Calculate and post your BMI

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (244 of them)

20.5

gff, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

1.21 gigawatts

bnw, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

23.2

franny glass, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

xp - great scott!

gabbneb, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

28.2 - was under 25 before I quit smoking :(

Can't imagine getting down into the 150-160 range and still looking healthy.

milo z, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

17.75, give or take .35 based on how I've much I've starved myself in the last week.

Straight dope on BMI:

"(BMI) is both a convenient and reliable indicator of obesity."
...
Yes, it's great for estimating the fitness of groups of people, but used to assess any one individual it can sometimes produce an iffy answer. Since it doesn't differentiate between fat weight and muscle weight, and since muscle is denser than fat, people who are especially muscular tend to score as fatter than they really are. (Most NBA superstars — e.g., LeBron James, listed at six-eight and 240 — are classed as at least mildly overweight.) BMI also glosses over the issue of fat distribution — excess weight carried around the waist is more unhealthy than extra inches on the hips.

Leee, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

i should put an andwhat-disapproved collidge picture of myself somewhere prominent as motivation

gabbneb, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

25.1 shiiiiit, and i had a haircut earlier

blueski, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

it was the lol creme

gabbneb, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link

19. It was 17 until a couple of years ago.

Alba, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

18.9. That, for me, is rather high.

suzy, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

you discovered a meal between breakfast and brunch (xp)

blueski, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

That applies to me too, Steve: it's called Leftover Vietnamese Food.

suzy, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

have you ever ordered but then not eaten any of it until the next morning? it's an ambition of mine

blueski, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

That Ruth Fowler article is awful but she'll go away if her soon to be published book bombs. Give it time.

Steve: This is easy to do if you live on your own and need to order a minimum value of delivered food. I always get a 'dinner box' of lemongrass prawns on rice noodles and immediately put it into the fridge for the next day's lunch. The breakfast leftovers I am really talking about are things like salt and chilli spare ribs, chicken satay and crispy duck with pancakes.

I'm going to have to stop with the over-ordering and totally throw away my microwave.

suzy, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

23.4. My peak of fattitude was 25.1 when I was 23. I then drastically lost weight down to 17.8 in my mid-twenties before settling around 23-24 since. Didn't change my diet at all!

Colonel Poo, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

mine is like 30

czn, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I scored 23.3 with a rough guess at my weight (I'm also unsure of my exact height, I may be 1 inch taller - I don't weigh or measure myself for I dislike thinking of my own corporeality). I am definitely fatter than a 23.3, mind you: I should be scoring at least slightly in the 'overweight' section rather than the 'normal' one.

emil.y, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

When I was 23 I was in a much worse shape than when I've been close to that recently - it was all beer gut, whereas now I'm just a bit bigger overall. I'm tall though so it's easier to get away with it.

Colonel Poo, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago) link

or a 100

czn, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago) link

24, thank god for being really tall because I'm way out of shape and beefing up.

stet, Saturday, 12 April 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link

GUYS BMI DOESNT TELL YOU ANYTHING, IT IS A RED HERRING

-- bell_labs, Saturday, 12 April 2008 06:17 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

Dead set, mine's 24.0 and my body fat is somewhere below 10%

Autumn Almanac, Saturday, 12 April 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link

20.9

water, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:09 (sixteen years ago) link

20.1

Sundar, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:30 (sixteen years ago) link

26.1

but i had to roughly guess my weight, and i'm not even completely sure of my height.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:32 (sixteen years ago) link

At 5'10", I'd have to be 128 lbs to be underweight... which actually seems fair to me, slightly high even. The limit on the other end of the 'normal' spectrum might be less fair, yes.

xpost

Sundar, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:33 (sixteen years ago) link

24.1

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:51 (sixteen years ago) link

23.7

johnny crunch, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

17.6

Jacob, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I am a skinny motherfucker.

Jacob, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link

22.9 right now...I AM TALL WOMANG

Abbott, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

23, i could lose about 10 lbs.

gershy, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I think mine is around 24, though I haven't weighed myself for ages. It used to be around 20 when I was in my early twenties, but I've gained some weight after that. Which is okay, because I don't think the super-skinny indie look really fits me.

Tuomas, Saturday, 12 April 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago) link

23.5. Peaked at 26 fourteen years ago. Never again.

Mark C, Saturday, 12 April 2008 14:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Also in the 27 range. Hmph.

Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

28.9

Kerm, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

19

Tracer Hand, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

18

who wants a kookie

warmsherry, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

30.6.

Again, bmi is bullshit. The only way I could go back to that level is to return to my 17 year old self, before the half-assed weighttraining and when I was still running cross country my senior year.

BFI is what you should be concerned about.

i like this answer: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080330164202AAgAgME

kingfish, Saturday, 12 April 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

well the *best* way to truly gauge this sort of thing is to slice yourself in half and count the fat rings.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link

about 24.74

gabbneb, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

(woo!)

gabbneb, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link

16.7, which is actually up from a year ago when it would have been 15.3

I am, how you say, less than healthy.

en i see kay, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Y'all are way too skinny. At least me and my fat will float when the sea levels rise

StanM, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

19.5
I feel kind of out of shape from winter

daria-g, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ humungous fatteys bitching about fat gauge telling them they're fat!!!!!

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

FAT FAT HUGE FAT PEOPLE YOU EAT TOO MUCH LOL

El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Somebody turn on a fan...

Kerm, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not fat, I'm PHAT.

(which is like Korpulent)

Oilyrags, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.