20.5
― gff, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link
1.21 gigawatts
― bnw, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link
23.2
― franny glass, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link
xp - great scott!
― gabbneb, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link
28.2 - was under 25 before I quit smoking :(
Can't imagine getting down into the 150-160 range and still looking healthy.
― milo z, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link
17.75, give or take .35 based on how I've much I've starved myself in the last week.
Straight dope on BMI:
"(BMI) is both a convenient and reliable indicator of obesity." ... Yes, it's great for estimating the fitness of groups of people, but used to assess any one individual it can sometimes produce an iffy answer. Since it doesn't differentiate between fat weight and muscle weight, and since muscle is denser than fat, people who are especially muscular tend to score as fatter than they really are. (Most NBA superstars — e.g., LeBron James, listed at six-eight and 240 — are classed as at least mildly overweight.) BMI also glosses over the issue of fat distribution — excess weight carried around the waist is more unhealthy than extra inches on the hips.
― Leee, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link
i should put an andwhat-disapproved collidge picture of myself somewhere prominent as motivation
― gabbneb, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link
25.1 shiiiiit, and i had a haircut earlier
― blueski, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link
it was the lol creme
― gabbneb, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link
19. It was 17 until a couple of years ago.
― Alba, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link
18.9. That, for me, is rather high.
― suzy, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link
you discovered a meal between breakfast and brunch (xp)
― blueski, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link
That applies to me too, Steve: it's called Leftover Vietnamese Food.
― suzy, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link
have you ever ordered but then not eaten any of it until the next morning? it's an ambition of mine
― blueski, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link
EIGHTEEN http://www.charlestonseafood.com/images/Amazon/Shrimp-cooked-500.jpg POINT http://www.averyrailing.com/handrail1.jpg TWO http://farm1.static.flickr.com/121/289964817_abb7fca85d.jpg
― Z S, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link
That Ruth Fowler article is awful but she'll go away if her soon to be published book bombs. Give it time.
Steve: This is easy to do if you live on your own and need to order a minimum value of delivered food. I always get a 'dinner box' of lemongrass prawns on rice noodles and immediately put it into the fridge for the next day's lunch. The breakfast leftovers I am really talking about are things like salt and chilli spare ribs, chicken satay and crispy duck with pancakes.
I'm going to have to stop with the over-ordering and totally throw away my microwave.
― suzy, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link
23.4. My peak of fattitude was 25.1 when I was 23. I then drastically lost weight down to 17.8 in my mid-twenties before settling around 23-24 since. Didn't change my diet at all!
― Colonel Poo, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link
mine is like 30
― czn, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link
I scored 23.3 with a rough guess at my weight (I'm also unsure of my exact height, I may be 1 inch taller - I don't weigh or measure myself for I dislike thinking of my own corporeality). I am definitely fatter than a 23.3, mind you: I should be scoring at least slightly in the 'overweight' section rather than the 'normal' one.
― emil.y, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link
When I was 23 I was in a much worse shape than when I've been close to that recently - it was all beer gut, whereas now I'm just a bit bigger overall. I'm tall though so it's easier to get away with it.
― Colonel Poo, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago) link
or a 100
― czn, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago) link
24, thank god for being really tall because I'm way out of shape and beefing up.
― stet, Saturday, 12 April 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link
GUYS BMI DOESNT TELL YOU ANYTHING, IT IS A RED HERRING
-- bell_labs, Saturday, 12 April 2008 06:17 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link
Dead set, mine's 24.0 and my body fat is somewhere below 10%
― Autumn Almanac, Saturday, 12 April 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link
20.9
― water, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:09 (sixteen years ago) link
20.1
― Sundar, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:30 (sixteen years ago) link
26.1
but i had to roughly guess my weight, and i'm not even completely sure of my height.
― Rubyredd, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:32 (sixteen years ago) link
At 5'10", I'd have to be 128 lbs to be underweight... which actually seems fair to me, slightly high even. The limit on the other end of the 'normal' spectrum might be less fair, yes.
xpost
― Sundar, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:33 (sixteen years ago) link
24.1
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:51 (sixteen years ago) link
23.7
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link
17.6
― Jacob, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link
I am a skinny motherfucker.
22.9 right now...I AM TALL WOMANG
― Abbott, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link
23, i could lose about 10 lbs.
― gershy, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link
I think mine is around 24, though I haven't weighed myself for ages. It used to be around 20 when I was in my early twenties, but I've gained some weight after that. Which is okay, because I don't think the super-skinny indie look really fits me.
― Tuomas, Saturday, 12 April 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago) link
23.5. Peaked at 26 fourteen years ago. Never again.
― Mark C, Saturday, 12 April 2008 14:36 (sixteen years ago) link
Also in the 27 range. Hmph.
― Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link
28.9
― Kerm, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link
19
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link
18
who wants a kookie
― warmsherry, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link
30.6.
Again, bmi is bullshit. The only way I could go back to that level is to return to my 17 year old self, before the half-assed weighttraining and when I was still running cross country my senior year.
BFI is what you should be concerned about.
i like this answer: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080330164202AAgAgME
― kingfish, Saturday, 12 April 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link
well the *best* way to truly gauge this sort of thing is to slice yourself in half and count the fat rings.
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link
about 24.74
― gabbneb, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link
(woo!)
― gabbneb, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link
16.7, which is actually up from a year ago when it would have been 15.3
I am, how you say, less than healthy.
― en i see kay, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link
Y'all are way too skinny. At least me and my fat will float when the sea levels rise
― StanM, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link
19.5 I feel kind of out of shape from winter
― daria-g, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago) link
lol @ humungous fatteys bitching about fat gauge telling them they're fat!!!!!
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link
FAT FAT HUGE FAT PEOPLE YOU EAT TOO MUCH LOL
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link
Somebody turn on a fan...
― Kerm, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link
I'm not fat, I'm PHAT.
(which is like Korpulent)
― Oilyrags, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link