ok, so another thing I've been thinking about is the integration of rss feeds in search results. I'm a total cpu noob so I have no idea of the feasibility of this, but it'd be nice to be able to subscribe to rss feeds of search words or individual posters.
― Gigolo Grasiento (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:27 (sixteen years ago)
Baaderonixx, it's something I'd like to do, but it is really quite tricky to do without making a site come to a standstill... To be useful, you have to customise for each user (in the way you mention), which makes it very hard to keep data in memory (needed to make the site run quickly and smoothly), and in addition to this, you have RSS readers that automatically hit the server every 30 seconds checking for updates!
As I say, I'd like to do it in some fashion - it's pretty easy technically, but pretty hard to ensure the site continues to work well.
I know other sites have it, but then sites like Slashdot have something like eighty servers; whereas, ILX has one.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)
hey keith i don't think i have many but can u tell me how many sb's i ahve?
― mark cl, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)
just curious
Sure, you have one.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:59 (sixteen years ago)
Necessity of dumping the mob-rule-enabling Suggest Ban being discussed here:
Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:00 (sixteen years ago)
Yes, Morbs, especially this post.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
yeah. I like Matt, but that's BS.
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:02 (sixteen years ago)
remove suggest ban
― 51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:03 (sixteen years ago)
whoa what just happened
― Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
So I made the change - if you restore defaults on the customise site new answers page, you'll get normal un-styled links back.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
mods vs mobs vs morbs
― unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:52 (sixteen years ago)
"View in Alphabetical Order". Lol.
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:54 (sixteen years ago)
Tho it might make me angry seeing it there all the time. Why?! WHHHYYYY?!
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
where is titles-in-rot13 option?
― stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i don't see the point of it
― unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
in case you only like threads that begin with a certain letter???
i like the bullet-changing thing a lot btw
― blobfish russian (harbl), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
TBH it was more an experiment to see if I could find more space for options. Happy to go with the majority on the alphabetical order thing, but I'll leave it for now - can always change it in a couple of days' time.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
order by number of suggest bans generated
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:02 (sixteen years ago)
Although it was because Billy asked for it. And it's quite reasonable for people to request things that others might not find useful.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)
I don't mind it but I don't like it not in line with the threads ('cos I'm anal). What is the bullet point thing?
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
still think suggest excelsior will be a good idea
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
but it might not be reasonable to implement them all on a top level menu. xxp.
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
Ned, that's dependent on stylesheet... Which one are you using?
The bullet point thing is where it changes the bullet style to highlight threads you have recently read, but that have posts on them made after you read it.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
Ledge, yeah maybe, as I say, most likely temporary. I'll find a way, it's just not completely obvious to me right now.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
xpOK, right, thanks, I'm using style.css
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
Ah, it may be because your browser hasn't picked up the latest stylesheet (it needed some changes), so you could try refreshing, or killing it and loading again... It's supposed to be in line with the bullets in the new answers list.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)
Nah, still not in line. I'm using the latest firefox.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:10 (sixteen years ago)
S'ok though - I rather like the look of the new blueski...
Any chance of this annoying link for view in alphabetical order at the top being shoved down the bottom of the page out of the way?
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
Please read above.
Ned, is this what you see?
http://i30.tinypic.com/xdvark.png
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:14 (sixteen years ago)
Can this alphabetical option not just go in the preferences? I can't really see a widespread enough need for it to have it on New Answers at all times.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
The real trick would be to have the alphabetical option for individual threads.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
xp - no the 'View...' bit is over to the left.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
Matt, see about ten posts up for this: Ideas for ILX
Ned, makes me wonder if your browser's caught up with the stylesheet yet - I'm using latest FF too here.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:23 (sixteen years ago)
ah mine just caught up, blueski on camino. it just takes a few min.
― blobfish russian (harbl), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)
AFAIC, Site New Answers is now perfect and awesome. Thanks Keith!
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, looks awesome. Sorry about all my moaning and wailing yesterday. I was one big nerve ending, no reason for all that.
― reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks Keith, all these changes are awesome. And thank you too Kenan, for the kenan_style.css, this will be my stylesheet for a while. All these combined, it feels like a brand new ILX for me.
― J4mi3 H4rl3y (Snowballing), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)
Cheers. Kenan, no need to worry about that.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)
cant the menu buttons just be smaller?
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 22:37 (sixteen years ago)
:)
since i am being a whiney bitch on the sb thread, wanted to tip my hat to keith for his work on the board overherre :) thanks!
― bnw, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 23:02 (sixteen years ago)
link
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 23:44 (sixteen years ago)
Seriously, what value does this "alphabetical order" thing have. What nonsense.
― suggest banh mi (fields of salmon), Thursday, 6 August 2009 03:48 (sixteen years ago)
Shh. It's done.
― Black bread and Victory gin AGAIN? (kenan), Thursday, 6 August 2009 04:01 (sixteen years ago)
(But of course I personlly think it's frivolous at best, and could be moved to the bottom of the page at the least.)
― Black bread and Victory gin AGAIN? (kenan), Thursday, 6 August 2009 04:03 (sixteen years ago)
11th burger is free!
― ambience chaser (S-), Thursday, 6 August 2009 04:20 (sixteen years ago)
^^^^^
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Thursday, 6 August 2009 04:29 (sixteen years ago)
i remember there was another feature i saw once elsewhere basically new answers would normally hide any threads that hasn't had an update since you last read it. would that be possible? saves me obsessively clicking the same threads even though they haven't had updates.
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Thursday, 6 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)