So you can pick your own colors for links on the new answers page (which remains future news to me, I don't see any such option), AND you can pick your own stylesheet, which conflicts with the colors the users may have picked... goddamn, man. You're going to give yourself a brain hemorrhage over this. Just DO NOT DO one of those things. Why would you need to do both?
― reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
It's been that way for about two years! Click on the site new answers heading.
― Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
colour picker is linked from prefs page.
― ledge, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:24 (sixteen years ago)
it's 'cause of users picking their own colours for site new answers, ain't it? that kind of overrides and sits outside any stylesheet coding.
Well, even if you don't pick your own colors for Site New Answers, you're still stuck with the default color (black). Basically, as it stands, you can't use SNA without overriding stylesheet colors for thread titles.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)
Yes you can. The problem arises when you start hiding sub-boards, or at least this is the way old.css behaves; I can't speak for the other stylesheets.
― pon de floor (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)
> how would you convert to hsb tho?
java's Color class has a method. (the actual maths is a fiddle, usually a case statement which splits it up into 60 degree segments and treats them differently. http://actionsnippet.com/?p=797 )
― koogs, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:52 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe I don't understand what you're talking about. I just changed my stylesheet to "old.css," I selected show "all" boards in the Site New Answers settings, and I set the color for all of the boards to be the default, black. Site New Answers still shows thread titles as black, rather than the blue/purple of old.css.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)
Does it do this if you click the "Restore Defaults" button as opposed to manually setting the values?
― pon de floor (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)
A-ha! No, it doesn't. I forgot about "Restore Defaults." Yeah, that works fine then, even with blueski.css. So the problem only develops if you set preferences for Site New Answers.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)
Correct.
― pon de floor (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)
(which is why I never changed the preferences for SNA)
― pon de floor (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)
I just figured there were some boards that I wouldn't want to be shown, since I never read them, but I'm looking at the default SNA page right now, and it appears no one else reads them either lol.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)
How come the boards on the "Boards" page and the "I Want to Change the Boards Shown on Site New Answers..." in a different order? Not important at all, just noticed.
― StanM, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 13:34 (sixteen years ago)
"I Want ... " is ordered alphabetically. The boards page has ILM and ILE at the top, then it's broadly alphabetical except for some new ones, TMI is up and the top and People/Vinyl/Photography are at the bottom. I think it could be tweaked.
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 13:45 (sixteen years ago)
Yes, it's because I have some functionality that allows you to define the order of boards and create folder and put things in on the front page, that's basically never been used.
I've just moved the newer boards into alphabetical order. The other one is just in alphabetical order as it's sorted before being displayed.
Jay, I tried to do the link visited thing for colours - I had hoped to set a visited link to a darker colour, based on whatever colour you had selected for that thread, but it seems as though it's impossible to set the 'visited' status of a link, on a link-by-link basis, which makes this very tricky.
Nonetheless, I have added a 'not set' option in the colours, which all will be set to if you 'restore defaults', when I next upload the software (I'll do that shortly).
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:12 (sixteen years ago)
thx!
― StanM, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:17 (sixteen years ago)
ok, so another thing I've been thinking about is the integration of rss feeds in search results. I'm a total cpu noob so I have no idea of the feasibility of this, but it'd be nice to be able to subscribe to rss feeds of search words or individual posters.
― Gigolo Grasiento (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:27 (sixteen years ago)
Baaderonixx, it's something I'd like to do, but it is really quite tricky to do without making a site come to a standstill... To be useful, you have to customise for each user (in the way you mention), which makes it very hard to keep data in memory (needed to make the site run quickly and smoothly), and in addition to this, you have RSS readers that automatically hit the server every 30 seconds checking for updates!
As I say, I'd like to do it in some fashion - it's pretty easy technically, but pretty hard to ensure the site continues to work well.
I know other sites have it, but then sites like Slashdot have something like eighty servers; whereas, ILX has one.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)
hey keith i don't think i have many but can u tell me how many sb's i ahve?
― mark cl, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)
just curious
Sure, you have one.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:59 (sixteen years ago)
Necessity of dumping the mob-rule-enabling Suggest Ban being discussed here:
Missin U <3 - lamentations for those felled by the SB
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:00 (sixteen years ago)
Yes, Morbs, especially this post.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
yeah. I like Matt, but that's BS.
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:02 (sixteen years ago)
remove suggest ban
― 51 is the loneliest number (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:03 (sixteen years ago)
whoa what just happened
― Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
So I made the change - if you restore defaults on the customise site new answers page, you'll get normal un-styled links back.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
mods vs mobs vs morbs
― unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:52 (sixteen years ago)
"View in Alphabetical Order". Lol.
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:54 (sixteen years ago)
Tho it might make me angry seeing it there all the time. Why?! WHHHYYYY?!
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
where is titles-in-rot13 option?
― stet, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i don't see the point of it
― unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
in case you only like threads that begin with a certain letter???
i like the bullet-changing thing a lot btw
― blobfish russian (harbl), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
TBH it was more an experiment to see if I could find more space for options. Happy to go with the majority on the alphabetical order thing, but I'll leave it for now - can always change it in a couple of days' time.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
order by number of suggest bans generated
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:02 (sixteen years ago)
Although it was because Billy asked for it. And it's quite reasonable for people to request things that others might not find useful.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)
I don't mind it but I don't like it not in line with the threads ('cos I'm anal). What is the bullet point thing?
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
still think suggest excelsior will be a good idea
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
but it might not be reasonable to implement them all on a top level menu. xxp.
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
Ned, that's dependent on stylesheet... Which one are you using?
The bullet point thing is where it changes the bullet style to highlight threads you have recently read, but that have posts on them made after you read it.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
Ledge, yeah maybe, as I say, most likely temporary. I'll find a way, it's just not completely obvious to me right now.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
xpOK, right, thanks, I'm using style.css
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
Ah, it may be because your browser hasn't picked up the latest stylesheet (it needed some changes), so you could try refreshing, or killing it and loading again... It's supposed to be in line with the bullets in the new answers list.
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)
Nah, still not in line. I'm using the latest firefox.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:10 (sixteen years ago)
S'ok though - I rather like the look of the new blueski...
Any chance of this annoying link for view in alphabetical order at the top being shoved down the bottom of the page out of the way?
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
Please read above.
Ned, is this what you see?
http://i30.tinypic.com/xdvark.png
― Keith, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:14 (sixteen years ago)
Can this alphabetical option not just go in the preferences? I can't really see a widespread enough need for it to have it on New Answers at all times.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
The real trick would be to have the alphabetical option for individual threads.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
xp - no the 'View...' bit is over to the left.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)