And for the Ultra Diamond Platinum account (a one-time payment of $44,000,000) we'll push all of your tweets to every user!
― nickn, Thursday, 30 March 2023 05:43 (three years ago)
Sorry, $44,000,000,000.
there's a free layer as well, 1,500 tweets a month, ~50 a day. unfortunately that kills Cheap Bots Done Quick which is what my bots use and which hosts thousands of others.
(mm, i wonder if i can cobble together an aws lambda that does the same?)
― koogs, Thursday, 30 March 2023 11:28 (three years ago)
i dont feel like switching my bots to the new free tier theyre all on v1 hopefully it just keeps working
― lag∞n, Thursday, 30 March 2023 17:46 (three years ago)
lol
New: The New York Times says it is not planning to pay for Twitter verification:"We aren't planning to pay the monthly fee for verification of our institutional Twitter accounts," a spokesperson tells me.— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) March 30, 2023
He was born a pauper to a pawn on a Christmas DayWhen the New York Times said, "Biden's dead!And ten laptops are free!"
― INDEPENDENTS DAY BY STEVEN SPILBERG (President Keyes), Thursday, 30 March 2023 18:22 (three years ago)
The Los Angeles Times also says it will not pay for Twitter Blue, noting "verification no longer establishes authority or credibility." Here's an internal note from managing editor Sara Yasin that went out to staff. pic.twitter.com/DK8c2iAHpJ— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) March 30, 2023
awww did constantly calling the MSM liars and scumbags not work out for you
― frogbs, Thursday, 30 March 2023 18:37 (three years ago)
curious which direction he's gonna go with this he's either gonna dramatically reduce the cost and get mad when they still don't pay or call everyone a bunch of pedos
― frogbs, Thursday, 30 March 2023 18:39 (three years ago)
once famous people are sick of being impersonated, I think their only option is to shut down their account and let everyone know (on Instagram) that any tweets you see are not theirs
― INDEPENDENTS DAY BY STEVEN SPILBERG (President Keyes), Thursday, 30 March 2023 18:43 (three years ago)
imo musk won't reduce the cost because changing it would be an admission of failure. He won't call everyone a pedo for not paying up, because that would call attention to his failure, too. instead he'll defect attention away from the fiasco as best he can by churning out more attention-grabbing chaotic garbage in heroic quantities until he explodes or no one cares any more and the world stops looking. Or both.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 30 March 2023 18:49 (three years ago)
accounts ive unfollowed in the last couple days are still showing up in my following feed
― lag∞n, Thursday, 30 March 2023 19:04 (three years ago)
is this good
"From September to October of last year, the top 10 advertisers on Twitter spent $71 million on ads, according to estimates from Pathmatics. In the past two months, that figure dropped to just $7.6 million, a decline of 89%, the research firm said."https://t.co/9R7gWkPAXS— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) March 30, 2023
― lag∞n, Thursday, 30 March 2023 19:09 (three years ago)
I assume he was going for 69% and over-delivered
― rob, Thursday, 30 March 2023 19:12 (three years ago)
dogshit MSM orgs not paying seems pretty bad for them, feel like most big companies are probably gonna folow suit because Elon's made the very idea of paying for Twitter such a radioactive & desperate thing. obviously Nazi rags like Stormfront and Daily Wire might swoop in but I kinda feel they can't afford it.
― frogbs, Thursday, 30 March 2023 19:26 (three years ago)
Never mind also all the local governments and non profit organizations absolutely can not and will not pay $120,000 a year for a blue check mark.
― "The pudding incident?" (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 30 March 2023 19:41 (three years ago)
And again, the reason Twitter had verification was because they got sued over verification.
― "The pudding incident?" (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 30 March 2023 19:43 (three years ago)
Sued over celebrity impersonators, that is .
― "The pudding incident?" (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 30 March 2023 19:44 (three years ago)
yea I mean I suspect most big companies are sorta looking at each other like "we doing this er nah?" and if a few go "no because the checkmark is meaningless" I can't imagine any of them will
― frogbs, Thursday, 30 March 2023 19:46 (three years ago)
I'm curious as to whether he'll start auctioning big media's accounts.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 30 March 2023 22:09 (three years ago)
been scrolling twitter for a while and haven't seen any good indictment tweets.... this sucks
― 龜, Thursday, 30 March 2023 22:50 (three years ago)
pic.twitter.com/FMijgdNblX— future canon (@futurecanon) March 30, 2023
― papal hotwife (milo z), Thursday, 30 March 2023 22:53 (three years ago)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA oops I mean how terrible for Donald Trump— Jeff Tiedrich (@itsJeffTiedrich) March 30, 2023
― lag∞n, Thursday, 30 March 2023 22:56 (three years ago)
so happy for eric clapton
― Chyiv Kyiv (Fetchboy), Thursday, 30 March 2023 23:00 (three years ago)
Thank you, BrooklynDad, for indicting former president Donald J Trump
Happy trump Indictment Day, for those who celebrate! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/dy1n6MIppB— BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️ (@mmpadellan) March 30, 2023
― Chyiv Kyiv (Fetchboy), Thursday, 30 March 2023 23:04 (three years ago)
lol its their day you gotta let em have it
― lag∞n, Thursday, 30 March 2023 23:05 (three years ago)
You do not, under any circumstances, etc.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 30 March 2023 23:05 (three years ago)
Lol the Clapton guy deserves this
― frogbs, Thursday, 30 March 2023 23:05 (three years ago)
Which now sends me off on a Redd tangent about the guy who did a deep dive into Real Eric Clapton’s bookshelf.
― It’s Only Her Factory, Girl! (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 30 March 2023 23:11 (three years ago)
god it's so funny this guy replaced a mostly-functioning verification system with his dumb "show off that you paid me 8 dollars" checkmark which turned out to be so embarrassing they had to add a feature to let you hide it
― frogbs, Friday, 31 March 2023 03:10 (three years ago)
Hello everyone! My Twitter account may lose its ‘blue tick’ verified status very soon. Please be aware that this will remain my ONLY official Twitter account! Watch out for scammers/impersonators - I do not contact fans or sell anything over Twitter DMs. Thank you!— Peter Hook (@peterhook) March 31, 2023
― groovypanda, Friday, 31 March 2023 13:35 (three years ago)
I want some sufficiently irony poisoned celebrity to start twitter scamming their own fans now
― Toploader on the road, unite and take over (Bananaman Begins), Friday, 31 March 2023 14:05 (three years ago)
lmao dude just can't win
Twitter Will Exempt 10,000 Most-Followed Companies and Organizations From $1,000 Monthly Verified-Status Charge: Report https://t.co/ekuJqCj0L0— Variety (@Variety) March 31, 2023
― frogbs, Friday, 31 March 2023 14:30 (three years ago)
thank god steak-umms keeps the check
― mh, Friday, 31 March 2023 14:40 (three years ago)
haa
― lag∞n, Friday, 31 March 2023 14:58 (three years ago)
blue check gonna be a scarlet letter
Welp guess my blue ✔️ will be gone soon cause if you know me I ain’t paying the 5. 🤷🏾♂️— LeBron James (@KingJames) March 31, 2023
― four square ups... no punches thrown (Spottie), Friday, 31 March 2023 16:37 (three years ago)
In that Variety article, lol"A request for comment sent to Twitter’s PR account returned an automated reply with a poop emoji (a change Musk announced last week). "
― groovypanda, Friday, 31 March 2023 17:20 (three years ago)
Lmao things going great
👋 Hello there baby 😍, I hope you are having a g00d day, would you like to have a $ugar daddy? 👴💰— Daddy Whispers (@BuzzFeed) March 31, 2023
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 31 March 2023 17:26 (three years ago)
click through to the site and check the date on your calendar, daddy
― mh, Friday, 31 March 2023 17:36 (three years ago)
This year April Fools fell on a weekend/Me and Geto Boys went trick or tweetin'
― INDEPENDENTS DAY BY STEVEN SPILBERG (President Keyes), Friday, 31 March 2023 17:38 (three years ago)
The 4 types of Twitter posters, according to the just open-sourced algorithm 😯https://t.co/xTLX77vJ75 pic.twitter.com/SaQN03P9eK— Amjad Masad ⠕ (@amasad) March 31, 2023
― 龜, Friday, 31 March 2023 19:37 (three years ago)
Thank you mh. I’m so tired.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 31 March 2023 19:57 (three years ago)
pic.twitter.com/0CfR6YVltQ— The Classical Conservative (@Xenos_RIFS) March 31, 2023
― frogbs, Friday, 31 March 2023 20:10 (three years ago)
Pay the $8 for the guys https://t.co/U3Xjg7bpdw— Marquez V-S (@MVS__11) March 31, 2023
Can’t bro i got kids… https://t.co/dP0DlmVaDl— Patrick Mahomes II (@PatrickMahomes) March 31, 2023
― frogbs, Friday, 31 March 2023 20:17 (three years ago)
having the check is going to be confirmation of loser-dom in a few days
― INDEPENDENTS DAY BY STEVEN SPILBERG (President Keyes), Friday, 31 March 2023 21:03 (three years ago)
the new digital fedora
― got it in the blood, the kid's a pelican (Doctor Casino), Friday, 31 March 2023 21:41 (three years ago)
genuinely baffled by what Elon thinks is going to happen open sourcing all this code. nobody is gonna do shit to improve it and it may lead to a bunch of backdoors being discovered. best case scenario he just finds new ways to embarrass himself.
― frogbs, Friday, 31 March 2023 21:43 (three years ago)
I’m likely the only one bored enough to still occasionally check the For You tab so this is of limited interest. But they’ve significantly deteriorated the functionality over the past day. Yesterday there was still a clear indication of why tweets were recommended as “For You” — if you clicked “Not interested” it would bring up a list of options such as “Show fewer follows from [X account you follow]”. That’s all gone now. It’s obvious there’s a lot more random Twitter-selected recommendations in For You since they made the change too. We’ll see if they really go through with the promised self-defeating termination of legacy blue checks over the coming day.
― recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Friday, 31 March 2023 22:32 (three years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/DOfVAqP.png
The checkmark apocalypse has begun https://t.co/ayRh2OCSIH— Matt Novak (@paleofuture) April 1, 2023
― lag∞n, Saturday, 1 April 2023 02:45 (three years ago)
LMAOOO
― frogbs, Saturday, 1 April 2023 02:48 (three years ago)
God it's going to be funny if this is exactly like last time and the verification policy almost immediately gets walked back. pic.twitter.com/ZgeUJ33BRq— Velodus✨ (@velodus) April 1, 2023
― lag∞n, Saturday, 1 April 2023 03:10 (three years ago)