20:17 (two years ago)
If I correctly understand what I just heard reported on MSNBC, the ruling bars Trump from obtaining any loans from any bank or business which is licensed to do business in New York state for a period of 3 years. That will totally screw over his ability to pay judgments against him without liquidating large amounts of his assets.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:17 (two years ago)
Oh darn!
Especially since IIRC if he wants to appeal he has to put up the amount fined within 30 days.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 February 2024 20:21 (two years ago)
Would you be okay with him being rendered ineffective by completely illegal subterfuge?
Show me some illegal subterfuge and then I'll consider what it means to me.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:21 (two years ago)
Fraud on me vs Down on Me vs Crazy on on You...
Any word on whether he will ever actually pay anything out as a result of these fines/judgments/rulings?
I know that it is not good news for him, but I just want to make sure he suffers, instead of kicking the can down the road endlessly.
― fleetwood macrame (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:22 (two years ago)
With any luck, the stress will kill him.
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:23 (two years ago)
of course not that's what the RNC is for
― frogbs, Friday, 16 February 2024 20:26 (two years ago)
Further thought: It's interesting that all these cases and appeals and fines and civil judgments are being handled by his lawyers. Lawyers that he has no intention of paying, ever.
Motherfucker needs some goddamn consequences
― fleetwood macrame (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 16 February 2024 20:27 (two years ago)