thats funny, though
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Monday, 3 August 2009 05:44 (sixteen years ago)
i believe i attempted to do that before but it was a pain so
― tehresa, Monday, 3 August 2009 05:45 (sixteen years ago)
haw
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Monday, 3 August 2009 05:45 (sixteen years ago)
we can all agree that FIRE WALK WITH ME is boss, though, right?
― amateurist, Monday, 3 August 2009 07:32 (sixteen years ago)
only a few people i know like it. whereas i think it is so mercilessly scary and weird that i fucking love it. especially the 'pink room' scene.. wish there was more of it up other than what this asshole posted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpH0imTHw6Y
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 3 August 2009 07:50 (sixteen years ago)
Got y'all some friendship donuts.http://farm1.static.flickr.com/56/160443802_c7c4ea4376.jpg?v=0
― ╓abies, Monday, 3 August 2009 07:52 (sixteen years ago)
iirc we already disagreed about it a year ago xpost
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Monday, 3 August 2009 07:52 (sixteen years ago)
Fire Walk with Me is my second favorite film. The first thirty minutes, and all of the Bob/Mike/Black Lodge shit is just mindblowingly awesome for me. I still hope the rights issues get resolved and we get the deleted scenes someday.
I'm still pissed that they fucked up the audio for the Pink Room scene on the DVD release, making the dialogue easily audible and the subtitles useless. It ruins the hypnotic quality of the scene.
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 3 August 2009 07:58 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, it is a shame.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 3 August 2009 08:01 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, in the theater the dialogue was incomprehensible. there's a neat, and to my mind similar, moment in THE STRAIGHT STORY where lynch cuts to a long shot and the characters' dialogue suddenly becomes scarcely audible, as though we along with the camera had backed up out of easy earshot. it's a good example of "defamiliarization" -- he takes something simple, like a cut out to a master shot, and reminds of the convention of the typical sound mix, where the dialogue's volume seldom accords with what (or how much) we see on screen.
i would love to see TPFWWM again in 35mm, by the way. probably will never get the chance.
i think a lot of critics are coming around on this one, either reversing their earlier dismissals or finally just coming out and admitting they like it. kent jones carries the torch for this one (although, unlike me, he thinks MULHOLLAND DRIVE is a superior go-round of similar themes).
― amateurist, Monday, 3 August 2009 08:59 (sixteen years ago)
i'm starting to really prefer lara flynn boyle over moira kelley, though. or is this universal?
lara is donna, to me
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Monday, 3 August 2009 09:51 (sixteen years ago)
thinking about doing twin peaks babez poll, or do we already have one?
― caek, Monday, 3 August 2009 10:14 (sixteen years ago)
Fire Walk With Me was, I say, Lynch's masterpiece up until the '00s.
― sir-mounter (Eric H.), Monday, 3 August 2009 11:21 (sixteen years ago)
the only sub-plot i truly loathe is the one involving the woman and james, but i also hate everything involving james, so that's a given.
^^^This is completely otm. Though I have to ask if I am the only one who likes the Benjamin Horne civil war shenanigans, as all my friends seem to hate that bit. I think it's hilarious.
Think there was a TP babes poll last year.
― emil.y, Monday, 3 August 2009 11:26 (sixteen years ago)
Choose, But Choose Wisely. Anyone Picking Joan Chen Will Be Grouped With Momus From Now On (A Twin Peaks Female Lead Poll)
― kid cruti (roxymuzak), Monday, 3 August 2009 11:27 (sixteen years ago)
shitty poll imo
I love the series - watched it again fairly recently - but have never seen Fire Walk With Me. Should probably do something about that.
― ENBB, Monday, 3 August 2009 11:29 (sixteen years ago)
Nadine is the character I mostly can't stand in the second season.
― sir-mounter (Eric H.), Monday, 3 August 2009 12:26 (sixteen years ago)
There wasn't anything inherently wrong with most of the mid-second-season sub-plots (except the nadine one), but there were too many of them, and too little focus.
― caek, Monday, 3 August 2009 12:30 (sixteen years ago)
the james subplot was pretty dumb, made worse by bad writing and direction (I maintain that the episode directed by Diane Keaton that focused on that was the worst episode of the series)
― akm, Monday, 3 August 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)
(oh someone said that right above, glad I'm not alone, not that I thought I was)
― akm, Monday, 3 August 2009 13:51 (sixteen years ago)
also, lara is donna, but I liked Moira Kelly in the role more, but I also liked Donna at the beginning of twin peaks more than I did her character later, so maybe I just like innocent donna more than skanked donna.
― akm, Monday, 3 August 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)
Nadine plot, James plot, Leo plot, Windom [sic] Earle plot... yeah the second season pretty much blowed, imho. Fire Walk With Me is awesome tho.
― ledge, Monday, 3 August 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)
Windom (sic) Earle
Huh, spelled like my hometown, would not have guessed.
As much as I <3 Twin Peaks to the infinity and back, S2 I would agree is pretty snoozy. Bookended awesomely though--for weeks after watching it (alright maybe several days) all I needed to do was picture the i've-heard-about-you-thumbs-up scene and I'd be restraining some serious giggles.
― producto do Brazil (╓abies), Monday, 3 August 2009 14:14 (sixteen years ago)
Season 2 probably would have been so awesome if they hadn't rushed them into solving Laura's murder.
I think Earle was a cool idea for a villain, but just generally miscast and mishandled, perhaps because Lynch was busy with Wild at Heart.
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 3 August 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)
Fire Walk With Me is pretty horrible in places, on par with the worst of S2 afaic
― (*゚ー゚)θ L(。・_・) °~ヾ(・ε・ *) (Steve Shasta), Monday, 3 August 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
i thought lynch was busy with "on the air" during s2 iirc?
― there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Monday, 3 August 2009 14:53 (sixteen years ago)
― (*゚ー゚)θ L(。・_・) °~ヾ(・ε・ *) (Steve Shasta), Monday, August 3, 2009 2:50 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
the worst of Season 2 bears no resemblance to FWWM. What made Season 2 so bad at times was that it became so ordinary and pedestrian (e.g. the James subplot), while FWWM is pretty much wall to wall crazy/weird/beautiful.
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 3 August 2009 15:00 (sixteen years ago)
i love the civil war reenactment stuff, season 2 is hilarious in general.
just started rewatching TP with my gf last night (she hasn't seen any of it before), it's nice to see it on something other than about-to-disintegrate VHS tapes.
― Ømår Littel (Jordan), Monday, 3 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
I think On the Air was made later, it's pretty common knowledge Lynch was busy filming Wild at Heart during Season 2 and only came back in time to do the final episode.
― Tuomas, Monday, 3 August 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
S2 recap:
Absolutely horrible/nigh unwatchable - James and the Vixen subplotMarginally entertaining - Dick Tremayne and the Spawn of Satan (Dick is pretty much always funny, so he redeems this somewhat), Super Nadine (this goes nowhere), Josie gets turned into a doorknob (the mill stuff was always pretty lame but Piper Laurie is teh awesome. also her as a Japanese guy was funny)Great - Windom Earl, Civil War Reenactment
― girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
also absolutely horrible - the Billy Zane stuff
― Emmet Otter's SugBan Christmas (The Yellow Kid), Monday, 3 August 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)
Well, Lynch must've had some awareness of what was happening in Season 2 - he's in 5 of the episodes, including 3 of the post-reveal "crappy" ones.
And besides, Wild At Heart premiered at Cannes in May of 1990, when the first season of Twin Peaks was still airing.
― Emmet Otter's SugBan Christmas (The Yellow Kid), Monday, 3 August 2009 17:39 (sixteen years ago)
i think the wild at heart thing is just an alibi -- i'm not sure lynch had the patience for TV work. it seems to be that the micro-managing "show runner" is mostly a recent invention, e.g. deadwood, the wire, veronica mars. i don't think it was all that uncommon for an exec producer like lynch to sort of lie back and let the show take its course in those days. but the deal is that lynch is so talented and distinctive as a director that all the stuff he didn't have his hand in really seems a few cuts below.
― amateurist, Monday, 3 August 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)
it's weird that lynch tried not one, not two, but three times to get back into TV: on the air, hotel room, mulholland drive. i actually would really have liked to see where that last one would have gone as a show. the film has always been somewhat crippled for me since i saw the unaired pilot first.
― amateurist, Monday, 3 August 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)
is the pilot on the DVD?
― caek, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)
I wasn't saying that Lynch was totally unaware of what was happening during season 2, just that (besides his few appearances as an actor) his creative input for the series was minimal between the "reveal" episode and the final episode; IIRC this was exactly when he was working with Wild At Heart. (It's worth noticing that Mark Frost didn't write or direct any of the episodes between those two either.) There are several reasons why the series starts to meander after the "reveal" episode, the obvious one being that the murder mystery was the driving force behind the series, so what are you gonna do when it is solved, but I'm sure lack of Lynch didn't help things.
True, but I think most TV series are shot well in advance of their airing. There's only four months from Wild at Heart's premier to the premier of Season 2, so it seems quite likely that Season 2 and WaH were being made around the same time. And most articles I've read on TP and Lynch explicitly state WoH as the biggest reason for Lynch's absence from Season 2, so why would they be lying? I'm sure he had other reasons too, such as getting bored with the whole series, as he never even wanted to reveal the killer in the first place.
(xxx-post)
― Tuomas, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:09 (sixteen years ago)
True, but I think most TV series are shot well in advance of their airing.
Not in the U.S.
― caek, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)
they actually introduce the windom earle subplot in the 2nd episode of the 2nd season, but it takes FOREVER for them to ramp that up. that was a mistake, i think. but i suppose at the point they made that early episode, they didn't know they were going to reveal laura's killer halfway through the season, so they had no rush in elevating the earle plot to be the focus of the series. so what happens is there is a horrid few episodes where laura's killer is revealed and caught but windom earle is hardly a palpable threat. do you remember the half-assed major plot at that point? the DEA investigation/jean renault/canadian mountie zzzzzzzzzzzz. that said, the earle plot was so mishandled in the end that it almost didn't matter.
― amateurist, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)
this thread is like the part of the show with the escaped weasel or whatever it was
― nabisco, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)
no, the mulholland pilot isn't on the dvd, but I think it's around as a bootleg.
― akm, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)
Some of the deleted MD material:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qujcGFNSBrM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P4-Lg7GvLw
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)
the DEA investigation/jean renault/canadian mountie zzzzzzzzzzzz.
you forgot Mulder in a dress. yeah that is bad.
― girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 August 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)
mulder in drag is awesome. it's like fbi hazing before he could become agent mulder.
― Ømår Littel (Jordan), Monday, 3 August 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)
i completely forgot the save the pine weasel stuff.
― amateurist, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)
It's interesting to me on rewatching just how much the show deals with female sexuality as taboo. Laura is open to her own sexuality in ways than none of the other females in this town seem to be. Males are drawn to this and react to it with violence; she is too open, too revealing. Even Cooper with all his restraint is tempted by this femininity in the form of Audrey. The red curtains are such a blatant metaphor/image in this reading. It's when the show moves away from this theme that it loses its bearings. Thus, the James/woman, Nadine/Ed, Ben's madness subplots seem unmoored because they are. They are extensions of those characters from earlier in the show, but really have nothing to do with the first 12-13 episodes; they are marginal. The introduction of Annie returns it a bit, but it seems clear to me that Lynch was not involved with the story/themes beyond the first arc because none of his usual obsessions are there anymore.
― wmlynch, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)
he reintroduces the theme with a vengeance in the film. though he also delves into the theme of family sexual abuse which for obvious reasons he had to skate around on the TV show. of course, the intimation that leland/BOB raped laura is present in the series, if you connect the dots, it's not dwelled upon.
the idea of aggressive female sexuality as necessarily stemming from childhood trauma and/or neglect is a troubling one that lynch shares with a lot of popular culture.
― amateurist, Monday, 3 August 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)
But female sexuality also as access to something that is otherwise inaccessible. The red curtains appear in 3 places: One-Eyed Jack's, where sex is sold; Leo's cabin, where it is taken; an the Lodge, where well I'm not sure what goes on there.
― wmlynch, Monday, 3 August 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)
From an article about Iran in NYRB recently:
"The East–West battle over gender is brilliantly described by Janet Afary in her groundbreaking survey Sexual Politics in Modern Iran. As in other patrilineal societies the woman is the "door of entry to the group." Improper behavior on her part can expose her community and family to all sorts of hidden dangers. Systems such as these
'exercise a double standard wherein a woman's infidelity (but not a man's) is seen to allow tangible and damaging impurities to infiltrate the family, both physically and morally.... A woman's sexual and reproductive functions turned her body into a contested site of potential and real ritual contamination. The concept of namus (honor) and the need to control women's chastity may be related to this fear of sexual contamination.'"
I was startled at how well this seems to describe the situation in Twin Peaks, like jaw-dropped on the bus.
― wmlynch, Monday, 3 August 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)